ADEPT www.scteachers.org 1 SAFE-T Judgments. SAFE-T 2 What are the stages of SAFE-T?  Stage I: Preparation  Stage II: Collection of evidence  Stage.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NC Educator Evaluation System Process Orientation
Advertisements

Lee County Human Resources Glenda Jones. School Speech-Language Pathologist Evaluation Process Intended Purpose of the Standards Guide professional development.
1 Orientation to SAFE-T. 2 ADEPT A Assisting, D Developing, and E Evaluating P Professional T Teaching.
I. Confirm Implementation of the CIP II. Assess the Effectiveness of the Strategies, Action Steps, Benchmarks III. Provide Feedback to CIP Team and Faculty.
Gwinnett Teacher Effectiveness System Training
Teacher Evaluation Model
1.  Why and How Did We Get Here? o A New Instructional Model And Evaluation System o Timelines And Milestones o Our Work (Admin and Faculty, DET, DEAC,
Training Module for Cooperating Teachers and Supervising Faculty
Purpose of Evaluation  Make decisions concerning continuing employment, assignment and advancement  Improve services for students  Appraise the educator’s.
Educator Evaluation System Salem Public Schools. All DESE Evaluation Information and Forms are on the SPS Webpage Forms may be downloaded Hard copies.
Annual Review Process Georgi Lowe UWSA Office of Human Resources & Workforce Diversity.
ADEPT for School Guidance Counselors
Teacher Evaluation Process Component 1: Training Before participating in the evaluation process, all teachers, principals and peer evaluators must complete.
Differentiated Supervision
1 ADEPT Training Module for Cooperating Teachers and Supervising Faculty Winthrop University.
REGIONAL PEER REVIEW PANELS (PRP) August Peer Review Panel: Background  As a requirement of the ESEA waiver, ODE must establish a process to ensure.
for School Library Media Specialists
Lincoln School District. Agenda  Overview of packets Observations Other Types of Evidence Mid-Year Conferences Closing and Next Steps.
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
Rhode Island Model Academy for Personnel Evaluating Teachers Day One Professional Practice.
ADEPT Framework
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Inspire, Educate, and Protect the Students of California Commission on Teacher Credentialing 1 Accreditation Overview.
Document Review STANDARDEVIDENCE Standard 1 - Professional KnowledgeDocumentation and Observation Standard 2 - Instructional PlanningDocumentation and.
Teacher Keys Effectiveness System Forsyth County Schools Orientation May 2013 L.. Allison.
BASIC IRRS TRAINING Lecture 7
1 EPT Adding the A and D back into AD.
ADEPT A D E P T Assisting Developing Evaluating Professional Teaching.
ADEPT 1 SAFE-T Judgments. SAFE-T 2 What are the stages of SAFE-T? Stage I: Preparation  Stage I: Preparation  Stage II: Collection.
The Jordan Performance Appraisal System (JPAS) is designed to help educators in their continuing efforts to provide high quality instruction to all students.
Getting Engaged in Evaluation: How to Develop an Evidence-based Offense for Your Evaluation Presented by Ellen Holmes, NBCT
1 ADEPT for School Guidance Counselors. 2 ADEPT Web Site
ADEPT 1 SAFE-T Evidence. SAFE-T 2 What are the stages of SAFE-T? Stage I: Preparation  Stage I: Preparation  Stage II: Collection.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
SIX STANDARDS RELATED TO TEACHER EFFECTIVENESS STANDARDS 1-5 FROM OBSERVATIONS AND EVIDENCE STANDARD 6 AS A MEASURE OF STUDENT GROWTH WITH A TEACHER AND.
School Social Workers’ Evaluation System Orientation SY10-11 School Social Workers Office, SSS Paulette Herbert, Supervisor Evaluation Systems Office,
The Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 6: Reflecting and Planning for Next Year December 2013.
In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.
SAFE-T NET Introduction
ADEPT Updated November SAFE-T Evidence. SAFE-T 2 Your SAFE-T Guide Who is becoming your your new best friend?
The District Management Council 70 Franklin Street Boston MA, Tel: 877.DMC Springfield Public Schools Springfield Effective.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
STANDARD V AND WRAP-UP: NC TEACHER CANDIDATE EVALUATION TRAINING GWU TRAINING SESSION.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline LEARNING OBJECTIVES REVIEW TEAM AMD COUNTERPARTS Team Composition Qualification PREPARATORY PHASE.
Maximizing RANDA Reports for Directors and Principals Erin Brophy-Lindo Educator Effectiveness Director HR 2015.
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System Jessica Garner
School Development External Review “Building a Learning Community”
The Evaluator's Role in the SLO Process Module Three Summative Conference Presented by the SCDE Office of Educator Effectiveness.
1 Expanded ADEPT Support and Evaluation System Training Module for Cooperating Teachers and Supervising Faculty.
Lenoir County Public Schools New North Carolina Principal Evaluation Process 2008.
Expanded ADEPT Guidance Presentation Office of Educator Effectiveness May 9, 2016.
Process for Evaluating Teachers. Principal’s Responsibility ManageKnowIdentifyEnsureSupervise.
HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT Appraisal Training for Central Office and Campus-Based Non-Teacher Employees September 2013 HOUSTON INDEPENDENT.
AUDIT STAFF TRAINING WORKSHOP 13 TH – 14 TH NOVEMBER 2014, HILTON HOTEL NAIROBI AUDIT PLANNING 1.
Pre-Evaluation Conference Conducted August 18, 2015 STING Schedule.
Candidate Assessment of Performance (CAP): an Overview CAP Practicum Workshop for AIC Teacher Candidates Practicum Workshop Pt.2.
The District Management Council 70 Franklin Street Boston, MA Tel: 877.DMC Springfield Public Schools Springfield Effective.
Speech/Language Pathologist Evaluation System Orientation SY Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Doreen Griffeth, Director.
Evaluations (TPGES) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards. SB 1 Changes The Process Starts with the PGP. Bourbon.
The Club Health Assessment
Speech/Language Pathologist Evaluation System Orientation SY
Teacher Evaluation Process
Administrator Evaluation Orientation
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
SAFE-T Steps to Consensus
Pike County Schools Certified Evaluation Annual Training
SAFE-T Steps to Consensus
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
Presentation transcript:

