Small_X / 09/17 – 09/20Jorge Barreto – UFRJ The D0 Forward Proton Detector (FPD) Status Jorge Barreto IF – UFRJ/CBPF D1 TDC D2 TDC pbar p.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FPD FPD STATUS JORGE MOLINA CBPF February FPD Current FPD Group UTA –Andrew Brandt –Andrew Brandt (faculty) –Mike Strang (grad student) –Pierrick.
Advertisements

NDVCS measurement with BoNuS RTPC M. Osipenko December 2, 2009, CLAS12 Central Detector Collaboration meeting.
B. List, ETH Zürich Page 1 Report from H1: PRC Open Session, H1: Status and Prospects Benno List Institute for Particle Physics, ETH Zürich.
LHC/HERA workshop, WG 4 (17. Jan. 2005)
DIFFRACTION NEWS FROM CDF Konstantin Goulianos The Rockefeller University Otranto (Lecce), Italy.
Status of the MICE SciFi Simulation Edward McKigney Imperial College London.
September 17-20, 2003.Kenichi Hatakeyama1 Soft Double Pomeron Exchange in CDF Run I Kenichi Hatakeyama The Rockefeller University for the CDF Collaboration.
Diffractive W/Z & Exclusive CDF II DIS 2008, 7-11 April 2008, University College London XVI International Workshop on Deep-Inelastic Scattering and.
Recent Results on Diffraction and Exclusive Production from CDF Christina Mesropian The Rockefeller University.
June 2003 M.Mulders - Fermilab 1 Diffractive results from DØ and prospects for Run II Martijn Mulders Fermilab for the DØ collaboration (with special thanks.
Diffractive W and Z Production at Tevatron Konstantin Goulianos The Rockefeller University and the CDF collaboration Moriond QCD and High Energy Interactions.
Diffractive Results from Workshop on low x physics, Antwerp 2002 Brian Cox   E Diffractive W and Z Observation of double diffractive dijets Run 1 highlights.
Elastic Scattering at s=1.96 TeV Using the DØ Forward Proton Detector
TOF for ATLAS Forward Proton Upgrade AFP concept: adds new ATLAS sub-detectors at 220 and 420 m upstream and downstream of central detector to precisely.
High Energy Physics at UTA UTA faculty Andrew Brandt, Kaushik De, Andrew White, Jae Yu along with many post-docs, graduate and undergraduate students investigate.
FPD Status and Data Quality Andrew Brandt UTA Q4 D S Q3S A1A2 P 1 UP p p Z(m) D1 Detector Bellows Roman Pot P 2 OUT Q2 P 1 DN P 2 IN D2.
Jorge Barreto Low_x Prague1 Status of Diffractive Physics at DØ Run II Jorge Barreto Instituto de Física - UFRJ Rio de Janeiro – RJ - Brazil Outline.
Status of the NO ν A Near Detector Prototype Timothy Kutnink Iowa State University For the NOvA Collaboration.
THE FORWARD PROTON DETECTOR AT DZERO Gilvan Alves Lafex/CBPF 1) MOTIVATION 2) DETECTOR OPTIONS 3) FPD R&D 4) OUTLOOK Lishep 98 Lafex/CBPF Feb 17, 1998.
FPD FPD STATUS JORGE MOLINA CBPF February FPD  10 detector cartridges have been installed: 8 in the vertical plane, 2 at Dipole locations  We.
Forward Proton Detector Update  9 momentum spectrometers comprised of 18 Roman Pots  Scintillating fiber detectors can be brought close (~6 mm) to the.
K. Goulianos The Rockefeller University (Representing the CDF Collaboration) DIS April – 1 May Madison, Wisconsin Update on CDF Results on Diffraction.
Diffractive Triggers E   Andrew Brandt, U. Texas at Arlington Trigger Integration November 18, 2003 A1UA2U P2DP1D P Pbar LM VC.
Lishep06 Gilvan Alves1 Overview of Diffraction from DØ Gilvan Alves Lafex/Brazil  Introduction  DØ RunI x RunII  Special Runs  Outlook.
» Absolute Polarimetry of Proton Beams at RHIC« Oleg Eyser for the RHIC Polarimetry Group International Workshop on Polarized Sources, Targets and Polarimetry.
AFP Introduction September 10th 2014 M. Bruschi, INFN Bologna (Italy) 1.
1 PID & FPD Software Gilvan Alves (Lafex/CBPF) Q4Q4 D S Q2Q2 Q2Q2 Q3Q3 Q3Q3 Q4Q4 S A 1Q A1SA1S A 2Q A 2S P 1Q P 2S P 1S P 2Q p p Z(m) A D1 Detector Roman.
Elastic Scattering and Diffraction at DØ Tamsin Edwards for the DØ collaboration 14 th - 18 th April, 2004 XII International Workshop on Deep Inelastic.
Diffraction at DØ: Past, Present, and Future E   Andrew Brandt, University of Texas at Arlington Future QCD Workshop May 20, 2004 Fermilab A1UA2U P2DP1D.
Small_X / 09/17 – 09/20Jorge Barreto – UFRJ The D0 Forward Proton Detector (FPD) Status Jorge Barreto UFRJ/CBPF - Brazil D1 TDC D2 TDC pbar p.
APS April Meeting Detector Construction of the Forward Proton Detector at D0 Michael Strang University of Texas at Arlington Diffractive Events FPD.
