Continuing Review Presented by: Karen Jeans, PhD, CCRN, CIP Program Analyst, COACH.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Role of the IRB An Institutional Review Board (IRB) is a review committee established to help protect the rights and welfare of human research subjects.
Advertisements

Susan Burner Bankowski, M.S., J.D. Chair, OHSU IRB
Gerald Treiman, IRB Chair John Stillman, IRB Director Maureen Brinkman, IRB Administrator Ann Johnson, IRB Administrator.
SOP Melody Lin, Ph.D. Deputy Director, Office for Human Research Protections Director, International Activities Santiago, Chile August.
UTHSC IRB Donna Hollaway, RN, CCRC 11/30/2011 Authority to Audit 45 CFR (e) An IRB shall conduct continuing review of research covered by this.
Fundamentals of IRB Review. Regulatory Role of the IRB Authority to approve, require modifications in (to secure approval), or disapprove all research.
Ethical Considerations when Developing Human Research Protocols A discipline “born in scandal and reared in protectionism” Carol Levine, 1988.
IRB Review Mechanics: Looking under the hood IRB Administrators 2012 PRIDE Lucindia Shouse, MS, CIP May 31, 2012.
IRB Determinations 1. AAHRPP Site Visit Results Site visitors observed a real commitment to human subject protections Investigator and research staff.
Evaluating Risk 1 IRB CELT Presentation Colleen Donaldson – IRB Administrator Julie Wilkens – IRB Coordinator.
Conflict and Consent: Managing Disclosure in Human Subjects Research University of Miami Human Subjects Research Office Conflict of Interest Symposium.
Human Subjects Protection: Creation and Maintenance of an IRB Regulatory Requirements & Recommendations 45 CFR part 46 Freda E. Yoder Office for Human.
Pharmacists Responsibilities in Clinical Studies Mike R Sather, PhD Crystal L Harris, PharmD February 26, 2004.
Columbia University IRB IRB 101 September 21, 2005 George Gasparis, Executive Director, CU IRB Asst. V.P. and Sr. Asst. Dean for Research Ethics.
Human Research Protection Program Training: Post-Approval Event Reporting March 26, 2008 Lisa Voss, MPH, CIP Assistant Director, QIU Human Research Protection.
IRB Basics Helen Panageas New York University School of Medicine Institutional Review Board Portion of slides courtesy of Suzanne M. Smith, University.
Renewing An Approved Protocol: IRB Review Process
8 Criteria for IRB Approval of Research 45 CFR (a)
Unlocking the Mystery of General Information Reporting Research Compliance Administration Training Presentation Wednesday, June 6, 2007 Presenter:Heather.
PRESENTING A PROTOCOL AN IRB INFOSHORT FEBRUARY 2013.
Continuing Review VA Requirements Kevin L. Nellis, M.S., M.T. (A.S.C.P.) Program Analyst Program for Research Integrity Development and Education (PRIDE)
How to Obtain Institutional Review Board (IRB) Approval Richard Wagner Associate Director UCSF Human Research Protection Program August 14, 2008.
Response to FDA Audit 483 MX-4501N : Nine Category 483 Citations Meetings Minutes: Votes for, against, abstention and reason not recorded;
Human Research Protection Program 101 March 19, 2007 Cincinnati, OH.
Adverse Events and Unanticipated Problems Presented by: Karen Jeans, PhD, CCRN, CIP COACH Program Analyst.
 Understanding the IRB Process University of Tennessee Health Science Center Institutional Review Board.
Office of Research Oversight ORO Reporting Adverse Events in Research to ORO Paula Squire Waterman, MS, CIP Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Research.
The IRB Approval Process Michael Bingham, JD Assistant Director, University of Wisconsin-Madison Education IRB
Common Audit Findings UTHSC Institutional Review Board (IRB)
Michelle Groy Johnson Quality Improvement Officer Research Integrity Office Tough Love: Understanding the Purpose and Processes of Quality Assurance.
Questions: AAHRPP Evaluation Instrument for Use with Final Revised Accreditation Standards Presented by: C. Karen Jeans, MSN, CCRN, CIP COACH Program Analyst,
The Institutional Review Board: A Community College Toolkit Dr. Geri J Anderson.
How to Successfully Apply to the IRB Richard Gordin, IRB Chair True Rubal, Administrator / Director For the Protection of Human Participants in Research.
IRB BASICS: Issues in Ethics and Human Subject Protections Prepared by Ed Merrill Department of Psychology November 12, 2009.
Human Research Protection Program & IRB Responsibilities Marisue Cody, PhD Director Center on Advice & Compliance Help.
AUDIT REQUIREMENTS, FINDINGS & BASICS RESEARCH COMPLIANCE.
Institutional Review Board Issues for Classroom Research Sharon McWhorter IRB Administrator, The University of Akron (With assistance from Phil Allen,
OBSERVED IN ORO REVIEWS COMPLIANCE ISSUES: OBSERVED IN ORO REVIEWS David A. Weber, Ph.D., FACNP Acting Chief Officer Office of Research.
CUNY Human Research Protection Program (HRPP) School of Professional Studies April 18, 2013
APPROVAL CRITERIA AN IRB INFOSHORT MAY CFR CRITERIA FOR IRB APPROVAL OF RESEARCH In order for an IRB to approve a research study, all.
The NCI Central IRB Initiative Jacquelyn L. Goldberg, J.D. VA IRB Chair Training April 8, 2004.
HRPP Policies & Forms Chapter Two Created/Revised for AAHRPP June 1, 2007.
WELCOME to the TULANE UNIVERSITY HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION OFFICE WORKSHOP for SOCIAL/BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH (March 2, 2010) Tulane University HRPO Uptown.
 Epidemiology -- Research – or Not Research? Medical Research Summit March Tom Puglisi, PhD.
Conducting Research at Lincoln IRB/HRPP Policies, Procedures & Good Clinical Practices B Kanna MD, MPH, FACP Associate Program Director of Internal Medicine.
Human Subjects Protection Program Office of Research Compliance Navigating through the current HSPP and IRB Presented by: Danielle Griffin, M.S. Research.
INVESTIGATOR RESPONSIBILITIES C. Karen Jeans, MSN COACH Project Analyst.
Ethical and Regulatory Oversight of Human Subjects Research in the VA C. Karen Jeans, PhD, CCRN, CIP COACH Program Analyst September 29, 2010.
 What is an IRB and why do we need one at Western?  Who needs to submit proposals to the IRB?  If approved, how long is your proposal good for?  Is.
PRIMER: Human Subjects, Past, Present, and Future Susan Metosky, Arizona State University Debra Murphy, Arizona State University.
THE INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD. WHAT IS AN IRB? An IRB is committee set up by an institution to review, approve, and regulate research conducted under.
EXCEPTION FROM INFORMED CONSENT IN CPR DEVICE TRIALS: PROTECTION OF PATIENTS’ RIGHTS Circulatory System Devices Panel Meeting September 21, 2004 Elisa.
Informed Consent Presented by Marian Serge, RN. Goals Informed consent process and form Title 38 CFR , Common Rule required elements and additional.
IRB Minutes Karen Jeans, MSN, CCRN, CIP COACH Program Analyst.
Instructions for New IRB Continuing Review (Progress) Report
Conditional IRB Approval
Susan Sonne, PharmD, BCPP Chair, MUSC IRB II
IRB BASICS Ethics and Human Subject Protections Summer 2016
University of Central Florida Office of Research & Commercialization
IRB reporting updates.
What is a Data and Safety Monitoring Plan and how do I get one?
Conducting Human Subjects Research
Reportable Events & Other IRB Updates February 2017
Jeffrey M. Cohen, Ph.D. CIP President HRP Associates, Inc.
University of Central Florida Office of Research & Commercialization
To start the presentation, click on this button in the lower right corner of your screen. The presentation will begin after the screen changes and you.
Anca Miron, PhD IRB Chair, UW Oshkosh Kelly Schill, BS, CIP
Exploring 45 CFR , Criteria for IRB Approval of Research
Protocol Approval Criteria
Research with Human Subjects
Presentation transcript:

Continuing Review Presented by: Karen Jeans, PhD, CCRN, CIP Program Analyst, COACH

Objectives Describe what is meant by “continuing review” Describe VA requirements for continuing review Calculate dates for continuing review expiration

What is Meant by Continuing Review? Term is undefined in the Federal Regulations

What is Continuing Review? Monitoring on-going projects thru continuing review at intervals appropriate to the degree of risk, but not less than once per year. VHA Handbook , Paragraph 7.(g) page 15 “An IRB shall conduct continuing review of research covered by these regulations at intervals appropriate to the degree of risk, but not less than once per year...” {21 CFR (f) and 38 CFR (e)}

Criteria for IRB Approval (.111) A. Required determinations: 1. Risks to subjects are minimized (i) By using procedures consistent with sound research design… (ii) When appropriate, using procedures already being performed… 2. Risks are reasonable in relation to benefits 3. Selection of subjects is equitable 4. Informed consent will be sought prospectively 5. Informed consent is appropriately documented 6. Research plan makes adequate provisions for safety monitoring 7. There are adequate provisions to protect privacy and confidentiality B. When appropriate, additional protections for Vulnerable Subjects

Continuing Review Decisions Made by the IRB at Continuing Review: Are subjects adequately protected through the current approved protocol? Informed consent issues The informed consent process is appropriate Written informed consent document is accurate and complete Any significant new findings are provided to the subject

Continuing Review What is required to be submitted to the IRB by a Principal Investigator at Continuing Review?