ADEPT 1 SAFE-T Judgments

SAFE-T 2 What are the stages of SAFE-T?  Stage I: Preparation  Stage II: Collection of evidence  Stage III: ___________________  Stage IV: ___________________ Deliberation Judgments

SAFE-T 3 SAFE-T Evaluator Roles  Detective (i.e. a collector of evidence)  Judge (i.e., a decision-maker about the evidence)

SAFE-T 4 The Role of Detective  As a collector of evidence, the evaluator is responsible for gathering evidence that is as objective as possible.

SAFE-T 5 The Role of Judge  As a judge, the evaluator is responsible for making informed professional judgments.

SAFE-T 6 What is an “informed professional judgment?”  “Informed” means that the judgment is based on factual evidence.

SAFE-T 7 What is an “informed professional judgment?”  “Professional” means that the judgment  is made by a trained expert in the field,  is consistent with ethical guidelines,  is made on a case-by-case basis, and  is maximally free from bias.

SAFE-T 8 Where is the evidence located?  All evidence is contained in the dossier.  The dossier is maintained by the chair of the evaluation team.

SAFE-T 9 What’s in the dossier? At this point, the dossier should contain the following completed documents:  TT1: teacher’s LRP and reflections  TT2: teacher’s UWS and reflections  ET1s: evaluators’ observation records  TT3s: teacher’s reflection on each observed lesson  ET2: professional review completed by the principal  TT4: teacher’s self-assessment

SAFE-T 10 The Judgment Process  At the end of each evaluation period, the team chair must ensure that each member of the evaluation team has access to the entire contents of the dossier.

SAFE-T 11 The Judgment Process  Each evaluator independently reviews all of the evidence in the dossier.

SAFE-T 12 The Judgment Process  Each evaluator analyzes the evidence and completes a working copy of a SAFE-T Summary (ET3) to reflect his or her own independent judgments.

SAFE-T 13 What is ET3?  ET3 is the SAFE-T Summary template.  ET3 is the only required template.

SAFE-T 14 What is ET3?  ET3 is not a form of evidence. ET3 is used to describe the judgments that are based on the evidence.  In addition to the judgments, ET3 includes the rationales for the judgments.

SAFE-T 15 ET3: Levels of Judgments 1.Judgment for each key element (34) 2.Judgment for each domain (4) 3.An overall judgment (1)

SAFE-T 16 The Judgment Process  Following completion of the independent reviews, all members of the evaluation team must participate in a consensus meeting.

SAFE-T 17 The Consensus Meeting  Each evaluator must bring his or her working copy of the SAFE-T Summary (ET3) that he or she has prepared independently.

