Fractal reconnection at the Earth’s magnetopause and associated ionospheric convection. Gary Abel, Iain Coleman, Mervyn Freeman and Gareth Chisham British.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Shapelets Correlated with Surface Normals Produce Surfaces Peter Kovesi School of Computer Science & Software Engineering The University of Western Australia.
Advertisements

Un-freezing the turbulence: improved wind field modelling for investigating Lidar-assisted wind turbine control Ervin Bossanyi.
Generation of the transpolar potential Ramon E. Lopez Dept. of Physics UT Arlington.
Statistical study of non-reconnection plasma jets as observed by the DOUBLE STAR spacecraft E. Amata 1, S. Savin 2, D. Ambrosino 1, L. Trenchi 1, M.F.
Anti-Parallel Merging and Component Reconnection: Role in Magnetospheric Dynamics M.M Kuznetsova, M. Hesse, L. Rastaetter NASA/GSFC T. I. Gombosi University.
Using a DPS as a Coherent Scatter HF Radar Lindsay Magnus Lee-Anne McKinnell Hermanus Magnetic Observatory Hermanus, South Africa.
Principles of Global Modeling Paul Song Department of Physics, and Center for Atmospheric Research, University of Massachusetts Lowell Introduction Principles.
Cluster, THEMIS, & Geotail Conjunction Event on 11 July 2008 Hiroshi Hasegawa ISAS/JAXA.
Formation of the Magnetosphere 1 Solar Wind. Formation of the Magnetosphere 2 Solar Wind Bow Shock Magnetosheath.
ESS 7 Lecture 14 October 31, 2008 Magnetic Storms
The role of solar wind energy flux for transpolar arc luminosity A.Kullen 1, J. A. Cumnock 2,3, and T. Karlsson 2 1 Swedish Institute of Space Physics,
VT SuperDARN Group2011 SuperDARN WorkshopJoseph Baker Testing the Equipotential Magnetic Field Line Assumption Using Interhemispheric.
Spatial distribution of the auroral precipitation zones during storms connected with magnetic clouds O.I. Yagodkina 1, I.V. Despirak 1, V. Guineva 2 1.
Magnetopause flow vortices revealed during high speed solar wind streams Mona Kessel (NASA GSFC), Yaireska Collado-Vega (University of Puerto Rico), Xi.
Anti-parallel versus Component Reconnection at the Magnetopause K.J. Trattner Lockheed Martin Advanced Technology Center Palo Alto, CA, USA and the Polar/TIMAS,
Peter Boakes 1, Steve Milan 2, Adrian Grocott 2, Mervyn Freeman 3, Gareth Chisham 3, Gary Abel 3, Benoit Hubert 4, Victor Sergeev 5 Rumi Nakamura 1, Wolfgang.
SuperDARN Workshop May 30 – June Magnetopause reconnection rate and cold plasma density: a study using SuperDARN Mark Lester 1, Adrian Grocott 1,2,
Comparing the solar wind-magnetosphere interaction at Mercury and Saturn A. Masters Institute of Space and Astronautical Science, Japan Aerospace Exploration.
Atmospheric Motion ENVI 1400: Lecture 3.
Properties of Solar Wind ULF Waves Associated with Ionospheric Pulsations A D M Walker, & J A E Stephenson, & S Benz School of Physics University of KwaZulu-Natal.
Hanover, May/June 2011 Analysis of waves near the magnetopause during a period of FLR activity recorded by the Sanae radar J A E Stephenson & A D M Walker.
Solar wind-magnetosphere coupling Magnetic reconnection In most solar system environments magnetic fields are “frozen” to the plasma - different plasmas.
Auroral Complexity Mervyn Freeman Thanks to: Nick Watkins, Steve Morley, and many others.
Phase Coherence on Open Field Lines Associated with FLRs Abiyu Nedie, Frances Fenrich & Robert Rankin University of Alberta Edmonton, Alberta, Canada 2011.
On the relationship between polar cap flows and the IMF W.A. Bristow, R.T. Parris, J. Spaleta, T. Theurer Geophysical Institute, University of Alaska.
Addressing magnetic reconnection on multiple scales: What controls the reconnection rate in astrophysical plasmas? John C. Dorelli University of New Hampshire.
O. M. Shalabiea Department of Physics, Northern Borders University, KSA.
31 May 2011SuperDARN Workshop, 29 May - 3June 2011, Hanover, US 1 Short-period Doppler shift variations in the polar cap: ULF waves or something else?
In-situ Observations of Collisionless Reconnection in the Magnetosphere Tai Phan (UC Berkeley) 1.Basic signatures of reconnection 2.Topics: a.Bursty (explosive)
& Atmospheric StudiesPhysics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan Hemispheric Comparison of Signatures of.
Observations of Open and Closed Magnetic Field Lines at Mars: Implications for the Upper Atmosphere D.A. Brain, D.L. Mitchell, R. Lillis, R. Lin UC Berkeley.
