European Arrest Warrant – Actual Challenges

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
European Judicial Network The EJN website:
Advertisements

EUROPEAN INITIATIVES IN THE FIELD OF MUTUAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE IN CRIMINAL MATTERS AND MUTUAL RECOGNITION NEW LEGAL MECHANISM FOR CREATING AN AREA OF FREEDOM,
Procedural Rights Challenges of implementation of the Directive 2010/64/EU of 20 October 2010 on the right to interpretation and translation in criminal.
Law Enforcement : Lessons for Investigators & Prosecutors by Ahmer Bilal Soofi Consultant National Accountability Bureau Government of Pakistan.
Framework Decisions 909 and 947 A Policy Perspective DUTT Conference Amsterdam, Netherlands 25 January 2013.
Serving Time in a Foreign Land 22 March 2012 Anand Doobay Consultant, Peters & Peters 15 Fetter Lane, London, EC4A 1BW Tel: + 44 (0) Fax: +
Slide 1/31 © copyright Standard training programme in judicial cooperation in criminal matters within the European Union Version: 3.0 Last updated:
Purpose MLA and extradition (and other forms of international judicial cooperation) with 3rd countries is part of the external policy of the Union Purpose.
NEW EXISTING TOOLS FOR ENHANCING INTERNATIONAL JUDICIAL COOPERATION WITHIN THE EUROPEAN UNION Towards a new generation of mutual legal assistance mechanisms.
Double jeopardy and Mutual Legal Assistance
1. Asset Recovery Rules in Jordan 5 th Pan-European High Level Conference on asset Recovery Offices Cyprus Oct Prof. Fayyad Alqudah (LL.B,
Slide 1/32 © copyright Standard training programme in judicial cooperation in criminal matters within the European Union Version: 3.0 Last updated:
Ensuring respect of international anti-corruption standards Laura Sanz-Levia Council of Europe.
The Area of Liberty, Security and Justice. Objectives Free movement for EU citizens Security and safety in a Europe without borders Figth against international.
Bali Process Technical Expert Workshop on Mutual Legal Assistance and Law Enforcement Bangkok, Thailand, June 2011 Celia Maunder International Crime Cooperation.
The European Public Prosecutor: Coming soon to a country near you? An EPP working with UK authorities Practical issues Mike Kennedy President of Eurojust.
Slide 1/15 © copyright Standard training programme in judicial cooperation in criminal matters within the European Union Version: 3.0 Last updated:
European Arrest Warrant
1 Substantive criminal law and mutual recognition Hans G. NILSSON, Jur Dr h.c. Head of Division Criminal justice Council of the European Union.
The transition to surrender procedures based on a European Arrest Warrant Wouter van Ballegooij LLM TMC Asser Instituut The Hague.
Privacy and security: Is Europe going banana? Jean-Marc Van Gyseghem Head of Unit « Liberties in the information society » CRID – University.
EU: Bilateral Agreements of Member States. Formerly concluded international agreements of Member States with third countries Article 351 TFEU The rights.
EU responses to hate crimes and support to the victims Linda Maria Ravo DG Justice – European Commission Unit C1.
6 December 2010 Judicial cooperation in the EU From mutual legal assistance to mutual recognition Adrienne Boerwinkel Senior Legal Adviser Dutch Ministry.
Course: European Criminal Law SS 2009 Hubert Hinterhofer.
International Cooperation in Criminal Matters Extradition and Mutual Legal Assistance in Transnational Investigations.
European arrest warrant and equality of treatment of EU citizens: Croatian example Elizabeta Ivičević Karas University of Zagreb, Faculty of Law.
M O D U L O IV M O D U L E IV. THE PRINCIPLE OF MUTUAL RECOGNITION AND ITS IMPLEMENTATION.
Digitalization of courts in the context of mutual assistance in criminal matters Dr Arkadiusz Lach Department of Criminal Procedure University of Nicolaus.
Welcome to Maastricht University. Faculty of Law Oral v. written evidence in the European Union Prof. André Klip Maastricht University, Ravenna 14 May.
AGIS 2004 EAW Conference Noordwijkerhout June The European Arrest Warrant Project A short overview of Project JAI/2004/AGIS/043.
VICTIMS’ RIGHTS New EU Directive establishing minimum standards on the rights, support and protection of victims of crime 20 September 2012 CABVIS Conference.
