Based on the work of Dr. M.S. Smith, University of Pgh. Key Ingredients to Developing Mathematical Understanding: Anticipating, Monitoring, Selecting,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Alabama College- and Career-Ready Standards for Mathematics
Advertisements

Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning
Mathematics Instruction: Planning, Teaching, and Reflecting
Re-viewing the CMI Framework (Re-view: Take another look, see anew)
Integrating the Standards for Mathematical Practice as a Natural part of Teaching Through Whole Class Mathematics Discussions. Teruni Lamberg, Ph.D. University.
Team Task Choose 1 Progression to READ: Number and Operations--Fractions Ratios and Proportional Relationships Develop “Content” Knowledge.
Wesnesday, January 30, 2013 PS 153 Paul Perskin CFN 204.
Common Core Circles - Monitoring 1. Common Core Circles A Joint Venture of CMC-S and CAMTE.
Mathematics Reform The Implications of Problem Solving in Middle School Mathematics.
Common Core Planning for Content & Practice Preparing Los Angeles Students for College and Career.
TEAM-Math and AMSTI Professional Mathematics Learning Communities Building Classroom Discourse.
Science PCK Workshop March 24, 2013 Dr. Martina Nieswandt UMass Amherst
Science Inquiry Minds-on Hands-on.
Student Engagement through the use of High-Level Tasks Presented by: Raven Hawes iZone Mathematics.
Lesson Design: An Overview of Key Tools for Flexible Math Instruction Think about Ms. Christiansen—the teacher in the video. What helps a teacher plan.
Math Content Workshop Focus: Progression of Fractions in Grades 3-5
Mathematics the Preschool Way
CCRS Quarterly Meeting # 3 Promoting Discourse in the Mathematics Classroom Welcome participants to 3rd Quarterly Meeting for school year.
Math AP Meeting January 20, 2015 Presenter: Simi Minhas Math Achievement Coach, CFN204.
DeAnn Huinker & Kevin McLeod University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Designing High Quality Professional Development Knowledge, Management, & Dissemination Conference.
Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning
The Use of Student Work as a Context for Promoting Student Understanding and Reasoning Yvonne Grant Portland MI Public Schools Michigan State University.
Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Tennessee Department of.
Measured Progress ©2011 ASDN Webinar Series Spring 2013 Session Four March 27, 2013 New Alaska State Standards for Math: Connecting Content with Classroom.
Teaching Through Problem Solving Part 2 – Bermuda Framework for Teaching Mathematics Gilbert Institute Ongoing PD commencing the week of March 3, 2014.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Selecting and Sequencing Students’ Solution Paths to Maximize Student Learning Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching.
LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Using Assessing and Advancing.
Engaging Students in High Level Cognitive Tasks Marjorie Graeff April 21, 2010 Division of Teaching & Learning.
Materials Beliefs Cut-up beliefs Answer key Adjusting support tool Tasks activity Martha’s carpeting problem (on ppt) Fencing problem (labels) 3-5 tasks.
© 2013 University Of Pittsburgh Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Using Assessing and Advancing Questions to Target Essential Understandings.
© 2013 University Of Pittsburgh Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Making Sense of Numbers and Operations Fraction Standards via a Set.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER Study Group 7 - High School Math (Algebra 1 & 2, Geometry) Welcome Back! Let’s.
Peg Smith University of Pittsburgh Teachers Development Group Leadership Seminar on Mathematics Professional Development February 13, 2009 Learning to.
01.1 WELCOME TO COMMON CORE HIGH SCHOOL MATHEMATICS LEADERSHIP SCHOOL YEAR SESSION 1 16 SEPTEMBER 2015 EMBARKING ON A LEADERSHIP JOURNEY.
Committee on the Assessment of K-12 Science Proficiency Board on Testing and Assessment and Board on Science Education National Academy of Sciences.
Implementing the Nevada Academic Content Standards for Mathematics Talking About Solution Methods and Problem-Solving Strategies Traci Loftin and Rachel.
PRINCIPAL SESSION 2012 EEA Day 1. Agenda Session TimesEvents 1:00 – 4:00 (1- 45 min. Session or as often as needed) Elementary STEM Power Point Presentation.
Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership High School Labs Kevin McLeod and DeAnn Huinker University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Designing High Quality Professional.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Using Assessing and Advancing Questions to Target Essential Understandings.
LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2012 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Using Assessing and Advancing.
Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Tennessee Department of Education High School Mathematics Algebra 2 Illuminating Student Thinking:
Successfully Implementing High- Level Tasks Based on work by Dr. Margaret S. Smith, University of Pittsburgh.
Effective Practices and Shifts in Teaching and Learning Mathematics Dr. Amy Roth McDuffie Washington State University Tri-Cities.
Amy Jones Lewis November 2010 Green River Regional Educational Cooperative MathPLUS Content Day 1: Student-Centered Problem Solving.
Grade 3 & 6 EQAO Network Scaffolding Students to Independence.
2 Differentiated Technical Assistance Team (DTAT) Video Series Instructional Delivery Part II of III: A Framework Judy Johnston, LaVonne Kunkel, and Steve.
{ Developing Student Thinking Seventh Grade Mathematics.
An Unpacking of a Module.  I can identify the components of the math modules  I can understand the content included in the math modules  I can identify.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Shaping Talk in the Classroom: Academically Productive Talk Features.
KEYNOTE ADDRESS North Carolina Teachers of Mathematics Conference 2013 Teruni Lamberg Ph.D. University of Nevada, Reno Whole Class Mathematics Discussions:
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Shaping Talk in the Classroom: Academically Productive Talk Features.
Manipulatives and Technology. Minds On – Activities While the music plays, find your musical pattern partner. Choose a table (6 people per table) and.
Plenary 1. What’s important about the Math we Teach? A Focus on Big Ideas Marian Small
© Crown copyright 2006 Renewing the Frameworks Enriching and enhancing teaching and learning.
This module was developed by Amy Hillen, Kennesaw State University; DeAnn Huinker, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee; and Victoria Bill, University of.
Deepening Teacher Math Content Knowledge MMP Key Components of High Quality Professional Development DeAnn Huinker & Kevin McLeod University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
5 Practices for Orchestrating productive math discussions
Productive Mathematical Discussions: Working at the Confluence of Effective Mathematics Teaching Practices Core Mathematics Partnership Building Mathematical.
Review of TTLP Insert comments for another assigned group within their Google doc (be certain to include your name) Read the comments made on your TTLP.
Discourse Measurement
Teaching Mathematics for Learning: Standards Aligned System
Productive Mathematical Discussions: Working at the Confluence of Effective Mathematics Teaching Practices Core Mathematics Partnership Building Mathematical.
Discourse Measurement
Discourse Measurement
Discourse Measurement
Discourse Measurement
Discourse Measurement
Productive Mathematical Discussions: Working at the Confluence of Effective Mathematics Teaching Practices Core Mathematics Partnership Building Mathematical.
HLPs and EBPs in mathematics and science in clinical experiences
Presentation transcript:

Based on the work of Dr. M.S. Smith, University of Pgh. Key Ingredients to Developing Mathematical Understanding: Anticipating, Monitoring, Selecting, Sequencing, and Connecting Student Thinking Thinking Through a Lesson Protocol

Based on the work of Dr. M.S. Smith, University of Pgh. Background on the Thinking Through the Lesson Protocol (TTLP) Framework for developing lessons Dr. Margaret Smith- University of Pittsburgh “As a teacher, how will you determine what your students learn and the effectiveness of your instruction?”  Developed as a result of nearly a decade of work on QUASAR at the Learning Research and Development Center at the University of Pittsburgh  “The effectiveness of a lesson depends significantly on the care with which the lesson plan is prepared.”- Brahier, 2000

Based on the work of Dr. M.S. Smith, University of Pgh. “The cumulative experiences of (numerous elementary and secondary teachers with varying levels of teaching experience) suggests that the Thinking Through a Lesson Protocol can be a useful tool in planning, teaching, and reflecting on lessons and can lead to improved teaching.” Smith, Bill, Hughes (MTMS, October 2008, p.137)

Based on the work of Dr. M.S. Smith, University of Pgh. Part III Sharing & Discussing the Task: Orchestrating Whole- Group Discussions

Based on the work of Dr. M.S. Smith, University of Pgh. The Role of the Teacher  Worthwhile tasks alone are not sufficient for effective teaching. Teachers must also decide what aspects of a task to highlight, how to organize and orchestrate the work of students, what questions to ask to challenge those with varied levels of expertise, and how to support students without taking over the process of thinking for them and thus eliminating the challenge. NCTM, 2000, p.19

