1 Measuring Quality Using Experience Surveys 2005 Center for Policy and Innovation Quality Assurance and Improvement January 26, 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University ®
Advertisements

Iowas Money Follows the Person, Partnership for Community Integration: New Choices for Iowans with Disabilities and Their Families.
What It Means for HCS Participants & Their Families Hill Country Community MHMR Center March 23, 2010 Changing from HCS Case Management to Service Coordination.
1 Nebraska’s Pathway to Early Learning Guidelines.
Partnership for Community Integration Iowa’s Money Follows the Person Demonstration Project.
Maryland’s Participant Experience Survey Lisa Kelemen RN, MSN Administrator, Real Choice Systems Change Grant.
Maryland’s Home and Community-Based Services Waivers Medicaid Advisory Committee – June 2006 Maryland’s Home and Community-Based Services Waivers Medicaid.
STATE OF MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND MENTAL HYGIENE Statewide Transition Plan for Compliance with Home and Community-Based Setting Final Rule 1 Public.
11 Opportunities to Improve Care for Persons with Disabilities: The Community Living Initiative IMPLEMENTING NATIONAL HEALTH REFORM IN A DIFFICULT ECONOMIC.
Great change is made through small steps... Attachment Area Plan Public Hearing Handout.
The Evercare Model: Using Nurse Practitioners to Achieve Positive Outcomes Pat Kappas-Larson, MPH APRN-BC Professional Relations/Development April 24,
National Core Indicators Adult Family Survey Results Josh Engler, Human Services Research Institute
1 Wisconsin Partnership Program Steven J. Landkamer Program Manager Wisconsin Dept. of Health & Family Services July 14, 2004.
Building Consultation Teams Lisa Manuel, PhD Family Service Toronto National Elder Abuse Conference November 4, 2009.
Medicaid Waivers and Interest Lists JOHN E SCHNEIDER.
Federal Consulting Group August 2004 Department of Labor Civil Rights Center 2004 Satisfaction Study - Recipients.
1. Self-AdvocacyObjective 1.1: Increase the number of individuals with developmental disabilities who participate in self- advocacy, leadership and self-determination.
FAMILY PEER SUPPORT SERVICES OMH Children’s Division of Integrated Community Services May 19, 2015 Presentation to New York State Success Membership.
1 Georgia Division of Aging Services Overview of Programs.
Information and planning that make the difference.
Transition Assessments Matrix Great Prairie AEA Transition Coordinators  Transition Assessment  Living, Learning and Working.
Washington State Team May, 2015 Ed Holen, DDC Shannon Manion, DDA Debbie Roberts, DDA Community of Practice: Supporting Individuals with Intellectual/Developmental.
Sara Galantowicz July 11, 2006 Using Consumer Surveys for Quality Management: A Modified PES as One Option Presentation to Cash & Counseling States.
State of Maine: Quality Management and National Core Indicators.
Organization Mission Organizations That Use Evaluative Thinking Will Develop mission statements specific enough to provide a basis for goals and.
Personal Experience Survey (PES) Michigan Model Measuring the Quality of Services in the MIChoice Waiver Program.
ACT NDIS Awareness Package
INCOPORATING NCI INTO A QUALITY REVIEW SYSTEM CONNECTICUT DMR Laura Nuss, Director of Strategic Leadership Reinventing Quality Conference 2004.
Santa Clara County Older Adult Summit Held on June, 1, 2011 Summary Report to the Mental Health Board March 12,
COMMUNITY Needs Assessment Overview
Introduction to the Family-Centered Medical Home Massachusetts Home Visiting Initiative A Department of Public Health led state agency collaborative
New York State Department of Health Office of Long Term Care Long Term Care Restructuring Annual Long Term Care Ombudsman Training Institute October 18,
What It Means for HCS Participants and Their Families.
The Quality Conundrum Achieving Safety, Health and Valued Outcomes.
Drake 274.  Interests and Preferences for Postsecondary Expectations  Definition: Interests are those things/activities that evoke curiosity and preferences.
PEONIES: Making self determination and self direction the root of quality Sara Karon, Ph.D. Director, the PEONIES Project Center for Health Systems Research.
NCI: A Growing Commitment Five Years of Performance Measurement 127 th Annual AAMR Meeting, Chicago, IL Val Bradley  Human Services Research Institute.