Council Framework Decision 2008/947/JHA Cooperation between Romania, Ireland and Italy to support the implementation of the Council Framework Decision.
Division for Treaty Affairs Aims and Structure of Convention Preventive Measures International Cooperation Asset Recovery Technical Assistance Information.
MODULE II: THE INSTRUMENTS OF JUDICIAL COOPERATION IN CRIMINAL MATTERS IN THE CONTEXT OF THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE.- TOPIC 4 THE 1959 CONVENTION ON MUTUAL.
EUROJUST EUROJUST Veronika Keller Seconded National Expert for the National Member for Germany (Eurojust)
Chapter IV. International Cooperation. 2 2 International Cooperation Mandatory Offences Optional Offences Narrow Dual Criminality Requirements In MLAs.
MODULE II: THE INSTRUMENTS OF JUDICIAL COOPERATION IN CRIMINAL MATTERS IN THE CONTEXT OF THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE.- TUTOR: JOSÉ MIGUEL GARCÍA MORENO Red Europea.
Living in an area of freedom, security and justice European CommissionDirectorate-General Justice and Home affairs.
Mutual recognition of restraint and confiscation orders in the EU David Trovato CPS Proceeds of Crime ECLA & IALS Seminar 7 December 2015.
The EU Fight against Environmental Crime – Directive 2008/99 Helge Elisabeth Zeitler DG Justice, Criminal Law.
Mutual Recognition of Financial Penalties Dr. Christian Johnson Federal Office of Justice Bonn, Germany Expert Group meeting, Paris, 11. December 2015.
Prof. Dr. Gert Vermeulen t f Practitioners’ expectations regarding mutual recognition Mutual.
Extradition Issues arising in people smuggling matters Australia’s Experience Technical Expert Workshop on Mutual Legal Assistance (MLA) and Law Enforcement.
Wanchai Roujanavong Deputy Director General International Affairs Department Office of the Attorney General 31 May 2010.
Experience of Slovenia in implementation of European Arrest Warrant
TOPIC DEBATE TOPIC International Cooperation in Criminal Matters Paris France—Final Julien Goldszlagier Hugues Julié Florence Lardet Accompanying Teacher:
PRINCIPLE NE BIS IN IDEM IN EUROPEAN UNION CRIMINAL LAW Zoran Burić, PhD University of Zagreb – Faculty of Law Department for Criminal Procedural Law
1 European Evidence Warrant Mutual recognition and judicial co- operation in criminal matters in the EU Jarlath Spellman Irish National Member Eurojust.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 31 – Common Foreign, Security and.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 31 – Common Foreign and Security Policy.
Lost in Translations – An Examination of the Legal & Practical Problems Associated with the Implementation (or Non-Implementation) of Directive 2010/64/EU.
TAIEX SEMINAR JUDICIAL COOPERATION IN CRIMINAL MATTERS: TWENTY YEARS OF SHARING EU EXPERTISE 3 June, 2016 Dr. Anna Fiodorova Working group II EaP session.
Lessons learned: our way towards securing Freedom Security and Justice Igor Dzialuk, public prosecutor (ret.) former Polish negotiator (EU accession) former.
ASSET RECOVERY AND INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION IN INDONESIA ASSET RECOVERY AND INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION IN INDONESIA THE 6 TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF IAACA.
CROSS BORDER GATHERING EVIDENCE “BEST PRACTICES” IN MUTUAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE EUROPEAN JUDICIAL TRAINING NETWORK BRUSSELS, 15 – 16 March 2016 David J Dickson.
TAIEX INTERNAL MARKET WEEK IN BUDAPEST November 2004 Co-operation of Customs Administrations Presentation by: Sandro Le Noci – Italian Customs.
Procedural Safeguards in Criminal Proceedings in the European Union in Practice Estella Baker Professor of European Criminal Law & Justice
JUDICIAL COOPERATION IN CRIMINAL MATTERS IN THE EU
U.S. – MEXICO EXTRADITION & LEGAL ASSISTANCE
Dr. Željko Karas Police College, Zagreb (Croatia)
Case-law of CJEU in criminal matters: Which lessons learnt for the EIO? 21 September Barcelona.
Effective control over arrests The CJEU on the EAW
THE 2012 REPORT ON MUNICIPAL ELECTIONS
INTERNATIONAL LEGAL COOPERATION
Daniel BERNARD Federal Prosecutor of Belgium CICERO FOUNDATION SEMINAR
2nd Biennial conference on the STOP program
European arrest warrant – in theory
European Arrest Warrant
European arrest warrant (Case C‑216/18 PPU)
Presentation transcript:

European Arrest Warrant – Actual Challenges Dr. Christian Johnson Belgrade, 7 - 8 November 2011

European Arrest Warrant (EAW) a) History of the EAW b) Key features of the EAW c) Follow-up (reports / evaluation / handbook / statistics) 2. Actual challenges a) Double criminality b) Grounds for refusal c) Proportionality d) Miscellaneous 3. Summary Belgrade, 7 - 8 November 2011

EAW: History 1957 Council of Europe Convention on Extradition Article 1: Obligation to extradite Article 2: Extraditable offences / Dual criminality Article 3: Political offences Article 6: No obligation to extradite nationals Belgrade, 7 - 8 November 2011

EAW: History 19 September 2001: Commission proposal 6/7 December 2001: Political agreement 13 June 2002: Formal adoption Belgrade, 7 - 8 November 2011

EAW: Key features System of surrender between judicial authorities Principle of mutual recognition New terminology Central authorities: only practical and administrative assistance Deadlines for decision and surrender Belgrade, 7 - 8 November 2011

EAW: Key features List offences / double criminality Surrender of own nationals Belgrade, 7 - 8 November 2011

EAW: Follow-up Implementation Commission reports Evaluation of all Member States Experts on the EAW European handbook how to issue an EAW Statistical data Belgrade, 7 - 8 November 2011

Actual challenges: Double criminality Article 2 ECJ C-303/05 – „Advocaten voor de Wereld“ – on principle of legality Article 5 No. 3: return of own nationals – CoE 1983 Convention or EAW? (FD 2008/909) Belgrade, 7 - 8 November 2011

Actual challenges: Reasons for refusal Mandatory grounds Optional grounds: „The executing judicial authority may refuse …“ Dispute: Discretion for judicial authority or FD adressed to national legislator? Belgrade, 7 - 8 November 2011

Actual challenges: Reasons for refusal Optional ground: Article 4 No. 2 – prosecution for the same act in the executing Member State Optional ground: Article 4 No. 4 – criminal prosecution statute-barred and own jurisdiction Belgrade, 7 - 8 November 2011

Actual challenges: Reasons for refusal Optional ground: Article 4 No. 6 - EAW for execution of a sentence against national or resident of executing Member State Request for takeover? 1983 CoE Convention? No problem: National / but: resident? ECJ – C-123/08 – „Wolzenburg“ Belgrade, 7 - 8 November 2011

Actual challenges: Proportionality Article 2, but additional proportionality test in the issuing Member State? In the executing Member State? Specifically: EAWs to obtain testimony from suspects? Alternative: mla, video-conferencing Belgrade, 7 - 8 November 2011

Miscellaneous: Judicial authorities Framework Decision: System of surrender between judicial authorities No political influence Belgrade, 7 - 8 November 2011

Miscellaneous: Time limits (receipt of EAW) No provision in the FD Some Member States: 40 days (= 1957 Convention) Other Member States: various deadlines Belgrade, 7 - 8 November 2011

Miscellaneous: Language requirements Translation into the official language of the executing Member State Future: one working language? Belgrade, 7 - 8 November 2011

Miscellaneous: Accessory surrender 1957 Convention: possible EAW: no provision Practice of Member States: diverging Belgrade, 7 - 8 November 2011

Miscellaneous: Time limits (decision/surrender) EAW Article 17: decision 60 days after arrest EAW Article 23: physical surrender 10 days after final decision Germany: practical problems with 10 day-deadline Belgrade, 7 - 8 November 2011

Miscellaneous: Prison conditions European Convention on Human Rights Belgrade, 7 - 8 November 2011

Summary System of effective and efficient surrender among 27 Member States No consent: 48 days / consent: 14-17 days Grounds for refusal / proportionality Belgrade, 7 - 8 November 2011

European Arrest Warrant – Actual Challenges All information: www.ejn-crimjust.europa.eu Thank you for your attention! Dr. Christian Johnson Head of Department Extradition, Mutual Legal Assistance, Enforcement of Sentences, EAW Federal Office of Justice / Bundesamt für Justiz Adenauerallee 99 – 103, D-53113 Bonn, Germany Tel. 49 (0) 228 99 410 - 5300 christian.johnson@bfj.bund.de Belgrade, 7 - 8 November 2011