NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing Segmentation Core 1-3 Meeting, May. 22-23, 2008 - SLC, UT.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing Slicer3 EMSegment Tutorial January 2008 NAMIC All-Hands Meeting Brad Davis, Yuman.
Advertisements

SPM5 Segmentation. A Growing Trend Larger and more complex models are being produced to explain brain imaging data. Bigger and better computers allow.
VBM Voxel-based morphometry
National Alliance for Medical Image Computing Slide 1 NAMIC at UNC DTI, Shape and Longitudinal registration Closely linked with Utah.
MRI preprocessing and segmentation.
Gordon Wright & Marie de Guzman 15 December 2010 Co-registration & Spatial Normalisation.
Department of Radiology
Vision REU Week 3. Image registration  Used mutual information-based registration from ITK Ben SchoepkeREU Week 36/8/07 Fixed imageMoving image Pre-registrationPost-registration.
Automatic Feature Extraction for Multi-view 3D Face Recognition
Algorithms (UAB/BU): Interactive segmentation feedback model.
Level-Set Evolution with Region Competition: Automatic 3-D Segmentation of Brain Tumors 1 Sean Ho, 2 Elizabeth Bullitt, and 1;3 Guido Gerig 1 Department.
September 27, / 18 Automatic Segmentation of Neonatal Brain MRI Marcel Prastawa 1, John Gilmore 2, Weili Lin 3, Guido Gerig 1,2 University.
Cortical Surface Analysis and Automatic Parcellation of Human Brain Wen Li, Ph.D. student Advisor: Vincent A. Magnotta, Ph.D. Biomedical Engineering University.
Preprocessing II: Between Subjects John Ashburner Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, 12 Queen Square, London, UK.
Methods in Medical Image Analysis Statistics of Pattern Recognition: Classification and Clustering Some content provided by Milos Hauskrecht, University.
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing DTI atlas building for population analysis: Application to PNL SZ study Casey Goodlett,
National Alliance for Medical Image Computing – Algorithms Core (C1a) Five investigators: –A. Tannenbaum (BU), P. Golland (MIT), M. Styner.
Diffusion MRI Analysis in 3D Slicer Carl-Fredrik Westin 1,2, Steven Pieper 1,2, Marek Kubicki 1,3, Ron Kikinis 1,2 1 Laboratory of Mathematics in Imaging,
Collaborations and Architectures mBIRN Progress at BWH.
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing Lesion Classification in Lupus Update H. Jeremy Bockholt DBP2, MIND.
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing Algorithms MIT PI: Polina Golland.
Multimodal Interaction Dr. Mike Spann
Prakash Chockalingam Clemson University Non-Rigid Multi-Modal Object Tracking Using Gaussian Mixture Models Committee Members Dr Stan Birchfield (chair)
Dinggang Shen Development and Dissemination of Robust Brain MRI Measurement Tools ( 1R01EB ) Department of Radiology and BRIC UNC-Chapel Hill IDEA.
Multi-Modal Quantitative Analysis of Pediatric Focal Epilepsy Andy Eow Medical Vision Group CSAIL, MIT.
DTU Medical Visionday May 27, 2009 Generative models for automated brain MRI segmentation Koen Van Leemput Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical.
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing Cortical Thickness Analysis Delphine Ribes (Internship UNC 2005/2006) Guido Gerig.
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing Cortical Thickness Analysis with Slicer Martin Styner UNC - Departments of Computer.
Image Segmentation and Seg3D Ross Whitaker SCI Institute, School of Computing University of Utah.
Sparse Shape Representation using the Laplace-Beltrami Eigenfunctions and Its Application to Modeling Subcortical Structures Xuejiao Chen.
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing Core 1 & Core 3 Projects.
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing Shape Analysis and Cortical Correspondence Martin Styner Core 1 (Algorithms), UNC.
Surgical Planning Laboratory -1- Brigham and Women’s Hospital Slicer Training 10 EMAtlasBrainClassifier Sonia Pujol, Ph.D. Randy.
