Status of tth analysis 1. √s=500 GeV 2. √s=1 TeV 3. MC requests R. Yonamine, T. Tanabe, K. Fujii T. Price, H. Tabassam, N. Watson, V. Martin ILD Workshop,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Current limits (95% C.L.): LEP direct searches m H > GeV Global fit to precision EW data (excludes direct search results) m H < 157 GeV Latest Tevatron.
Advertisements

Recent Results on the Possibility of Observing a Standard Model Higgs Boson Decaying to WW (*) Majid Hashemi University of Antwerp, Belgium.
E + e -  ttH Past Experimental (simulation) Studies and BG cross-section by MadGraph Sep physics WG meeting S. Uozumi (Shinshu)
Model independent determination of the top quark Yukawa coupling from LHC and ILC data Klaus Desch, Hamburg University Markus Schumacher, Bonn University.
Top Physics at the Tevatron Mike Arov (Louisiana Tech University) for D0 and CDF Collaborations 1.
Introduction to Single-Top Single-Top Cross Section Measurements at ATLAS Patrick Ryan (Michigan State University) The measurement.
Single-Top Cross Section Measurements at ATLAS Patrick Ryan (Michigan State University) Introduction to Single-Top The measurement.
Impact of ILC Tracker Design on e  e   H 0 Z 0       X Analysis Hai-Jun Yang & Keith Riles University of Michigan, Ann Arbor SiD Benchmarking.
Top Results at CDF Yen-Chu Chen/ 陳彥竹 中央研究院物理所 Institute of Physics, Academia Sinica Taiwan, ROC For the CDF collaboration ICFP /10/03-08.
Michele Faucci Giannelli, Mike Green, Veronique Boisvert, Fabrizio Salvatore, Tao Wu LCWS 08, Chicago, 18 November 2008 Sensitivity to the Higgs self-coupling.
DØ Higgs II Gordon Watts for the collaboration. 2 Gordon Watts (UW Seattle) WIN’ /07/2003 Outline Channels H  WW * H  H ++ H --  +  +  -
Michele Faucci Giannelli, Mike Green, Veronique Boisvert, Fabrizio Salvatore, Tao Wu ILD Workshop, Cambridge, 12 September 2008 Sensitivity to the Higgs.
Jake Anderson, on behalf of CMS Fermilab Semi-leptonic VW production at CMS.
1 VV scattering in P-TDR (CHAPTER 13.2 Vol 2.2) A simple summary of what we intend to put in our chapter CPTweek / PRSsession 10/31/05 Sara Bolognesi (TORINO)
Physics Session Summary Nobuchika Okada Institute of Particle and Nuclear Studies, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK) TILC09, Tsukuba,
1 ZH Analysis Yambazi Banda, Tomas Lastovicka Oxford SiD Collaboration Meeting
1 A Preliminary Model Independent Study of the Reaction pp  qqWW  qq ℓ qq at CMS  Gianluca CERMINARA (SUMMER STUDENT)  MUON group.
Associated top Higgs search: with ttH (H  bb) Chris Collins-Tooth, 17 June 2008.
Precise Measurements of SM Higgs at the ILC Simulation and Analysis V.Saveliev, Obninsk State University, Russia /DESY, Hamburg ECFA Study Workshop, Valencia.
Search for Invisible Higgs Decays at the ILC Akimasa Ishikawa (Tohoku University)
Z AND W PHYSICS AT CEPC Haijun Yang, Hengne Li, Qiang Li, Jun Guo, Manqi Ruan, Yusheng Wu, Zhijun Liang 1.
Commissioning Studies Top Physics Group M. Cobal – University of Udine ATLAS Week, Prague, Sep 2003.
HERA-LHC, CERN Oct Preliminary study of Z+b in ATLAS /1 A preliminary study of Z+b production in ATLAS The D0 measurement of  (Z+b)/  (Z+jet)
ILC DBD Common simulation and software tools Akiya Miyamoto KEK ILC PAC 14 December 2012 at KEK.
Sensitivity Prospects for Light Charged Higgs at 7 TeV J.L. Lane, P.S. Miyagawa, U.K. Yang (Manchester) M. Klemetti, C.T. Potter (McGill) P. Mal (Arizona)
Possibility of tan  measurement with in CMS Majid Hashemi CERN, CMS IPM,Tehran,Iran QCD and Hadronic Interactions, March 2005, La Thuile, Italy.
1 ttbar Cross-Section Studies D. Jana*, M. Saleem*, F. Rizatdinova**, P. Gutierrez*, P. Skubic* *University of Oklahoma, **Oklahoma State University.
Measurement of the branching ratios for Standard Model Higgs decays into muon pairs and into Z boson pairs at 1.4 TeV CLIC Gordana Milutinovic-Dumbelovic,
LCWS14, Belgrade, October M. Pandurović, H→WW at 350 GeV and 1.4 TeV CLIC Measurement of H→WW* in HZ at 350 GeV and WW fusion at 1.4 TeV CLIC.
1 Top and Tau Measurements Tim Barklow (SLAC) Oct 02, 2009.
Measurements of Top Quark Properties at Run II of the Tevatron Erich W.Varnes University of Arizona for the CDF and DØ Collaborations International Workshop.