D0 Status: 01/14-01/28 u Integrated luminosity s delivered luminosity –week of 01/ pb-1 –week of 01/ pb-1 –luminosity to tape: 40% s major.
DØ Forward Proton Detector Andrew Brandt UTA Q4 D S Q3S A1A2 P 1 UP p p Z(m) D1 Detector Bellows Roman Pot P 2 OUT Q2 P 1 DN P 2 IN D2.
Diffractive Physics at D0 Kyle Stevenson DIS 2003.
Why study Diffractive W Boson?. Data Samples Z boson sample: Start with Run1b Z ee candidate sample Central and forward electron W boson sample: Start.
Diffractive Physics E   Andrew Brandt, U. Texas at Arlington DØ Physics Workshop July 30, 2004 Fermilab A1UA2U P2DP1D P Pbar LM VC Focus on mature analyses:
Low Luminosity Opportunities Andrew Brandt, U. Texas at Arlington DØ ADM November 18, 2005 “easy” “really hard”
Diffractive W/Z Bosons Andrew Brandt UTA Run I Diffractive W/Z Boson Production Recap Run II Preliminary Search for Diffractive Z Bosons (Courtesy of Tamsin.
Agenda FPD Overview Andrew 30 mins Tunnel Status: 1) Castle Status Christophe 2) Detector Status Mike S. 3) Elec. rewiring+safety Pierrick 4) Amplifier.
Andrew Brandt FPD Rio Workshop Mar Forward Proton Detector Overview Andrew Brandt University of Texas at Arlington.
__________________________________ C. Avila, small x workshop, Sep ELASTIC SCATTERING IN D0 EXPERIMENT Carlos Avila Universidad de Los Andes Bogota,
DIS 2001 Bologna Hard Diffraction at DØ Run I and Run II Christophe Royon DØ Collaboration / DAPNIA-SPP Saclay, UT Arlington, Brookhaven.
Michael Strang Physics 5391, 22/July/02 Diffraction and the Forward Proton Detector at DØ Michael Strang Physics 5391.
UPDATE ON THE FORWARD PROTON DETECTOR Gilvan Alves Lafex/CBPF Introduction Accelerator Roman Pots Detector Future Plans April 1, 1998 (no kidding)
FPD Status and Plans Andrew Brandt UTA Q4 D S Q3S A1A2 P 1 UP p p Z(m) D1 Detector Bellows Roman Pot P 2 OUT Q2 P 1 DN P 2 IN D2 Q4Q3Q2.
FPD STATUS Carlos Avila Uniandes/UTA 1. FPD overview 2. Roman pot and detector status 3. FPD readout integration status 4. Software status 5. Stand-alone.
SEQUENCER DELAY PLD By ANTON H.C. SMITH ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA.
The Detector Performance Study for the Barrel Section of the ATLAS Semiconductor Tracker (SCT) with Cosmic Rays Yoshikazu Nagai (Univ. of Tsukuba) For.
FPD Status and Data Quality Andrew Brandt UTA Q4 D S Q3S A1A2 P 1 UP p p Z(m) D1 Detector Bellows Roman Pot P 2 OUT Q2 P 1 DN P 2 IN D2.
Status of the TOTEM Experiment and Latest Results
Susan Burke DØ/University of Arizona DPF 2006 Measurement of the top pair production cross section at DØ using dilepton and lepton + track events Susan.
Diffraction at DØ Andrew Brandt University of Texas at Arlington E   Run IRun II Low-x Workshop June 6, 2003 Nafplion, Greece.
Penny Kasper Fermilab Heavy Quarkonium Workshop 21 June Upsilon production DØ Penny Kasper Fermilab (DØ collaboration) 29 June 2006 Heavy Quarkonium.
Roman Pots and Microstations based on talk by Jaak Lippmaa Helsinki CERN 2005.
Diffraction at DØ E   Andrew Brandt, U. Texas at Arlington Future QCD Workshop May 20, 2004 Fermilab A1UA2U P2DP1D P Pbar LM VC.
Nikhef Scientific Meeting 2000Onne Peters D0 Muon Spectrometer December 14-15, Amsterdam Onne Peters Nikhef Jamboree 2000.
Open and Hidden Beauty Production in 920 GeV p-N interactions Presented by Mauro Villa for the Hera-B collaboration 2002/3 data taking:
Search for Standard Model Higgs in ZH  l + l  bb channel at DØ Shaohua Fu Fermilab For the DØ Collaboration DPF 2006, Oct. 29 – Nov. 3 Honolulu, Hawaii.
An FPD quadrupole castle Elastic Scattering and High Mass Exclusive Dijets at DØ (  s=1.96 TeV) Andrew Brandt University of Texas, Arlington on behalf.
DØ Hard Diffraction in Run I and Prospects for Run II Andrew Brandt DØ / University of Texas, Arlington Intro and Run I Hard Diffraction Results Forward.
Andrew Brandt University of Texas at Arlington
First data from TOTEM experiment at LHC
Results of dN/dt Elastic
Kevin Burkett Harvard University June 12, 2001
FPD Status and Data Quality Andrew Brandt
FPD Motivation Andrew Brandt UTA
Observation of Diffractively Produced W- and Z-Bosons
Observation of Diffractively Produced W- and Z-Bosons
The D0 Forward Proton Detector (FPD) Status
Susan Burke, University of Arizona
Presentation transcript:

Small_X / 09/17 – 09/20Jorge Barreto – UFRJ The D0 Forward Proton Detector (FPD) Status Jorge Barreto IF – UFRJ/CBPF D1 TDC D2 TDC pbar p

Small_X / 09/17 – 09/20Jorge Barreto – UFRJ Forward Proton Detector Layout  9 momentum spectrometers comprised of 18 Roman Pots  Scintillating fiber detectors can be brought close (~10 mm) to the beam to track scattered protons and anti- protons  Reconstructed track is used to calculate momentum fraction and scattering angle –Much better resolution than available with gaps alone  Cover a t region (0 < t < 4.5 GeV 2 ) where the high t range was never before explored at Tevatron energies  Allows combination of tracks with high-p T scattering in the central detector D S Q2Q2 Q3Q3 Q4Q4 S A1A1 A2A2 P 1U P 2I P 2O P 1D p p Z(m) D2 D Veto Q4Q4 Q3Q3 Q2Q2

Small_X / 09/17 – 09/20Jorge Barreto – UFRJ FPD Detector Setup  6 planes per detector in 3 frames and a trigger scintillator  U and V at 45 degrees to X, 90 degrees to each other  U and V planes have 20 fibers, X planes have 16 fibers  Planes in a frame offset by ~2/3 fiber  Each channel filled with four fibers  2 detectors in a spectrometer 0.8 mm 3.2 mm 1 mm mm U U’ X X’ V V’ Trigger

Small_X / 09/17 – 09/20Jorge Barreto – UFRJ Detector Construction At the University of Texas, Arlington (UTA), scintillating and optical fibers were spliced and inserted into the detector frames. The cartridge bottom containing the detector is installed in the Roman pot and then the cartridge top with PMT’s is attached.

