Mohamed A Guenena, MD Helga P Sandoval, MD, MSCR, Kerry D Solomon, MD Magill research center for vision correction Storm Eye Institute Medical University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Femtosecond Laser–Assisted Sutureless Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty
Advertisements

Evaluation of Enhancement Rates following Hyperopic LASIK with Femtosecond versus Microkeratome Assisted Flap Creation Raj Rajpara, BS * Richard M. Awdeh,
Are Network Results Regarding Ocular Coherence Tomography (OCT) Relevant to Clinical Practice and Clinical Trials? Sponsored by the National Eye Institute,
Presented by: Ray T. Oyakawa, M.D. Sharper Vision Centers A MEDICAL GROUP Comparison of PalmScan and IOL Master axial lengths measurements No financial.
Steve Schallhorn MD Myth Busters in Patient Selection for LASIK Steve Schallhorn MD.
Pooja B. Jamnadas, MD, Peter Russo, OD, William Bonk, Shuchi Patel, MD Loyola University Chicago, Stritch School of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology,
Swept Source Optical Coherence Tomography for Evaluation of Posterior Corneal Changes after Refractive Surgery Dr. Tommy Chung Yan Chan Dr. Vishal Jhanji.
Tarek Abdel-Wahab, MD Clear Vision Center Cairo,Egypt Clinical Consultant of Schwind and technolase.
Intraoperative Aberrometry Mark Packer, MD, FACS Clinical Associate Professor Oregon Health & Sciences University.
Astigmatism “NO TOUCH” PROCEDURE
IOL power calculation after refractive surgery A. Peyman, MD.
Clinical evaluation of foldable acrylic phakic IOL (fP) implantation ASCRS, San Diego, 2011 A.John Kanellopoulos, MD Professor NYU Medical School, NY Director,
US Trends in Refractive Surgery: 2009 ASCRS Survey Richard J. Duffey, MD David Leaming, MD Boston: April 13, 2010.
Alex P. Lange The author has no financial interest to disclose.
PRK Enhancement with Mitomycin - C after LASIK - a case series
Dept. of Ophthalmology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany. Outcome after big-bubble deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty.
Nizar S Abdelfattah, M.D.1, Marina Israel2, Nermin Osman, M.D.3,
Jérôme C. VRYGHEM, M.D. Brussels Eye Doctors Brussels, Belgium
INTRA OPERATIVE ONLINE PACHY METRY –A SAFETY TOOL Dr. KUMAR J DOCTOR DOCTOR EYE INSTITUTE MUMBAIINDIA NO FINANCIAL INTEREST.
TRANSPALPEBRAL TONOMETER APPLICATION DURING INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE EVALUATION IN THE PATIENTS WITH REFRACTION ANOMALY BEFORE AND AFTER KERATOPHOTOREFRACTIVE.
Mike P. Holzer, MD Annett Mannsfeld, MSc Angela Ehmer, MSc Gerd U. Auffarth, MD International Vision Correction.
Femto-Lasik after corneal transplantation
Hong Kong Eye Hospital Ms Frenchy Chiu Dr Victoria Wong IOL master
ASCRS 08 Changes Of Higher Order Aberrations After Excimer Laser Treatment For Moderate Myopia by Means of Preoperative Wavefront Aberration Levels using.
Elias F. Jarade, MD, FICS. Corneal and Refractive Surgery Service, The Dubai Mall Medical Center, Dubai- U.A.E. Tel: ; Mob
Custom Flap Formation: Advantages of Elliptical Flaps for LASIK Patients Custom Flap Formation: Advantages of Elliptical Flaps for LASIK Patients Henry.
Use of Multifocal IOLs in Patients with Age-Related Macular Degeneration Helga P. Sandoval, MD, MSCR 1 Reid B. Murphy, MD, 1 Luis E. Fernández de Castro,
March 2011 Bascom Palmer Eye Institute University of Miami Elaine Wu, M.D. Ana Paula Canto, M.D. William Culbertson, M.D. Sonia Yoo, M.D. Financial disclosure:
A Prospective Study Examining Contact Lens Wear, Refractive Error, and Optical Coherence Tomography Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Measurements Marie Brenner.
Patient Satisfaction After LASIK: Analysis of Over 15,000 Patients Steve Schallhorn MD Consultant for AMO Medical Director Optical Express.
Refractive outcome after myopic LASIK with a mechanical microkeratome or a femtosecond laser keratome Mark E Johnston, MD, FRCSC No.
Young Joo Shin, 1 Sang Mok Lee, 2 Jin Choi, 3 Eun Ryung Han, 4 Dong Hae Kim 4 1 H ally m University Gangnam Sacred Heart Hospital 2 3The Armed Forces Medical.
Khairidzan Mohd Kamal MD
Results of Collagen Crosslinking followed by posterior chamber toric implantable collamer lens implantation in patients with Keratoconus & High Myopia.
Refractive Accuracy of LASIK Using the IntraLase and Zyoptix BACKGROUND Wavefront guided customized lasik procedures are designed to correct both lower.