Independence & Well-being of Older People Community Services Scrutiny Committee - 12 June 2007 Morag Cuthbertson Julie Cushion “Our own future selves”
Division of Aging Services White House Conference on Aging Healthy Aging Summit Georgia Department of Human Services Presenter: James J. Bulot Division.
Using Program Data to Improve Services Kristin Stainbrook, Ph.D. Advocates for Human Potential, Inc. Albany, NY The Center for Substance Abuse Treatment.
Public Health Advocacy in Low Income Settings: Views and Experiences on Effective Strategies and Evaluation of Health Advocates in Malawi IFGH Conference:
C ore I ndicators P roject An Overview of How Connecticut Is Using the NCI CONSUMER SURVEY FAMILY SUPPORT SURVEY CHILDREN’S SURVEY State of Connecticut.
Tamar Heller, Katie Arnold, Lieke van Heumen Elizabeth McBride, & Alan Factor Growing Older with a Disability Toronto, June 6, 2011 Rehabilitation Research.
Medicaid Managed Care Program for the Elderly and Persons with Disabilities Pamela Coleman Texas Health and Human Services Commission January 2003.
Practical Approaches to Designing and Conducting Surveys for Quality Management Teresa Richard Texas Department of Aging and Disability Services 2006.
NCI-MAINE What is NCI?  NCI is a voluntary effort by public developmental disabilities agencies to measure and.
December 20, A Brief Overview: Real Choice and Independence Plus Systems Change Grants Connect the Dots Meeting December 20, 2004.
National Core Indicators Overview for the State of Maine Sarah Taub & Giusi Chiri Human Services Research Institute January 30, 2003.
Age & Disabilities Odyssey Conference Tuesday, June 21, 2011.
Money Follows the Person Demonstration Grant & Waivers May 18, 2012.
Chris Strangwood Frances Fairclough North Tyneside Single Assessment Process Information and Development Events Menzies Hotel, North Shields April - May.
Olmstead Plan One Year Update Presented at ACLAIMH November 6, 2014.
September 20, “Real Choice” in Flexible Supports and Services A Pilot Project Kim Wamback, UMMS Center for Health Policy and Research (Grant Staff)
Federal Quality Assurance and Improvement Initiatives Mary Jean Duckett Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services May 8, 2002.
Striving Towards Excellence in Comprehensive Care: What do Children Need? July 10, 2007 Christopher A. Kus, M.D., M.P.H.
Planning Phase March 1, 2010 from 3 to 5 PM One Ashburton Place, 21 st Floor Conference Room # 3 Boston, Massachusetts Integrating Medicare and Medicaid.
Independent Providers within a Quality Assurance & Improvement Framework Dilemmas, Future Directions, and Promising Practices Valerie Bradley & June Rowe.
DataBrief: Did you know… DataBrief Series ● September 2011 ● No.19 Differences in Hospitalization Rates By Residence Community residents are nearly twice.
Defining and Achieving Quality Michigan’s Long-Term Care Conference Troy Hilton March 23, 2006 Alison Hirschel, Esq., Michigan Poverty Law Program Pam.
Core Values For a Good Long Term Care System Persons with disabilities and their families are entitled to maximum feasible choice/participation in selecting.
Report on the NCSEAM Part C Family Survey Batya Elbaum, Ph.D. National Center for Special Education Accountability Monitoring February 2005.
Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale - 2 Parents, Caregivers and Youth Information on BERS-2 Parent Rating Scale April 13, 2012.
Aging in Place in Newport Toward A Model Senior-Friendly Community In Newport County, Rhode Island Visiting Nurse Services of Newport and Bristol Counties.
Home and Community-Based Medicaid Waiver Services Aged and Disabled Medicaid Waiver Update March 2016.
1 South Carolina ACCESS Plus (ARDC) Planning Retreat Susan C. Reinhard, R.N., Ph.D. Co -Director Rutgers Center for State Health Policy.
Leader of the Pack: The Role of the DON in Green House Homes
No Place Like HOME Texas Kick Off Meeting
Annual Meeting American Association of University Centers on Excellence in Developmental Disabilities Stephanie Giordano Valerie Bradley Alexandra Bonardi.
Everyday Lives: Values in Action Using IM4Q Data to Improve Statewide
Office of Developmental Programs IM4Q Annual Training Quality Management Updates July 28, /18/2018.
Presentation transcript:

1 Measuring Quality Using Experience Surveys 2005 Center for Policy and Innovation Quality Assurance and Improvement January 26, 2006

2 Critical optimism “is the belief that the specific conditions which exist at one moment, be they comparatively bad or comparatively good, in any event may be bettered”. (John Dewey, 1929)

3 DADS Mission T o provide a comprehensive array of aging and disability services, supports, and opportunities that are easily accessed in local communities. Our key responsibilities to the citizens of Texas include:  Working in partnership with consumer, caregivers, service providers, and other stakeholders.  Developing and improving service options that are responsive to individual needs and preferences  Ensuring and protecting self-determination, consumer rights, and safety.

4 Purpose  Obtain information from the person’s perspective about their experiences  Obtain initial baseline of data to build upon  Conduct surveys annually in order to trend and analyze  Data will point to areas for further exploration

5 Measuring Quality  One of only a few states to undertake a project of this size and scope  1,980 face-to-face surveys in the HCS, TxHmL, ICF/MR, CLASS, DB-MD, CBA, and CWP for 18 years and older

6 Introduction  DADS joined National Core Indicator Project in September 2005  Contracted with NACES Plus Foundation, Inc. to conduct the surveys  Interviews conducted May through August  Interviews conducted annually to identify trends

7 Quality Indicators  National Core Indicators (NCI)  30 Indicators  4 Domains – Consumer Outcomes – System Performance – Health, Welfare, and Rights – Self-Determination (added by the QA/QI Task Force)  Participant Experience Survey (PES) Elderly/Disabled version  39 Indicators  5 Domains – Access to Care – Choice and Control – Respect/Dignity – Community Integration/Inclusion – Self-Determination (added by QA/QI Task Force)

8 Methodology  Proportional sampling based on number of people in each program by county  Interviews were conducted in the person’s home unless person chose not to  Interviews were conducted in about one-half of the counties across Texas  Demographics from DADS automated systems of people receiving services

9 Training  Conducted in April 2005  In person by developers of tools  Mock interviews with persons receiving services  Regular conference call with interviewers  Frequently asked questions collected and distributed

10 It is important to use the data as a basis for further discussion and inquiry in order to “interpret” or draw conclusions from the results.

11 Next Steps  Internal review of results  Share with QA/QI Task Force to: – Review results and identify/prioritize areas for improvement or further study – Develop strategies for making improvements  Broader stakeholder input

12 High-Level Results  Majority of people in HCS, TxHmL, ICF/MR, CLASS, DB-MD, and CWP report: – They receive the services they need – Have had a physical exam in the past year – Do not feel lonely

13 Results - continued  Majority of people in HCS, TxHmL, and CLASS are satisfied with where they live  Majority of people in HCS, TxHmL, ICF/MR, CLASS, and DB-MD participate in integrated activities in their communities

14 Results - continued  In the HCS, TxHmL, ICF/MR, CLASS, DB- MD, & CWP a low proportion of: – Women had OB/GYN exams in the last year – People have participated in activities of self- advocacy groups – People were provided options about where to live and work – People made choices about important life decisions including: housing, roommates, support staff or providers, daily routines, social activities, job, and services coordination

15 Results - continued  The majority of people in the CWP & CBA Programs: – Are able to eat when they need to because there is someone there to help them. – Have chosen their current job – Like their current job

16 Results -continued  69% of people in CWP and 39% of people in CBA do not choose their staff but would like to  50% of people in CWP and 64% of people in CBA report an unmet need for community involvement  Over one-third of people in CWP who are not elderly would like to work

17 Home and Community-Based Services (HCS) Highest satisfaction with the following:  93% - “needed” services were available  92% - have had a physical exam in the past year

