Lessons for STEREO - learned from Helios Presented at the STEREO/Solar B Workshop, 17.11.2005 Rainer Schwenn, MPS Lindau The Helios.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ILWS Conference, October 5, 2009 Extension of Magnetic Clouds in the Inner Heliosphere as observed from Multi- Spacecraft Aline de Lucas Alisson Dal Lago.
Advertisements

Rainer Schwenn Max-Planck-Institut für Aeronomie Katlenburg-Lindau International Solar Cycle Studies 2001 (ISCS), June 13-16, 2001 Longmont, Colorado CME.
ICMEs and Magnetic Clouds Session Summary Charlie Farrugia and Lan Jian.
CAS Key Laboratory of Geospace Environment, USTC The Deflection of 2008 September 13 CME in Heliosphere Space ISEST, Hvar, Croatia,2013 June 17 Collaborators:
Interaction of coronal mass ejections with large-scale structures N. Gopalswamy, S. Yashiro, H. Xie, S. Akiyama, and P. Mäkelä IHY – ISWI Regional meeting.
Reviewing the Summer School Solar Labs Nicholas Gross.
The Solar Wind and Heliosphere Bob Forsyth - 15 th October 2007 TOPICS The Sun – interior and atmosphere Origin of the solar wind Formation of the heliosphere.
M. J. Reiner, 1 st STEREO Workshop, March, 2002, Paris.
Bastille Day 2000 Solar Energetic Particles Event: Ulysses observations at high heliographic latitudes M. Zhang Florida Institute of Technology.
STEREO AND SPACE WEATHER Variable conditions in space that can have adverse effects on human life and society Space Weather: Variable conditions in space.
Heliospheric MHD Modeling of the May 12, 1997 Event MURI Meeting, UCB/SSL, Berkeley, CA, March 1-3, 2004 Dusan Odstrcil University of Colorado/CIRES &
30-Day Science Plan Angelos Vourlidas, Russ Howard SECCHI Consortium Meeting IAS 8 March 2007.
CAWSES December 10, CMEs H.S. Hudson Space Sciences Lab, UC Berkeley.
C. May 12, 1997 Interplanetary Event. Ambient Solar Wind Models SAIC 3-D MHD steady state coronal model based on photospheric field maps CU/CIRES-NOAA/SEC.
Coronal Ejecta in October - November of 2003 and predictions of the associated geomagnetic events 1 Big Bear Solar Observatory, New Jersey Institute of.
When will disruptive CMEs impact Earth? Coronagraph observations alone aren’t enough to make the forecast for the most geoeffective halo CMEs. In 2002,
C. May 12, 1997 Interplanetary Event. May 12, 1997 Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejection Event CU/CIRES, NOAA/SEC, SAIC, Stanford Tatranska Lomnica, Slovakia,
Coronal and Heliospheric Modeling of the May 12, 1997 MURI Event MURI Project Review, NASA/GSFC, MD, August 5-6, 2003 Dusan Odstrcil University of Colorado/CIRES.
The “cone model” was originally developed by Zhao et al. ~10 (?) years ago in order to interpret the times of arrival of ICME ejecta following SOHO LASCO.
RT Modelling of CMEs Using WSA- ENLIL Cone Model
Why a Sun-Earth line Coronagraph is Best Doug Biesecker NOAA/SWPC.
Further investigations of the July 23, 2012 extremely rare CME: What if the rare CME was Earth-directed? C. M. Ngwira 1,2, A. Pulkkinen 2, P. Wintoft 3.
