IAEA Workshop on NSDD, Trieste, November 2003 The interacting boson model P. Van Isacker, GANIL, France Dynamical symmetries of the IBM Neutrons, protons.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Some (more) Nuclear Structure
Advertisements

Valence shell excitations in even-even spherical nuclei within microscopic model Ch. Stoyanov Institute for Nuclear Research and Nuclear Energy Sofia,
Generalized pairing models, Saclay, June 2005 Generalized models of pairing in non-degenerate orbits J. Dukelsky, IEM, Madrid, Spain D.D. Warner, Daresbury,
Nuclear Collective Dynamics II, Istanbul, July 2004 Symmetry Approach to Nuclear Collective Motion II P. Van Isacker, GANIL, France Symmetry and dynamical.
Pavel Stránský 29 th August 2011 W HAT DRIVES NUCLEI TO BE PROLATE? Instituto de Ciencias Nucleares, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Alejandro.
IBA – An Introduction and Overview Basic Ideas, underpinnings, Group Theory, basic predictions.
The Collective Model and the Fermi Gas Model
II. Spontaneous symmetry breaking. II.1 Weinberg’s chair Hamiltonian rotational invariant Why do we see the chair shape? States of different IM are so.
The Collective Model Aard Keimpema.
Structure of odd-odd nuclei in the interacting boson fermion-fermion model 3.
ISOLDE workshop, CERN, November 2008 Correlations between nuclear masses, radii and E0 transitions P. Van Isacker, GANIL, France Simple nuclear mass formulas.
9/28/ :01 (00) PAIRING PROPERTIES OF SUPERHEAVY NUCLEI A. Staszczak, J. Dobaczewski and W. Nazarewicz (KFT UMCS) (IFT UW) (ORNL & UT)
Universality in ultra-cold fermionic atom gases. with S. Diehl, H.Gies, J.Pawlowski S. Diehl, H.Gies, J.Pawlowski.
NUCLEAR STRUCTURE PHENOMENOLOGICAL MODELS
Introduction to Nuclear Physics
The IBA The Interacting Boson Approximation Model Preliminary review of collective behavior in nuclei Collective models, and why the IBA Basic ideas about.
The Shell Model of the Nucleus 5. Nuclear moments
Relativistic chiral mean field model for nuclear physics (II) Hiroshi Toki Research Center for Nuclear Physics Osaka University.
IAEA Workshop on NSDD, Trieste, November 2003 The nuclear shell model P. Van Isacker, GANIL, France Context and assumptions of the model Symmetries of.
Outline  Simple comments on regularities of many-body systems under random interactions  Number of spin I states for single-j configuration  J-pairing.
NSDD Workshop, Trieste, February 2006 Nuclear Structure (II) Collective models P. Van Isacker, GANIL, France.
Nuclear structure investigations in the future. J. Jolie, Universität zu Köln.
Even-even nuclei odd-even nuclei odd-odd nuclei 3.1 The interacting boson-fermion model.
Symmetries in Nuclei, Tokyo, 2008 Symmetries in Nuclei Symmetry and its mathematical description The role of symmetry in physics Symmetries of the nuclear.
Odd nuclei and Shape Phase Transitions: the role of the unpaired fermion PRC 72, (2005); PRC 76, (2007); PRC 78, (2008); PRC 79,
fermions c j N bosons A nucleons valence nucleonsN nucleon pairs L = 0 and 2 pairs s,d  even-even nuclei 2.2 The Interacting Boson Approximation A.
Lecture 24 Collective Excitations in nuclei Introduction: Over half the known nuclei have configurations (Z,N) even, J  = 0 + Recall that an empirical.
5. Exotic modes of nuclear rotation Tilted Axis Cranking -TAC.
FermiGasy. W. Udo Schröder, 2005 Angular Momentum Coupling 2 Addition of Angular Momenta    
1 New formulation of the Interacting Boson Model and the structure of exotic nuclei 10 th International Spring Seminar on Nuclear Physics Vietri sul Mare,
Themes and challenges of Modern Science Complexity out of simplicity -- Microscopic How the world, with all its apparent complexity and diversity can be.
Lecture 20: More on the deuteron 18/11/ Analysis so far: (N.B., see Krane, Chapter 4) Quantum numbers: (J , T) = (1 +, 0) favor a 3 S 1 configuration.
Symmetries in Nuclei, Tokyo, 2008 Symmetries in Nuclei Symmetry and its mathematical description The role of symmetry in physics Symmetries of the nuclear.
Collective Model. Nuclei Z N Character j Q obs. Q sp. Qobs/Qsp 17 O 8 9 doubly magic+1n 5/ K doubly magic -1p 3/
Shape phase transition in neutron-rich even-even light nuclei with Z=20-28 H.B.Bai X.W.Li H.F.Dong W.C.Cao Department of Physics, Chifeng University, Chifeng.
原子核配对壳模型的相关研究 Yanan Luo( 罗延安 ), Lei Li( 李磊 ) School of Physics, Nankai University, Tianjin Yu Zhang( 张宇 ), Feng Pan( 潘峰 ) Department of Physics, Liaoning.
The calculation of Fermi transitions allows a microscopic estimation (Fig. 3) of the isospin mixing amount in the parent ground state, defined as the probability.
The Algebraic Approach 1.Introduction 2.The building blocks 3.Dynamical symmetries 4.Single nucleon description 5.Critical point symmetries 6.Symmetry.
Isospin and mixed symmetry structure in 26 Mg DONG Hong-Fei, BAI Hong-Bo LÜ Li-Jun, Department of Physics, Chifeng university.
Nuclear deformation in deep inelastic collisions of U + U.
How do nuclei rotate? 1. The molecular picture.
Quantum Chemistry: Our Agenda (along with Engel)
Partial dynamical symmetries in Bose-Fermi systems* Jan Jolie, Institute for Nuclear Physics, University of Cologne What are dynamical symmetries? Illustration.
NSDD Workshop, Trieste, February 2006 Nuclear Structure (I) Single-particle models P. Van Isacker, GANIL, France.
Symmetries and collective Nuclear excitations PRESENT AND FUTURE EXOTICS IN NUCLEAR PHYSICS In honor of Geirr Sletten at his 70 th birthday Stefan Frauendorf,
ShuangQuan Zhang School of Physics, Peking University Static chirality and chiral vibration of atomic nucleus in particle rotor model.
Lecture 23: Applications of the Shell Model 27/11/ Generic pattern of single particle states solved in a Woods-Saxon (rounded square well)
Petrică Buganu, and Radu Budaca IFIN-HH, Bucharest – Magurele, Romania International Workshop “Shapes and Dynamics of Atomic Nuclei: Contemporary Aspects”
Nuclear and Radiation Physics, BAU, 1 st Semester, (Saed Dababneh). 1 Shell model Notes: 1. The shell model is most useful when applied to closed-shell.
Nuclear and Radiation Physics, BAU, First Semester, (Saed Dababneh). 1 Extreme independent particle model!!! Does the core really remain inert?
Partial Dynamical Symmetry in Odd-Mass Nuclei A. Leviatan Racah Institute of Physics The Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel P. Van Isacker, J. Jolie,
July 29-30, 2010, Dresden 1 Forbidden Beta Transitions in Neutrinoless Double Beta Decay Kazuo Muto Department of Physics, Tokyo Institute of Technology.
Some (more) High(ish)-Spin Nuclear Structure Paddy Regan Department of Physics Univesity of Surrey Guildford, UK Lecture 2 Low-energy.
Interacting boson model s-bosons (l=0) d-bosons (l=2) Interpretation: “nucleon pairs with l = 0, 2” “quanta of collective excitations” Dynamical algebra:
Exactly Solvable gl(m/n) Bose-Fermi Systems Feng Pan, Lianrong Dai, and J. P. Draayer Liaoning Normal Univ. Dalian China Recent Advances in Quantum.
The i 13/2 Proton and j 15/2 Neutron Orbital and the SD Band in A~190 Region Xiao-tao He En-guang Zhao En-guang Zhao Institute of Theoretical Physics,
Quantum phase transitions and structural evolution in nuclei.
Quantum Phase Transitions in Nuclei
Variational Multiparticle-Multihole Configuration Mixing Method with the D1S Gogny force INPC2007, Tokyo, 06/06/2007 Nathalie Pillet (CEA Bruyères-le-Châtel,
Quantum Phase Transition from Spherical to γ-unstable for Bose-Fermi System Mahmut Böyükata Kırıkkale University Turkey collabration with Padova–Sevilla.
No Low-Lying Nuclear Vibrations: Configuration Dependent Pairing and Axial Asymmetry J. F. Sharpey-Schafer University of the Western Cape, South Africa.
Congresso del Dipartimento di Fisica Highlights in Physics –14 October 2005, Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Milano Contribution to nuclear.
Rotational energy term in the empirical formula for the yrast energies in even-even nuclei Eunja Ha and S. W. Hong Department of Physics, Sungkyunkwan.
Determining Reduced Transition Probabilities for 152 ≤ A ≤ 248 Nuclei using Interacting Boson Approximation (IBA-1) Model By Dr. Sardool Singh Ghumman.
IV. Nuclear Structure Topics to be covered include:
Yu Zhang(张宇), Feng Pan(潘峰)
a non-adiabatic microscopic description
Nuclear shapes for the critical point
II. Spontaneous symmetry breaking
How do nuclei rotate? 1. The molecular picture.
Presentation transcript:

IAEA Workshop on NSDD, Trieste, November 2003 The interacting boson model P. Van Isacker, GANIL, France Dynamical symmetries of the IBM Neutrons, protons and F-spin (IBM-2) T=0 and T=1 bosons: IBM-3 and IBM-4

IAEA Workshop on NSDD, Trieste, November 2003 Overview of collective models Pure collective models: –(Rigid) rotor model –(Harmonic quadrupole) vibrator model –Liquid-drop model of vibrations and rotations –Interacting boson model With inclusion of particle degrees of freedom: –Nilsson model –Particle-core coupling model –Interacting boson-fermion model

IAEA Workshop on NSDD, Trieste, November 2003 Rigid rotor model Hamiltonian of quantum mechanical rotor in terms of ‘rotational’ angular momentum R: Nuclei have an additional intrinsic part H intr with ‘intrinsic’ angular momentum J. The total angular momentum is I=R+J.

IAEA Workshop on NSDD, Trieste, November 2003 Modes of nuclear vibration Nucleus is considered as a droplet of nuclear matter with an equilibrium shape. Vibrations are modes of excitation around that shape. Character of vibrations depends on symmetry of equilibrium shape. Two important cases in nuclei: –Spherical equilibrium shape –Spheroidal equilibrium shape

IAEA Workshop on NSDD, Trieste, November 2003 Vibrations about a spherical shape Vibrations are characterized by a multipole quantum number in surface parametrization: – =0: compression (high energy) – =1: translation (not an intrinsic excitation) – =2: quadrupole vibration

IAEA Workshop on NSDD, Trieste, November 2003 Vibrations about a spheroidal shape The vibration of a shape with axial symmetry is characterized by a. Quadrupolar oscillations: – =0: along the axis of symmetry (  ) – =  1: spurious rotation – =  2: perpendicular to axis of symmetry (  )

IAEA Workshop on NSDD, Trieste, November 2003 The interacting boson model Nuclear collective excitations are described in terms of N s and d bosons. Spectrum generating algebra for the nucleus is U(6). All physical observables (hamiltonian, transition operators,…) are expressed in terms of the generators of U(6). Formally, nuclear structure is reduced to solving the problem of N interacting s and d bosons.

IAEA Workshop on NSDD, Trieste, November 2003 Justifications for the IBM Bosons are associated with fermion pairs which approximately satisfy Bose statistics: Microscopic justification: The IBM is a truncation and subsequent bosonization of the shell model in terms of S and D pairs. Macroscopic justification: In the classical limit (N  ∞) the expectation value of the IBM hamiltonian between coherent states reduces to a liquid-drop hamiltonian.

IAEA Workshop on NSDD, Trieste, November 2003 The IBM hamiltonian Rotational invariant hamiltonian with up to N- body interactions (usually up to 2): For what choice of single-boson energies  s and  d and boson-boson interactions  L ijkl is the IBM hamiltonian solvable? This problem is equivalent to the enumeration of all algebras G that satisfy

IAEA Workshop on NSDD, Trieste, November 2003 The U(5) vibrational limit Spectrum of an anharmonic oscillator in 5 dimensions associated with the quadrupole oscillations of a droplet’s surface. Conserved quantum numbers: n d, , L. A. Arima & F. Iachello, Ann. Phys. (NY) 99 (1976) 253 D. Brink et al., Phys. Lett. 19 (1965) 413

IAEA Workshop on NSDD, Trieste, November 2003 The SU(3) rotational limit Rotation-vibration spectrum with  - and  - vibrational bands. Conserved quantum numbers: (,  ), L. A. Arima & F. Iachello, Ann. Phys. (NY) 111 (1978) 201 A. Bohr & B.R. Mottelson, Dan. Vid. Selsk. Mat.-Fys. Medd. 27 (1953) No 16

IAEA Workshop on NSDD, Trieste, November 2003 The SO(6)  -unstable limit Rotation-vibration spectrum of a  -unstable body. Conserved quantum numbers: , , L. A. Arima & F. Iachello, Ann. Phys. (NY) 123 (1979) 468 L. Wilets & M. Jean, Phys. Rev. 102 (1956) 788

IAEA Workshop on NSDD, Trieste, November 2003 Synopsis of IBM symmetries Symmetry triangle of the IBM: –Three standard solutions: U(5), SU(3), SO(6). –SU(1,1) analytic solution for U(5)  SO(6). –Hidden symmetries (parameter transformations). –Deformed-spherical coexistent phase. –Partial dynamical symmetries. –Critical-point symmetries?

IAEA Workshop on NSDD, Trieste, November 2003 Extensions of the IBM Neutron and proton degrees freedom (IBM-2): –F-spin multiplets (N +N  =constant). –Scissors excitations. Fermion degrees of freedom (IBFM): –Odd-mass nuclei. –Supersymmetry (doublets & quartets). Other boson degrees of freedom: –Isospin T=0 & T=1 pairs (IBM-3 & IBM-4). –Higher multipole (g,…) pairs.

IAEA Workshop on NSDD, Trieste, November 2003 Scissors excitations Collective displacement modes between neutrons and protons: –Linear displacement (giant dipole resonance): R -R   E1 excitation. –Angular displacement (scissors resonance): L -L   M1 excitation. N. Lo Iudice & F. Palumbo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 41 (1978) 1532 F. Iachello, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53 (1984) 1427 D. Bohle et al., Phys. Lett. B 137 (1984) 27

IAEA Workshop on NSDD, Trieste, November 2003 Supersymmetry A simultaneous description of even- and odd- mass nuclei (doublets) or of even-even, even- odd, odd-even and odd-odd nuclei (quartets). Example of 194 Pt, 195 Pt, 195 Au & 196 Au: F. Iachello, Phys. Rev. Lett. 44 (1980) 772 P. Van Isacker et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 54 (1985) 653 A. Metz et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 (1999) 1542

IAEA Workshop on NSDD, Trieste, November 2003 Example of 195 Pt

IAEA Workshop on NSDD, Trieste, November 2003 Example of 196 Au

IAEA Workshop on NSDD, Trieste, November 2003 Isospin invariant boson models Several versions of IBM depending on the fermion pairs that correspond to the bosons: –IBM-1: single type of pair. –IBM-2: T=1 nn (M T =-1) and pp (M T =+1) pairs. –IBM-3: full isospin T=1 triplet of nn (M T =-1), np (M T =0) and pp (M T =+1) pairs. –IBM-4: full isospin T=1 triplet and T=0 np pair (with S=1). Schematic IBM-k has only S (L=0) pairs, full IBM-k has S (L=0) and D (L=2) pairs.

IAEA Workshop on NSDD, Trieste, November 2003 IBM-4 Shell-model justification in LS coupling: Advantages of IBM-4: –Boson states carry L, S, T, J and (  ). –Mapping from the shell model to IBM-4  shell- model test of the boson approximation. –Includes np pairs  important for N~Z nuclei. J.P. Elliott & J.A. Evans, Phys. Lett. B 195 (1987) 1

IAEA Workshop on NSDD, Trieste, November 2003 IBM-4 with L=0 bosons Schematic IBM-4 with bosons –L=0, S=1, T=0  J=1 (p boson,  =+1). –L=0, S=0, T=1  J=0 (s boson,  =+1). Two applications: –Microscopic (but schematic) study of the influence of the spin-orbit coupling on the structure of the superfluid condensate in N=Z nuclei. –Phenomenological mass formula for N~Z nuclei.

IAEA Workshop on NSDD, Trieste, November 2003 Boson mapping of SO(8) Pairing hamiltonian in non-degenerate shells, …is non-solvable in general but can be treated (numerically) via a boson mapping. Correspondence S + 10  p + and S + 01  s + leads to a schematic IBM-4 with L=0 bosons. Mapping of shell-model pairing hamiltonian completely determines boson energies and boson-boson interactions (no free parameters). P. Van Isacker et al., J. Phys. G 24 (1998) 1261

IAEA Workshop on NSDD, Trieste, November 2003 Pair structure and spin-orbit force Fraction of p bosons in the lowest J=1, T=0 state for N=Z=5 in the pf shell: 0 0,4 0,8 -0,75 -0,5 -0,25 0 0,25 0,5 0, O. Juillet & S. Josse, Eur. Phys. A 2 (2000) 291

IAEA Workshop on NSDD, Trieste, November 2003 Mass formula for N~Z nuclei Schematic IBM-4 with L=0 bosons has U(6) algebraic structure. The symmetry lattice of the model: Simple IBM-4 hamiltonian suggested by microscopy with adjustable parameters: E. Baldini-Neto et al., Phys. Rev. C 65 (2002)

IAEA Workshop on NSDD, Trieste, November 2003 Binding energies of sd N=Z nuclei

IAEA Workshop on NSDD, Trieste, November 2003 Binding energies of pf-shell nuclei

IAEA Workshop on NSDD, Trieste, November 2003 Algebraic many-body models The integrability of any quantum many-body (bosons and/or fermions) system can be analyzed with algebraic methods. Two nuclear examples: –Pairing vs. quadrupole interaction in the nuclear shell model. –Spherical, deformed and  -unstable nuclei with s,d-boson IBM.

IAEA Workshop on NSDD, Trieste, November 2003 Other fields of physics Molecular physics: –U(4) vibron model with s,p-bosons. –Coupling of many SU(2) algebras for polyatomic molecules. Similar applications in hadronic, atomic, solid- state, polymer physics, quantum dots… Use of non-compact groups and algebras for scattering problems. F. Iachello, 1975 to now