Continuing Review – VHA Handbook Requirements Brief summary of the research methodology and procedures; Number of subjects entered and withdrawn (including the reason for withdrawal) for the review period and since the inception of the research project; The gender and minority status of those entered into the protocol; Number of subjects considered as members of specific vulnerable populations; A copy of the proposal and all approved amendments; A copy of the current consent document for the IRB to review; A copy of the current HIPAA Authorization document, if separate from the informed consent;

Continuing Review – VHA Handbook Requirements Information that may impact on the risk benefit ratio such as AEs, unanticipated problems, and complaints regarding the research; Research findings to date, if available; Summary of the DSMB or DMC meetings (if applicable) or findings based on information collected by the data and safety monitoring plan submitted in the initial proposal; An assurance that all SAEs and UAEs have been reported as required; and New scientific findings in the literature, or other relevant findings, that may impact on the research.

Continuing Review – Lapses in IRB Approval - VHA Handbook If the continuing review does not occur within the timeframe set by the IRB, the research is ‘automatically suspended.” NOTE: For suspended research, enrollment for new subjects cannot occur; continuation of research interventions or interactions in already enrolled subjects should only continue when the IRB or IRB Chair, in consultation with the Chief of Staff (COS), finds that it is in the best interest of individual subjects to do so.

Continuing Review – Lapses in IRB Approval - VHA Handbook Once notified of the suspension, the PI must immediately submit to the IRB Chair, a list of research subjects for whom suspension of the research would cause harm. The IRB Chair, with appropriate consultation with the Chief of Staff, determines if the subject may continue in the research. If the study is FDA-regulated, the Chief of Staff and IRB Chair must follow FDA requirements in 21 CFR (b)(3) in making their decision.

Continuing Review – VHA Handbook Whose responsibility is it to make sure a protocol does not lapse? Both the Investigator and IRB have different roles

Continuing Review – VHA Handbook Notification of Lapse of Approval Sponsoring agent, private sponsor, ORD, ORO, or other Federal agencies must be informed, as appropriate When is it appropriate to notify these agencies?

Continuing Review – VA vs. Everyone Else What is the difference between a lapse in approval and a suspension of IRB approval? A lapse in approval is a passive process. A suspension of IRB approval is an active process.

Lapse of Approval Following Expiration of Continuing Review Interval Issue #1:What about the investigational pharmacist? Issue #2:What happens to subjects entered into a study during a period when the study’s continuing review approval period lapsed? Issue #3:What happens to subjects enrolled during a period when the study’s continuing review approval lapsed and it was due to an administrative error within the IRB (study requiring review by a convened IRB left off the agenda)?

Determination of Continuing Review Dates When Does Continuing Review Expire? The convened IRB meets on March 1, 2007 and approves Study A for a continuing review period of one year pending minor revisions. The revisions are approved by expedited review of the IRB Chairperson on March 7, The convened IRB meets on March 1, 2006 and approves Study B for a continuing review period of one year pending major revisions. The revisions are reviewed and approved by a convened IRB on April 1, 2006.

Determination of Continuing Review Dates Continued… The convened IRB meets on March 1, 2005 and approves Study C for a continuing review period of one year pending major revisions. The revisions are reviewed and approved by a convened IRB on March 1, The convened IRB meets on March 1, 2006 and approves Study D for a continuing review period of one year pending minor revisions. The revisions are reviewed and approved by a convened IRB (the IRB does not allow expedited review procedures) on April 1, 2007.

Annual Revision Date – Keeping the Same Date If continuing review occurs annually, and the IRB performs the continuing review evaluation 30 days before the IRB approval period expires, the IRB may retain the anniversary as the date by which the continuing review must occur.

Annual Revision Date – Keeping the Same Date 1.The IRB approves a protocol requiring full board review on March 1, Continuing review expires on March 1, The convened IRB reviews the protocol for continuing approval on February 15, 2007 and approves the study for one year. Continuing review expires on March 1, The convened IRB reviews the protocol on January 27, 2008 and approves the study for one year. Continuing review expires on January 27, 2009.

Guidance on Continuing Review Office for Human Research Protections: Guidance on Continuing Review dated January 15, 2007: