C+ Pass/Fail A A- 85% F S Unsatisfactory 67% D C B 93%

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Peer-Assessment. students comment on and judge their colleagues work.
Advertisements

Good Evaluation. Good Evaluation Should … be simple be fair be purposeful be related to the curriculum assess skills & strategies set priorities use multiple.
Rubric Design Denise White Office of Instruction WVDE.
Completing the cycle: an investigation of structured reflection as a tool to encourage student engagement with feedback Jackie Pates Lancaster Environment.
Analyzing Student Work
ASSESSMENT FOR LEARNING
Evaluation and Feedback. some definitions Assessment = making the observation -sitting next to Evaluation = assigning value - not grading uses words -
Acadia Institute for Teaching and Technology1 The more effectively we give and receive feedback, the more likely we are to promote learning - that of our.
Here is how close you are to the knowledge or skills you are trying to develop, and heres what you need to do next.
PACT Feedback Rubric Pilot Results with UC Davis English Cohort.
Providing Effective Feedback and Evaluation
Providing Effective Feedback and Evaluation of Competency Development UW School of Social Work Field Educator Training Program.
Gradual Release of Responsibility & Feedback
Assessment Assessment should be an integral part of a unit of work and should support student learning. Assessment is the process of identifying, gathering.
Briefing: NYU Education Policy Breakfast on Teacher Quality November 4, 2011 Dennis M. Walcott Chancellor NYC Department of Education.
New Supervisor: Skills for Success
Performance Management Guide for Supervisors. Objectives  Understand necessity of reviews;  To define a rating standard across the Foundation for an.
Rubric Workshop Los Angeles Valley College Fall 2008.
Evaluating Teaching and Learning Linda Carey Centre for Educational Development Queen’s University Belfast 1.
Behavioral Issues in Online Courses. Learning Outcomes In this session, you will: Participate in group activities and offer suggestions for managing a.
Assessment Rubrics Los Angeles City College Assessment Team.
Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. Alternative Assessments FOUN 3100 Fall 2003 Sondra M. Parmer.
EVALUATING WRITING What, Why, and How? Workshopping explanation and guidelines Rubrics: for students and instructors Students Responding to Instructor.
Consistency of Assessment
1 Peer Review of Teaching K.P. Kwan & J. Jones, EDU etkpkwan etjjones x 6287 x6320 EDU Seminar 7 May 1999 (Friday)
Kauchak and Eggen, Introduction to Teaching: Becoming a Professional, 3rd Ed. © 2008 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Chapter 11 Creating.
2010 Performance Evaluation Process Information Session for Staff
INACOL National Standards for Quality Online Teaching, Version 2.
FLCC knows a lot about assessment – J will send examples
National Food Service Management Institute
OCTOBER ED DIRECTOR PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT 10/1/14 POWERFUL & PURPOSEFUL FEEDBACK.
Coaching and Providing Feedback for Improved Performance
Using formative assessment. Aims of the session This session is intended to help us to consider: the reasons for assessment; the differences between formative.
Marion Webb January  By the end of the session, participants will be able to:  Discuss the role of assessment for learning  Describe key assessment.
School’s Cool in Kindergarten for the Kindergarten Teacher School’s Cool Makes a Difference!
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
Feedback and Next Step Marking
Prepared by SOCCCD Office of Human Resources
Tutorial Methods of Instruction Assessment and Feedback Adapted from a presentation at PBL2002 by Dr. Bill Galey, University of New Mexico, School of Medicine.
Grading and Reporting Chapter 15
IMPORTANCE &SKILLS OF GIVING FEEDBACK Dr. A.K.Pathak ELMC,Lucknow.
EDU 385 CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT Week 1 Introduction and Syllabus.
OCTOBER ED DIRECTOR PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT 10/1/14 POWERFUL & PURPOSEFUL FEEDBACK.
Teachers Mentoring Teachers: The Gift of Peer Feedback Katherine M. Hyland, PhD Gerald Hsu, MD University of California, San Francisco Academy of Medical.
Workshops to support the implementation of the new languages syllabuses in Years 7-10.
Performance-Based Assessment HPHE 3150 Dr. Ayers.
INACOL Standard D: CLEAR EXPECTATIONS PROMPT RESPONSES REGULAR FEEDBACK.
Summative vs. Formative Assessment. What Is Formative Assessment? Formative assessment is a systematic process to continuously gather evidence about learning.
Instructional Strategies Teacher Knowledge, Understanding, and Abilities The online teacher knows and understands the techniques and applications of online.
1 Setting Assessment Questions and Providing Constructive Feedback.
The CAP Self-evaluation Survey Goal: to improve the assessment (the CAP survey is designed for a formative purpose)
An Assessment For Learning. A rubric is a scoring tool that lists the criteria for a piece of work, or “what counts” and clearly defines gradations of.
Feedback in University Teaching Prof. Arif Khurshed Division of Accounting and Finance.
Rubrics Staff development workshop 19/9/2014 Dr Ruth Fazakerley.
1 Chapter 19: Evaluating Performance Coaching Essentials of Performance Evaluation Making the Evaluation The Appraisal Interview Follow-Up Legal Aspects.
Teachers Mentoring Teachers: The Gift of Peer Feedback Katherine M. Hyland, PhD Gerald Hsu, MD February 1, 2016.
Assessment: Marking and Feedback How to evidence progression effectively.
20 Tips for your Poetry Analysis Test Strategies to Help You Improve and Achieve your Best Results on the Test.
Grading based on student centred and transparent assessment of learning outcomes Tommi Haapaniemi
Assessment Online. Student Assessment Design learner-centered assessment that include self-reflection Design grading rubrics to assess discussions, assignments,
Assessment & Feedback Working Group Developing Departmental Assessment & Feedback Practices The ‘Quick Wins’ Paper.
Summative Evaluation Shasta Davis. Dimension: Preparation (Score- 4) Plans for instructional strategies that encourage the development of critical thinking,
Improving Performance Through Feedback Anita R. Webb, PhD JPS Family Medicine Residency Fort Worth, Texas.
Responding to Student Work
NQT Mentor and Tutor Seminar
Giving Feedback The purpose of feedback is to be helpful
Coaching.
Chapter 11 Creating Productive Learning Environments
FEEDBACK Dr. Mohammed Moizuddin Khan Associate Professor.
Giving Effective Feedback and Feedforward
Presentation transcript:

C+ Pass/Fail A A- 85% F S Unsatisfactory 67% D C B 93%

 Research indicates that students prefer field instructors who give them ongoing and critical feedback regarding their performance. Two findings from the second national student survey reported in 2006 provided a dramatic contrast- 80% of students were satisfied with their course overall, 40% were not satisfied with their course assessment and feedback.

 There may be many reasons for the students to show these differences.some students were dissatisfied with the marks they were awarded; and the way they were assessed and feedback they got.

 The students would like to know their marks or level of performance as soon as possible after they submit their assignments which helps them to achieve their best performance. Hence a timely feedback is a must.

 Information provided to a learner in order to help him to continue the behavior or modify the behavior.  Information that assists learners in correcting their course.

 Information is learner uses to improve.  Information a learner uses to help him accomplish a set of learning objectives.

 Feedback is information and is formative in nature.  Evaluation is a quantification or judgment about performances (e.g. grade A, B, C or scores in the scale).

GOAL The goal of feedback is learning. Educators must provide critical and constructive feedback to students in order to facilitate learning and promote ongoing improvement. Students are expected to make mistakes and errors in judgment. Students can only correct mistakes and improve their practice.If these mistakes are identified, suggestions are provided.

 Is specific and avoids vague comment.  Is varied in its method of application.  Uses models showing desired outcomes.  Shows a valuing of students work.

CONTI...  Uses marks or grades only some of the time.  Provides time for students to act upon advice.  Enables students to know how they will benefit.

 Well timed and expected.  Based on observation or reliable information.  Specific, not generalizations.

