Information Technology Division Executive Office for Administration and Finance IT Service Excellence Committee Jan. 19, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Information Technology Division Executive Office for Administration and Finance IT Service Excellence Committee (ITSEC) Sept. 19, 2011.
Advertisements

Problem Management Process Training
IT Governance Infocom India Presentation December 6, 2006.
Information Technology Division Executive Office for Administration and Finance IT Service Excellence Committee (ITSEC) Nov 23, 2010.
Deloitte Consulting LLP Commonwealth of Massachusetts IT Consolidation Program IT Finance and Budgeting Sub-committee Discussion Document April 21, 2010.
Active Directory Production Pilot Project Department of Administration Enterprise Technology Services (ETS) ETS is a customer based team that provides.
Best Practices – Overview
Disaster Recovery and Business Continuity Ensuring Member Service in Times of Crisis.
Problem Management Overview
Incident Management ISD Division Office of State Finance.
Problem Management ISD Division Office of State Finance.
Network security policy: best practices
Integrated IT Service Management
Information Technology Division Executive Office for Administration and Finance Infrastructure Services Board December 13th, 2010 Commonwealth IT Service.
Change Advisory Board COIN v1.ppt Change Advisory Board ITIL COIN June 20, 2007.
Release & Deployment ITIL Version 3
Commonwealth of Massachusetts Statewide Strategic IT Consolidation (ITC) Initiative July 30, 2010 Secretariat IT Consolidation Plan Update.
Sign-Off on Commonwealth Incident Prioritization: Defines Priority with which Incident will be managed URGENCY/ IMPACT High A service outage with broad.
Information Technology Division Executive Office for Administration and Finance Planning for Commonwealth Service Excellence Oct. 14, 2010.
1. Agenda Service Utilization Service Level Metrics Service Performance Review Incident Review Current / Future Service Plan Service Improvement Plan.
IT Business Continuity Briefing March 3,  Incident Overview  Improving the power posture of the Primary Data Center  STAGEnet Redundancy  Telephone.
Administration and Finance Incident Prioritization Document
- 0 - Service Desk Replacement: IBM Service Desk Tivoli Tool Suite –Adopting a new best-in-class ITIL Platform: IBM Service Desk –Accelerated adoption.
Information Technology Division Executive Office for Administration and Finance IT Service Excellence Committee (ITSEC) Sept. 29, 2011.
Current Job Components Information Technology Department Network Systems Administration Telecommunications Database Design and Administration.
IT Service Excellence Committee (ITSEC) Jan. 20th Meeting
Information Technology Division Executive Office for Administration and Finance IT Service Excellence Committee (ITSEC) March 17, 2011 March 17, 2011.
Information Technology Division Executive Office for Administration and Finance IT Service Excellence Committee (ITSEC) Oct. 28, 2010.
Commonwealth Incident Prioritization– ITSEC Endorsed: Defines Priority with which Incident will be managed URGENCY/ IMPACT High A service outage with broad.
Case Study: Department of Revenue Data Breach National Association of State Auditors, Comptrollers and Treasurers March 21, 2013.
Roles and Responsibilities
1 Market Trials Outage Scheduling Qualifications Weekly Update April 02, 2010.
Deloitte Consulting LLP Commonwealth of Massachusetts IT Consolidation Program Statewide Working Group Discussion Document January 25, 2010 DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION.
Commonwealth IT Consolidation Background and Basic Talking Points (Update Title as Needed) Committee or Person Presenting Date MM/DD/YYYY.
 ITSEC Agreed upon initial set of Commonwealth-wide KPI’s* for Incident Management  Reporting is based upon ITSEC endorsed Incident Priority model as.
Commonwealth of Massachusetts Statewide IT Consolidation IT Consolidation Working Group Meeting March 21, 2011.
CD FY09 Tactical Plan Status FY09 Tactical Plan Status Report for Site Networking Anna Jordan April 28, 2009.
Service Transition & Planning Service Validation & Testing
Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Health and Human Services Implementing the Affordable Care Act in Massachusetts 2012 Legislative Changes.
