AT&T Government Solutions, Inc. Patrick Emery Lewis Hart or

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dr. Leo Obrst MITRE Information Semantics Information Discovery & Understanding Command & Control Center February 6, 2014February 6, 2014February 6, 2014.
Advertisements

19 July 2001 Lewis Hart GRC International, an AT&T Company.
HotDAML Driven Information Push The objective of HotDDIP is to provide content based knowledge management and distribution for a stream of DAML annotated.
Meta Data Larry, Stirling md on data access – data types, domain meta-data discovery Scott, Ohio State – caBIG md driven architecture semantic md Alexander.
CACORE TOOLS FEATURES. caCORE SDK Features caCORE Workbench Plugin EA/ArgoUML Plug-in development Integrated support of semantic integration in the plugin.
Schema Matching and Query Rewriting in Ontology-based Data Integration Zdeňka Linková ICS AS CR Advisor: Július Štuller.
The 20th International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering (SEKE2008) Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering
CH-4 Ontologies, Querying and Data Integration. Introduction to RDF(S) RDF stands for Resource Description Framework. RDF is a standard for describing.
© 2006 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice Use Case: Populating Business Objects.
16/11/ IRS-II: A Framework and Infrastructure for Semantic Web Services Motta, Domingue, Cabral, Gaspari Presenter: Emilia Cimpian.
Interoperability of Distributed Component Systems Bryan Bentz, Jason Hayden, Upsorn Praphamontripong, Paul Vandal.
Multi-Phase Reasoning of temporal semantic knowledge Sakirulai O. Isiaq and Taha Osman School of Computer and Informatics Nottingham Trent University Nottingham.
SPICE! An Ontology Based Web Application By Angela Maduko and Felicia Jones Final Presentation For CSCI8350: Enterprise Integration.
©Ian Sommerville 2004Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 8 Slide 1 System modeling 2.
Using the Semantic Web to Construct an Ontology- Based Repository for Software Patterns Scott Henninger Computer Science and Engineering University of.
TU/e technische universiteit eindhoven Hypermedia Presentation Adaptation on the Semantic Web Flavius Frasincar Geert-Jan Houben
Building Enterprise Applications Using Visual Studio ®.NET Enterprise Architect.
Oct 31, 2000Database Management -- Fall R. Larson Database Management: Introduction to Terms and Concepts University of California, Berkeley School.
Annotating Documents for the Semantic Web Using Data-Extraction Ontologies Dissertation Proposal Yihong Ding.
1 Extracting RDF Data from Unstructured Sources Based on an RDF Target Schema Tim Chartrand Research Supported By NSF.
11/8/20051 Ontology Translation on the Semantic Web D. Dou, D. McDermott, P. Qi Computer Science, Yale University Presented by Z. Chen CIS 607 SII, Week.
/ faculty of mathematics and informatics TU/e eindhoven university of technology ADBIS'200128/09/20011 An RMM-Based Methodology for Hypermedia Presentation.
The information integration wizard (Iwiz) project Report on work in progress Joachim Hammer Presented by Muhammed Al-Muhammed.
MDC Open Information Model West Virginia University CS486 Presentation Feb 18, 2000 Lijian Liu (OIM:
Knowledge Mediation in the WWW based on Labelled DAGs with Attached Constraints Jutta Eusterbrock WebTechnology GmbH.
OMAP: An Implemented Framework for Automatically Aligning OWL Ontologies SWAP, December, 2005 Raphaël Troncy, Umberto Straccia ISTI-CNR
XML, distributed databases, and OLAP/warehousing The semantic web and a lot more.
Knowledge Management in Geodise Geodise Knowledge Management Team Liming Chen, Barry Tao, Colin Puleston, Paul Smart University of Southampton University.
Managing & Integrating Enterprise Data with Semantic Technologies Susie Stephens Principal Product Manager, Oracle
Information Integration Intelligence with TopBraid Suite SemTech, San Jose, Holger Knublauch
BiodiversityWorld GRID Workshop NeSC, Edinburgh – 30 June and 1 July 2005 Metadata Agents and Semantic Mediation Mikhaila Burgess Cardiff University.