Based on the work of Dr. M.S. Smith, University of Pgh. Communication  Communication is an essential part of mathematics and mathematics education. It is a way of sharing ideas and clarifying understanding. Through communication, ideas become objects of reflection, refinement, discussion, and amendment. The communication process also helps build meaning and permanence for ideas and makes them public. NCTM, 2000, p. 60

Based on the work of Dr. M.S. Smith, University of Pgh. Sharing and Discussing the Task With your group, analyze all student work samples Based on the math goals for this task, select four pieces of work. Consider the following in your selections:  Identify the solution paths that you would want to have shared during the whole-group discussion.  Specify the order in which they would be shared.  Explain your selection and ordering.

Based on the work of Dr. M.S. Smith, University of Pgh. Sharing and Discussing the Task  Review the chart of responses to be shared and identify any patterns you observe in this data.

Based on the work of Dr. M.S. Smith, University of Pgh. Sharing and Discussing the Task  Can we begin to generate any general “Rules of Thumb” for determining which responses to share and discuss?

Based on the work of Dr. M.S. Smith, University of Pgh. Part II: Supporting Students’ Exploration Imagine that you are walking around the room as your students work on the task, observing what they are doing. Consider what you would say to the students who produced the following responses:  Emma & Emma  Harry & Ese  Nellie & Nate  Suzanne & Rose, in order to assess and advance their understanding. Specifically for each response, indicate what questions you would ask:  To assess the students’ understanding of key mathematical ideas, problem-solving strategies or representations.  To advance the students’ understanding toward the target goals.

Based on the work of Dr. M.S. Smith, University of Pgh. Supporting Students’ Exploration With your group, discuss:  What are the characteristics of assess questions?  What are the characteristics of advance questions?

Based on the work of Dr. M.S. Smith, University of Pgh. Characteristics of Questions that Support Students’ Exploration Assessing Questions Based closely on the work the student has produced. Clarify what the student has done and what the student understands about what they have done Advancing Questions Use what students have produced as a basis for making progress toward the target goal. Move students beyond their current thinking by pressing students to extend what they know to a new situation

Based on the work of Dr. M.S. Smith, University of Pgh. Reflecting on our work  In what ways might assessing and advancing questions help you support students’ engagement with a high-level task?  Does the distinction between assess and advance questions really matter?

Based on the work of Dr. M.S. Smith, University of Pgh. The importance of Questions  Teachers provoke students’ reasoning about mathematics through the tasks they provide and the questions they ask. (NCTM,1991)  Asking questions that reveal students’ knowledge about mathematics allows teachers to design instruction that responds to and builds on this knowledge. (NCTM, 2000)

Based on the work of Dr. M.S. Smith, University of Pgh. The Importance of Questions  Teachers’ questions are crucial in helping students make connections and learn important mathematics and science concepts. Teachers need to know how students typically think about particular concepts, how to determine what a particular student or group of students thinks about those ideas, and how to help students think about those ideas, and how to help students deepen their understanding. Weiss & Paskey, 2004

Based on the work of Dr. M.S. Smith, University of Pgh. Purpose of TTLP  To prompt teachers to think deeply about a specific lesson in order to consider how to advance students’ mathematical understanding  To focus on students’ mathematical thinking  Requires anticipating a range of student solutions or solution strategies  Prompts the development of questions that will support students’ engagement and learning  Address ways to facilitate the learning of all students  To move beyond structural components of lesson planning

Based on the work of Dr. M.S. Smith, University of Pgh. Connecting the TTLP to Practice 1. What questions will you ask to focus student thinking? 2. What will you see or hear that lets you know how students are thinking about the mathematical ideas of the lesson? 3. Which solution paths do you want to have shared during the class discussion? In what order will the solutions be presented? Why? 4. What will you see or hear that lets you know that students in the class understand the mathematical ideas that you intended for them to learn?

Based on the work of Dr. M.S. Smith, University of Pgh. Teacher reflection: “I may not have it sitting on my desk, going point to point with it, but I think: What are the misconceptions? How am I going to organize work? What are my questions? Those are the three big things I think about when planning a lesson.” Smith, Bill, Hughes- (MTMS, October 2008, p. 137)

Based on the work of Dr. M.S. Smith, University of Pgh. This material is based on work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. EHR Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the granting agency.