Small_X / 09/17 – 09/20Jorge Barreto – UFRJ Segments to Hits y x 10  u x v Segments (270  m)  Combination of fibers in a frame determine a segment  Need two out of three possible segments to get a hit –U/V, U/X, V/X Can reconstruct an x and y  Can also get an x directly from the x segment  Require a hit in both detectors of spectrometer

Small_X / 09/17 – 09/20Jorge Barreto – UFRJ All 6 castles with 18 Roman pots comprising the FPD were constructed in Brazil, installed in the Tevatron in fall of 2000, and have been functioning as designed. A1 Quadrupole castle installed in the beam line. Castle Status

Small_X / 09/17 – 09/20Jorge Barreto – UFRJ 10 of the 18 Roman pots have been fully instrumented with detectors Funds to add detectors to the remainder of the pots have recently been obtained from NSF. During the shutdown (Sep-Nov. 2003), the final eight detectors and associated readout electronics are being installed. P2 Quadrupole castle with up and down detectors installed Detector Status

Small_X / 09/17 – 09/20Jorge Barreto – UFRJ Castle Design 50 l/s ion pump Beam Worm gear assembly Step motor Detector Constructed from 316L Stainless Steel Parts are degreased and vacuum degassed Vacuum bettter than Torr 150 micron vacuum window Bakeout castle, THEN insert fiber detectors Thin vaccum window

Small_X / 09/17 – 09/20Jorge Barreto – UFRJ Pot motion is controlled in the DØ Control Room via a Python program that uses the DØ online system to send commands to the step motors in the tunnel. The software is reliable and has been tested extensively. It has many safeguards to protect against accidental insertion of the pots into the beam. Pot Motion Software

Small_X / 09/17 – 09/20Jorge Barreto – UFRJ Currently FPD pots are inserted in every store Commissioning integrated FPD Have some dedicated FPD triggers, more when TM operational Working towards automated pot insertion Operations

Small_X / 09/17 – 09/20Jorge Barreto – UFRJ Stand-alone DAQ In phase I we used a stand-alone DAQ (2000 engineering run). We build the trigger with NIM logic using signals given by our trigger PMT’s, veto counters, DØ clock, and the luminosity monitor. If the event satisfies the trigger requirements, the CAMAC module will process the signal given by the MAPMT’s. With this configuration we can read the fiber information of only two detectors, although all the trigger scintillators are available for triggering.

Small_X / 09/17 – 09/20Jorge Barreto – UFRJ In-time hits in AU-PD detectors, no early time hits, or LM or veto counter hits A1UA2U P2D P1D P Pbar Halo Early Hits LM VC  Over 1 million elastic trigger events taken with stand-alone DAQ  About 1% pass multiplicity cuts –Multiplicity cuts used for ease of reconstruction and to remove halo spray background Quadrupole Elastic Data

Small_X / 09/17 – 09/20Jorge Barreto – UFRJ  =  p/p should peak at 0 for elastic events!! Dead Fibers due to cables that have since been fixed P1D P2D beam Y X Y Reconstructed  beam Initial Reconstruction DØ Preliminary

Small_X / 09/17 – 09/20Jorge Barreto – UFRJ Spectrometer Alignment  Good correlation in hits between detectors of the same spectrometer but shifted from kinematic expectations –3mm in x and 1 mm in y P1D x vs. P2D x (mm) P1D y vs. P2D y (mm) DØ Preliminary

Small_X / 09/17 – 09/20Jorge Barreto – UFRJ t distribution Before alignment After alignment Gaussian fit After alignment correction,  peaks at 0 (as expected for elastics); MC  resolution is 15% lower (including z smearing and dead channels) than data The t distribution has a minimum of 0.8 GeV 2 ; t min is determined by how close the pots are from the beam, shape is in rough agreement with expected angular acceptance from MC. FPD is also a tool helping BD Elastic Data Distributions DØ Preliminary