18 Home and Community-Based Services (HCS) Lowest satisfaction with the following:  16% - people have participated in activities of self-advocacy groups or other groups that address rights  17% - people make choices about important life decisions including: housing, roommates, support staff or providers, daily routines, social activities, job and services coordination

19 Texas Home Living (TxHmL) Highest satisfaction with the following:  93% - “needed” services were available  93% - do not feel lonely

20 Texas Home Living (TxHmL) Lowest satisfaction with the following:  14% - women have had an OB/GYN exam in the past year  9% - people have participated in activities of self-advocacy groups or other groups that address rights  7% - people report having been provided options about where to live  16% - people indicate that most staff who come to their home treat them with respect * *72% reported having no staff who come to their home

21 Intermediate Care Facilities for Persons with Mental Retardation (ICF/MR) Highest satisfaction with the following:  98% - “needed” services were available  96% - have had a physical exam in the past year

22 Intermediate Care Facilities for Persons with Mental Retardation (ICF/MR) Lowest satisfaction with the following:  12% - have participated in activities of self- advocacy groups or other groups that address rights  16% - report having been provided options about where to live  15% - report having been provided options about where to work  9% - people make choices about important life decisions about; housing, roommates,support staff or providers, daily routines, social activities, job, and services coordination

23 Community Living Assistance and Support Services (CLASS) Highest satisfaction with the following:  93% - “needed” services were available  96% - have had a physical exam in the past year

24 Community Living Assistance and Support Services (CLASS) Lowest satisfaction with the following:  10% - women have had an OB/GYN exam in the past year  14% - people report having been provided options about where to live  9% - people report having been provided options about where to work

25 Deaf-Blind with Multiple Disabilities (DB-MD) Highest satisfaction with the following:  98% - “needed” services were available  90% - have had a physical exam in the past year  92% - do not feel lonely Results are valid plus or minus 9.4 percent because of the small sample size.

26 Deaf-Blind with Multiple Disabilities (DB-MD) Lowest satisfaction with the following:  15% - people have participated in activities of self-advocacy groups or other groups that address rights  10% - people report having been provided options about where to live  10% - people report having been provided options about where to work  15% - people have an “advocate” or someone who speaks on their behalf

27 Deaf-Blind with Multiple Disabilities (DB-MD) Lowest satisfaction with the following:  18% - people report that service coordinators help them get what they need  20% - people who report that they feel safe in their home  20% - people who report that they feel safe in their neighborhood  20% - people whose basic rights are respected by others

28 Consolidated Waiver Program (CWP) Using the NCI Survey Highest satisfaction with the following:  88% - “needed” services were available  84% - do not feel lonely  78% - have had a physical exam in the past year Results are valid no more than plus or minus 9.6 percent because of the small sample size.

29 Consolidated Waiver Program (CWP) Using the NCI Survey Lowest satisfaction with the following:  4% - women have had an OB/GYN exam in the past year  20% - people have participated in activities of self-advocacy groups or other groups that address rights  6% - people report having been provided options about where to live  18% - people make choices about important life decisions including: housing, roommates, support staff or providers, daily routines, social activities, job, and services coordination

30 Consolidated Waiver Program (CWP) Using the PES Survey Major findings from the PES indicators:  3% - are not treated respectfully by staff in their homes  3% - are verbally abused by current staff Results are valid plus or minus 4.6 percent because of the small sample size.

31 Consolidated Waiver Program (CWP) Using the PES Survey Other major findings:  69% - do not choose their care staff, but would like to  50% - report an unmet need for community involvement Results are valid plus or minus 12.5 percent because of the small sample size.

32 Community Based Alternatives (CBA) Using the PES Survey Major findings from the PES indicators:  3% - sometimes go without a meal because there is no one there to help them  3% - are unsure who to report staffing problems to or would report staffing problems to “no one”  2% - are sometimes unable to eat because there is no one there to help them

33 Community Based Alternatives (CBA) Using the PES Survey Other major findings:  37% - earn enough money to buy the things they want  39% - do not choose their care staff, but would like to  64% - report an unmet need for community involvement