CATEGORICAL SYLLOGISMS

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THE CATEGORICAL SYLLOGISM
Advertisements

Four Rules of Aristotelian Logic 1. Rule of Identity: A is A 2. Rule of Non-Contradiction: A is not (-A) 3. Rule of Excluded Middle: Either A or (-A)
An overview Lecture prepared for MODULE-13 (Western Logic) BY- MINAKSHI PRAMANICK Guest Lecturer, Dept. Of Philosophy.
Deductive Arguments: Categorical Logic
Categorical Logic Categorical statements
Logic. To Think Clearly Use reason, instead of relying on instinct alone What is Logic? – “the art of reasoning” – The study of truth – The ethics of.
Deduction: the categorical syllogism - 1 Logic: evaluating deductive arguments - the syllogism 4 A 5th pattern of deductive argument –the categorical syllogism.
Today’s Topics Introduction to Predicate Logic Venn Diagrams Categorical Syllogisms Venn Diagram tests for validity Rule tests for validity.
Rules for Valid Syllogisms
Philosophy 1100 Today: Hand Back “Nail that Claim” Exercise! & Discuss
Categorical Syllogisms Always have two premises Consist entirely of categorical claims May be presented with unstated premise or conclusion May be stated.
Syllogistic Logic 1. C Categorical Propositions 2. V Venn Diagram 3. The Square of Opposition: Tradition / Modern 4. C Conversion, Obversion, Contraposition.
Chapter 16: Venn Diagrams. Venn Diagrams (pp ) Venn diagrams represent the relationships between classes of objects by way of the relationships.
Your name Mediate Inference. your name Mediate Inference Commonly called as argument Has two major types: –Deduction/Deductive Arg./Syllogism Categorical.
Categorical Syllogisms

CATEGORICAL PROPOSITIONS, CHP. 8 DEDUCTIVE LOGIC VS INDUCTIVE LOGIC ONE CENTRAL PURPOSE: UNDERSTANDING CATEGORICAL SYLLOGISMS AS THE BUILDING BLOCKS OF.
Critical Thinking Lecture 10 The Syllogism By David Kelsey.
The Science of Good Reasons
Testing Validity With Venn Diagrams
Philosophy 148 Chapter 7. AffirmativeNegative UniversalA: All S are PE: No S is P ParticularI: Some S is PO: Some S is not P.
Venn Diagrams and Categorical Syllogisms
Logic A: Capital punishment is immoral. B: No it isn’t! A: Yes it is! B: Well, what do you know about it? A: I know more about it then you do! B: Oh yeah?
Chapter 15: Rules for Judging Validity. Distribution (p. 152) Several of the rules use the notion of distribution. A term is distributed if it refers.
Deductive Reasoning Rules for Valid Syllogisms. Rules for a valid categorical syllogism 1.A valid syllogism must possess three, and only three, unambiguous.
Chapter 18: Conversion, Obversion, and Squares of Opposition
4 Categorical Propositions
MLS 570 Critical Thinking Reading Notes for Fogelin: Categorical Syllogisms We will go over diagramming Arguments in class. Fall Term 2006 North Central.
Logic – Basic Terms Logic: the study of how to reason well. Validity: Valid thinking is thinking in conformity with the rules. If the premises are true.
LOGICAL REASONING FOR CAT 2009.
Chapter 13: Categorical Propositions. Categorical Syllogisms (p. 141) Review of deductive arguments –Form –Valid/Invalid –Soundness Categorical syllogisms.
Practice Quiz 3 Hurley 4.3 – 4.6.
Diagramming Universal-Particular arguments The simplest style of nontrivial argument is called a Universal-Particular argument. Earlier in Part 2 Module.
Chapter 17: Missing Premises and Conclusions. Enthymemes (p. 168) An enthymeme is an argument with an unstated premise or conclusion. There are systematic.
Invitation to Critical Thinking Chapter 6
Fun with Deductive Reasoning
SYLLOGISTIC REASONING PART 2 Properties and Rules PART 2 Properties and Rules.
Chapter 6 Evaluating Deductive Arguments 1: Categorical Logic Invitation to Critical Thinking First Canadian Edition.
Critical Thinking: A User’s Manual
Invitation to Critical Thinking Chapter 7 Lecture Notes Chapter 7.
Chapter 14: Categorical Syllogisms. Elements of a Categorical Syllogism (pp ) Categorical syllogisms are deductive arguments. Categorical syllogisms.
The Traditional Square of Opposition
Critical Thinking Lecture 10 The Syllogism By David Kelsey.
McGraw-Hill ©2004 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Testing Validity With Venn Diagrams The aim of this tutorial is to help you learn.
Categorical Propositions Chapter 5. Deductive Argument A deductive argument is one whose premises are claimed to provide conclusive grounds for the truth.
Deductive Reasoning. Inductive: premise offers support and evidenceInductive: premise offers support and evidence Deductive: premises offers proof that.
Rules for Valid Syllogisms
a valid argument with true premises.
Testing Validity With Venn Diagrams
Deductive Logic, Categorical Syllogism
THE CATEGORICAL SYLLOGISM
5 Categorical Syllogisms
Venn Diagrams 1= s that are not p; 2= s that are p; 3= p that are not s S P.
Today’s Topics Introduction to Predicate Logic Venn Diagrams
5.1 Standard Form, Mood, and Figure
5 Categorical Syllogisms
Rules for Valid Syllogisms
Practice Quiz 3 Hurley
Rules and fallacies Formal fallacies.
5 Categorical Syllogisms
4.1 The Components of Categorical Propositions
Philosophy 1100 Class #8 Title: Critical Reasoning
Categorical propositions
4 Categorical Propositions
5 Categorical Syllogisms
Chapter 6 Categorical Syllogisms
Reason and Argument Chapter 7 (2/2).
Critical Thinking Lecture 11 The Syllogism
Critical Thinking Lecture 10 The Syllogism
Practice Quiz 3 Hurley 4.3 – 4.6.
Presentation transcript:

CATEGORICAL SYLLOGISMS A SYLLOGISM: A ONE STEP ARGUMENT WITH 2 PREMISES, WHICH ARE DEPENDENT, AND 1 CONCLUSION. A CATEGORICAL SYLLOGISM SIMPLY USES CATEGORICAL PROPOSITIONS IN PREMISES AND CONCLUSION

CATEGORICAL SYLLOGISMS 1. ALL WHALES ARE MAMMALS. 2. ALL MAMMALS ARE ANIMALS THAT BREATHE BY MEANS OF LUNGS. 3. ALL WHALES ARE ANIMALS THAT BREATHE BY MEANS OF LUNGS. COMPONENTS OF CATEGORICAL SYLLOGISMS

CATEGORICAL SYLLOGISMS MAJOR TERM: OCCURS IN PREDICATE OF CONCLUSION (P) MAJOR PREMISE: PREMISE IN WHICH MAJOR TERM APPEARS MINOR TERM: OCCURS IN THE SUBJECT OF THE CONCLUSION. (S) MINOR PREMISE: PREMISE IN WHICH MINOR TERM APPEARS. MIDDLE TERM: TERM WHICH APPEARS IN EACH PREMISE BUT NOT IN CONCLUSION.

CATEGORICAL SYLLOGISMS THE FUNCTION OF THE MIDDLE TERM: THIS TERM WILL BE NAMED M. IT MEDIATES OR CONNECTS S AND P. MOOD OF CATEGORICAL SYLLOGISMS: REFERS TO ORDER OF TYPES OF PROPOSITIONS IN THE SYLLOGISM. WHALE ARGUMENT AGAIN. AAA

CATEGORICAL SYLLOGISMS FIGURE OF A CATEGORICAL SYLLOGISM: REFERS TO THE POSITION OF THE MIDDLE TERM IN THE PREMISES. ONLY 4 MOODS, SEE P. 236. YOU NEED TO COMMIT THIS TO MEMORY.

CATEGORICAL SYLLOGISMS STANDARD FORM: WHEN SYLLOGISMS APPEAR IN ORDINARY LANGUAGE CONTEXTS WE NEED TO PUT THEM INTO STANDARD FORM. STRATEGY: (EACH SYLLOGISM HAS THREE LINES WHICH CORRESPOND TO EACH PROPOSITION.)

CATEGORICAL SYLLOGISMS 1. PUT PROPOSITIONS INTO STANDARD FORM (CHAPTER 8) 2. IDENTIFY THE CONCLUSION. WRITE IT DOWN AND PUT A NUMBER 3 BEFORE IT. 3. IDENTIFY S AND P AND WRITE THEM DOWN TO THE SIDE. 4. IDENTIFY MIDDLE TERM AND WRITE IT DOWN AT SIDE. 5. FIND PREMISE WITH MAJOR TERM AND WRITE IT ON LINE 1. 6. FIND PREMISE WITH MINOR TERM AND WRITE IT ON LINE 2. P.QUIZ 9.1. P. 238.

CATEGORICAL SYLLOGISMS SEE PRACTICE QUIZ EXAMPLE ON WEB. VALIDITY OF CATEGORICAL SYLLOGISMS VALIDITY: NECESSITY: ALL OR NONE IN TOTAL 256 FORMS OF CATEGORICAL SYLLOGISMS.

TESTING FOR VALIDITY RULES AND VENN DIAGRAMS. PLEASE EXCLUDE CANCELLATION METHOD GOAL: TO UTILIZE BOTH TO UNDERSTAND WHY SOME SYLLOGISMS ARE VALID AND OTHERS ARE NOT. RULES: 5 TOTAL AND ALL NEED TO BE SATISFIED FOR SYLLOGISM TO BE VALID. 2 RELATED TO DISTRIBUTION 2 RELATED TO NEGATIVITY 1 RELATED TO MODERN SQUARE OF OPPOSITION

TESTING FOR VALIDITY RULE 1: THE MIDDLE TERM MUST BE DISTRIBUTED IN AT LEAST ONE PREMISE. (FALLACY OF UNDISTRIBUTED MIDDLE) RULE 2: IF EITHER TERM IS DISTRIBUTED IN THE CONCLUSION, IT MUST BE DISTRIBUTED IN THE PREMISE IN WHICH IT APPEARS. EXAMINE CONCLUSION! ILLICIT MINOR OR MAJOR RULE 3: NO VALID SYLLOGISM CAN HAVE TWO NEGATIVE PREMISES. TWO NEGATIVES DO NOT ADD UP TO ANYTHING.

TESTING FOR VALIDITY RULE 4: IF EITHER PREMISE IS NEGATIVE, THE CONCLUSION MUST BE NEGATIVE. IF THE CONCLUSION IS NEGATIVE, ONE PREMISE MUST BE NEGATIVE. (CONVERSE) RULE 5: IF THE CONCLUSION IS PARTICULAR, ONE PREMISE MUST BE PARTICULAR. (CANNOT INFER A PARTICULAR FROM TWO UNIVERSAL PREMISES: CANNOT DRAW THE SUBALTERNATES)

ENTHYMEMES CATEGORICAL SYLLOGISMS WITH IMPLIED PREMISE. P.QUIZ 9.3. P. 242.