An Integrated Approach to Extracting Ontological Structures from Folksonomies Huairen Lin, Joseph Davis, Ying Zhou ESWC 2009 Hyewon Lim October 9 th, 2009.
1 Overview of Databases. 2 Content Databases Example: Access Structure Query language (SQL)
Knowledge representation
Peer-to-Peer Data Integration Using Distributed Bridges Neal Arthorne B. Eng. Computer Systems (2002) Supervisor: Babak Esfandiari April 12, 2005 Candidate.
Introduction to MDA (Model Driven Architecture) CYT.
WebODE and its Ontology Management APIs. April 8th © Ontology Engineering Group WebODE and its Ontology Management APIs Ontology Engineering Group.
Master Informatique 1 Semantic Technologies Part 11Direct Mapping Werner Nutt.
Development Process and Testing Tools for Content Standards OASIS Symposium: The Meaning of Interoperability May 9, 2006 Simon Frechette, NIST.
Metadata. Generally speaking, metadata are data and information that describe and model data and information For example, a database schema is the metadata.
Coastal Atlas Interoperability - Ontologies (Advanced topics that we did not get to in detail) Luis Bermudez Stephanie Watson Marine Metadata Interoperability.
Semantic Web - an introduction By Daniel Wu (danielwujr)
The Prajna Project Utilities for Understanding Edward Swing.
XML Schema Integration Ray Dos Santos July 19, 2009.
©Ferenc Vajda 1 Semantic Grid Ferenc Vajda Computer and Automation Research Institute Hungarian Academy of Sciences.
Interoperability & Knowledge Sharing Advisor: Dr. Sudha Ram Dr. Jinsoo Park Kangsuk Kim (former MS Student) Yousub Hwang (Ph.D. Student)
Selena Extension Christian Brand Eckart Langhuth Matthias Metzler
© Geodise Project, University of Southampton, Knowledge Management in Geodise Geodise Knowledge Management Team Barry Tao, Colin Puleston, Liming.
Group A Next Generation Information Access Group.
Text Mining & NLP based Algorithm to populate ontology with A-Box individuals and object properties Alexandre Kouznetsov and Christopher J. O. Baker, University.
User Profiling using Semantic Web Group members: Ashwin Somaiah Asha Stephen Charlie Sudharshan Reddy.
Of 33 lecture 1: introduction. of 33 the semantic web vision today’s web (1) web content – for human consumption (no structural information) people search.
© 2006 Altova GmbH. All Rights Reserved. Altova ® Product Line Overview.
Dictionary based interchanges for iSURF -An Interoperability Service Utility for Collaborative Supply Chain Planning across Multiple Domains David Webber.
Distributed Data Analysis & Dissemination System (D-DADS ) Special Interest Group on Data Integration June 2000.
BI Practice March-2006 COGNOS 8BI TOOLS COGNOS 8 Framework Manager TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES SEEPZ, Mumbai.
1 Open Ontology Repository initiative - Planning Meeting - Thu Co-conveners: PeterYim, LeoObrst & MikeDean ref.:
Manufacturing Systems Integration Division Development Process and Testing Tools for Content Standards Simon Frechette National Institute of Standards.
A Portrait of the Semantic Web in Action Jeff Heflin and James Hendler IEEE Intelligent Systems December 6, 2010 Hyewon Lim.
CoRD Meeting 12 March 2003 STIPES (Lot 4) STIPES = Statistical Inquiries from Popular European Software.
ISO TC37/SC4 N435 Nov 12, 2007 Presented by Miran Choi/ETRI Written by Jae Sung Lee/Chungbuk National Univ.
Semantic Interoperability in GIS N. L. Sarda Suman Somavarapu.
Viewpoint Modeling and Model-Based Media Generation for Systems Engineers Automatic View and Document Generation for Scalable Model- Based Engineering.
Mechanisms for Requirements Driven Component Selection and Design Automation 최경석.
Building Enterprise Applications Using Visual Studio®
Comparative Data Analysis Ontology (CDAO)
Building Trustworthy Semantic Webs
Collaborative Vocabulary Management
Lecture #11: Ontology Engineering Dr. Bhavani Thuraisingham
Piotr Kaminski University of Victoria September 24th, 2002
Presentation transcript:

AT&T Government Solutions, Inc. Patrick Emery Lewis Hart or

2 Overview Key Ideas The CODIP program provides frameworks and components for intelligent processing of information based on its semantics.  Distribution of information from publishers to subscribers using subscriber defined semantic queries.  Automatic generation of semantic mapping between ontologies to facilitate database integration, content translation and distribution.  Application of a UML technology to leverage existing resources to provide knowledge engineering capability.  Ontological processing components and services that can bring built-in knowledge processing capability to applications.

3 Overview Applications and Products  Primary products support these applications: –Duet to support visualization, application and management of ontologies using the UML/MOF engineering standards, –Kage to support applications with analysis, translation, and repository functionality, –ODKD for semantics based publication of information to subscribers, and –Artic to support using multiple ontologies concurrently by finding and codifying relationships between their concepts.  These products are built from library of reusable components that may be integrated into other applications.

4 Artic Functional Architecture  Knowledge Access Engine – Provides management and access to collections of ontologies.  Ontology Mapping Engine –Provides automated analysis of potential mappings between ontologies and builds articulation ontologies that codify the mappings.  Artic Service –Provides APIs, command line and web based access to the mapping engine. Ontology Mapping Engine Duet Other Tools Articulation Ontology API Source Ontologies Knowledge Access Engine Artic Service A P I

5 Artic Ontology Mapping Engine  Multiple Layers –Non-procedural rules and procedural processors, invoked by rules.  Multiple Phases –Analysis, Match Factors, Matches. MF Rule MF Rule MF Rule MF Rule Language Processors MF Rule Match Rule Match Rule Match Rule Match Rule Match Rule Knowledge-base Lexical Processors Structure Processors Other Processors Ana Rule Ana Rule Ana Rule Ana Rule Ana Rule Articulation Kage Seed Object Ontology Subject Ontology Reference Ontologies

6 Articulation Ontologies  Articulations are specialized ontologies that relate concepts in other ontologies. – Relationships of various types: » Similarity, Part-Of, Kind- Of, Temporal, Spatial, and Domain Specific. – Multiplicity may be 1:1, 1:M, M:1 or M:M –Variable ‘strength’. –May include conversion rules, which may be one-way. Articulation Area Target Ontology Length Width Source Ontology Convertible _To Conversion Rule: subject.Area := Source.Width *Source.Length Same_As Out In

7 Example Match Simple, ‘Perfect’ <Match kind”=“owl:sameIndividualAs” rdf:about="artic2659" strength="10.00" > <MatchFactor rdf:about="artic1913" detail="BoatWidth" kind="EX_NM_MTCH:ele_nm" strength="7"> MatchFactor rdf:about="artic2271” detail="Boat width in meters rounded up." kind="PHRASE_MTCH:ele_defn" strength="10"> <MatchFactor rdf:about="artic2341" detail="FLOAT8" kind="EX_DT_MTCH:ele_data_type" strength="2"> <MatchFactor rdf:about="artic2394" detail="BoatWidth" kind="EX_NM_MTCH:ele_access_nm" strength="6"> BoatWidth file:Shipyard_2.owl#genid308 BoatWidth file:Shipyard_3.owl#genid311 owl:equivalentTo reasons

8 Articulation Example Structural, Imperfect Match Structural Match Matching elements found in matching tables generate reciprocal factors WorkOrder file:Shipyard_2.owl#genid662 WorkOrder file:Shipyard_3.owl#genid735 owl:equivalentTo <Match kind”=“owl:sameIndividualAs” rdf:about="artic3027" strength="8.60" > WorkOrderID file:Shipyard_2.owl#genid308 OrderID file:Shipyard_3.owl#genid342 owl:equivalentTo <Match kind”=“owl:sameIndividualAs” rdf:about="artic2999" strength=”9.84" > <Match kind”=“owl:sameIndividualAs” rdf:about="artic2999" strength=”9.84" > <MatchFactor rdf:about="artic3029" detail="artic3027 artic2999" kind="TBL_ELE_MTCH" strength="3"> MatchFactor rdf:about="artic3030” detail="artic3027 artic2999" kind="ELE_TBL_MTCH" strength="9"> <MatchFactor rdf:about="artic1730" kind="EX_NM_MTCH:tbl_nm” detail=“WorkOrder” strength="8"> <MatchFactor rdf:about="artic1819" detail="Unique marina work order ID." kind="PHRASE_MTCH:ele_defn" strength="8"> <MatchFactor rdf:about="artic1825" detail="INTEGER" kind="EX_DT_MTCH:ele_data_type” strength="2"> reasons Parent Match Child Match

9 I3Con Processing  Pre Processing applies transformations to –Convert DAML and RDFS to compatible OWL equivalents. –Adds XML Base namespace if needed.  Post Processing applies transformations to –Convert Articulation to Alignment format. –Remove low confidence (< 0.8) and uninteresting matches (e.g. ‘genid’). –Removes faulty matches (e.g. rdf:ID=“ “) AB Alignment Post Process Post Process XSL Artic Pre Process Pre Process Source Ontologies B B A A XSL

10 I3Con Results Summary  Issues –Namespaces – XML Base needed to allow local file usage. –ID verses rdf:ID – leads to resources with no ID.  Semantic differences between RDF/S, DAML+OIL, OWL  Some results not understood –Comsci topic lead to no alignments –Removal of instance data in People&Pets produced more alignments. * Confidence < 0.8 removed.