October 19, 2000ACAT 2000, Fermilab, Suman B. Beri Top Quark Mass Measurements Using Neural Networks Suman B. Beri, Rajwant Kaur Panjab University, India.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ACAT05 May , 2005 DESY, Zeuthen, Germany Search for the Higgs boson at LHC by using Genetic Algorithms Mostafa MJAHED Ecole Royale de l’Air, Mathematics.
Advertisements

Regina Demina, University of Rochester 05/15/2013 Top-antitop production in pbar-p collisions.
Investigation on Higgs physics Group Ye Li Graduate Student UW - Madison.
Search for Top Flavor Changing Neutral Current Decay t → qZ Ingyin Zaw DOE Review August 21, 2006.
First look of ME study on ttH(  bb) channel Univ. of Tokyo Y.Kataoka
Tau dilepton channel The data sample used in this analysis comprises high-p T inclusive lepton events that contain an electron with E T >20 GeV or a muon.
Higgs Searches using Vector Boson Fusion. 2 Why a “Low Mass” Higgs (1) M H
Summary of Results and Projected Sensitivity The Lonesome Top Quark Aran Garcia-Bellido, University of Washington Single Top Quark Production By observing.
Summary of Results and Projected Precision Rediscovering the Top Quark Marc-André Pleier, Universität Bonn Top Quark Pair Production and Decay According.
Recent Electroweak Results from the Tevatron Weak Interactions and Neutrinos Workshop Delphi, Greece, 6-11 June, 2005 Dhiman Chakraborty Northern Illinois.
Top Turns Ten March 2 nd, Measurement of the Top Quark Mass The Low Bias Template Method using Lepton + jets events Kevin Black, Meenakshi Narain.
Kevin Black Meenakshi Narain Boston University
Top Physics at the Tevatron Mike Arov (Louisiana Tech University) for D0 and CDF Collaborations 1.
The new Silicon detector at RunIIb Tevatron II: the world’s highest energy collider What’s new?  Data will be collected from 5 to 15 fb -1 at  s=1.96.
Higgs Searches at LEP2 E. Kneringer University of Innsbruck / Austria Collaboration LAKE LOUISE WINTER INSTITUTE Electroweak Physics February 1999.
Bayesian Neural Networks Pushpa Bhat Fermilab Harrison Prosper Florida State University.
S. Martí i García Liverpool December 02 1 Selection of events in the all-hadronic channel S. Martí i García CDF End Of Year Review Liverpool / December.
Search for resonances The fingerprints of the Top Quark Jessica Levêque, University of Arizona Top Quark Mass Measurement Top Turns Ten Symposium, Fermilab,
Harrison B. Prosper Workshop on Top Physics, Grenoble Bayesian Statistics in Analysis Harrison B. Prosper Florida State University Workshop on Top Physics:
W properties AT CDF J. E. Garcia INFN Pisa. Outline Corfu Summer Institute Corfu Summer Institute September 10 th 2 1.CDF detector 2.W cross section measurements.
Irakli Chakaberia Final Examination April 28, 2014.
1 A Preliminary Model Independent Study of the Reaction pp  qqWW  qq ℓ qq at CMS  Gianluca CERMINARA (SUMMER STUDENT)  MUON group.
Use of Multivariate Analysis (MVA) Technique in Data Analysis Rakshya Khatiwada 08/08/2007.
KIRTI RANJANDIS, Madison, Wisconsin, April 28, Top Quark Production Cross- Section at the Tevatron Collider On behalf of DØ & CDF Collaboration KIRTI.
Study of the to Dilepton Channel with the Total Transverse Energy Kinematic Variable Athens, April 17 th 2003 Victoria Giakoumopoulou University of Athens,
HERA-LHC, CERN Oct Preliminary study of Z+b in ATLAS /1 A preliminary study of Z+b production in ATLAS The D0 measurement of  (Z+b)/  (Z+jet)
24 June Thoughts on Jet Corrections in Top Quark Decays Outline: 1. List of some issues regarding jets 2. Figures of merit 3. Eg: Underlying Event.
LCWS14, Belgrade, October M. Pandurović, H→WW at 350 GeV and 1.4 TeV CLIC Measurement of H→WW* in HZ at 350 GeV and WW fusion at 1.4 TeV CLIC.
B-Tagging Algorithms for CMS Physics
Report on LHT at the LHC ~ Some results from simulation study ~ Shigeki Matsumoto (Univ. of Toyama) 1.What kinds of LHT signals are expected, and how accurately.
DPF2000, 8/9-12/00 p. 1Richard E. Hughes, The Ohio State UniversityHiggs Searches in Run II at CDF Prospects for Higgs Searches at CDF in Run II DPF2000.
Measurements of Top Quark Properties at Run II of the Tevatron Erich W.Varnes University of Arizona for the CDF and DØ Collaborations International Workshop.