Evolution of the 2012 July 12 CME from the Sun to the Earth: Data- Constrained Three-Dimensional MHD Simulations F. Shen 1, C. Shen 2, J. Zhang 3, P. Hess.
Assessing Predictions of CME Time- of-Arrival and 1 AU Speed to Observations Angelos Vourlidas Vourlidas- SHINE
Solar System Missions Division Solar Orbiter Next major Solar and Heliospheric mission ESA ILWS flagship Now with the Inner Heliospheric Sentinels.
A Catalog of Halo Coronal Mass Ejections from SOHO N. Gopalswamy 1, S. Yashiro 2, G. Michalek 3, H. Xie 3, G. Stenborg 2, A. Vourlidas 4, R. A. Howard.
IHY Workshop A PERSONAL VIEW OF SOLAR DRIVERS for Solar Wind Coronal Mass Ejections Solar Energetic Particles Solar Flares.
Locating the solar source of 13 April 2006 Magnetic Cloud K. Steed 1, C. J. Owen 1, L. K. Harra 1, L. M. Green 1, S. Dasso 2, A. P. Walsh 1, P. Démoulin.
1 Determination of CME 3D Trajectories using COR Stereoscopy + Analysis of HI1 CME Tracks P. C. Liewer, E. M. DeJong, J. R. Hall, JPL/Caltech; N. Sheeley,
RECREATING THE THREE DIMENSIONAL STRUCTURE OF INTERPLANETARY CORONAL MASS EJECTIONS Timothy A. Howard and S. James Tappin AGU Fall Meeting, December,
Solar Drivers of Space Weather Steven Hill NOAA/SEC June 14, 2007 Research Experience for Undergraduates.
Olga Khabarova Heliophysical Laboratory, Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism, Ionosphere and Radio Wave Propagation RAS (IZMIRAN), Moscow, Russia
Space Weather from Coronal Holes and High Speed Streams M. Leila Mays (NASA/GSFC and CUA) SW REDISW REDI 2014 June 2-13.
195 Å image – behind 195 Å image – Sun- Earth line – SOHO/ EIT image 195 Å image – Sun- Earth line – SOHO/ EIT image 195 Å image – ahead SECCHI Extreme.
Arrival time of halo coronal mass ejections In the vicinity of the Earth G. Michalek, N. Gopalswamy, A. Lara, and P.K. Manoharan A&A 423, (2004)
Solar Wind and Coronal Mass Ejections
The Solar Wind.
2004 September 11CAWSES Theme 2 Meeting, Beijing Solar Sources of Geoeffective Disturbances N. Gopalswamy NASA/GSFC Greenbelt, MD
First STEREO workshop Paris March 18 – 20, 2002 Rainer Schwenn Max-Planck-Institut für Aeronomie Lindau, Germany.
Forecast of Geomagnetic Storm based on CME and IP condition R.-S. Kim 1, K.-S. Cho 2, Y.-J. Moon 3, Yu Yi 1, K.-H. Kim 3 1 Chungnam National University.
1 Interplanetary Magnetic Flux Enhancements as seen by STEREO C.T. Russell, L.K. Jian and J.G. Luhmann 18 th STEREO Science Working Group April Meudon,
Interplanetary Shocks in the Inner Solar System: Observations with STEREO and MESSENGER During the Deep Solar Minimum of 2008 H.R. Lai, C.T. Russell, L.K.
The Space Weather Week Monique Pick LESIA, Observatoire de Paris November 2006.
11. Assessing the Contribution of Heliospheric Imaging, IPS and other remote sensing observations in Improving Space Weather Prediction Bernie Jackson,
GEOEFFECTIVE INTERPLANETARY STRUCTURES: 1997 – 2001 A. N. Zhukov 1,2, V. Bothmer 3, A. V. Dmitriev 2, I. S. Veselovsky 2 1 Royal Observatory of Belgium.
CME Propagation CSI 769 / ASTR 769 Lect. 11, April 10 Spring 2008.
CASS/UCSD ILWS 2009 SMEI 3D reconstructions of density behind shocks B.V. Jackson, P.P. Hick, A. Buffington, M.M. Bisi, J.M. Clover, S. Hamilton Center.
SEP Event Onsets: Far Backside Solar Sources and the East-West Hemispheric Asymmetry S. W. Kahler AFRL Space Vehicles Directorate, Kirtland AFB, New Mexico,
Anemone Structure of AR NOAA and Related Geo-Effective Flares and CMEs A. Asai 1 ( 浅井 歩 ), T.T. Ishii 2, K. Shibata 2, N. Gopalswamy 3 1: Nobeyama.
Correlation of magnetic field intensities and solar wind speeds of events observed by ACE. Mathew J. Owens and Peter J. Cargill. Space and Atmospheric.
Introduction to Space Weather Jie Zhang CSI 662 / PHYS 660 Fall, 2009 Copyright © The Heliosphere: Solar Wind Oct. 08, 2009.
Heliospheric Simulations of the SHINE Campaign Events SHINE Workshop, Big Sky, MT, June 27 – July 2, 2004 Dusan Odstrcil 1,2 1 University of Colorado/CIRES,
Studies of Solar Wind Structures Using STEREO Lan K. Jian 1, C.T. Russell 1, J.G. Luhmann 2, A.B. Galvin 3, K. Simunac 3 1 Inst. Geophysics & Planetary.
Analysis of 3 and 8 April 2010 Coronal Mass Ejections and their Influence on the Earth Magnetic Field Marilena Mierla and SECCHI teams at ROB, USO and.
A tool for improved space weather predictions: the CME expansion speed. Max-Planck-Institut für Aeronomie Katlenburg-Lindau Germany Instituto Nacional.
Shocks in the IPS Wageesh Mishra Eun-kyung Joo Shih-pin Chen.
1 NASA’s STEREO Mission J.B. Gurman STEREO Project Scientist W.T. Thompson STEREO Chief Observer Solar Physics Laboratory, Helophysics Division NASA Goddard.
Multi-Point Observations of The Solar Corona for Space weather Acknowledgements The forecasting data was retrieved from NOAA SWPC products and SIDC PRESTO.
State of NOAA-SEC/CIRES STEREO Heliospheric Models STEREO SWG Meeting, NOAA/SEC, Boulder, CO, March 22, 2004 Dusan Odstrcil University of Colorado/CIRES.
1 Pruning of Ensemble CME modeling using Interplanetary Scintillation and Heliospheric Imager Observations A. Taktakishvili, M. L. Mays, L. Rastaetter,
Interplanetary proton and electron enhancements associated with radio-loud and radio-quiet CME-driven shocks P. Mäkelä 1,2, N. Gopalswamy 2, H. Xie 1,2,
Detecting, forecasting and modeling of the 2002/04/17 halo CME Heliophysics Summer School 1.
Pulkkinen, A., M. Kuznetsova, Y. Zheng, L. Mays and A. Wold
Radial Dependence of Solar Energetic Particle Intensities
Introduction to Space Weather Interplanetary Transients
Solar Wind Transients and SEPs
Corona Mass Ejection (CME) Solar Energetic Particle Events
Forecasting the arrival time of the CME’s shock at the Earth
Ulysses COSPIN High Energy Telescope observations of cosmic ray and solar energetic particles intensities since its distant Jupiter flyby in 2004 R.B.
Introduction to Space Weather
Presentation transcript:

Lessons for STEREO - learned from Helios Presented at the STEREO/Solar B Workshop, Rainer Schwenn, MPS Lindau The Helios mission resembled the upcoming STEREO mission in several respects. Helios could reveal details about the longitudinal and latitudinal stream structure, it allowed unique associations between limb CMEs and their radial propagation towards an in-situ observer, and the large-scale propagation of solar energetic particles could also be studied.

The orbits of the Helios 1&2 solar probes in 1976 node line

Helios 1&2 a stereo-mission, but no imagers on board ! The mission lasted from Dec to March 86 A variety of stereo and radial line-up constellations!

The solar wind stream structure, observed by the Helios 1&2 and IMP spacecraft from activity minimum in 1975/76 onward. Solar wind stream structure 1974 to 1978 Minimum Maximum With increasing solar activity (in 1978), many transient events destroyed any regular solar wind structure

The line-up between Helios 1 and Helios 2 in 1976, and the succeeding divergence in latitude Latitudinal stream boundaries Δ Lat. [ 0 ]: Schwenn et al., 1981 It is the latitude that makes stream structures differ, rather than radial distance or time!

Entry into a high-speed stream in 2 or even 3 steps, a mere latitude effect! Δ Lat. [ 0 ]: Schwenn et al., 1981 Latitudinal stream boundaries

They remain sharp, even beyond 1 AU! Latitudinal stream boundaries

CIRs at high speed stream fronts can differ substantially with latitude! No corotating shockCIR with corotating shock R = 0.78 AU0.87 AU Lat = Clong = Date = 76:338:16:00 UT76:336:21:00 UT He 1 He 2 He 1

Burlaga et al., 1978 A CIR observed by 6 S/C in November 1977 Note: the stream interface SI is observed at all S/C, He 2 is first to observe a corotating shock, the stream is gone at 1.6 AU, but the SI is still there, and the corotating shock is still there.

He 1 He 2 77:28, He 2 77:29, He 1 Helios orbits in 1977 A transient shock, seen from Helios 1& apart in longitude

shock Cloud, He +, BDEs shock No cloud, But BDEs! AU lat HSE 0.98 AU lat HSE A transient shock, seen from Helios 1& apart in longitude

The coronagraph on P 78-1 recorded CMEs above the limb. The plane-of-the-sky speed (which equals the radial speed for limb CMEs) of several hundred CMEs was measured. The Helios probes happened to travel above the limb for long time periods and could observe in-situ the arrival of ICMEs. For 49 events in 1979 to 1982 a unique association between CMEs seen at the sun and ICMEs observed in-situ (within +/ of the sky plane) could be found and the travel time be determined. Orbit of Helios 1 with respect to the Sun-Earth line Predecessors to STEREO-A/B: Helios plus P78-1 Schwenn, 1983; Sheeley et al., 1985

Results from correlations between CMEs and interplanetary shocks: an observer within the angular span of a fast (>400 km/s) CME has a 100% chance to be hit by a fast shock wave, every shock (except at CIRs) can be traced back to a fast CME. Indeed: there are flares without CMEs (and geo-effects) and there are CMEs (and geo-effects) without flares. These shocks and the driver gases following them have a near 100% chance of becoming geo-effective, if ejected towards Earth. Note: no such statement applies to flares! Stereo views resolved the flare-CME controversy Sheeley et al., 1985

On October 28, 2003, in conjunction with a X13 flare, there occurred a gigantic halo CME. How to measure the CME’s speed component V rad along the LOS? By the way: 8 hours earlier a little comet had evaporated! Coincidence? : Note: in 10 years mission time, SOHO has seen more than 1000 little comets and some CMEs… Even if we could measure V rad near the Sun, we are still in trouble. That‘s what we learned from Helios The key problem in space weather forecasting:

The travel time of ICME driven shock fronts from the Sun to the location of Helios 1 vs the CME radial speed V rad. Unique radial speed measurements of limb CMEs (SOLWIND) and associated ICMEs (Helios) From Helios in situ From P 78-1 coronagraph Note the substantial scatter! Reasons: CME speeds may not have been measured sufficiently well, Helios was not always hit by the fastest parts of ICMEs, Ejecta travel times do not equal shock travel times, ICMEs travel through different ambient solar wind. Schwenn et al.., 2005

Shock fronts may extend far around the Sun The CME center was in longitude off the Helios 1 position

81:103, He 1 X2/3B flare at N09 W40 on 81:100 D st -311 nT on 81:103 Shock fronts may extend far around the Sun

Multipoint study of shock propagation and extent Burlaga et al., 1978, 1980 These studies showed a lot of surprises!

The shocks A1 and A2 seen by He 2 merged, and at Earth and at the Voyagers one single shock arrived. Shock fronts may extend far around the Sun Burlaga et al., 1978

X1/1B flare at S07 E28 on 76:88 He 2: shock and cloud on 76:90 He 1: no shock, no ICME Earth: Dst -218 nT on 76:90 Stereo-constellation at the events in March 1976

Multipoint study of particle propagation X1/1B flare at S07 E28 on 76:88 Wibberenz, 1991 Relativistic solar electrons made it to He 1, some 90 0 west of the flare site, but no protons!

Preparing for STEREO – revisit Helios! The Helios plasma data are available, on line, Thanks to Peter Schroeder, SSL Berkeley!