Small_X / 09/17 – 09/20Jorge Barreto – UFRJ TDC Timing from Trigger PMTs From TDCs : 18ns = (396ns – L1/c) – L1/c 4ns = (396ns – L2/c) – L2/c  L1 = 56.7 m; L2 = 58.8 m Tevatron Lattice: L1 = 56.5m; L2 = 58.7m TOF: 197ns 190ns t p – t p = 18ns t p – t p = 4ns DØ Preliminary

Small_X / 09/17 – 09/20Jorge Barreto – UFRJ TDC Resolution  Can reject proton halo at dipoles using TDC timing  Can see bunch structure of both proton and antiproton beam  1ns ~ 4 TDC channels D1 TDC D2 TDC pbar p DØ Preliminary

Small_X / 09/17 – 09/20Jorge Barreto – UFRJ FPD Trigger and Readout

Small_X / 09/17 – 09/20Jorge Barreto – UFRJ Standalone Readout vs. AFE Readout  Standalone Readout  No TDC cut –such cut removes lower correlation in y plot  Diffracted pbars fall in upper correlation of y plot  Uses a trigger based on particles passing through trigger scintillators at detector locations  AFE readout  Similar correlations  Uses trigger: –one jet with 25GeV and North luminosity counters not firing  This trigger suppresses the halo band D0 Preliminary

Small_X / 09/17 – 09/20Jorge Barreto – UFRJ Resolution of Noise problem with AFE  Moving to AFE readout required use of a Transition Patch Panel  Noticed large rms values with this setup  Traced to a capacitive coupling between grounds  Isolating one of the grounding planes fixes the problem

Small_X / 09/17 – 09/20Jorge Barreto – UFRJ Dipole Diffraction Results - Alignment  Raw data sample has 4640 events  Reconstruction of ~50% of events  Hit patterns: Misalignment?  Hit correlations: pbar halo?  Poor  and t distributions D0 Preliminary All units in mm  t (GeV 2 ) X1X1 X1X1 X2X2 X2X2 Y1 Y2Y2 Y2Y2

Small_X / 09/17 – 09/20Jorge Barreto – UFRJ  Shifts ΔY 1 = ΔY 2 =+2mm  Cut the pbar blob (X2 > - 14mm)  Fair agreement between MC and Data  More realistic  and t distributions  Allow to study  vs t correlation D0 Preliminary Dipole Diffraction Results - II MCData X1X1 X2X2 X1X1 X2X2 Y1Y1 Y2Y2 Y2Y2 Y2Y2  t (GeV 2 ) All units in mm

Small_X / 09/17 – 09/20Jorge Barreto – UFRJ Dipole Diffraction Results - III  Geometrical Acceptance 14σ Data |t| (GeV 2 ) D0 Preliminary Flat-t distribution  |t| (GeV 2 )

Small_X / 09/17 – 09/20Jorge Barreto – UFRJ Run II Diffractive Z → µµ candidate

Small_X / 09/17 – 09/20Jorge Barreto – UFRJ   E Soft Diffraction and Elastic Scattering: Inclusive Single Diffraction Elastic scattering (t dependence) Total Cross Section Centauro Search Inclusive double pomeron Search for glueballs/exotics Hard Diffraction: Diffractive jet Diffractive b,c,t, Higgs Diffractive W/Z Diffractive photon Other hard diffractive topics Double Pomeron + jets Other Hard Double Pomeron topics Rapidity Gaps: Central gaps+jets Double pomeron with gaps Gap tags vs. proton tags Topics in RED were studied with gaps only in Run I 1000 tagged events expected in Run II DØ Run II Diffractive Topics

Small_X / 09/17 – 09/20Jorge Barreto – UFRJ Summary and Future Plans  Run II analysis still in early stages  Early FPD stand-alone analysis shows that detectors work  FPD now integrated into DØ readout  Commissioning of FPD and trigger in progress  Gap results in Run II not yet approved  Full 18 pot FPD will start taking data after shutdown (12/03)  Tune in next year for first FPD physics results