1 Overview of Polarimetry Outline of Talk Polarized Physics Machine-Detector Interface Issues Upstream Polarimeter Downstream Polarimeter Ken Moffeit,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Measuring the Neutron and 3 He Spin Structure at Low Q 2 Vincent Sulkosky for the JLab Hall A Collaboration College of William and Mary, Williamsburg VA.
Advertisements

Fast and Precise Beam Energy Measurement at the International Linear Collider Michele Viti.
Page 1 Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010 Mike Spata February 24, 2010 Collider Review Retreat International Linear Collider.
1 Electron Beam Polarimetry for EIC/eRHIC W. Lorenzon (Michigan) Introduction Polarimetry at HERA Lessons learned from HERA Polarimetry at EIC.
Summary of wg2a (BDS and IR) Deepa Angal-Kalinin, Shigeru Kuroda, Andrei Seryi October 21, 2005.
EPAC June 2003 The EPAC June 2003 Questions 1. Clarify the Motivation for the Proposal. 2. How to ensure the e+ polarimeter works right away? 3. What is.
5 th Rencontres du Vietnam - Aug. 7, 2004 Polarized Positrons…E166 A.W.Weidemann 1 Introduction (What, who) Motivation (Why) Experiment and Polarimetry.
Stanford – Mar , 2005 LCWS-2005 Norbert Meyners Upstream Polarimetry with 4-Magnet Chicane 1 Introduction & Overview O Compton polarimetry basics.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project  IR background issues and plans for Snowmass Jeff Gronberg/LLNL Linear Collider Workshop October 25, 2000.
K. LaihemE166 collaboration LCWS06 Bangalore March 12th 2006 The E166 experiment Development of a polarized positron source for the ILC. Karim Laihem on.
IPBI 6 April 05Ken Moffeit Polarimetry Design Updates - Dispersion in upstream chicane - 20mrad extraction line 0.75 mrad beam stay clear location of Synchrotron.
27 June 2006Ken Moffeit1 Comparison of 2mrad and 14/20 mrad extraction lines Ken Moffeit ILC BDS 27 June 06.
Undulator-Based Positron Production in the Final Focus Test Beam (E-166) K.T. McDonald, J.C. Sheppard, Co-Spokespersons SLAC Experimental Program Advisory.
K. Moffeit 6 Jan 2005 WORKSHOP Machine-Detector Interface at the International Linear Collider SLAC January 6-8, 2005 Polarimetry at the ILC Design issues.
Machine-Detector Interface MDI Panel Report MDI Panel is one of several World-Wide Study (WWS) panels (R&D, Detector costing, MDI, 2 IRs) Interim panel.
A.Seryi, Oct. 26, BDS comparison and positron source A.Seryi October 26, 2005 Discussion of BDS and positron source is given in [1] “Comment on.
20 March 2005Ken Moffeit LCWS1 Highlights from the MDI workshop Spin Rotation System for 2 IR’s Downstream polarimetry Ken Moffeit.
2 February 2005Ken Moffeit Spin Rotation scheme for two IRs Ken Moffeit SLAC.
Feed forward orbit corrections for the CLIC RTML R. Apsimon, A. Latina.
M. Woods (SLAC) Beam Diagnostics for test facilities of i)  ii) polarized e+ source January 9 –11, 2002.
Beam Delivery System Review of RDR(draft) 1.Overview 2.Beam parameters 3.System description 3.1 diagnostic, tune-up dump, machine protection MPS.
August 2005Snowmass Workshop IP Instrumentation Wolfgang Lohmann, DESY Measurement of: Luminosity (precise and fast) Energy Polarisation.
Ground Motion + Vibration Transfer Function for Final QD0/SD0 Cryomodule System at ILC Glen White, SLAC ALCPG11, Eugene March 21, 2011.
ILC RTML Lattice Design A.Vivoli, N. Solyak, V. Kapin Fermilab.
Relative Error on Parameter Pessimistic Estimate Optimistic Estimate β function at the LW 3% 1% LW readout error 2% 1% Laser spot waist 10% Laser Pointing.
Summary of the Working Groups - Polarization -  Technical Aspects Conveners: Gudrid Moortgat-Pick,Louis Rinolfi, Sabine Riemann, Valery Telnov International.
Simulation of Positron Production and Capturing. W. Gai, W. Liu, H. Wang and K. Kim Working with SLAC & DESY.
Beijing, Feb 3 rd, % e+ Poalarization 1 Physics with an initial positron polarisation of ≈30% Sabine Riemann (DESY)
ILC BCD Crossing Angle Issues G. A. Blair Royal Holloway Univ. London ECFA ILC Workshop, Vienna 14 th November 2005 Introduction BCD Crossing Angle Rankings.
A study of systematic uncertainties of Compton e-detector at JLab, Hall C and its cross calibration against Moller polarimeter APS April Meeting 2014 Amrendra.
COMPTON POLARIMETRY Collected data Cavity power Status on counting methods Systematic errors and hardware issues.
October 31, BDS Group1 ILC Beam Delivery System “Hybrid” Layout 2006e Release Preliminary M. Woodley.
Feed forward orbit corrections for the CLIC RTML R. Apsimon, A. Latina.
Polarimetry at the LC Source Which type of polarimetry, at which energies for LC ? Sabine Riemann (DESY), LEPOL Group International Workshop on Linear.
Helical Undulator Based Positron Source for LC Wanming Liu 05/29/2013.
1 Options for low energy spin manipulation Ken Moffeit, SLAC 2009 Linear Collider Workshop of the Americas 29 September to 3 October 2009 K. Moffeit, D.
1 The Longitudinal Polarimeter at HERA Electron Polarization at HERA Laser System & Calorimeter Statistical and Systematic Precision Laser Cavity Project.
Status of ILC BDS Design Deepa Angal-Kalinin ASTeC/Cockcroft Institute, Daresbury Laboratory Andrei Seryi SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory ILC-CLIC.
LCWS2004 Paris 1 Beam background study for GLC Tsukasa Aso, Toyama College of Maritime Technology and GLC Vertex Group H.Aihara, K.Tanabe, Tokyo Univ.
19 July 2006Ken Moffeit1 Comparison of 2mrad and 14/20 mrad extraction lines Ken Moffeit (via Eric Torrence) VLCW06 19 July 06.
Oct. 6, Summary of the Polarisation Session J. Clarke, G. Moortgat-Pick, S. Riemann 10 November 2006, ECFA Workshop, Valencia.
Spin Control and Transportation O. Adeyemi*, M. Beckmann**, V. Kovalenko*, L. Malysheva*, G. Moortgat-Pick*, S. Riemann**, A. Schälicke**, A. Ushakov**
EIC Compton detector update October 24 th 2014 Alexandre Camsonne.
Polarimetry Report Sabine Riemann on behalf of the DESY/HUB group January 24, 2008 EUROTeV Annual Meeting, Frascati.
Proton Charge Form Factor Measurement E. Cisbani INFN Rome – Sanità Group and Italian National Institute of Health 113/Oct/2011E. Cisbani / Proton FF.
October 20, 2006 Global Design Effort 1 ILC Interaction regions : The GDE perspective Talk based on several talks presented by BDS area leaders Andrei.
Fast or slow positron spin flipping Sabine Riemann (DESY) November 17, 2008 ILC08, University of Illinois - Chicago.
EIC Users Meeting, SBU, 6/27/14 Polarized Electron Beams in the MEIC at JLab Fanglei Lin for MEIC Study Group EIC Users Meeting, Stony Brook University,
ILC EXTRACTION LINE TRACKING Y. Nosochkov, E. Marin September 10, 2013.
Ken Moffeit SLAC LCWA09 1 Polarization Considerations for CLIC Ken Moffeit, SLAC 2009 Linear Collider Workshop of the Americas 29 September to 3 October.
For Layout of ILC , revised K.Kubo Based on following choices. Positron source: Prepare both conventional and undulator based. Place the.
29/10/09 Positron Workshop 1 Working Assumptions for Low Energy Operations Jim Clarke ASTeC & Cockcroft Institute Daresbury Laboratory.
IWLC10, 18 th -22 nd October10, CERN/CICG 1 Global Design Effort Updates to ILC RDR Beam Delivery System Deepa Angal-Kalinin & James Jones ASTeC, STFC.
Positron polarization at the ILC: RDR vs. SB2009 Sabine Riemann, DESY Zeuthen International Workshop on Linear Colliders 2010, Geneva October 25-29, 2010.
LCWS Paris – April 19-23, 2004 Polarimeter Issues K. Peter Schüler Polarimeter Issues 1 Polarimeter Studies for TESLA O General Considerations O.
ILC BDS Commissioning Glen White, SLAC AWLC 2014, Fermilab May 14 th 2014.
MAIN DUMP LINE: BEAM LOSS SIMULATIONS WITH THE TDR PARAMETERS Y. Nosochkov E. Marin, G. White (SLAC) LCWS14 Workshop, Belgrade, October 7, 2014.
Design challenges for head-on scheme Deepa Angal-Kalinin Orsay, 19 th October 2006.
Full-Acceptance & 2 nd Detector Region Designs V.S. Morozov on behalf of the JLEIC detector study group JLEIC Collaboration Meeting, JLab March 29-31,
A.P. Potylitsyn, I.S. Tropin Tomsk Polytechnic University,
Overview of Polarimetry
AD & I : BDS Lattice Design Changes
CLIC Undulator Option for Polarised Positrons
ILC BDS Emittance Diagnostics: Design and Requirements
At a Future Linear Collider
Status Report on E-166 Undulator-Based Production of Polarized Positrons K.T. McDonald Princeton University EPAC Meeting SLAC, November 15, 2003.
ILC Baseline Design: Physics with Polarized Positrons
Feed forward orbit corrections for the CLIC RTML
SuperB Workshop Frascati March 16, 2006
JLEIC Electron Ring Nonlinear Dynamics Work Plan
Presentation transcript:

1 Overview of Polarimetry Outline of Talk Polarized Physics Machine-Detector Interface Issues Upstream Polarimeter Downstream Polarimeter Ken Moffeit, SLAC ALCPG 2011 March 22, 2011

2

3 gain factor 1.4 gain factor 2 gain factor 1.6 (Pe - =80%, Pe + =60%) (Pe-=80%, Pe + =30%) Comparison with (Pe- =80%, Pe+ =0) estimated gain factor when Physics with polarized beams Cross section enhanced or reduced Positron Polarization important

4 ILC at 500 GeVCLIC at 1500 GeV

5 Two changes effecting polarization: 1)Undulator for positron production is at the end of the linac. 2)Location of the upstream polarimeter is now separated from the machine protection collimator, skew correction and emittance measurement.

6 Can polarization at 250GeV be increased above 22% by accepting fewer low energy positrons? Studies needed!

7 (b) Compton edge energy dependence on beam energy. Polarimetry uses Compton differential cross section on Compton edge (a) Compton differential cross section versus scattered electron energy for same (red curve) and opposite (green curve) helicity configuration of laser photon and beam electron. The beam energy is 250 GeV and the laser photon energy is 2.3 eV.

8 Schematic of the upstream polarimeter chicane.

9 Schematic of a single gas tube (left) and the complete hodoscope array covering the tapered exit window (right) as foreseen for the Cherekov detectors of both polarimeters.

10 Optical  functions and vertical momentum dispersion Dy in the 14 mrad extraction line from IP to the dump, shown for the 250 GeV nominal disrupted beam. Downstream extraction line Polarimeter Goal for Polarimeter Accuracy is <0.25%

11 Schematic of the ILC extraction line diagnostics for the energy spectrometer and the Compton polarimeter.

12 Machine-Detector Interface Issues BDS and Polarimeter Alignment CLIC  bend = 16.7  rad gives  spin = 28.3 mrad and cos (  spin ) =0.9996

13 Proposal: Add feedback system to keep orbit angle the same at the upstream polarimeter, interaction region and the downstream polarimeter.

14  The physics of the Compton scattering process is well understood in QED, with radiative corrections less than 0.1%  Detector backgrounds are easy to measure and correct for by using laser off pulses;  Polarimetry data can be taken simulatanously with physics data;  The Compton scattering rate is high and small statistical errors can be achieved in a short amount of time (sub-1% precision in one minute is feasible);  The laser helicity can be selected on a pulse-by-pulse basis;  The laser polarization is readily determined with 0.1% accuracy. Uncertainty dP/P Detector Analyzing Power0.2% Detector Linearity0.1% Laser Polarization0.1% Electronic Noise and Background Subtraction 0.05% TOTAL0.25% Systematic Errors Expected Polarimeter Systematic Errors

15 The Blondel scheme With 860 fb-1 of luminosity, the error on P e - ~ 0.1% and the error on P e + ~ 0.2%. Requires Positron Polarization

16 New Baseline: Undulator for positron production is at the end of the linac giving 30% polarized positrons at 150GeV and ~22% at 250GeV. Spin rotations systems for both electrons and positrons Does not have positron helicity flip randomly pulse train to pulse train Upstream and downstream polarimeters for both electrons and positrons. Both upstream and downstream polarimeters required. Physics benefit of having both polarimeters justifies $(10 to 15) million cost for either. Positron polarization of 30% improves physics reach (factor 2 in some reactions) Positron helicity flip important for systematic error reduction. Upstream Polarimeter Location of the upstream polarimeter is now separated from the machine protection collimator, skew correction and emittance measurement. Downstream Polarimeter The extraction line with six magnets improves the acceptance of the Compton scattered electrons. This allows detection over a larger part of the Compton electron energy spectra. The backscattered electrons are further away from the beam pipe by ~10 cm. Feedback Orbit through Compton IPs and e + e - IP needs active feedback to maintain orbit angle to ~25  m. Conclusions