Ensuring Success in Integrity Management Marty Matheson American Petroleum Institute July 24, 2002.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Make Commitment Milestone 1 Inventory Emissions Milestone 2 Set Target/Goal Milestone 3 Establish Local Action Plan Milestone 5 Monitor/Evaluate Progress.
Advertisements

Joe Killins & Associates, LLC Pipelines & Risk Based Management How Safe is Safe?
GTI’s Composite Materials (CM) Program
The Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) Spill Control Association of America 2014 Annual Meeting and Conference March 20, 2014.
1 PHMSA Pipeline Incident and IM Data: What They Do and Do Not Tell Us Pipeline Safety Trust Conference November 20, 2008 New Orleans, LA Carol Parker.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Gas Gathering Update Pipeline Safety – Getting to Zero Pipeline.
Unregulated Low-Stress Hazardous Liquid Pipelines Mike Israni & John Gale Aug 5, 2009.
Allegro ENERGY CONSULTING Corro sion November 17, 2011 New Orleans, LA © Cheryl J. Trench, 2011 A Tour of Lessons Learned from PHMSA Accident Data Prepared.
Interstate Natural Gas Association of America INGAA Action Plan to Build Confidence in Pipeline Safety INGAA Integrity Management Continuous Improvement.
AGA Perspectives on Current Pipeline Safety Regulations August 2014.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Pipeline and Hazardous Material Safety Administration (PHMSA)
High Consequence Areas & Pipeline Assessment Intervals –Is there a need for change? Terry Boss Sr. VP Environment Safety and Operations Interstate Natural.
BASIC CONCEPTS IN PIPELINE INTEGRITY MANAGEMENT
Overview of Key Rule Features
1 Resources for Integrity Management Marty Matheson, American Petroleum Institute OPS Public Meeting August 8, 2001 Houston, TX.
Pipeline Safety and Reauthorization Pipeline Safety Trust conference November 4, 2010.
Transportation Strategy SCMN 4780 Modal Analysis: Pipeline.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration ~NPMS ~ National Pipeline Mapping System
3P Services, Germany Basil Hostage
Regulation of Pipelines
SCC DA Program Stress-corrosion-cracking direct assessment (SCCDA) is a structured process that contributes to pipeline company’s efforts to improve.
Integrity Management Inspection Process Don Moore, OPS Central Region.
Lessons Learned….. Were PG&E practices an anomaly or the tip of a bigger problem? How would we know? 2011 Pipeline Safety Trust Conference – Getting to.
Western Regional Gas Conference August 24, 2010 Distribution Integrity Management Programs (DIMP) Rule.
Current Inspection Process for Operators of Hazardous Liquids Pipelines Rod Seeley OPS SW Region Director May 18, 2005.
RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS Stephanie Weidman Austin Regional Manager Oversight and Safety Division Pipeline Safety September 2015.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Regulatory and Compliance Landscape Western Region Gas Conference.
Pipeline Safety Trust Fort Worth Natural Gas Production Issues John W. Pepper Project Manager Office of Pipeline Safety Southwest Region, Houston, Texas.
Distribution Integrity Management – What To Expect John Erickson, PE American Public Gas Association Western Regional Gas Conference.
Office of Pipeline Safety U. S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
Pipeline Safety New Orleans Nov. 18, 2011 Getting to Zero.
Office of Pipeline Safety Integrity Management Inspection Process Louisiana Pipeline Safety Seminar August 2003.
Aging Infrastructure Management and Challenges Sue Fleck Vice President Pipeline Safety Trust “Getting to Zero’ Conference 2011.
Performance Reporting Presentation at the Pipeline Safety Trust’s “Restoring Trust in Pipeline Safety” Conference November 3, 2006 Lois N. Epstein, P.E.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Overview of Integrity Verification Process (IVP) Workshop Held.
