Melrose High School 2014 MCAS Presentation October 6, 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?
Advertisements

What You Should Know About the State’s Two Year Old Accountability System.
Franklin Public Schools MCAS Presentation November 27, 2012 Joyce Edwards Director of Instructional Services.
On The Road to College and Career Readiness Hamilton County ESC Instructional Services Center Christina Sherman, Consultant.
Accountability data overview August Topics  Changes to 2014 accountability reporting  Overview of accountability measures  Progress & Performance.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
 Assessing Student Achievement New Teacher Induction Program.
Rutland High School Technical Review Visit Looking At Results Planning Next Steps Learning About Resources.
A few of the Achievement Outcomes for San Francisco Unified School District’s California Math and Science Partnership Grant- Working together to Improve.
Understanding Massachusetts’ new accountability measures November 2012.
REVIEW OF 2014 SCHOOL ACCOUNTABILITY AND ACHIEVEMENT DATA, GOAL SETTING, AND STRATEGIC PLANNING FOR 2014/2015 SAUGUS PUBLIC SCHOOLS CURRICULUM & INSTRUCTION.
MELROSE PUBLIC SCHOOLS MELROSE VETERANS MEMORIAL MIDDLE SCHOOL OCTOBER 2013 MCAS Spring 2013 Results.
KCCT Kentucky’s Commonwealth Accountability Testing System Overview of 2008 Regional KPR.
(High/Middle School) HSTW/MMGW Site Presentation ( Month Date, 2006) Promising Practices Next Steps Major Challenges Technical Review Visit (TRV)
Department of Elementary and Secondary Education July, 2011
1 Paul Tuss, Ph.D., Program Manager Sacramento Co. Office of Education August 17, 2009 California’s Integrated Accountability System.
Elementary & Middle School 2014 ELA MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
MCAS REPORT Spring 2013 Presented to the Hingham School Committee November 18, 2013 by Ellen Keane, Assistant Superintendent.
District Determined Measures aka: DDMs The Challenge: The Essential Questions: 1.How can I show, in a reliable and valid way, my impact on students’
School & district accountability reporting Title I Technical Assistance & Networking Session October 17, 2013.
Hollywood High School Testing Data Results WASC Goals and Instructional Focus October 6, 2009.
ESEA Waiver and Accountability Status School Committee Presentation September 24, 2013.
CLINTON HIGH SCHOOL 2012 MCAS Presentation October 30, 2012.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Pittsfield Public Schools September 23, 2009.
1 Watertown Public Schools Assessment Reports 2010 Ann Koufman-Frederick and Administrative Council School Committee Meetings Oct, Nov, Dec, 2010 Part.
Melrose High School MCAS Presentation October 22, 2013.
The Norwood Public Schools 2014 Accountability Overview and MCAS Results Dr. Alexander Wyeth Assistant Superintendent for Curriculum, Instruction, and.
Hastings Public Schools PLC Staff Development Planning & Reporting Guide.
Spring 2009 MCAS Results. Dedham Elementary Schools.
Merrymount Elementary School PTO Assessment Presentation December 4, 2014.
2013 MASS Executive Institute. More Than a Decade of Progress: Grade 10 MCAS % proficient or higher 2.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) Results Update Prepared by the LUSD Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department.
Accountability Report Dedham Public Schools October 3,
HAWLEMONT REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT 2012 STATE OF THE DISTRICT ADDRESS Presented by: Michael A. Buoniconti Superintendent of Schools Hawlemont Regional.
Back to Table of Contents DART for English Language LearnersAnnual SnapshotDART for English Language LearnersAnnual Snapshot DART for English Language.
CURRICULUM RENEWAL EDD 7913 CRN BY JAMIE LEEDER, GENEVIEVE LEYDIG, KEITH MABE NOVA SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY APRIL 4, 2013.
1 Mitchell D. Chester Commissioner of Elementary and Secondary Education Report on Spring 2009 MCAS Results to the Massachusetts Board of Elementary and.
School Improvement Plan Central Elementary Vanessa S. McAllister, Principal Margaret Lewis, Assistant Principal RaeAnn Whiteside, Literacy Coach.
Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS) /22/2010.
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
Report to Board of Education April 12, 2010 Trenton Public Schools.
“ Let us not be content to wait and see what will happen, but give us the determination to make the right things happen”- Horace Mann 2014 MCAS Overview.
Standardized Testing EDUC 307. Standardized test a test in which all the questions, format, instructions, scoring, and reporting of scores are the same.
What You Should Know About the State’s Two Year Old Accountability System.
APR 2014 Report: Data, Analysis and Action Plan for Full Accreditation.
REVIEW OF DISTRICT GOALS AND INITIATIVES MOVING FORWARD Millbury Public Schools.
MCAS Progress and Performance Index Report 2013 Cohasset Public Schools.
CSDCDecember 8, “More questions than answers.” CSDC December 8, 2010.
Loretta L. Radulic, Assistant Superintendent Roxbury Township Public Schools October State Assessment Results and Analysis.
KHS PARCC/SCIENCE RESULTS Using the results to improve achievement Families can use the results to engage their child in conversations about.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
1 Testing Various Models in Support of Improving API Scores.
Spring 2011 MCAS Results.
Conversation about State Report Card November 28, 2016
Spring 2016 PARCC and MCAS Results: Newton Public Schools
West Haven Next-Generation Accountability Report
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) State Plan: Update
Spring 2016 MCAS Data Overview
2012 Accountability Determinations
2015 PARCC Results for R.I: Work to do, focus on teaching and learning
Massachusetts’ Next-Generation Accountability System
Milton Public Schools 2013 Accountability Status
Danvers Public Schools: Our Story
Framework for a Next-Generation Accountability System
Framework for a Next-Generation Accountability System
Madison Elementary / Middle School and the New Accountability System
WAO Elementary School and the New Accountability System
Presented by Joseph P. Stern
Meeting the challenge Every Classroom Every Student Every Day
Watertown Public Schools School Committee Meeting November 13, 2017
Presentation transcript:

Melrose High School 2014 MCAS Presentation October 6, 2014

Presentation agenda Essential Questions Some Key Terms and Abbreviations Major Findings Progress & Performance Index (PPI) PPI & Accountability Level Data for All Students Data for High Needs Students Student Growth Percentiles (SGP) Cumulative Performance Index (CPI) Next Steps

Essential Questions 2014 MCAS Results What is the level of student achievement and growth at Melrose High School? What can achievement and growth tell us about curriculum, instruction, and learning at Melrose High School? 3

Some Key Terms and Abbreviations PPI – (progress and performance index) Point measure of a school’s progress towards narrowing proficiency gaps. This is a weighted average over four years with greater weight for most recent year. CPI – Composite Performance Index (calculated by averaging all the “points” each student earns on a 100 point scale.) Proficient and Advanced scores earn 100 points and High Needs Improvement scores earn 75, Low Needs Improvement scores earn 50, etc.) SGP – Student Growth Percentile (calculated by comparing a student’s score on this year’s test and giving them a percentile rank of all others who had the same score on last year’s test.) SGP of is considered normal and moderate annual growth.

Major Findings Progress was made toward closing the achievement gap. In Math, the SGP of 64 for special education students indicates high growth for this subgroup. Efforts in curriculum, instruction, and assessment at the high school have shown impact on our scores. In English, students who are identified as “high need” are achieving at the same high level of advanced or proficient (88 – 100%) as students overall.

Increase in the number of students achieving advanced and proficient. Science – there has been a 19 point increase in the % of students achieving advanced or proficient on the MCAS. 6 Major Findings (cont.)

Progress and Performance Index (PPI) Progress and Performance Index, or PPI, includes data on narrowing proficiency gaps, growth (SGP), MCAS participation, graduation rates, and dropout rates. MeasureOverall GoalAnnual Target PPISchool/District must narrow achievement gaps by 50% over a six year period ( ) Level 1: PPI of 75+ AND Participation rate of 95% or more Level 2: PPI of 75 or below, low-MCAS AND/OR Participation of 90-94% Level 3: Among the lowest 20 th percentile by school type or subgroup Participation rate below 90% 7

2014 School PPI and Accountability Level for Melrose High School 8 Annual PPI (target is 75) 92 for all groups 85 for High Needs ACCOUNTABILITY Level 1 NOTES Meeting gap narrowing goals 97% MCAS Participation

2014 MCAS Results Subject & Grade% Advanced & Proficient % Needs Improvement% Warning ELA – grade MATH – grade SCIENCE – grade

% of Advanced and Proficient Adv.Prof.Adv.Prof.Adv.Prof.Adv.Prof. ELA Gr Math Gr Science Gr

English Language Arts History of % Scored at Advanced & Proficient Levels Gr All

Math History of %Scored at Advanced & Proficient Levels Gr ALL Grade 3-5 and ALL are district results; Grades 6-10 are school results.

Science and Technology/Engineering History of %Scored at Advanced & Proficient Levels Gr All

% of Students Achieving Advanced or Proficient in by Subgroup ELA Gr. 10 Math Gr. 10 Science Gr. 9 All High Needs Students w/ disabilities 8842 Low Income African American Subgroups with a gap to Proficiency of 20+ percentage points. 14

DESE Growth Percentile Ranges <20 th PercentileVery Low Growth 20 th -40 th PercentileLow Growth 40 th -60 th PercentileTypical Growth 60 th -80 th PercentileHigh Growth >80 th PercentileVery High Growth 15

English Language Arts Student Growth Percentile (SGP) ELA - All High Needs Students w/ disabilities Low Income

Math Student Growth Percentile (SGP) MATH - All High Needs Students w/ disabilities Low Income

Composite Performance Index for All Students (CPI) Subject ELA MATH SCIENCE

English Composite Performance Index(CPI) English - All High Needs Students w/ disabilities Low Income

Math Composite Performance Index(CPI) MATH - All High Needs Students w/ disabilities Low Income

Science Composite Performance Index(CPI) Science - All High Needs Students w/ disabilities Low Income

Next Steps - Grades 9-12 Expand learning walk-throughs to additional faculty members to support identification of best practices. Learning walkthroughs are non-evaluative classroom visits by teams of teachers and administrators designed to increase dialogue on instructional practices. More frequent observations of teaching of core instructional practices by evaluators.

Use of common planning time to perform in- depth analysis on the data for specific subgroups. Increase access and opportunity for all students, particularly the high needs subgroups, to participate in a standards based curriculum with high expectations. 23

ELA Grades 9-12 Revise and map ELA curriculum 9-12, adding more rigorous reading materials including challenging nonfiction texts. Refine rubrics and practices for use of dialectical journals to stimulate greater depth in student response to text in grades Effect interdisciplinary planning and assessment collaboration between history/social science and ELA in grades 9-12 to support non-fiction reading and writing in response to text. Strengthen writing across content areas particularly for those students with disabilities. 24

Math Grades 9-12 Increase writing opportunities in math grades Provide professional development and coaching to support integration of writing on a daily basis. Develop and implement brief formal assessments in math grades 9 &10 to gather more frequent feedback on students’ progress towards standards and prepare students for PARCC. 25

Science Grades 9-12 Increase the number of inquiry labs in grades Increase student retention of material through the use of accountable talk and responding to informational literacy pieces. Modify assessments to incorporate review items and test items with a higher depth of knowledge to reflect anticipated changes to STE MCAS. Analyze insufficient progress of specific subgroups and create action plans to address needs. 26