SAFE-T 18 Consensus Meeting At the consensus meeting, the evaluators 1.present their independent reviews, 2.arrive at consensus regarding each judgment (i.e., met or not met), 3.provide a rationale for each judgment, and 4.complete a consensus-based ET3 (SAFE-T Summary) that will serve as the evaluation report.

SAFE-T 19 Consensus Process 1.Quick polling for each key element. The chair tallies each individual evaluator’s judgment for each key element. 2.Reach consensus on the judgment (met or not met) for each key element.

SAFE-T 20 Consensus Process 3.Write a detailed rationale for each key element judged not met. 4.Write a brief summary rationale for each key element judged met.

SAFE-T 21 ET3 Writing Rubric  be sufficiently unique in order to avoid double jeopardy;  present a clear summary of substantive evidence; and  be sufficiently detailed. The rationale must...

SAFE-T 22 ET3 Writing Rubric  be based on valid evidence; and  be based on the preponderance of evidence. The judgment must...

SAFE-T 23 Who’s got the rationale?

SAFE-T 24 Consensus Process 5.determine the domain ratings by calculating the number of key elements judged as met in each domain. After consensus has been reached for the key element judgments and rationales,

SAFE-T 25 Domain Ratings Domain # of Key Elements Needed to Pass Planning Instruction Environment Professionalism 10 or or 12 5 or 6 4 or 5

SAFE-T 26 In simpler terms, A teacher can miss one key element and still “pass” a domain. If a teacher misses two or more key elements in a particular domain, he or she “fails” the domain.

SAFE-T 27 Consensus Process 6.determine the overall rating. After the domain ratings have been calculated,

SAFE-T 28 Overall Rating  To pass SAFE-T, a teacher must pass all four domains at the time of the final evaluation.  Key elements that are not met automatically become areas for improvement.

SAFE-T 29 Consensus Process 7.If this is the preliminary evaluation period, determine the need for another LRP, UWS, and/or self-assessment. 8.Reach consensus on the teacher’s Professional Growth & Development Plan.

SAFE-T 30 Putting it all together Judgment = Making Sense of the Evidence

SAFE-T 31 Written Reports  A consensus-based ET3 must be completed after each evaluation period. This document serves as the official report.  At the conclusion of each consensus meeting, the independently prepared working copies of the evaluators’ ET3s are destroyed.

SAFE-T 32 Written reports  The Preliminary Evaluation ET3 serves as a sort of progress report to the teacher.  The findings reported on the Final Evaluation ET3 serve as the teacher’s official ADEPT results for the year. Districts must report these results to the SCDE.

SAFE-T 33 Teacher Conferences  At least one evaluation team member must meet in person with the teacher following each consensus meeting but prior to the end of each evaluation cycle.  The purpose of the conference is to provide the teacher with an explanation and a written copy of the consensus-based ET3.

SAFE-T 34  The teacher must sign and date the consensus-based ET3 at the conclusion of the meeting to indicate that he or she has reviewed the information contained on the consensus-based ET3.  The teacher must receive a copy of the consensus-based ET3. Teacher Conferences

SAFE-T 35 What is ET4?  ET4 is the SAFE-T Log.  ET4 is not a form of evidence.  ET4 is an optional template that evaluators may use to plan and document the completion of each step of the evaluation process.

SAFE-T 36 SAFE-T Records  Each teacher’s dossier (including preliminary and final evaluation evidence) must be maintained at least until the teacher’s deadline for filing an appeal has expired.  The consensus-based SAFE-T Summary (ET3) must be maintained indefinitely as part of the teacher’s personnel record.

SAFE-T 37 Responsibilities of the Team Chair  Maintain the dossier.  Ensure that copies of all correspondences are included in the dossier.  If any required teacher evidence is missing from the dossier, note the reason and include copies of reminders to the teacher.

SAFE-T 38 Responsibilities of the Team Chair  Organize and disseminate the entire contents of the dossier to each evaluator.  Schedule and facilitate the consensus meeting.  Schedule the teacher conference and ensure that it is conducted appropriately.  Submit all required documentation to the district office

SAFE-T 39 SAFE-T Exercises Let’s get moving!

SAFE-T 40 Homework

SAFE-T 41 SAFE-T Exam  attend all SAFE-T NET sessions in their entirety;  contribute to all session activities; and  successfully complete all assignments. In order to be given access to the SAFE-T Exam, you must

SAFE-T 42 SAFE-T Certification  successfully complete the SAFE-T exam. In order to become a certified SAFE-T evaluator, you must

ADEPT 43 SAFE-T Take-Away