 Regulated in quantity.  Phrased in descriptive non-evaluative language.  Undertaken with the teaching and student working as allies with common goals.

ARCH MODEL Correct Help by building improvement plan with learner. ReinforcementAsk for self assessment AR CH

1.Feedback is provided in ways that students accept them. o Harsh and insensitive care cause damage to the supervisory relationship thus limiting the potential for learning and improvement.

2.Clear guideline o Clear guidelines for performances expected from students.without these students may feel that they are unfairly criticized. o Feedback is best received when it is based on direct observation of their performance rather than comments from others.

3.Empathy  Students are likely to respond well to feedback when they believe their instructor, understands them well.  Analyze the situations from your student’s perspective to try to understand their actions and then communicate to student.

4.Timeliness  Feedback is best received when it is provided immediately following action it concerns.

5.Regularity  Feedback is given after every direct observation of student’s performance.  When regular feedback is given students will expect this and be more open to discussing their performance.

6.Balance  Feedback is best received when it is balanced with both positive and negative comments.  Best to begin to provide some of the positive elements of behavior and then go on to the negative ones.

7.Consciousness and Directness  Feedback should be clear and easy to understand.  Specific and concrete suggestions for change should be provided.

8.Follow up  Effective feedback involves regularly following up on the students use of feedback.  When suggestions for change or improvements are made, relevant tasks or assignments should be developed that offer students the opportunity to incorporate these suggestions and help students to develop new skills.

9.Know your student  Each individual responds differently to feedback.  Some personality type will welcome substantial feedback, while others may be uncomfortable.

 Encourage students to discuss their feeling about the feedback to establish open and trusting environment.  When trusting environment exists the feedback is received well.

1.Sandwich method: It is fairly a simple method.  Strengths- points for improvement  The delivery of the feedback is structured in a way the weaknesses are mentioned in between the strong points.  list all the positive points and divide them into two parts.

 At the start of the feedback session mention the first half of the positive points,afterwards list the points for improvement and  Lastly end with remaining half of the positive points. This method is more effective for oral feedbacks.

2.Collaborative action plan:  It is a practice in which the student and teacher agree on a solution to the problem.  Action planning will help to realize that feedback reports are not personal attacks but they are solvable problems.

3.Stop-start continue.  It is an evaluation format which can be used during one-on- one feedback sessions. They are encouraged to think what are the things to stop, to start, or to be continued.  Format contains –points for improvement (stop), suggestions (start) and good points (continue). This method helps to think wholistically and limits them in giving negative points. 

 METHODS Written Oral METHODS Focused group discussion.

 Consider both intellectual and the emotional perspectives while commenting students work.  Use a friendly conversational tone.  Ensure handwriting is legible or type it out.

 Return the feedback promptly (ideally within 2 weeks of submission) and before they submit their next assignment.  Be available to students after they have received their feedback for discussion.

 Phrase the comments as statements and not as questions.  Explain your comments.  Tell the students what they did well and why as well as where they went wrong and why.

 Unravel misunderstanding.  Point out and explain irrelevant context.  Point out and explain missing context.  Consider referring the students to cases statutory sections, chapters/papers in particular texts.

 In places rewrite the students wording to demonstrate improvement (rather than commenting this is confused) this could be better expressed, needs to be more succinct.

 Ticks without explanatory comment are fairly helpful.  Writing “good” without explaining why something was good or how it could be better.

 Frequently using question marks and expressing comments as questions creates uncertainty for students. However the occasional question to encourage the students to think is helpful.  Excessive criticism discourages the students.

 Giving so much feedback that a student is unable to distinguish between the minor points indicated for improvement and the major.  Exasperation, sarcasm, rudeness, attempts at humor at students expense.  Avoid the words which the student does not know.

 Abbreviations, poor grammar, spelling and punctuation.  Instructions which are difficult to act upon without further clarification.

 Highly demanding of staff timing.  Difficult to provide individually tailored written feedback for all assignments.