NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy - 2009 Lecture 12: The beautiful theory of interferometry. First, some movies to illustrate the problem.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Points, Vectors, Lines, Spheres and Matrices
Advertisements

A Crash Course in Radio Astronomy and Interferometry: 2
Announcements. Structure-from-Motion Determining the 3-D structure of the world, and/or the motion of a camera using a sequence of images taken by a moving.
Transformations We want to be able to make changes to the image larger/smaller rotate move This can be efficiently achieved through mathematical operations.
Activity 1: Properties of radio arrays © Swinburne University of Technology The Australia Telescope Compact Array.
Lecture 11 (Was going to be –Time series –Fourier –Bayes but I haven’t finished these. So instead:) Radio astronomy fundamentals NASSP Masters 5003F -
Techniques in Signal and Data Processing CSC 508 Frequency Domain Analysis.
Machine Transformations
NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy Lecture 13 Further with interferometry – Resolution and the field of view; Binning in frequency and.
Understanding interferometric visibility functions J. Meisner.
Expression of d-dpacing in lattice parameters
SIW 2003 The antenna element Ravi ATNF, Narrabri 1.The role of the antenna in a Fourier synthesis radio telescope 2.The Compact array antenna.
Twelfth Synthesis Imaging Workshop 2010 June 8-15 Principles of Interferometry Rick Perley, NRAO/Socorro.
Radio `source’ Goals of telescope: maximize collection of energy (sensitivity or gain) isolate source emission from other sources… (directional gain… dynamic.
HCI 530 : Seminar (HCI) Damian Schofield. HCI 530: Seminar (HCI) Transforms –Two Dimensional –Three Dimensional The Graphics Pipeline.
1 EE 542 Antennas and Propagation for Wireless Communications Array Antennas.
2010 CASS Imaging Workshop Narrabri, NSW. Fundamentals of Radio Interferometry Rick Perley, NRAO/Socorro.
Interference Daniel Mitchell, ATNF and Sydney University.
Image Enhancement in the Frequency Domain Part I Image Enhancement in the Frequency Domain Part I Dr. Samir H. Abdul-Jauwad Electrical Engineering Department.
CSCE 590E Spring 2007 Basic Math By Jijun Tang. Applied Trigonometry Trigonometric functions  Defined using right triangle  x y h.
TECHNIQUES OF INTEGRATION
Some Properties of the 2-D Fourier Transform Translation Distributivity and Scaling Rotation Periodicity and Conjugate Symmetry Separability Convolution.
Fourier Analysis D. Gordon E. Robertson, PhD, FCSB School of Human Kinetics University of Ottawa.
1 Synthesis Imaging Workshop Error recognition R. D. Ekers Narrabri, 14 May 2003.
Discrete Time Periodic Signals A discrete time signal x[n] is periodic with period N if and only if for all n. Definition: Meaning: a periodic signal keeps.
ELECTRIC CIRCUIT ANALYSIS - I
Interferometry Basics
Multipole expansion of the radiation fields
Mathematical Fundamentals
ME 2304: 3D Geometry & Vector Calculus
Lecture 1: Complex Numbers
Motivation Music as a combination of sounds at different frequencies
Geometric Transformation. So far…. We have been discussing the basic elements of geometric programming. We have discussed points, vectors and their operations.
Investment Analysis and Portfolio management Lecture: 24 Course Code: MBF702.
Physics 361 Principles of Modern Physics Lecture 8.
Random Media in Radio Astronomy Atmospherepath length ~ 6 Km Ionospherepath length ~100 Km Interstellar Plasma path length ~ pc (3 x Km)
Eleventh Synthesis Imaging Workshop Socorro, June 10-17, 2008 Principles of Interferometry Rick Perley National Radio Astronomy Observatory Socorro, NM.
Tenth Summer Synthesis Imaging Workshop University of New Mexico, June 13-20, 2006 Antennas in Radio Astronomy Peter Napier.
P.Napier, Synthesis Summer School, 18 June Antennas in Radio Astronomy Peter Napier Interferometer block diagram Antenna fundamentals Types of antennas.
SECOND-ORDER DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS Series Solutions SECOND-ORDER DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS In this section, we will learn how to solve: Certain.
Prof. D. R. Wilton Notes 22 Antennas and Radiation Antennas and Radiation ECE 3317 [Chapter 7]
Two-Sided or Complex Exponential Form of the Fourier Series
1 The OSKAR Simulator (Version 2!) AAVP Workshop, ASTRON, 15 th December 2011 Fred Dulwich, Ben Mort, Stef Salvini.
NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy Lecture 9 – Radio Astronomy Fundamentals Source (randomly accelerating electrons) Noisy electro- magnetic.
Newton’s gravity Spherical systems - Newtons theorems, Gauss theorem - simple sphercal systems: Plummer and others Flattened systems - Plummer-Kuzmin -
October 29, 2013Computer Vision Lecture 13: Fourier Transform II 1 The Fourier Transform In the previous lecture, we discussed the Hough transform. There.
1 ATNF Synthesis Workshop 2001 Basic Interferometry - II David McConnell.
ATNF Synthesis Imaging School Narrabri, Sept. 30 – Oct 4, 2008 Principles of Interferometry Rick Perley National Radio Astronomy Observatory Socorro, NM.
Astronomical Data Analysis I
NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy Lecture 14 Reprise: dirty beam, dirty image. Sensitivity Wide-band imaging Weighting –Uniform vs Natural.
The Australia Telescope National Facility Ray Norris CSIRO ATNF.
Practicalities of Radio Interferometry
Ninth Synthesis Imaging Summer School Socorro, June 15-22, 2004 Fundamentals of Radio Interferometry Rick Perley.
NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy Lecture 12 Complex numbers – an alternate view The Fourier transform Convolution, correlation, filtering.
NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy Lecture 16 Further with interferometry – Digital correlation Earth-rotation synthesis and non-planar.
Lecture 14. Radio Interferometry Talk at Nagoya University IMS Oct /43.
Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) Problem: we need an efficient way to compute the DFT. The answer is the FFT. Consider a data sequence and its DFT: We can.
Lens to interferometer Suppose the small boxes are very small, then the phase shift Introduced by the lens is constant across the box and the same on both.
1 ATNF Synthesis Workshop 2003 Basics of Interferometry David McConnell.
NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy Lecture 11 Single-dish spectra: baselines. Complex numbers refresher Fourier refresher Correlation.
Single Dish Summer School, Green Bank 2007 Things to do with Single Dish: VLBI Tapasi Ghosh NAIC/Arecibo Observatory Outline: Interferometry Basic.
Antenna Engineering EC 544 Lecture#9. Chapter 9 Horn Antenna Horn Antenna.
7. Electromagnetic Waves 7A. Plane Waves Consider Maxwell’s Equations with no sources We are going to search for waves of the form To make things as general.
Details: Gridding, Weight Functions, the W-term
Potential - density pairs (continued)
COMPLEX NUMBERS and PHASORS
Positional Astronomy Chapter 3 Fundamentals of Radio Interferometry
van Cittert-Zernike Theorem
Sinusoids: continuous time
Activity 1: Properties of radio arrays
Presentation transcript:

NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy Lecture 12: The beautiful theory of interferometry. First, some movies to illustrate the problem. Clues of what sort of maths to aim for. Geometrical calculation of phase. Visibility formulas.

NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy Simplifying approximations: I’ll assume a small bandwidth Δ ν, so signals can be approximated by sinusoids. I’ll neglect polarization. I’ll explain interferometry first in 2 dimensions, then extend this to 3. There are many sorts of interferometer but I’ll concentrate on aperture synthesis. The fundamental maths for a 2-antenna interferometer can be easily expanded to cater for more than 2.

NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy Interferometry

NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy Interferometry

NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy Expression for the phase difference φ θ Path difference d = D sin θ D=u λ

NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy Clues..? Since φ is proportional to sin(θ), if we could measure φ, we could work out where the source is in the sky. From last lecture, we saw that correlating the signals from the two antennas gives us a number proportional to S exp(-iφ), where S is the flux density of the source in W Hz -1. Things are looking good! The fly in the ointment is...

NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy The sky is full of sources. The correlation returns an intensity-weighted average of all their phases. D=u λ

NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy Formally speaking... The correlation between the voltage signals from the two antennas is We’ll call V the visibility function. A is the variation in antenna efficiency with θ. I is the quantity formerly known as B – ie the brightness distribution. Its units (in this 2- dimensional model) are W m -2 rn -1 Hz -1 To keep things simple(r) I’ve ignored any summation over frequency ν.

NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy Coordinate systems – everything is aligned with the phase centre. b w u For baselines: 2 1 θ l (1-l 2 ) 1/2 Celestial sphere dθdθ =sin θ The direction normal to the plane of the antennas is called the phase centre. Normally the antennas are pointing that way, too. =cos θ

NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy Putting it all together: gives We want to complete the change of variable from θ to l. It’s not hard to show that so the final expression is

NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy Ahah! Provided w=0, or in other words provided the antennas all lie in a single plane normal to the phase centre, This is a Fourier transform! We just need to get a lot of samples of V at various u, then back- transform to get Trouble is, we can’t always keep w=0.

NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy Non-coplanar arrays. b 1,2 2 1 θ l (1-l 2 ) 1/2 dθdθ 3 b 2,3 b 1,3 Phase centre w u For baselines: u 1,3 w 1,3 = w 2,3

NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy The factor of (1- l 2 ) 1/2 prevents the full expression for V´(u,w) from being a Fourier transform. But for small l, (1- l 2 ) 1/2 is close to 1, and varies only slowly. Let’s do a Taylor expansion of it: The full expression therefore becomes (1- l 2 ) 1/2 = 1 – ½ l 2 +O( l 4 ). Non-coplanar arrays - small-field approximation:

NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy Non-coplanar arrays - small-field approximation: For V(u)=V´(u,w)exp(2 π iw), and πwl 2 <<1, and we are back to the Fourier expression. V is like measuring V´ with a phantom antenna in the same plane as the others. So: for non-coplanar antennas, what matters is the projection length u of each baseline, projected on a plane normal to the ‘phase centre’.

NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy The phase centre The location of the phase centre is controlled as follows: 1.Decide which direction you want to be the phase centre. 2.That direction defines the orientation of the u-w axes. 3.Calculate w j,k for each j,k th baseline in that coordinate system. 4.Multiply each correlation R j,k by the appropriate e 2 π iw factor. (Equivalent is to delay the leading signal by t=w/ ν.) 5.After appropriate scaling, the result is a sample of the visibility function V(u j,k ) appropriate to the chosen phase centre.

NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy Now we go to 3 dimensions and N antennas. The coordinate axes in 3 dimensions are labelled (u,v,w) for baselines and (l,m,n) for source vectors. Each pair of antennas gives us a different projected baseline. N antennas give N(N-1)/2 baselines. Thus N antennas give N(N-1)/2 samples of the ‘coplanar’ visibility function

NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy An example The full visibility function V(u,v) (real part only shown). A familiar pattern of ‘sources’

NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy Let’s observe this with three antennas: u v Longitude Latitude

NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy ‘Snapshot’ sampling of V is poor.

NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy Aperture synthesis via the Earth’s rotation.

NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy View from the phase centre