Guatemala: An evaluation of Biosafety Regulations Drew L. Kershen Earl Sneed Centennial Professor Univ. of Oklahoma, College of Law Copyright 2007, all.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Pest Risk Analysis (PRA) Training
Advertisements

The Role of Customs Officers in Implementing the Protocol GRULAC Regional Training of Trainers Workshop on the Identification and Documentation of LMOs.
Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety -Reducing the Environmental Risks of Modern Biotechnology Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity
Erie Tamale Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity
Domestic Import Regulations for GMOs and their Compatibility with WTO Rules: Some Key Issues Heike Baumüller ICTSD Trade and Development Symposium
Making the rules of the world Geoff Tansey Green Feast, 12 Mar 2008.
Model Act: Proposed Provisions for a Transparent, Effective and Workable Biosafety Regulatory Framework Stanley H. Abramson, Esq. Arent Fox Kintner Plotkin.
Technical Requirements, WTO Rules and Trade
PPKE JÁK Budapest Jean Monnet Centre of Excellence Environmental Democracy Conference 19th October, 2012.
The International Regulation of Biotechnology Lecture No. 19 Further Inf. For further information and video link please click on the right buttons in the.
INCEPTION WORKSHOP BACKGROUND PAPER BIOSAFETY IMPLEMENTATION PROJECT FOR ARAB REPUBLIC OF EGYPT GEF/UNEP DR. NERMEEN EL-TAYEB ASSISTANT TO THE INTERIM.
Liberalizing Trade in Agriculture and Food Security Vanderbilt Symposium on Food Security Prof. Christine Kaufmann, University of Zurich Nashville, 16.
FAO/WHO CODEX TRAINING PACKAGE
GMOs and the WTO Rules Mark Halle Minsk, 24 October 2008.
“PRECAUTION AND THE REGULATION OF LIVING MODIFIED ORGANISMS (LMOs)” EMMA ISSATT.
Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety Drew L. Kershen University of Oklahoma College of Law Earl Sneed Centennial Professor of Law Copyright 2005, all rights.
Consistency of SEC assessment under the Cartagena Protocol with other international obligations Karinne Ludlow, Monash University, Australia
Amanda Hodges, Ph.D. Entomology/Nematology Dept. University of Florida Exotic Species & Biosecurity Issues ENY 4161/6166.
Cartagena protocol on Biosafety to the Convention on Biological Diversity and the International debates (COP- MOP) Stakeholders’ workshop on the Biosafety.
Compliance with the WTO Technical Barriers to Trade Agreement and Steps Toward Developing Good Regulatory Practices Bryan O’Byrne Trade Compliance Center.
1 Inter-linkages: BCH, Parties, Capacity Building, Compliance and RA Concept Sustainability Biosafety Programme - Secretariat of the Convention on Biological.
Liability and Redress: Overview and General Comments Asia Regional Workshop on the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety September 7-8, 2010 Daewoo Hotel, Hanoi,
Confronting Contamination: Biosafety Lim Li Lin, Third World Network.
Agricultural Biotechnology: The Technology in the Seed Drew L. Kershen Earl Sneed Centennial Law Professor University of Oklahoma Copyright 2001, all rights.
Training Workshop for Regional Advisors Bangkok, Thailand 15 – 27 May 2006.
Disciplining the use of food safety measures: The impacts of the WTO SPS agreement on developing countries Michael Friis Jensen Researcher, Globalisation.
Australia’s policy and regulatory framework for gene technology QMAC 2003 (Dr) Sue D Meek Gene Technology Regulator.
Ole Kr. Fauchald Introduction to biodiversity n What is ”biodiversity”? ä Distinguish between levels of biodiversity ä Development of biodiversity.
Potential trade implications of CBD and the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety MEA – UNEP meeting on Enhancing MEA and WTO Information Exchange 11 November,
BioSafety Protocol Article 27 Scenarios of Liability Drew L. Kershen Earl Sneed Centennial Professor University of Oklahoma College of Law © 2006 Drew.
1 Basic principles of legislation to implement CITES CITES Secretariat.
An Introduction to CPB and Importance of BCH to CPB Obligations.
Creating a Conducive Environment for Biotechnology: The Cartagena Protocol as an Enabling Framework Drew L. Kershen Earl Sneed Centennial Professor University.
Genetic Resources Policy and Intellectual Property I. Ownership and control of genetic resources II. Movement of genetic resources III. Intellectual Property.
Program for Biosafety Systems – Conceptual and Implementation Clarity of SECs and Biosafety Decision-Making Presented at the ICABR.
Introduction to the Obligations of the Party to the Biosafety Clearing-House Manoranjan Hota.
THE BIOSAFETY BILL, 2007 JACARANDA HOTEL, 26 TH JULY 2007.
International Standards and the TBT Agreement Ludivine Tamiotti WTO, Trade and Environment Division Legal Affairs Officer
1 Proposal To Extend the Application of the Convention on Biological Diversity and the Biosafety Protocol to the Hong Kong SAR.
Keller and Heckman LLP Market Access and Trade Barriers and Practices: The Role of the Precautionary Principle and Other Non-Scientific Factors in Regulating.
CARTAGENA PROTOCOL ON BIOSAFETY NDA- DEAT BILATERAL MEETING 1 August 2003 Presenter : M. Mbengashe.
Biotechnology Priorities for South Africa Prof. Diran Makinde AfricaBio Cape Town- 14/15 April 2003.
AGRICULTURAL PRODUCT INSPECTION SERVICES Mooketsa Ramasodi Directorate Agricultural Product Inspection Services Trade Awareness Workshop Polokwane, 13.
Perspective on OECD activities from a non-member country Prof. Atanas Atanassov, Agrobioinstitute, BULGARIA workshop: Beyond the Blue Book: Framework for.
GMO amendment Bill and biotech policy W. De Greef, Consultant to AfricaBio.
Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety And India’s Obligations By Desh Deepak Verma Joint Secretary, Ministry of Environment and.
Introduction to the Biosafety Clearing-House. footer What is the role of the BCH? Under Art 20, the CPB established the BCH. The Protocol sets out two.
Biosafety Clearing House Training Workshop date place.
AGRICULTURAL PRODUCT INSPECTION SERVICES Mooketsa Ramasodi Directorate Agricultural Product Inspection Services Trade Awareness Workshop Polokwane, 12.
The International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture and The Convention on Biological Diversity Training Workshop The International.
Law and Policy of Relevance to the Management of Plant Genetic Resources Objectives of Day Five 1.To identify the main international agreements.
1 DEAT PERSPECTIVE ON GENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISMS 31 JULY 2007.
Tracy McCracken SPS Technical Advisor East Africa Region United States Agency for International Development (USAID) Kenya and East Aferica/Office of Regional.
Regulating goods and the WTO Erik Wijkström Counsellor, Trade and Environment Division World Trade Organization (WTO) Geneva, Switzerland
LMO RISK ASSESSMENT UNDER THE IPPC AND THE CARTAGENA PROTOCOL ON BIOSAFETY Velia Arriagada Rios Servicio Agrícola y Ganadero, Chile.
Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety Jebunnesa Chowdhury.
Food Safety, Risk Analysis, and International Trade 23 May 2002.
Preview Purpose of sanitary and phyto-sanitary and technical standards
University of Greenwich
IPP Training, IAPSC & IPPC/FAO/FAORAF
Susy Frankel Victoria University of Wellington New Zealand
Overview of the WTO SPS Agreement and the role of
CARTAGENA PROTOCOL ON BIOSAFETY
Environmental and Biosafety issues in modern Biotechnology
International Legal Framework
Understanding what is the Phytosanitary Capacity Evaluation (PCE)
ASTA V&F Seed Conference EI WG
The WTO-TBT-Agreement
Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety -Reducing the Environmental Risks of Modern Biotechnology Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity
Introduction to the Obligations of the Party to the Biosafety Clearing-House Manoranjan Hota.
Presentation transcript:

Guatemala: An evaluation of Biosafety Regulations Drew L. Kershen Earl Sneed Centennial Professor Univ. of Oklahoma, College of Law Copyright 2007, all rights reserved

Guatemala: Objectives Comply with International Obligations Comply with International Obligations World Trade Organization (WTO) AgreementsWorld Trade Organization (WTO) Agreements Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety (CPB)Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety (CPB) Seek compatibility between both obligationsSeek compatibility between both obligations Focus on Agricultural Biotechnology Focus on Agricultural Biotechnology Encourage innovation, science and investmentEncourage innovation, science and investment Develop the agricultural sectorDevelop the agricultural sector Insure food and feed safetyInsure food and feed safety Protect environmental values and resourcesProtect environmental values and resources Promote health and general welfarePromote health and general welfare Promote Science Based Regulatory Policy Promote Science Based Regulatory Policy Unless Guatemala uses science, cannot fulfill the two prior objectives – i.e. comply and focusUnless Guatemala uses science, cannot fulfill the two prior objectives – i.e. comply and focus

Way Forward: General Ideas Rely upon 20+ years research and 10+ years commercial use of agricultural biotechnology Rely upon 20+ years research and 10+ years commercial use of agricultural biotechnology Do not repeat what has already been done properly and correctlyDo not repeat what has already been done properly and correctly Improve what has already functioned well Improve what has already functioned well Use existing Guatemalan laws and regulationsUse existing Guatemalan laws and regulations e.g. Acuerdo Ministerial No (AM 386) e.g. Acuerdo Ministerial No (AM 386) Use Models that support, rather than undermine, the objectives of GuatemalaUse Models that support, rather than undermine, the objectives of Guatemala e.g. Libro de referencia de normativas sobre seguridad de la biotechnología, e.g. Libro de referencia de normativas sobre seguridad de la biotechnología,

Transgenic Crops: Food and Feed and Processed Cartagena Protocol Cartagena Protocol Art. 11: excludes from Advance Informed Agreement (AIA)Art. 11: excludes from Advance Informed Agreement (AIA) Art. 18: DocumentsArt. 18: Documents Art. 13: simplified procedures of notification or exemptionArt. 13: simplified procedures of notification or exemption Notification from Art. 18 Notification from Art. 18 Art. 14: agreements and arrangementsArt. 14: agreements and arrangements Additional impositions raise significant questions of WTO violations Additional impositions raise significant questions of WTO violations Not science basedNot science based Discriminate against like productsDiscriminate against like products Excessive and disguised barriersExcessive and disguised barriers Guatemala Guatemala Learn that these have approvals and safety in country of export Direct notification Biosafety Clearing House Nothing else required to comply with CPB and WTO Risk assessment already done in country of export Decisions on science already done in country of export If any additional questions, use the existing laws of Guatemala on food and feed safety – clearly identify the safety issue, such as a legitimate concern of toxic mixture

Transgenic Crops: Introduction into the Environment Cartagena Protocol Cartagena Protocol (CBD) Convention on Biological Diversity: “conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity”(CBD) Convention on Biological Diversity: “conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity” Arts. 7-10, Arts , AIA procedures, risk assessment, and risk managementArts. 7-10, Arts , AIA procedures, risk assessment, and risk management Core articles and core concernCore articles and core concern Compatible with WTO if: Compatible with WTO if: Based in scienceBased in science NondiscriminatoryNondiscriminatory Not excessive or disguised barriers to tradeNot excessive or disguised barriers to trade Guatemala – AM 386 Guatemala – AM 386 AM Arts – equivalent AIA, risk assessment and risk management AM Arts – technical scientific advice -- coordinate Make nondiscriminatory, i.e. for all introductions not just for export production AM Arts – CPB Arts 13 & 14: simplified procedures Approvals in other nations Rely on already done risk assessments and risk management plans Only reconsider if a specific, legitimate additional concern about biodiversity Approvals should be final – transparent, clear, and certain

Transgenic Organisms: Contained Use, Pharmaceuticals, and Transit Cartagena Protocol Cartagena Protocol Arts. 5 & 6 – AIA does not applyArts. 5 & 6 – AIA does not apply Recognizes and defers to other laws and agreementsRecognizes and defers to other laws and agreements Compatible with WTO Compatible with WTO Outside the scope of CPB, no conflict possibleOutside the scope of CPB, no conflict possible Focus shifts: compatibility of other laws with WTOFocus shifts: compatibility of other laws with WTO Concept especially of nondiscrimination between like products Concept especially of nondiscrimination between like products Guatemala Guatemala AM 386 – amend to delete references to contained use Field trials Laboratory experiments Rely upon existing laws and regulations No need for special laws or regulations for transgenic organisms Rely upon good laboratory practices, good plant breeding protocols, good scientific practices 100 years of scientific plant breeding

Cartagena Concepts: Unrelated and Unneeded Socio-economic considerations Socio-economic considerations CPB Art. 26: “… may take into account, consistent with their international obligations …”CPB Art. 26: “… may take into account, consistent with their international obligations …” Permissive, not mandatory Permissive, not mandatory WTO obligations are based in science, not socio-economic considerations WTO obligations are based in science, not socio-economic considerations Guatemala need not and should not include socio- economic considerations in its biosafety laws. Guatemala need not and should not include socio- economic considerations in its biosafety laws. Liability and redress Liability and redress CPB Art. 27 “… appropriate elaboration of international rules and procedures …” The appropriate elaboration is no international rules and procedures Guatemala need not address liability and redress in its biosafety laws Guatemala need not address liability and redress in its biosafety laws Use existing laws for comparable harms and damages, if any Environmental laws about damage should be nondiscriminatory – i.e. should be general laws that do not single out transgenic crops

General Concepts: Unrelated and Unneeded Consumer labeling Consumer labeling Not addressed in CPBNot addressed in CPB Guatemala Guatemala Use existing laws and regulations about consumer labelingUse existing laws and regulations about consumer labeling Label for safety and nutrition – need to know informationLabel for safety and nutrition – need to know information Voluntary labels for niche markets at the cost of the retailer and consumer seeking niche productVoluntary labels for niche markets at the cost of the retailer and consumer seeking niche product Genetic resources and benefit-sharing Genetic resources and benefit-sharing Not addressed in CPB CBD and International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (PGRFA) Guatemala Guatemala Transgenic agriculture is only distantly related to these concerns. Address in laws that are separate and distinct from biosafety laws.

Guatemala: A Law Focused on Agricultural Biotechnology Can be compatible with CPB and WTO obligations. Can be compatible with CPB and WTO obligations. Can be transparent, clear, and certain. Can be transparent, clear, and certain. Can provide a science-based regulatory policy while avoiding unrelated and unneeded concepts. Can provide a science-based regulatory policy while avoiding unrelated and unneeded concepts. Can promote the benefits of modern plant breeding for the good of Guatemalan society without compromising health and environmental safety. Can promote the benefits of modern plant breeding for the good of Guatemalan society without compromising health and environmental safety. Libro de referencia de normativas sobre seguridad de la biotecnología – a Model Libro de referencia de normativas sobre seguridad de la biotecnología – a Model

Thank you. I welcome questions and further discussions on these very important issues for the benefit of Guatemala and other developing nations.