Gaining a Competitive Advantage Cindy Alligood, Pam Truitt, Mary Alice Applegate  December 3, 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Carryover Allocations and 10% Test
Advertisements

Carryover Allocations and the 10% Test IPED Housing Tax Credits 101 October 16-17, 2008 By: Catherine E. Tenney, Esq.
HOPE VI Main Street Grants Contact Lawrence Gnessin Office of Public Housing Investments, Washington, DC
Homeowner Homebuyer Operating Rental 1.  $5,500,000 (including NAHTF & HOME funds) will be available within DED’s Annual Cycle.  Includes $360,000 for.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST PROHIBITION Michael Casper, Compliance Manager  September 4, 2014.
Award Review Process Presenter: Kadija Baffoe-Harding.
Prepared by the Office of Grants and Contracts1 COST SHARING.
HOPE VI Main Street Contact Lawrence Gnessin Office of Public Housing Investments, Washington Presented by Shawn M. Sweet Cleveland.
Cuyahoga County Department of Development 2010 Municipal Grant Seminar June 4, 2009 Middleburg Heights Community Center.
Project Application Process September 15th, 2013 Michelle Sandoz-Dennis Cares Inc.
The Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act Mary Alice Applegate, Field Services Representative  September 4, 2014.
2011 CDBG Applicants’ Workshop Important Reminders for 2011.
2010 DCA CDBG Applicants’ Workshop New for 2010 & Important Reminders.
MRWA 2013 ANNUAL CONFERENCE MAINE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) PROGRAM.
Downtown Revitalization Overview OBJECTIVES Provide for investments in Nebraska communities that will contribute to the revitalization or redevelopment.
Regional Development Australia Fund Round Two Guidelines Overview This presentation is intended as an overview only. For the full guidelines visit
CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION Preconstruction Operations Dr. Alaattin Kanoğlu Spring, 2013 Professional Practice Management I.B.U. Architecture Undergraduate.
CDBG Compliance Lite Michael Casper and Pam Truitt December 3, 2014.
2013 CDBG Applicants’ Workshop 2013 Applicants’ Workshop CDBG COMPLIANCE LITE.
Marcy Mealy Procurement Specialist CDBG Program
3 CDBG Workshop Tuesday, November 26, Planning Grants $1.3 million available Awarded monthly 1 Original and 1 Copy Letters of Intent Projects/applications.
1.  CDBG: Owner-Occupied Rehab.,  Special projects to remove physical barriers for elderly and handicapped persons. 2.
SURVIVING A MONITORING VISIT Mary Alice Applegate, Field Representative  September 4, 2014.
2009 CDBG/CHIP Recipients’ Workshop Welcome to the COMPLIANCE SESSION ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS Afternoon session will cover new CHIP FEDERAL LABOR STANDARDS.
Cuyahoga County Department of Development 2009 Municipal Grant Seminar June 17, 2008 Mayfield Village Civic Center COMMISSIONERS Jimmy Dimora Timothy.
Circular A-110 Everything You Didn’t Want to Know.
Office of Business Development Training
Partnership Agreements Delegation of SBA’s Contract Execution Authority to other Federal Government Agencies.
Page CDBG Recipients' Workshop Community Finance Division NEPA Environmental Procedures.
2009 CDBG/CHIP Recipients’ Workshop CDBG LABOR STANDARDS.
CDBG Labor Standards Tonya Mole, Pam Truitt  September 4, 2014.
COMPLIANCE WITH GRANT IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURES TxDot Grant Fund Project.
CED Application Reviewer Training Module 6: Budget and Budget Justification June 2012.
Solving the Matching Dilemma Session 32 Tuesday, May 24, 2011 National Extension and Research Officers Administrative Conference Anchorage, Alaska.
3 CDBG Disaster Recovery Program Information Workshop Monday, February 1, 2010.
3 CDBG Disaster Recovery Workshop Tuesday, March 20, 2012.
State of Georgia Neighborhood Stabilization Program Goals.
Grant Financial Management U.S. Department of Commerce Officer of the Inspector General 1.
2014 CDBG Applicants' Workshop Gaining a Competitive Advantage.
1 Procurement. 2 Overview Every municipality should keep procurement records that allow an auditor or other interested party to track the specific nature.
NEPA Environmental Procedure Pam Truitt, Grants Specialist  September 10, 2015.
3 CDBG Disaster Recovery Appropriation # 2 Workshop Thursday, April 2, 2009.
Casey Moore, CDBG Field Services Representative September 10, 2015 Surviving a Monitoring Visit.
Monitoring Region 3 Discretionary Roundtable May 20 – 23, 2008 Mary Evans And Conyers Garrett EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT.
2013 CDBG Recipients' Workshop CONFLICT OF INTEREST PROHIBITION.
2009 DCA CDBG/CHIP Applicants’ Workshop 2009 Applicants’ Workshop CDBG COMPLIANCE.
COMMUNITY FOOD COMPETITIVE GRANTS PROGRAM Award Information Webinar Thursday, October 22, 2015 Awards Management Division Office of Grants and Financial.
Proposition 1 Workshop: the Grant Application Process July 2015.
2015 HUD Continuum of Care NOFA Bidder’s Conference 1.Review of Community Input Session 2.Local Process and Strategic Changes 3.Application Highlights.
CDBG Compliance Lite Michael Casper and Pam Truitt December 2, 2015.
Immediate Threat and Danger Program Pam Truitt  September 10, 2015.
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL on behalf of DIVISION OF DISABILITY & REHABILITATIVE SERVICES.
PY 2005 Grant Officer Overview U.S. Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration Office of Grant and Contracts Management.
2013 CDBG Recipients' Workshop CDBG Labor Standards.
2011 CDBG Applicants’ Workshop Rating and Selection: How the panels score Feasibility, Strategy, Impact, and Bonus Points.
Stockton University Purchasing and Grants 11/4/15.
LPA Program Federal-aid Issues for Local Agencies Mike Morrow – December 10, 2010.
2010 DCA CDBG Applicants’ Workshop 2010 Applicants’ Workshop CDBG COMPLIANCE.
Introduction to Procurement for Public Housing Authorities Sealed Bids Unit 5.
Consolidated Plan Programs Universal Application Process Budget & Financial Analysis Mandatory Workshop March 24, :00 p.m. 1 Laura Stagner Director.
Copyright © Texas Education Agency Matching and Cost-Share Requirements Allowable Items and Accounting for Cost Share.
Introduction to Procurement for Public Housing Authorities Getting Started: Basic Administrative Requirements Unit 1.
3 CDBG Disaster Recovery Waterway Debris Program Wednesday, January 13, 2010.
Governor’s Office of Emergency Services 1 The Governor’s Office of Emergency Services Application and Benefit Cost Analysis (BCA) Training.
Steed Robinson, Office of Community Development
Downtown Commercial Rehabilitation
Construction Oversight
What PIs working on federally sponsored projects need to know.
What PIs working on federally sponsored projects need to know.
Procurement.
Presentation transcript:

Gaining a Competitive Advantage Cindy Alligood, Pam Truitt, Mary Alice Applegate  December 3, 2014

Leverage  Leverage includes additional resources committed to and directly related to the CDBG project  Includes cash above the required minimum cash match amount  Purchase with non-CDBG funds of new equipment and furnishings for buildings proposed to be constructed with CDBG funds (used equipment is not counted toward leverage)  Cost of conducting housing surveys in conjunction with the Programmatic Agreement on Historic Preservation

Leverage (cont.)  Costs of preliminary engineering and architectural reports  Costs of CDBG application preparation  Additional grants and loans from other sources that address the applicants identified community development needs.  Up to $1,000 may be counted toward leverage if the applicant commits to paying for required audits without using CDBG resources for this effort.

Leverage (continued)  Commitment must be in writing by the appropriate party and the amount committed must be specified.  Only items that would not otherwise have been provided and that are directly related to the proposed CDBG project will be counted.  A "reasonable" value must be assigned to donated and "in-kind" items and the basis for the value assigned or claimed must be fully described and documented.

Leverage (continued)  Land currently owned by an applicant may be donated to the project and be counted as leverage provided the value of the land is well documented (appraisal, tax value, etc.) and the documentation is included in the application.  Land donated to the project that exceeds project needs will not be counted in full.  The labor of volunteers may be counted toward leverage provided the applicant provides reasonable documentation for labor hours and the value of labor per hour See manual for additional information

Bonus Points for Readiness to Proceed  A maximum of 5 bonus points may be earned through the demonstration of a project’s readiness to proceed.  Points may be earned through documentation in the application that:  Procurement documents/processes are ready to proceed  NEPA review and required notices for wetlands and floodplains have been completed  All real-estate (including easements and right of ways) needed for the project has been acquired in accordance with applicable requirements and is available for the project;  All engineering and architectural plans are finalized and have been submitted to the appropriate local, state or federal authorities  Contract documents are finalized and have been submitted to the appropriate local authorities.

Bonus Points (continued)  Procurement. This bonus point refers to procurement of professional services in accord with all DCA requirements.  If either the grant administrator or the architect/engineer is procured, ½ bonus point will be assigned.  If both are procured, a full bonus point will be assigned.  Remember Section 3 for professional services procurement  Required Documentation  Any required advertisements and the local resolution or copies of certified minutes showing which firm(s) has been selected.

Bonus Points (continued)  Acquisition Activities. A full bonus point will be given if all needed acquisition activities are complete or if the project does not require acquisition.  Required Documentation  Deed or other evidence of property ownership.  If acquisition is not required, the applicant must submit a letter from its chief elected official indicating it is not required.  Remember that all property acquired in anticipation of the proposed CDBG project regardless of the source of funding is subject to URA requirements. Non- compliance with URA requirements could lead to ineligible and non-reimbursable costs.

Bonus Points (continued)  Architectural and Engineering Plans. To earn a bonus point under this criterion, applicants must have completed the design phase of the project and must have submitted the finished plans to the appropriate local, state or federal authorities.  Required Documentation  A letter from the architect or engineer stating that the design of the project is complete and listing the agencies to which the plans have been submitted along with agency contact information.  Plans should not be submitted to DCA.

Bonus Points (continued)  Contract Documents. To earn a bonus point under this criterion, applicants must have completed the design and the bid and construction document phase of the project and the project must be ready for bid with the exception of final approval by the appropriate local, state or federal authorities.  Required Documentation  A letter from its chief elected official stating that the project is ready for bid and listing the agencies to which the contract documents have been submitted along with agency contact information.  Contract documents should not be submitted to DCA.

Bonus Points (continued)  Bonus points should be claimed on DCA-5.  A brief narrative should be included in DCA-5 stating the bonus points claimed and the rationale for claiming the points.  DCA-5 should clearly reference all documentation attached to the application that demonstrates accomplishment of the bonus point thresholds outlined above.  DCA reserves the right to assign a bonus point of ½ to any bonus point threshold if an applicant demonstrates partial accomplishment of the bonus point threshold.

CDBG Revitalization Strategies - RAS Program Scoring Threshold – 5 points Economic Development Tools – 5 points Collaboration – up to 5 points Investment Partnerships – up to 5 points