National Alliance for Medical Image Computing Slicer3 Status Update.
J OURNAL C LUB : Cardoso et al., University College London, UK “STEPS: Similarity and Truth Estimation for Propagated Segmentations and its application.
Medical Image Analysis Image Registration Figures come from the textbook: Medical Image Analysis, by Atam P. Dhawan, IEEE Press, 2003.
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing ABC: Atlas-Based Classification Marcel Prastawa and Guido Gerig Scientific Computing.
MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory
NCBC EAB, January 2010 NA-MIC Highlights: A Core 1 Perspective Ross Whitaker University of Utah National Alliance for Biomedical Image Computing.
National Alliance for Medical Image Computing Segmentation Foundations Easy Segmentation –Tissue/Air (except bone in MR) –Bone in CT.
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing UNC Shape Analysis Martin Styner, Ipek Oguz Department of CS UNC Chapel Hill Max.
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing Process-, Work-Flow in Medical Image Processing Guido Gerig
National Alliance for Medical Image Computing Structure.
EMSegmentation in Slicer 3 B. Davis, S. Barre, Y. Yuan, W. Schroeder, P. Golland, K. Pohl.
National Alliance for Medical Image Computing Core What We Need from Cores 1 & 2 NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing.
Incorporating Non-rigid Registration into Expectation Maximization Algorithm to Segment MR Images By K.M. Pohl, W.M. Wells, A. Guimond, K. Kasai, M.E.
MINC meeting 2003 Pipelines: analyzing structural MR data Jason Lerch.
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing NA-MIC UNC Guido Gerig, Martin Styner, Isabelle Corouge
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing Evaluating Brain Tissue Classifiers S. Bouix, M. Martin-Fernandez, L. Ungar, M.
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing fMRI in NAMIC Facilitator: Polina Golland Presenters: Jim Fallon and Andy Saykin.
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing 3D Slicer Version 3.0 and Diffusion MRI Steve Pieper, PhD.
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing A longitudinal study of brain development in autism Heather Cody Hazlett, PhD Neurodevelopmental.
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing Engineering a Segmentation Framework Marcel Prastawa.
MultiModality Registration Using Hilbert-Schmidt Estimators By: Srinivas Peddi Computer Integrated Surgery II April 6 th, 2001.
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing Velocardiofacial Syndrome as a Genetic Model for Schizophrenia Marek Kubicki DBP2,
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing UNC/Utah-II Core 1 Guido Gerig, Casey Goodlett, Marcel Prastawa, Sylvain Gouttard.
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing Velocardiofacial Syndrome as a Genetic Model for Schizophrenia Marek Kubicki DBP2,
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing fMRI within NAMIC Sandy Wells, Polina Golland Discussion moderator: Andy Saykin.
National Alliance for Medical Image Computing Hierarchical Atlas Based EM Segmentation.
EMAtlasBrainClassifier By Kilian Maria Pohl 
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing Statistical Models of Anatomy and Pathology Polina Golland.
Kim HS Introduction considering that the amount of MRI data to analyze in present-day clinical trials is often on the order of hundreds or.
ITK. Ch 9 Segmentation Confidence Connected Isolated Connected Confidence Connected in Vector Images Jin-ju Yang.
National Alliance for Medical Image Computing Bayesian Classifier Image Filter John Georgia Tech Luis Kitware.
Random Forests For Multiple Sclerosis Lesion Segmentation
Polina Golland Core 1, MIT
Aline Martin ECE738 Project – Spring 2005
Anatomical Measures John Ashburner
EM Algorithm and its Applications
MultiModality Registration using Hilbert-Schmidt Estimators
Presentation transcript:

NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing Segmentation Core 1-3 Meeting, May , SLC, UT

Georgia Tech/JHU Prostate Segmentation & Registration Framework Yi Gao (Georgia Tech), Allen Tannenbaum (Georgia Tech), Gabor Fichtinger (JHU)‏

Background Under the roadmap project: Brachytherapy Needle Positioning Robot Integration. Auto/Semiauto segmentation. Registration: –Between modalities: US/MRI –Before/during therapy

Segmentation Two approaches: –Random Walks(RW)‏ RW + post process Toward automatic segmentation –Spherical wavelet shape based method

Random walks Random Walks(RW)‏ –Result → –Less interaction –C++ code

Shape based method Spherical wavelet shape based method –Shape learning –ITK Spherical wavelet transformation –Shape based segmentation

Shape based method Spherical wavelet shape based method –Shape learning –ITK Spherical wavelet transformation –Shape based segmentation

Shape learning Align segmented shapes. –Registration under Similarity transform. Learn aligned shapes. –Statistical learning: PCA, KPCA, GPCA

Shape learning Align segmented shapes. –Registration under Similarity transform. Learn aligned shapes. –Statistical learning: PCA, KPCA, GPCA

Registration Common region extraction –Used as landmark Rigid/Deformable registration –Particle filter/Kalman filter –Optimal mass transportation

Landmark extraction Chan-Vese on manifold –Extract featured region on surface. –Feature defined by a function. Color depicts a scalar function defined on a surface.

Landmark extraction, cont.

Landmark based Registration Concave belly of prostate –Common among all prostate Used as soft-landmark in registration.

UNC/MIND Lesion Segmentation Marcel Prastawa (Utah), Guido Gerig (Utah), Jeremy Bockholt (MIND)‏

Lesion Segmentation T1T1 T2T2 before after

MIND Lupus Lesion

Iowa/MIND Bayesian Classification of Lupus Lesions Vincent A. Magnotta (Iowa), Jeremy Bockholt (MIND), Peter Pellegrino (Iowa)‏

Algorithm Overview Tissue classification algorithm coupled with lesion identification Required Inputs –T1, T2, and FLAIR images that have been spatially normalized and bias field corrected –Definition of the brain –Currently uses BRAINS Autoworkup pipeline to fulfill these requirements

Algorithm Uses K-means classification –Initial estimate of GM, WM, and CSF based on minimum, mean, and standard deviation from T1 weighted image –Kmeans segmentation into GM, WM, and CSF from T1 weighted image Lesion from FLAIR Images –Threshold FLAIR image based on mean and standard deviation within the brain –Eliminate lesion voxels adjacent to CSF –Remaining lesion voxels from the Kmeans classification are used to relabel the Kmeans labelmap with a Lesion value

Bayesian Classification Define exemplars for classes –Randomly sample 1000 points from GM, WM, CSF, and Lesion labels –Used to define the means and variance for the classes Define class priors –Extract each class from labelmap generated in previous step and filter with a 2mm gaussian filter Run multi-modal Bayesian classifier –T1, T2, and FLAIR images input

Results

MIT/Harvard Tissue Classification Kilian Pohl (MIT/BWH), Brad Davis (Kitware), Sylvain Bouix (Harvard), Marek Kubicki (Harvard), Martha Shenton (Harvard), Sandy Wells (BWH), Polina Golland (MIT)‏

Slicer 3 Module

EM-Segmenter Intensity normalization Structure hierarchy Registration –Atlas-to-subject –Multimodal Applications: –Tissue classification –Structure parcelation –MS lesions segmentation

Georgia Tech/Harvard Label Space Segmentation Jimi Malcolm (Georgia Tech), Allen Tannenbaum (Georgia Tech), Yogesh Rathi (Harvard)‏

Problem: Constructing an anatomical model for multiple, covarying regions - Slice from labeled brain: State of the art - Signed distance maps: develop artifacts along interface between regions, small variations on interface cause large perturbations far away - Binary vectors: background bias during registration - LogOdds: natural probabilistic interpretation, but uses the above intermediate representations thus incurring similar problems Label Space

Label Space: - regular simplex: - natural algebraic manipulation - direct probabilistic interpretation - unbiased toward any label

Label Space Experiments: - smoothing, interpolation - registration - probabilistic atlases

Questions?