Magnetic Field Studies Dan Karmgard for the HCAL RBX Group.
Solar system science using X-Rays Magnetosheath dynamics Shock – shock interactions Auroral X-ray emissions Solar X-rays Comets Other planets Not discussed.
Relation Between Electric Fields and Ionospheric/magnetospheric Plasma Flows at Very Low Latitudes Paul Song Center for Atmospheric Research University.
Initial 3D isotropic fractal field An initial fractal cloud-like field can be generated by essentially performing an inverse 3D Fourier Transform on the.
Hamrin, M., Norqvist, P., Marghitu, O., et al. Department of Physics, Umeå University, Sweden Nordic Cluster.
On the importance of IMF |B Y | on polar cap patch formation Qinghe Zhang 1, Beichen Zhang 1, Ruiyuan Liu 1, M. W. Dunlop 2, M. Lockwood 2, 3, J. Moen.
Radio and Space Plasma Physics Group The formation of transpolar arcs R. C. Fear and S. E. Milan University of Leicester.
Location of Magnetopause Reconnection S M Petrinec 1, S A Fuselier 1, K J Trattner 1, and J Berchem 2 1 Lockheed Martin Advanced Technology Center, Palo.
Benoit Lavraud CESR/CNRS, Toulouse, France Uppsala, May 2008 The altered solar wind – magnetosphere interaction at low Mach numbers: Magnetosheath and.
Mervyn Freeman British Antarctic Survey
EISCAT Svalbard Radar studies of meso-scale plasma flow channels in the polar cusp ionosphere Y. Dåbakk et al.
Magnetosphere-Ionosphere coupling processes reflected in
Analysis of Turbulence Development in the Morning
Atmospheric Motion SOEE1400: Lecture 7. Plan of lecture 1.Forces on the air 2.Pressure gradient force 3.Coriolis force 4.Geostrophic wind 5.Effects of.
Recent THEMIS and coordinated GBO measurements of substorm expansion onset: Do we finally have an answer? Larry Kepko NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center.
Introduction to Digital Signals
27-Day Variations Of The Galactic Cosmic Ray Intensity And Anisotropy In Different Solar Magnetic Cycles ( ) M.V. Alania, A. Gil, K. Iskra, R.
Figure 3. Log-log plot of simulated oscillating phantom, assuming a Gaussian-shaped field. Field constants a 1 =a 2 =0.1. The data initially plateau, then.
SUBDIFFUSION OF BEAMS THROUGH INTERPLANETARY AND INTERSTELLAR MEDIA Aleksander Stanislavsky Institute of Radio Astronomy, 4 Chervonopraporna St., Kharkov.
Testing the Equipotential Magnetic Field Line Assumption Using SuperDARN Measurements and the Cluster Electron Drift Instrument (EDI) Joseph B. H. Baker.
E.E. Antonova1,2, I.P. Kirpichev2,1, Yu.I. Yermolaev2
SWOT Hydrology Workshop Ka-band Radar Scattering From Water and Layover Issues Delwyn Moller Ernesto Rodriguez Contributions from Daniel Esteban-Fernandez.
Ionospheric HF radars Pasha Ponomarenko. Outline Conventional radars vs ionospheric radars Collective scatter processes Aspect angle effects HF propagation.
Global MHD Simulation with BATSRUS from CCMC ESS 265 UCLA1 (Yasong Ge, Megan Cartwright, Jared Leisner, and Xianzhe Jia)
The effects of the solar wind on Saturn’s space environment
MULTI-INSTRUMENT STUDY OF THE ENERGY STEP STRUCTURES OF O + AND H + IONS IN THE CUSP AND POLAR CAP REGIONS Yulia V. Bogdanova, Berndt Klecker and CIS TEAM.
Substorms: Ionospheric Manifestation of Magnetospheric Disturbances P. Song, V. M. Vasyliūnas, and J. Tu University of Massachusetts Lowell Substorms:
ASEN 5335 Aerospace Environments -- Magnetospheres 1 As the magnetized solar wind flows past the Earth, the plasma interacts with Earth’s magnetic field.
A radar data simulator for SuperDARN A.J. Ribeiro, P.V. Ponomarenko, J.M. Ruohoniemi, J.B.H. Baker, L.B.N. Clausen, R.A. Greenwald /29/2012 SuperDARN.
Exploring reconnection, current sheets, and dissipation in a laboratory MHD turbulence experiment David Schaffner Bryn Mawr College Magnetic Reconnection:
Dynamics of the auroral bifurcations at Saturn and their role in magnetopause reconnection LPAP - Université de Liège A. Radioti, J.-C. Gérard, D. Grodent,
Lecture 12 The Importance of Accurate Solar Wind Measurements
Characterization of Field Line Topologies Near the Magnetopause Using Electron Pitch Angle Measurements D. S. Payne1, M. Argall1, R. Torbert1, I. Dors1,
Stochastic Acceleration in Turbulence:
Munetoshi Tokumaru (ISEE, Nagoya University)
Effects of Dipole Tilt Angle on Geomagnetic Activities
The Physics of Space Plasmas
Jupiter’s Polar Auroral Emisssions
Dynamic Coupling between the Magnetosphere and the Ionosphere
Presentation transcript:

Fractal reconnection at the Earth’s magnetopause and associated ionospheric convection. Gary Abel, Iain Coleman, Mervyn Freeman and Gareth Chisham British Antarctic Survey MRT Workshop 9 th -10 th August 2004

A quote from the classic Dungey [1961] paper “A steady laminar flow will be assumed here for simplicity, but it should be noted that large variations of the field were detected by Pioneer I” … “The connection between the neutral points (reconnection) and the auroras (convection) is obvious in this model, but it remains to study … the effect of turbulence.” Dungey [PRL 1961].

We commonly model dayside reconnection in terms of a uniform IMF phase front draped across the magnetopause by a laminar hydrodynamic flow. Such models naturally give rise to large-scale, spatially coherent reconnection structures on the magnetopause and in ionospheric convection. The draped IMF is in reality highly disordered, and not well described by laminar models. What is the implication of this at the magnetopause and in the ionosphere? Introduction

Antiparallel Reconnection with Perfect Draping The clock angle of the magnetosheath B-field is everywhere equal to the upstream IMF clock angle of 135°. The antiparallel reconnection regions are shown in black

Fractal anti-parallel reconnection Magnetosheath is noisy Difference between upstream measured clock angle and sheath clock angle has standard deviation of around 40º But!!!

Fractal anti-parallel reconnection Perfect DrapingWhite (gaussian) Noise Draping

Adding significant amounts of gaussian noise breaks down the structure of the reconnection regions. This is because gaussian noise is spatially uncorrelated. It may be more reasonable to model the “noisy” part of noisy draping as fractal turbulence, rather than gaussian white noise. In the following slides, a random fractal of power spectrum –5/3 is added to the magnetosheath field, such that the standard deviation of the clock angle is similar to that in the gaussian case. The Trouble with Gaussian Noise

Fractal anti-parallel reconnection Perfect DrapingRed Noise Draping

Gaussian (White) Noise Fractal Noise

Time Series of Reconnection Sites with Fractal Turbulence

Fractal turbulence is correlated on large spatial scales. Thus, it preserves the antiparallel reconnection structures of the laminar model to far greater extent than gaussian noise can manage. However, further structure is introduced to magnetopause reconnection sites. Is this structure reflected in ionospheric convection? The Importance of Fractal Turbulence

Investigate spatial structuring of ionospheric flows using structure function analysis Structure function analysis using SuperDARN radar. Radar measure LOS component of convection velocity. Use Halley meridional beam – ranges 10 to – Calculate, m=1,2,3, l=1,2,… 55 Precondition data so we only include fluctuations of ±1 

Poleward of Open/Closed Field Line Boundary - Nightside

Slope = 0.81 Slope = 0.57 Slope = 0.30

Summary and Conclusions M-I system is a complex system driven by a complex driver. In order to fully understand the system we must understand the fractal nature. Our simple model suggests that a fractal solar wind can give rise to structured reconnection on the magnetopause while maintaining spatially large scale features. Observations in the ionosphere show the fluctuations in convection velocity are consistent with such a model.