A New Technique for Precise, Predictable SBK Surgery Using the B&L Zyoptix XP Microkeratome David R. Shapiro, MD Shapiro Laser Eye Center Ventura, California.
10 year follow up of LASIK surgery for low to high levels of myopia Qasim Qasem FRCS, Caitriona Kirwan MRCOpth, Michael O’Keefe FRCS. Institutional Affiliations:
Long-Term Longitudinal Change in Keratometry After Pediatric Cataract Surgery Rupal H. Trivedi, MD MSCR M. Edward Wilson, MD Osman Melih, MD Dipankar Bandyopadhyay,
Study of Flap Thickness Precision with a Femtosecond Laser Shinagawa LASIK Center Tatsuya Yonekawa,MSc ; Minoru Tomita,MD.PhD ; Youhei Iida,CE ; Yuko Inada,CE.
Effect of an irregular anterior surface on a lamellar femtosecond laser cut Robert E. Fintelmann, MD Michele M. Bloomer, MD Bennie H. Jeng, MD Authors.
Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness, Anterior Chamber Depth, and Central Corneal Power Measurements between Two Scheimpflug Imaging Systems Yuichi.
Corneal Wound: Architecture and Integrity Luis E. Fernández de Castro, M.D. 1 Helga P. Sandoval, M.D., M.S.C.R. 1 Kerry D. Solomon, M.D. 1 1 Magill Research.
Post-LASIK Intraocular Lens Power Adjustment Nomogram Joseph Diehl Kevin Miller, MD Jules Stein Eye Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine.
Refractive Outcomes with Advanced Wavefront-Guided LASIK William Trattler, MD Charles Reilly, MD Consultant to the USAF SG for Refractive Surgery Lackland.
Augenabteilung am St. Franziskus Hospital Münster Lasik Flap Thickness using the Zyoptix XP Microkeratome Susanne Stottmeister, Suphi Taneri * * Travel.
Long Term Results of Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Sutureless Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty “FALK” Mohamed Abou Shousha, MD, Sonia H. Yoo, MD, William Feuer,
US Trends in Refractive Surgery: 2011 ASCRS Survey Richard J. Duffey, MD David Leaming, MD Chicago: April 21, 2012.
Comparison of Varying the Ablation Diameter in LASIK and LASEK:The Effects on Anterior Chamber Depth (ACD) and Regression at 3 months Minoru Tomita, MD,
Corneal Endothelial Cell Changes After LASIK Using a Femtosecond Laser Minoru Tomita, MD, PhD, Masaru Aoyama, MD, Minoru Tomita, MD, PhD, Masaru Aoyama,
The results of PTK using Fourier-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography for Granular Corneal Dystrophy Type 2 Eung Kweon Kim, MD, Ph.D 1 ; Tae-im Kim, MD,
Postoperative Uncorrected Visual Acuity (UCVA) versus Preoperative Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) with the WaveLight Refractive Suite (Excimer EX500.
Initial clinical experience with the FS200 Femto and EX500 excimer lasers for LASIK ASCRS, San Diego 2011 A.John Kanellopoulos, MD Professor NYU Medical.
Intraocular Lens Outcomes: Comparison of Technologies and Formulas Carolina Eyecare Physicians, LLC Research Assistant Professor of Ophthalmology Storm.
Analysis of Macular Edema after Cataract Surgery in Patients with Diabetes Using Optical Coherence Tomography  Stephen J. Kim, MD, Robert Equi, MD, Neil.
Measurement of 60 kHz Femtosecond LASIK Flaps with Anterior Segment Ocular Coherence Tomography & Ultrasonic Subtraction Pachymetry Edward E. Manche, MD.
Wavefront Optimized Retreatment after Prior Wavefront
Laboratory evaluation of LASIK flap parameters created with 2 femtosecond lasers ASCRS, San Diego 2011 Chatzilaou, Georgios, MD¹ A. John Kanellopoulos,
Maria A Henriquez MD Luis Izquierdo MD Jackeline Parraga MD
and High-Order Aberrations After Intrastromal Presbyopia Correction
Safe Lasik on Thin Cornea with Moderate Myopia
post-lasik corneal ectasia
No financial interest for all authors
Three-Year Follow-up after LASIK in Eye with Extremely Thin Corneal Bed Hidemasa Torii, MD, Kazuno Negishi, MD, Murat Dogru, MD, Takefumi Yamaguchi, MD,
Mohamed A Guenena, MD Helga P Sandoval, MD, MSCR Kerry D Solomon, MD
Is Photorefractive Keratectomy the Laser Vision Correction of Choice?
Optical Coherence Pachymetry with the ESIRIS DOCTOR EYE INSTITUTE
Factors Potentially Affecting the Accuracy of Methods to Calculate Effective Refractive Power After Keratorefractive Surgery Helga P Sandoval, MD, MSCR,
Dr Haralabos Eleftheriadis, M.D Ultralase Clinic Bristol UK
Visual Outcomes and Satisfaction with Toric IOL Versus Monofocal IOL
The authors have no financial interest
Presentation transcript:

Mohamed A Guenena, MD Helga P Sandoval, MD, MSCR, Kerry D Solomon, MD Magill research center for vision correction Storm Eye Institute Medical University of South Carolina

 To assess the accuracy and reproducibility of flap thickness created by the fifth generation femtosecond laser using:  Intraoperative pachymetry  Postoperative anterior segment OCT ASCRS 2009

 Prospective, unmasked study  24 eyes of 12 patients  Had primary LASIK surgery  Flaps created with the new 5th generation femtosecond Laser (iFS Advanced Femtosecond Laser, Abbot Medical Optics )  Attempted Flap depth  100 microns in 4 eyes  110 microns in 20 eyes  Assessment:  Intraoperative pachymetry  Postoperative anterior segment Fourier-domain optic coherence tomography (OCT) on a subgroup of patients at an average of 3 month  The SAS system software was used to analyze the results ASCRS 2009

 2 cross scans were used to measure each flap (Figure 1)  The cross scan setting entails 2x1024 A scans (8 scans in each directions are then averaged)  The LASIK flap was identified by increased reflectivity at the flap-stromal interface. then the cursor was moved manually to the interface and measurements were recorded.  On each line of the cross scan, the thickness was calculated at four points ( Figure 2)  A 2.5 mm left to the midline  B 1 mm left to midline  C 1 mm right to midline  D 2.5 mm right to midline Fig. 1 Fig. 2 ASCRS 2009 ABCD Line 1 Line 2 Line 3 Line 4

 Pre and Postoperative Data  Intraoperative Pachymetry was done by subtraction method ASCRS 2009 Pre-operativePost-operative day 30 Spherical error-2.5 (-6.2—2.2)0.1 (-0.2―1.2) Cylinder-0.7 ( -3.5―0.5)-0.2(-0.5―0) Spherical equivalent (-7.75― 2.25)0 (-0.37―0.25) Pachymetry 565 ( 535―596) NA 100 µm flaps110 µm flaps Number of eyes418 Flap thickness by US pachymetry 109 µm (±9.6)119 µm (±11.5)

ASCRS 2009 OCT picture showing the four points measurements for a single line scan in a patient who had a 110 µm flap

Attempted Flap thickness Number of eyes OCT measurements Mean Std Dev 100 µm2117 µm µm4123 µm6.5 ASCRS 2009  Overall flap thickness per group  Comparing the consistency of the flap thickness at different points in the 110 µm group in all line scans Point APoint BPoint CPoint D Average thickness 119 µm (±10.9) 124 µm (±4.4) 124 µm (±7.5) 124 µm (±6.4)

 Comparing the flap thickness by lines for the 110µm group ASCRS 2009 Line 1Line 2Line 3Line 4 Average thickness 121 µm (±7.1) 124 µm (±5.5) 124 µm (±7.4) 124 µm (±6)

 The new fifth generation femtosecond laser shows  High consistency of flap thickness  High reproducibility of flap thickness  Accurate flap thickness predictability  The flaps are uniform at different points ASCRS 2009