Physics at LHC Prague, 6-12 July, 2003 R. Kinnunen Helsinki Institute of Physics A/H ->  and H + ->  in CMS R. Kinnunen Physics at LHC Prague July 6.
Liu Minghui Nanjing MC study of W polarization and ttbar spin correlation Liu Minghui, Zhu Chengguang April 27, 2008.
Report on ttH Analysis S. Uozumi (Kobe) R. Yonamine (GUAS) K. Fujii (KEK) Mar PhysicsWG meeting.
Higgs self coupling Djamel BOUMEDIENE, Pascal GAY LPC Clermont-Ferrand.
Tth study Lepton ID with BDT 2015/02/27 Yuji Sudo Kyushu University 1.
Taikan Suehara, ILC physics mini-workshop, 2009/01/21 page 1 SUSY and Tau-pair analysis with full simulation in ILD detector model Taikan Suehara ICEPP,
Study of pair-produced doubly charged Higgs bosons with a four muon final state at the CMS detector (CMS NOTE 2006/081, Authors : T.Rommerskirchen and.
Taikan Suehara et al., Chicago, 17 Nov page 1 Tau-pair performance in ILD detectors Taikan Suehara (ICEPP, The Univ. of Tokyo) with K. Fujii(KEK),
1 Searching for Z’ and model discrimination in ATLAS ● Motivations ● Current limits and discovery potential ● Discriminating variables in channel Z’ 
1 TOP MASS MEASUREMENT WITH ATLAS A.-I. Etienvre, for the ATLAS Collaboration.
By Henry Brown Henry Brown, LHCb, IOP 10/04/13 1.
Higgs & EWSB session LCWS marchHiggs self couplingP. Gay 1 Higgs self coupling at e + e - Linear Collider Higgs self coupling at e + e - Linear.
Summary of MC requests for DBD benchmarks ILD Workshop, Kyushu University May 23,
ATLAS Higgs Search Strategy and Sources of Systematic Uncertainty Jae Yu For the ATLAS Collaboration 23 June, 2010.
1 Diboson production with CMS Vuko Brigljevic Rudjer Boskovic Institute, Zagreb on behalf of the CMS Collaboration Physics at LHC Cracow, July
Top Higgs Yukawa Coupling Analysis – Status Report Hajrah Tabassam Quai-i-Azam University, Islamabad ON BEHALF OF: R. Yonamine, T. Tanabe, K. Fujii, KEK.
La Thuile, March, 15 th, 2003 f Makoto Tomoto ( FNAL ) Prospects for Higgs Searches at DØ Makoto Tomoto Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (For the.
Higgs pair production in a Photon Collider Tohru Takahashi Hiroshima University for S.Kawada, N.Maeda, K.Ikematsu, K.Fujii,Y.Kurihara,,, 1 LCWS12 Arlington,
Background Shape Study for the ttH, H  bb Channel Catrin Bernius First year talk 15th June 2007 Background Shape Study for the ttH 0, H 0  bb Channel.
Stano Tokar, slide 1 Top into Dileptons Stano Tokar Comenius University, Bratislava With a kind permissison of the CDF top group Dec 2004 RTN Workshop.
Measurements of the model parameter in the Littlest Higgs Model with T-parity 1 Masaki Asano (ICRR, Univ. of Tokyo) Collaborator: E. Asakawa ( Meiji-gakuin.
Higgs Summary Alexei Raspereza On behalf of Higgs Working Group ECFA Workshop, Warsaw 12/06/2006 Outline  Current Status  Contributions in Warsaw  Theory.
1 UCSD Meeting Calibration of High Pt Hadronic W Haifeng Pi 10/16/2007 Outline Introduction High Pt Hadronic W in TTbar and Higgs events Reconstruction.
TtH(H->bb) searches in ATLAS and CMS Ricardo Gonçalo Collider Cross Talk, 18 October 2012.
Search for Invisible Higgs Decays at the ILC Ayumi Yamamoto, Akimasa Ishikawa, Hitoshi Yamamoto (Tohoku University) Keisuke Fujii (KEK)
 reconstruction and identification in CMS A.Nikitenko, Imperial College. LHC Days in Split 1.
Viktor Veszpremi Purdue University, CDF Collaboration Tev4LHC Workshop, Oct , Fermilab ZH->vvbb results from CDF.
Marcello Barisonzi First results of AOD analysis on t-channel Single Top DAD 30/05/2005 Page 1 AOD on Single Top Marcello Barisonzi.
Search for Standard Model Higgs in ZH  l + l  bb channel at DØ Shaohua Fu Fermilab For the DØ Collaboration DPF 2006, Oct. 29 – Nov. 3 Honolulu, Hawaii.
Eric COGNERAS LPC Clermont-Ferrand Prospects for Top pair resonance searches in ATLAS Workshop on Top Physics october 2007, Grenoble.
Benchmark analysis of tau-pairs
Brief summary of discussion at LCWS2010 and draft short term plan
ttH (Hγγ) search and CP measurement
Venkat Kaushik, Jae Yu University of Texas at Arlington
Higgs Self-coupling Status and Prospects
LCWS10 & ILC10, Beijing, China, March 2010
W boson helicity measurement
ZHH: Linear collider Benchmark
Northern Illinois University / NICADD
Presentation transcript:

Status of tth analysis 1. √s=500 GeV 2. √s=1 TeV 3. MC requests R. Yonamine, T. Tanabe, K. Fujii T. Price, H. Tabassam, N. Watson, V. Martin ILD Workshop, Kyushu University May 23, 2012

Main Motivations We must verify the origin of EWSB and the mass generation mechanism, which must be done before BSM physics can be established. Given the hint of a light Higgs at the LHC (we will assume mh=120 GeV), ILC becomes an ideal probe for measuring the Higgs couplings to the gauge bosons and fermions. Our focus: top Yukawa coupling. T. Tanabe2

Motivations at √s=500 GeV Well-known energy thresholds for ILC: –250 GeV: Zh(m h =120 GeV) –350 GeV: top pair –500 GeV: Zhh & tth y t measurement possible at 500 GeV due to QCD bound-state effects (enhancement near the production threshold) Fast simulation result: 10% statistical precision on y t [Phys. Rev. D 84, (2011)] –Next: full simulation to increase confidence Zhh cross section (fb) tth without ISR/beam with ISR/beam with ISR/beam + QCD bound-state effects Higgs from Z T. Tanabe3 Note: ttZ is also enhanced. But ttg* is not enhanced because tt system is not a color singlet.

Signal & background Signal: –tth  bWbWbb 6 jet + lepton mode 8 jets mode Main backgrounds: –ttg*  ttbb  bWbWbb –ttZ  ttbb  bWbWbb –tt  bWbW –off-resonant contributions important ! Motivations at √s=1 TeV Detector benchmark process for DBD Should be better measurement at higher energy: –Signal cross section increases (peaks around 800 GeV) (QCD bound-state effects become negligible) –ttZ and ttg*  ttbb also increase but tt  bWbW decreases T. Tanabe4