Chapter 20 Classification and Estimation Classification – Feature selection Good feature have four characteristics: –Discrimination. Features.
Feasibility of Detecting Leptoquarks With the CDF Detector Althea Moorhead Mentor: Darin Acosta.
Top mass error predictions with variable JES for projected luminosities Joshua Qualls Centre College Mentor: Michael Wang.
Emily Nurse W production and properties at CDF0. Emily Nurse W production and properties at CDF1 The electron and muon channels are used to measure W.
Study of pair-produced doubly charged Higgs bosons with a four muon final state at the CMS detector (CMS NOTE 2006/081, Authors : T.Rommerskirchen and.
Leptoquark Searches at DØ DDDD  Search for Leptoquark at D  using Neural Networks Silvia Tentindo-Repond Florida State University for the  D  Collaboration.
Lake Louise (February 2002) Ivo van Vulpen 1 Z boson pair production Ivo van Vulpen Outline: LEP and its operation between ZZ production & final.
Update on WH to 3 lepton Analysis And Electron Trigger Efficiencies with Tag And Probe Nishu 1, Suman B. Beri 1, Guillelmo Gomez Ceballos 2 1 Panjab University,
By Henry Brown Henry Brown, LHCb, IOP 10/04/13 1.
Alexei Safonov (Texas A&M University) For the CDF Collaboration.
Susan Burke DØ/University of Arizona DPF 2006 Measurement of the top pair production cross section at DØ using dilepton and lepton + track events Susan.
1 Measurement of the Mass of the Top Quark in Dilepton Channels at DØ Jeff Temple University of Arizona for the DØ collaboration DPF 2006.
Single top quark physics Peter Dong, UCLA on behalf of the CDF and D0 collaborations Les Rencontres de Physique de la Vallee d’Aoste Wednesday, February.
April 7, 2008 DIS UCL1 Tevatron results Heidi Schellman for the D0 and CDF Collaborations.
Kinematics of Top Decays in the Dilepton and the Lepton + Jets channels: Probing the Top Mass University of Athens - Physics Department Section of Nuclear.
Jessica Levêque Rencontres de Moriond QCD 2006 Page 1 Measurement of Top Quark Properties at the TeVatron Jessica Levêque University of Arizona on behalf.
La Thuile, March, 15 th, 2003 f Makoto Tomoto ( FNAL ) Prospects for Higgs Searches at DØ Makoto Tomoto Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (For the.
Stano Tokar, slide 1 Top into Dileptons Stano Tokar Comenius University, Bratislava With a kind permissison of the CDF top group Dec 2004 RTN Workshop.
1 UCSD Meeting Calibration of High Pt Hadronic W Haifeng Pi 10/16/2007 Outline Introduction High Pt Hadronic W in TTbar and Higgs events Reconstruction.
SEARCH FOR DIRECT PRODUCTION OF SUPERSYMMETRIC PAIRS OF TOP QUARKS AT √ S = 8 TEV, WITH ONE LEPTON IN THE FINAL STATE. Juan Pablo Gómez Cardona PhD Candidate.
Single Top Quark Production at D0, L. Li (UC Riverside) EPS 2007, July Liang Li University of California, Riverside On Behalf of the DØ Collaboration.
A Precision Measurement of the Mass of the Top Quark Abazov, V. M. et al. (D0 Collaboration). Nature 429, (2004) Presented by: Helen Coyle.
Viktor Veszpremi Purdue University, CDF Collaboration Tev4LHC Workshop, Oct , Fermilab ZH->vvbb results from CDF.
Search for Standard Model Higgs in ZH  l + l  bb channel at DØ Shaohua Fu Fermilab For the DØ Collaboration DPF 2006, Oct. 29 – Nov. 3 Honolulu, Hawaii.
Suyong Choi (SKKU) SUSY Standard Model Higgs Searches at DØ Suyong Choi SKKU, Korea for DØ Collaboration.
Investigation on CDF Top Physics Group Ye Li Graduate Student UW - Madison.
American Physical Society Meeting St. Louis, MO April th, 2008 Measuring the top mass at DØ using the Ideogram Method Amnon Harel
1 Donatella Lucchesi July 22, 2010 Standard Model High Mass Higgs Searches at CDF Donatella Lucchesi For the CDF Collaboration University and INFN of Padova.
Top mass measurements at the Tevatron
Electroweak Physics Lecture 6
on top mass measurement based on B had decay length
First Evidence for Electroweak Single Top Quark Production
Venkat Kaushik, Jae Yu University of Texas at Arlington
Observation of Diffractively Produced W- and Z-Bosons
Top mass measurements at the Tevatron and the standard model fits
Measurement of the Single Top Production Cross Section at CDF
Susan Burke, University of Arizona
Presentation transcript:

October 19, 2000ACAT 2000, Fermilab, Suman B. Beri Top Quark Mass Measurements Using Neural Networks Suman B. Beri, Rajwant Kaur Panjab University, India Pushpalatha Bhat Fermilab Harrison B. Prosper Florida State University

October 19, 2000ACAT 2000, Fermilab, Suman B. Beri Outline Introduction Neural Networks Event Simulation Preliminary Studies Summary

October 19, 2000ACAT 2000, Fermilab, Suman B. Beri Introduction Run I, 1995, March 2: Discovery m t = 176 ± 17 GeV/c 2 (CDF) m t = 199 ± 30 GeV/c 2 (DØ) 1999, Combined Mass m t = 174 ± 5 GeV/c 2 (CDF+ DØ) Run II, (2001…) ? m t = 174 ± ? GeV/c 2

October 19, 2000ACAT 2000, Fermilab, Suman B. Beri Why Measure The Top Mass? from which we can infer something about the Higgs mass According to the Standard Model quantum corrections to the W and Z boson masses induce a relationship Corrections to W and Z mass

October 19, 2000ACAT 2000, Fermilab, Suman B. Beri Measuring the Top Mass 100 In Run II we expect about 100 times more data than was collected in Run I. reduce systematic errors The main task is to reduce systematic errors so that we can benefit from the reduction in statistical errors Goal to determine m t as accurately as possible by making optimal use of information using as many decay modes as possible several methods using several methods to cross-check the results exploring different methods which may yield smaller systematic errors.

October 19, 2000ACAT 2000, Fermilab, Suman B. Beri Feed-Forward Neural Networks x1x1 x2x2 x3x3 x4x4 Use non-linear transfer function (e.g., sigmoid)

October 19, 2000ACAT 2000, Fermilab, Suman B. Beri Training simply means minimizing the error function Training Neural Networks n(x i,  ) = network function x i = feature vector for pattern i, where i = 1,…N patterns  = weights d k = desired output for pattern i, where k =1,.. M classes

October 19, 2000ACAT 2000, Fermilab, Suman B. Beri P(k)Prior probability P(k) = Prior probability Pr(x|k)Likelihood Pr(x|k) = Likelihood ( Probability to get x given that x belongs to k) P(k|x)Posterior probability P(k|x) = Posterior probability ( Probability to belong to k given x) A Bit of Bayes!