ILLINOIS COMMERCE COMMISSION Darin Burk Manager – Pipeline Safety 1.
OPS Workshop August 8, 2001 Equilon Pipeline Company, LLC. Equilon Pipeline’s Risk Management Program.
HCAs & Pipeline Assessment Intervals Is There a Need for Change? Richard B. Kuprewicz President, Accufacts Inc. For Pipeline Safety Trust New Orleans Conference.
1 Integrity Management: Lessons Learned, Challenges A Presentation by the Hazardous Liquids Pipeline Industry to the OPS Public Meeting on Integrity Management.
10/09/03 GR: U.S. Department of Transportation Research and Special Programs Administration 10/09/03 Number of Accidents Trendline 01.
METAL LOSS IN-LINE INSPECTION SURVEYS LIMITS AND INACCURACIES.
1 November 3, 2006 David Knoelke API Public Awareness Committee Chair (BP Pipelines N.A.) Greater Public Involvement – What does that mean?
A Framework for Your Pipeline Integrity Program. 2 A Few Thoughts Before Beginning l This rule is new to the pipeline industry although many of the concepts.
What’s Wrong with Integrity Management? How Do We Improve Integrity Management? Terry Boss Senior Vice President Safety Environment and Operations PST.
Enbridge SCC Management Program SCC Workshop Houston - December 2, 2003 Walter Kresic Enbridge Pipelines Inc. SCC Workshop Houston - December 2, 2003 Walter.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Pipeline Standards and Rulemaking Division: Current Rulemakings.
Pipeline Performance Measures Alan Mayberry New Orleans, Louisiana Pipeline Safety Trust Annual Conference
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Gas Transmission 2012 Annual Reports Joint Advisory Committees.
Pipeline Safety – 2015 Year in Review. Large PHMSA Budget Increase Pipeline Safety spending in 2015 was increased $26.9 million. Main areas of expansion.
How Old is too Old? Who Makes that Decision? Alan Mayberry New Orleans, Louisiana Pipeline Safety Trust Annual Conference
Lessons Learned from Integrity Management Inspections Byron Coy – OPS Eastern Region Derick Turner – OPS Southern Region May 17, 2005.
Stress Corrosion Cracking (SCC) Josef Kopec, P.Eng.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Pipeline Standards and Rulemaking Division: Current Rulemakings.
OPS Observations, Expectations, and Concerns Zach Barrett (OPS) Direct Assessment Workshop November 4, 2003.
High Consequence Areas & Pipeline Assessment Intervals Pipeline Safety Trust New Orleans, LA November 20, 2008 Elizabeth Komiskey, P.E. PHMSA/Office of.
Development of IM Inspection Process Workshop on the Integrity Management Rule for Large Liquid Pipelines Bruce Hansen August 7, 2001.
Who is INGAA? INGAA represents the majority of the interstate natural gas transmission pipeline companies operating in the U.S., as well as comparable.
MICHAEL BAKER Jr., Inc. Stress Corrosion Cracking SCC Workshop December 2, 2003 Engineering & Energy.
Need Information or Assistance? Where to go, what’s available and what’s not.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Pipeline Standards and Rulemaking Division: Regulatory Initiatives.
Office of Pipeline Safety Remedial Action Review Protocol Integrity Management Workshop July 23-24, 2002.
Pipeline Safety in Michigan Jennifer McKay Policy Director Tip of the Mitt Watershed Council City of Boyne City Commission Meeting April 25, 2016.
Gas Pipeline Safety Federal Regulatory Update Pete Chace Public Utilities Commission of Ohio Gas Pipeline Safety Program Manager.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Pipeline Standards and Rulemaking Division: Current Rulemakings.
Integrity Management Continuous Improvement Project Status and Implementation Process Presentation for: PHMSA Advisory Committees July 11, 2012.
Stress Corrosion Cracking Technical Workshop Office of Pipeline Safety Research and Special Programs Administration SCC Workshop December 2, 2003 Houston,
Pipeline Safety Issues
Distribution Integrity
Pipeline Integrity Management Programs
Presentation transcript:

Ensuring Success in Integrity Management Marty Matheson American Petroleum Institute July 24, 2002

2 Our vision is an oil pipeline industry that -- l conducts operations safely and with respect for the environment; l respects the privilege to operate granted to it by the public; and l provides reliable transportation of the crude oil and refined products upon which America and all Americans rely.

The History: Improving Record, First six years, Annl Avg: 359 spills; 368,000 barrels Last six years, Annl Avg: 160 spills; 145,000 barrels Source: Allegro Energy Group from RSPA Updated 3/27/02.

4 Overview -- Measuring Effectiveness: l Understanding past performance l Creating new measures for future performance l Surveying operator plans for inspections l Identifying potential barriers to success and taking action

5 Pipeline Performance Tracking System – A Voluntary Effort l Incidents down to 5 gallons l 20 cause categories based on ASME l Detail, detail, detail l Over 140,000 miles of pipe or more than 90% of regulated mileage l Infrastructure information u Miles by diameter u Miles by decade of construction, etc.

6 New Infrastructure Data Elements l System Mileage By Commodity Transported u Crude oil u Refined products u HVLs u CO2 and other gases VALUE: Provides data for conducting analyses for separate aspects of the industry

7 New Infrastructure Data Elements l System Mileage That “Could Affect” High Consequence Areas (line pipe) l Facilities That “Could Affect” High Consequence Areas (tanks, pumps, etc.) l VALUE: Trend analysis of incidents in HCAs versus incidents in non-HCAs

New Infrastructure Data Elements l Mileage inspected by ILI u Corrosion or metal loss tool | Dent or deformation tool Crack or long seam defect tool | Any other ILI tool l Actions taken based on ILI u # Anomalies excavated and inspected | # Conditions identified and repaired | # “immediate repair condition” | # “60-day condition” | # “180-day condition” l Mileage inspected by pressure testing l Actions taken based on pressure testing u # Ruptures | # Leaks | # Test failures repaired l Mileage inspected by other techniques, direct assessment l VALUE: Provides for evaluating the effect of the IMP rules and of company integrity management programs

New Infrastructure Data Elements l Total mileage assessed in calendar year l Total number of conditions repaired or otherwise mitigated l Total baseline assessments completed in calendar year u Risk assessment complete u Inspection complete (tools/hydro) u Information integrated u Repairs and mitigation complete VALUE: Provides means to evaluate progress toward specific IMP rulemaking goals

l Did this release reach any "high consequence areas“? l If yes, specify below the types of HCA's affected and whether they were identified or not identified in your Integrity Management Program. Û Com. navigable waterway___identified ___not identified Û High population area___identified ___not identified Û Other populated area___identified ___not identified Û Unusually Sensitive Area – Water___identified ___not identified Û Unusually Sensitive Area – Ecol.___identified ___not identified VALUE: Provides data for evaluating HCA definitions and their application New Incident Data Elements

11 What Should You Be Doing to Measure Performance? l Collect information about your integrity performance l Participate in PPTS l Collect consistent information even if you don’t participate in PPTS

12 Survey of Company Plans on ILI l Over the 7 year baseline period l 112,000 miles included in the survey l 70% of interstate oil pipeline mileage regulated by OPS

13 Context Information l Between 85-90% of oil pipeline mileage is currently capable of being inspecting using ILI technology l Does not represent all forms of inspection, just IL l No hydrotest or direct assessment information

14 ILI Inspections – Inspection PeriodMiles inspected or to be inspected Cumulative mileage inspected 1996 – , – ,000 (HCA) 72, – ,000 (non HCA) 142,000

Projected ILI Demand – YearHCA milesNon-HCA miles or undifferentiated ILI per year 20027,5009,30016, ,70010,90018, ,90010,50017, ,60010,60016, ,90012,00017, ,9008,30012, ,4006,70011,100

16 Potential Range of Annual ILI Demand Prior to ,000 – 11,000 Projected peak year ,000 – 27,000 Projected average 2002 – ,000 – 23,000

17 Goals l More integrity assessments u In HCAs u Beyond HCAs l Improving integrity management within companies l Improving the government’s role in reviewing the adequacy of plans l Providing increased public assurance

The History: Improving Record, First six years, Annl Avg: 359 spills; 368,000 barrels Last six years, Annl Avg: 160 spills; 145,000 barrels Source: Allegro Energy Group from RSPA Updated 3/27/02.