Software tools 500 GeV1 TeV Event Generator tth, ttZ, ttg*  ttbb: physsim tt: LOI 6f (Whizard)STILL MISSING ! Detector Simulation Geant4 9.3p02 Mokka p02 Geant4 9.5 Mokka p06 Detector ModelILD_00ILD_o1_v0X Event Reconstruction LOI reconstruction: PandoraPFA SatoruJetFinder LCFIVertex ilcsoft v : PandoraPFANew MarlinFastJet LCFIVertex Still using old tools/samples in some places. They will be updated to the validated tools for DBD. Analysis Conditions Target luminosity: 1 ab-1 (both 500 GeV and 1 TeV) Polarizations: nominal polarizations (-0.8, ) T. Tanabe5

Jet Finding thresholds Event Shape (thrust) Isolated Leptons Event Selection Cone Energy (GeV) Lepton Energy (GeV) cos  < 0.98 b tagging Fast simulation results based on the following variables: + mass reconstruction based on jet combination selection. T. Tanabe6

Jet Finding thresholds Event Shape (thrust) Isolated Leptons Event Selection Cone Energy (GeV) Lepton Energy (GeV) cos  < 0.98 b tagging + mass reconstruction based on jet combination selection. LCFIVertex  LCFIPlus Available as of ilcsoft v : MarlinReco/Analysis/IsolatedLeptonFinder + MarlinKinfit Full simulation: T. Tanabe7

Preliminary Results 500 GeV analysis -- PRELIMINARY 1 TeV analysis -- PRELIMINARY top candidate mass after event selection 6 jet + lepton (500 GeV) Higgs candidate mass after event selection 6 jet + lepton (500 GeV) cumulative event fractions passing cuts 6 jet + lepton (1 TeV) cumulative cross section passing cuts 6 jet + lepton (1 TeV) T. Price T. Tanabe8

Sample requests for tth analysis 500 GeV samples are generated & simulated at KEK clusters –tth/ttZ/ttg* event generators ready –tt (6f) event generator not yet available 1 TeV samples are/will be made by central mass production For tth, ttZ, ttbb processes at 1 TeV –would like: 4 ab-1 (#events ~ 50,000) simulated –10 ab-1 (#events ~ 260,000) already generated For ttbar (6f) processes at 1 TeV –samples not yet available !! too late to decide preselections at this stage –6f is also a background for other analysis (nunuH) –will therefore request simulation without preselections –2 ab-1, ~1 million events simulated & generated T. Tanabe9

Process DBD (L80R20) DBD (L80R30) Max(F,G) Ptth-6q-hbb eL.pRI Ptth-6q-hbb eR.pLI Ptth-6q-hnonbb eL.pRI Ptth-6q-hnonbb eR.pLI Pttbb-6q-all eL.pRI Pttbb-6q-all eR.pLI Pttz-6q-all eL.pRI Pttz-6q-all eR.pLI Ptth-ln4q-hbb eL.pRI Ptth-ln4q-hbb eR.pLI Ptth-ln4q-hnonbb eL.pRI Ptth-ln4q-hnonbb eR.pLI Pttbb-ln4q-all eL.pRI Pttbb-ln4q-all eR.pLI Pttz-ln4q-all eL.pRI Pttz-ln4q-all eR.pLI Total tth, ttZ, ttbb 1 TeV Requesting 2 ab-1 for tth, ttZ, ttbb (without 2l+2nu channels), total of ~25,000 events. Samples already available (thanks to Akiya) on the Grid at: /grid/ilc/prod/ilc/mc-dbd A. Miyamoto x2 for training: ~50,000 events (6f events not included here) x2 T. Tanabe10

Summary and Outlook Progress in 500 GeV and 1 TeV analyses –Good coverage in man power –Analysis chain in place, using existing tools and samples –Switch to centrally produces samples & validated tools when available –Collaboration with SiD analysts starts in June MC request summary: –~50k events (total for tth, ttZ, ttbb, 4ab-1 each) –~1M events (ttbar, 2ab-1) T. Tanabe11