October 19, 2000ACAT 2000, Fermilab, Suman B. Beri If d k d k = 0 for class k = 1 (e.g., background) d k d k = 1 for class k = 2 (e.g., signal) Then Special Case: Classification Reduces to

October 19, 2000ACAT 2000, Fermilab, Suman B. Beri Neural Networks in Run I and II Run I Used by DØ to discriminate signal from background Used in the lepton + jets channel for top quark mass measurement Run II Can they be used to measure masses? Test some ideas using the e-  channel

October 19, 2000ACAT 2000, Fermilab, Suman B. Beri The e-  channel The e-  channel Pbar b b t b b t P

October 19, 2000ACAT 2000, Fermilab, Suman B. Beri Branching fractions ee   ee ee  e+ jets  jets  jets 6 jets 44.4% 1.25% 2.5% 14.8% +jets

October 19, 2000ACAT 2000, Fermilab, Suman B. Beri Characteristics of e-  Events Signature Two isolated, high p T leptons Significant missing transverse energy 2 jets from b quarks Branching fraction ~ 2.4 %

October 19, 2000ACAT 2000, Fermilab, Suman B. Beri Event Simulation Tools Tools : Pythia to generate events SHW 2.3 to model detector (John Conway) MLPfit 1.4 to train networks Python interface to above toolsSignal Top events (100 to 250 GeV in steps 10 GeV)Backgrounds Z   +  -  e  WW  e 

October 19, 2000ACAT 2000, Fermilab, Suman B. Beri Event Variables Variables Variables : x 1 = f(e,b 1 ) x 2 = f( ,b 2 ) x 3 = f(e,b 2 ) x 4 = f( ,b 1 ) where End-point occurs at the top mass if b quark and the lepton are correctly paired End-point occurs at the top mass if b quark and the lepton are correctly paired

October 19, 2000ACAT 2000, Fermilab, Suman B. Beri Distributions: Correct/Wrong Pairing blue Parton-level (blue) distributions compared to distributions at the red reconstruction-level (red). We see that these variables are insensitive to jet energy scale uncertainties and fragmentation Also, note the sharp end-point when the b and lepton are correctly paired.

October 19, 2000ACAT 2000, Fermilab, Suman B. Beri Distributions: Reconstruction Level We have not yet devised a method to pair the lepton and b quark with high probability. For now we take all pairings of leptons and b quarks.

October 19, 2000ACAT 2000, Fermilab, Suman B. Beri Combining Variables using NN Use NN to create a single mass-dependent variable y from the variables x 1 to x 4 Training Training: 500 events/top mass (100 to 250 in steps of 10) Target output d k = top quark mass 200 epochs

October 19, 2000ACAT 2000, Fermilab, Suman B. Beri Neural Network Output Distributions 160 GeV 169 ± GeV 175 ± GeV 181 ± GeV 186 ± 25 GeV

October 19, 2000ACAT 2000, Fermilab, Suman B. Beri Mean NN output vs Top Mass The distortions are caused by edge effects, that is, restriction to a finite range. Need to deal with this.

October 19, 2000ACAT 2000, Fermilab, Suman B. Beri Some thoughts about how to proceed Let y = be the NN output. Let P(y|m t ) denote the probability to get y given the true top mass m t. Use Bayes’ theorem to invert probability: Use position of max[P(m t |y] as top mass estimate

October 19, 2000ACAT 2000, Fermilab, Suman B. Beri Summary The challenge in Run II will be to reduce substantially the systematic uncertainties. We are conducting a systematic study of neural network based methods of mass measurement. This is just the beginning. From our success in Run I we are hopeful that our current efforts will be fruitful.