Jac J. Varco1, Robert E. Earnest1, and Jimmy D. Johnson2

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Nitrogen Loss Research
Advertisements

Nutrient management issues and initiatives 2013 Deer Industry Conference James Parsons.
Nitrogen Source Issues Dale Leikam Kansas State University Manhattan, KS.
 Nitrogen › Not available › NH3 is the devil  Phosphorus › Not available › Around for a long time › Ortho P is better than Poly P.
Morteza Mozaffari Soil Testing and Research Laboratory, Marianna Efforts to Improve N Use Efficiency of Corn in Arkansas Highlights of Research in Progress.
An integrated study of nutrient leaching and greenhouse gas emissions Tyson Ochsner and Rodney Venterea Soil and Water Management Research Unit Agricultural.
EFISIENSI PUPUK DAN PEMUPUKAN NITROGEN Bahan kajian MK Pemupukan Dosen: Prof Dr Ir Soemarno MS Jur Tanah FP UB, 2011.
Mineral Nutrition & Management Dr. Richard Rosecrance California State University, Chico.
Matt Ruark, Dept. Soil Sci. Nav Ghimire, UWEX Green Lake County Joe Lauer, Dept. Agronomy. Thierno Diallo, Dept. Agronomy. CONTROLLED AND DELAYED RELEASE.
Effect of Tillage on Nitrogen Availability to Sugar Beets Years 1 & 2 Amber Moore and David Tarkalson University of Idaho – Twin Falls USDA ARS - Kimberly.
May 6, Drought tolerant Miller ComparisonsEfawLCB Grain Yield (bu/ac) Drought tolerant vs. Non-drought tolerant Monsanto vs. Pioneer
Fertilizing potatoes with biofuel byproducts Amber Moore, Ph.D University of Idaho Twin Falls Research and Extension Center.
Why is Nitrogen High? How Long Will it Last? Other Nitrogen Fertilization Issues. Gordon Johnson Soil Nutrient Management Specialist Plant & Soil Sciences.
Nitrogen Sources for Cotton Across the Belt
Outline Drought update/outlook  Stand losses Soil management strategies Sounds too good to be true!  N fertilizer savings  Foliar fertilizers.
Tobacco Production Update Bob Pearce, Gary Palmer, Andy Bailey Extension Tobacco Specialists Kenny Seebold Extension Plant Pathologist.
The Nitrogen Requirement and Use Efficiency of Sweet Sorghum Produced in Central Oklahoma. D. Brian Arnall, Chad B. Godsey, Danielle Bellmer, Ray Huhnke.
Oklahoma State University Department of Plant and Soil Sciences Oklahoma State University Department of Plant and Soil Sciences Nitrogen Loss from Urea.
Ammonia volatilization from urea David E. Kissel University of Georgia.
Projected Deliverables: Estimates of N losses due to leaching, volatilization, and uptake by competing understory vegetation Determine the relative efficiency.
Fertilization Fundamentals for Hay Producers Glen Harris Extension Agronomist University of Georgia - Tifton.
Fertility Trials Fertility trials included transplant water treatments, nitrogen sources, nitrogen rates and Poultry Litter. Drought overshadowed many.
Residue Biomass Removal and Potential Impact on Production and Environmental Quality Mahdi Al-Kaisi, Associate Professor Jose Guzman, Research Assistant.
Annual Nutrient Removal by the Primary Hay Crops in the South Adapted from Southern Forages, 2007 and Myer et al, 2010.
Fertilization Strategies For Hay Producers Glen Harris UGA-Tifton.
Right Product With higher prices for fertilizer nutrients, it becomes more important to use product s that provide high efficiency. Premiums previously.
Evaluation of Foliar UAN and Timing on Wheat Grain Yield and Protein Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Oklahoma State University, 371 Agricultural.