Backup Slides T. Tanabe12

Impact on y t accuracy our fast simulation at 500 GeV shows S/B is ~O(1) –roughly expect 6x (2x) increase in signal (background) at 1 TeV statistical accuracy of δyt/yt = 0.5*sqrt(S+B)/S –calculate relative error on this number from MC statistics of S and B processxsec 500 GeV xsec 1 TeV tth ttZ ttbb tbW (S,B) at 1 ab-1 δyt/yt Lumi = 1 ab-1Lumi = 2 ab-1 S errorB errorS errorB error (50,100)12%17%3.3%12%2.4% (100,50)6.1%13%2.4%9.4%1.7% (100,100)7.1%13%2.5%8.8%1.8% (100,200)8.7%12%2.4%8.3%1.7% (200,100)4.3%9.4%1.7%6.7%1.2% (200,200)5.0%8.8%1.8%6.3%1.3% 500 GeV fast simulation For <10% relative error on top Yukawa, would like 2 ab-1 for S; 1 ab-1 for B sufficient. T. Tanabe13

Preselections thrust 500 GeV - ILD_00 - LOI reco. Jet Clustering log 10 ( Y 87 ) 500 GeV Generator Level Reconstructed  tth  bbcssc = cut in fast sim.  tth  bbcssc = cut in fast sim. Generator-level particles: generator status =1, not created in simulation, neutrino veto, cosTheta 0.1 Reconstructed Particles: same cosTheta & pT cuts tth is to be studied in (1) 6 jets + lepton mode, and (2) 8 jets mode. main cuts in the analysis: event shape, jet clustering thresholds, b-tagging Some safe cuts may be possible, need more detailed study by analysts.  propose to let analysts generate large statistics background samples T. Tanabe14

Evaluate accuracy of y t = Accuracy of e+e-  tth cross section 15 ytyt Statistical Uncertainty Background Shape Systematics Luminosity Systematics Analysis Systematics Estimate the statistical uncertainty. Higgs strahlung off Z negligible T. Tanabe

Indirect vs. direct measurement Indirect measurement of top Yukawa is possible at the ttbar threshold and also at the LHC via gluon fusion to ttbar (but the jet background makes it challenging) –if an anomaly is found in the production rate, one cannot distinguish (1) the coupling anomaly or (2) the presence of a new particle in the loop Need direct measurement; feasibility already shown for √s= GeV ILC; we show this for √s=500 GeV –direct measurement at LHC using h->  has been proposed but it can only measure  x BR(h->  ) y t ? X ? ytyt T. Tanabe16

Summary of cuts (fast simulation) cut6-jet + lepton8-jet number of isolated lepton 10 thrust< 0.77 < 0.7 jet clusteringY 5->4 > 0.005Y 8->7 > b-tagging4x b-jets top mass (GeV)140 < m t < < m H < 215 higgs mass (GeV)95 < m t < < m H < 150 T. Tanabe17

6-jet + lepton cut flow (fast simulation) T. Tanabe18 lumi = 1ab -1, polarized beams

6-jet + lepton analysis (fast simulation) T. Tanabe19 Scaled to 1 ab -1 Beam polarization ( Pol(e-),Pol(e+) ) = (-0.8,+0.3) All other cuts applied.

8-jet cut flow (fast simulation) T. Tanabe20 lumi = 1ab -1, polarized beams

8-jet analysis (fast simulation) T. Tanabe21 Scaled to 1 ab -1 Beam polarization ( Pol(e-),Pol(e+) ) = (-0.8,+0.3) All other cuts applied.

results (fast simulation) T. Tanabe22

preliminary results 6 jet: S/sqrt(S+B) = 28/sqrt( ) = 3.21 sigma 8 jet: S/sqrt(S+B) = 34/sqrt( ) = 3.32 sigma Assuming Gaussian errors, combined significance is 4.60 Relative uncertainty on y_t is 0.5/(uncertainty in xsec) = 0.5/4.60 = Full Sim tthttZttbbbWbW 6 jet + lepton280 → → → × 10 5 → 19 8 jet290 → → → × 10 5 → 33 Fast Sim tthttZttbbtbW 6 jet + lepton280 → → → × 10 5 → 23 8 jet290 → → → × 10 5 → 76 PRD 84, (2011) Preliminary ILC500 Lumi = 1 ab -1 P(e-,e+)=(-0.8,+0.3) ttZ: mistake found in QCD correction, fixed xsec below

24 6 jet + lepton 8 jet トップ ヒッグス ILD Full Simulation