Corn Plot Overview Jared Shippey Ben Logan. General Information  Planted 5/30/08  Hybrid – Pioneer 38B87 – 94 days  Planted population 35,000  Manure.
Southeast Beef Cattle Short Course | August 24 th.
Nitrogen fertilizer use efficiency in rice. Contents  Introduction  Nitrogen dynamic in lowland rice soil  Methods of Nitrogen losses from rice fields.
UTILIZATION OF CROP SENSORS TO DETECT COTTON GROWTH AND N NUTRITION
And Chuck Grantham Presents…. Reduced Inputs Increased Yields Higher Nutritional Value Improved Water Efficiency Less Plant Stress Improved Soil Health.
Soil Nitrogen Unit: Soil Science.
Fertilizing for No-till
Figure 3. Concentration of NO3 N in soil water at 1.5 m depth. Evaluation of Best Management Practices on N Dynamics for a North China Plain C. Hu 1, J.A.
Effect of micronutrient fertilizer on winter wheat yield
Highway 56 West Adams, MN Lynn Lagerstedt.
Current N Fertilization Strategy for Corn in Missouri Newell Kitchen Cropping Systems and Water Quality Research Unit Columbia, Missouri USDA-ARS.
Moving Beyond NDVI for Active Sensing in Cotton
Annual Nutrient Removal by the Primary Hay Crops in the South Adapted from Southern Forages, 2007 and Myer et al, 2010.
Nitrogen sources for Topdressing Using Variable Nitrogen Fertilizers.
Influence of Late-Season Foliar Nitrogen Applications on Grain Protein in Winter Wheat C.W. Woolfolk, W.R. Raun, G.V. Johnson E.G. Krenzer, and W.E. Thomason.
Reducing Orchard Fertilizer Costs Lenny Wells UGA Horticulture.
Pretreat Yourself to a Better Investment. Position in the Field AVAIL: For growers worldwide who want to maximize their crops’ phosphorus fertilizer performance.
Part 2: Answers to practical fertilizer management problems Fundamentals of Nutrient Management December 16-17, 2009 West Virginia University Extension.
Where do Enhanced Efficiency Nitrogen Fertilizers and Split N Applications Fit? Cynthia Grant and Alan Moulin AAFC - Brandon Research Centre Nicolas Tremblay.
Soil Acidity, Lime, and Phosphorous Brian Arnall Hailin Zhang Chad Godsey Department of Plant and Soil Sciences Oklahoma State University.
Nitrogen Stability: Protecting Your Nitrogen Investment
Manure Management in No-till
Nitrogen sources for Topdressing Winter Wheat In Oklahoma
Enhanced-Efficiency Fertilizers (EEF)
HOW CAN WE REDUCE VOLATILIZATION LOSSES?
Evaluation of N-stabilizers in Enhancing NUE of Animal Manures
Name:- Guajarati dharmesh Enrollment no Subject – chemical process industries-1 SEM-3 Subject code
Strategies for mitigating ammonia emissions from agroecosystems
Responsible Nitrogen Management in 2018: Rates, Treatments and Timing IFCA Webinar February 9, 2018 Emerson Nafziger Crop Sciences University of Illinois.
Wolfram Zerulla BASF SE, Agricultural Center Limburgerhof
G. V. Johnson and W. R. Raun Dept. Plant & Soil Sciences
Evaluation of Midseason UAN Application Depth in Winter Wheat
Joel Ransom and Nicholas Schimek
E.V. Lukina, K.W. Freeman,K.J. Wynn, W.E. Thomason, G.V. Johnson,
N fertilizer placements and greenhouse gas emissions from continuously
Nitrogen (N) use efficiency of rice grown in Arkansas.
Saturday, 24 November 2018 Nitrogen Management Selecting a suitable N fertiliser type David P. Wall Teagasc, Johnstown Castle, Co Wexford.
Third World Hand Planter
Conventional N Management for Oklahoma
HOW CAN WE REDUCE VOLATILIZATION LOSSES?
Nathan R. Thorp and Erik A. Hobbie
Three Key Considerations in Planning Your 2019 Soil Fertility Program
Fertilizer Calculations
Presentation transcript:

Urease Inhibitor (Agrotain®) Effects on N-Use Efficiency in No-Till Cotton Jac J. Varco1, Robert E. Earnest1, and Jimmy D. Johnson2 Plant and Soil Sciences Dept. (1) Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS, (2) Agrotain International, Collierville, TN

INTRODUCTION Findings from a 10-y study in Miss. (Parvin et al., 2003): AN highly profitable due to high yield achieved at a lower rate of N (80 lb/acre) Subsurface banded UAN efficient, but lower profit due to lower yield Surface dribbled UAN profitable at a higher rate of N (120 lb/acre) Urea most profitable at a high rate of N (120 to 180 lb/acre)

Current trends: Decreasing availability of ammonium nitrate to growers Increasing fertilizer N prices Increased acreage of no-till cotton

Research results: decreased NH3 loss with urease inhibitor (Beyrouty et al., 1988) N losses up to 30% of surface applied urea (Beyrouty et al., 1988) [N-(n-butyl)] thiophosphoric triamide (NBPT) is an effective urease inhibitor (Bremner et al., 1991) NBPT treated urea increased N-use-efficiency for rice (Aly et al., 2001)

N Fertilizer Use in MS (Nutrient short tons, 2004) Ammonium nitrate 20,089 Nitrogen solutions (UAN) 57,119 Urea 31,867

Price/lb N AN $0.448 UAN (32%) $0.328 Urea $0.364 Average N rate, MS 2005 =120 lb/ac

Urea Hydrolysis Increased potential for NH3 volatilization w/no-till due to greater urease activity on crop residues (NH2)2CO + H2O  2NH3 + CO2 Urease enzyme is a catalyst for hydrolysis reaction

OBJECTIVES Determine effects of fertilizer N source and placement on N-use-efficiency by no-till cotton Determine effects of a urease inhibitor (UI) on N-use-efficiency of urea N-sources by no-till cotton

METHODS General No-till N rate 120 lb/acre, split 50% @planting and early square 15N enriched fertilizer @  1.4% Varieties: ST 4892 BR (2005), DP 445 BR (2006) Urease inhibitor in Agrotain® [N-(n-butyl)] thiophosphoric triamide or NBPT Automated rainfall data collection

Treatments No N check Ammonium nitrate (AN) broadcast Urea broadcast Urea w/UI broadcast UAN subsurface banded UAN dribbled UAN w/UI dribbled Randomized complete block, four replications

Urea, AN, and urea treated with UI were broadcast within microplots using a pump type sprayer

UAN subsurface banded, UAN dribbled, and UAN w/UI dribbled were applied 8” from drill using a 2 oz syringe

Screens placed under rows to collect residues

Elemental and isotope analysis were determined w/an automated C/N analyzer coupled to a mass spectrometer

Rainfall/Fertilization 2005

Rainfall/Irrigation/Fertilization 2006

Cotton N Content Response Treatment Total N content, lb/acre 2005 2006 2-y ave. No N check 62 96 79 Ammonium nitrate 88 151 120 Urea 69 121 95 Urea w/UI 100 134 117 UAN banded 135 128 UAN surface dribbled 111 114 UAN dribbled w/UI 136 144 140 LSD0.05 22.4 27.5

N Derived From Fertilizer Response Treatment N derived from fertilizer, % 2005 2006 2-y ave. Ammonium nitrate 39.6 29.9 35 Urea 19.3 24.8 22 Urea w/UI 34.3 28.2 31 UAN banded 45.8 35.8 41 UAN surface dribbled 46.4 27.9 37 UAN dribbled w/UI 45.4 30.6 38 LSD0.05 4.5 5.1

Fertilizer N Recovery Response Treatment Fertilizer 15N recovery, % 2005 2006 2-y ave. Ammonium nitrate 28.1 43.0 35.6 Urea 11.1 29.6 20.4 Urea w/UI 28.7 36.1 32.4 UAN banded 46.2 48.2 47.2 UAN surface dribbled 43.5 34.8 39.2 UAN dribbled w/UI 49.9 43.8 46.9 LSD0.05 22.4 27.5

Price of Agrotain® $45/gal 1 gallon treats 1 ton dry urea 2.3 quarts treats 1 ton UAN 32% Price of urea w/Agrotain /lb N $0.413 Price of UAN 32% w/Agrotain /lb N $0.368 Price of AN $0.448

Cost Benefit at 120 lb N/acre Urea $43.68/acre w/o Agrotain $49.56/acre w/Agrotain 22 lb N/acre increase in efficiency @ $0.36/lb urea N = $8.01/acre = $2.13/acre cost benefit UAN 32% $39.36/acre w/o Agrotain $44.16/acre w/Agrotain 26 lb N/acre increase in efficiency @ $0.33/lb UAN N = $8.53/acre = $3.73/acre cost benefit

CONCLUSIONS UI treated urea improved no-till cotton N use efficiency comparable to AN UAN dribbled with UI was as effective as soil incorporation in no-till cotton production

When to use a urease inhibitor? Conditions for NH3 volatilization no-till temperatures above 65°F high organic matter/surface residues high humidity unincorporated urea