Existing Solution 1 Proactive – SLR 6 hour schedule activities for managed services Stop light report is posted and reviews any open tickets for.
Deloitte Consulting LLP Commonwealth of Massachusetts Statewide Strategic IT Consolidation (ITC) Initiative IT Consolidation Working Group Discussion Document.
Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Health and Human Services IT Town Hall December 3, 2010.
Information Technology Division Executive Office for Administration and Finance IT Service Excellence Committee (ITSEC) Dec. 23 rd Meeting Dec. 23, 2010.
Information Technology Division Executive Office for Administration and Finance IT Service Excellence Committee (ITSEC) Nov 10, 2010.
0 FY11 Budget Update Governor, House, and Senate budgets all rely on $600 - $700 million in additional federal reimbursement (“FMAP”) –Governor and House.
Target Accomplishments: Phase 3
Enterprise Service Desk (ESD) Enterprise Service Desk for Notification / Knowledge Article Authors.
Information Technology Division Executive Office for Administration and Finance IT Service Excellence Committee (ITSEC) Dec. 9, 2010.
CHANGE CONTROL PROCESS SEPTEMBER 22, /16/2015 Purpose  a methodical approach for capturing, managing and implementing IT changes  ongoing management.
Information Technology Division Executive Office for Administration and Finance Infrastructure Services Board (ISB)
Commonwealth of Massachusetts Statewide Strategic IT Consolidation (ITC) Initiative Phase 3d Work Plan IT Consolidation Working Group Discussion Document.
Commonwealth IT Consolidation Background and Basic Talking Points Date MM/DD/YYYY.
Introduction to ITIL and ITIS. CONFIDENTIAL Agenda ITIL Introduction  What is ITIL?  ITIL History  ITIL Phases  ITIL Certification Introduction to.
1 Procurement Operations Division (POD) Guidance for Telework and Work Schedules February 2016.
Working Group Meeting – Agenda for 05/17 1 Program Status / Phase 3c. (10 mins) J. McElhenny 2 IT Consolidation Program (30 mins) “ A Look Back & A Look.
Deloitte Consulting LLP Commonwealth of Massachusetts Statewide Strategic IT Consolidation (ITC) Initiative Bi-weekly Statewide Working Group Discussion.
Progress of ITSM at Pomona College and the use of Footprints Information Technology Services IT Service Management and the Tools Supporting it Pomona College,
IT Infrastructure Library (ITIL) For You -With Max Mart The ManageEngine Guy!!
Change Management Change Management.
A Helpdesk Health Check GURU’S GUIDE:
AgilizTech Support Desk Overview
ITIL: Why Your IT Organization Should Care Service Support
HP Service Manager-UPAPDRP
ITIL: Why Your IT Organization Should Care Service Support
The Service Portal What is the Self-Service Web Portal?
ITIL: Why Your IT Organization Should Care Service Support
The Service Portal What is the Self-Service Web Portal?
ISSUE MANAGEMENT PROCESS MONTH DAY, YEAR
ISDS Service Support Performance – May 2019
Presentation transcript:

Information Technology Division Executive Office for Administration and Finance IT Service Excellence Committee Jan. 19, 2012

TopicDesired OutcomesDiscussion lead Allotted time Incident management discussion Ticket closure process and also 1 st call resolution discussion All 30 min Change Management Update on activity in this process area and next steps All 30 min Wrap-up All 10 2 Agenda

3 Incident Management Some Secretariat KPI’s (EEA and LWD) have been showing a sizable Incident ticket backlog, possibly the result of delay in ticket closure (i.e. desire to obtain customer closure, or folks forgetting/neglecting to close the ticket or resource availability)Secretariat KPI’s ITIL best practice around ticket closure, is that once resolved an effort is made to confirm with the user or the customer of satisfaction with the resolution (experience tells us however, that this step can sometimes delay the ticket closure process) In an effort to support the work all the SD owners are doing on Incident processes, would it be helpful to have an agreed upon policy around ticket closure? (i.e. Would it be helpful to have a policy that says ticket will be closed xx days after resolution- leaving it up to the Secretariat to handle for tickets they own, in whatever way works best for them the customer notification )

4 Incident Management- Ticket closure Incident Management ticket best practice In ITIL nomenclature, Resolution is distinguished from Closure SLA performance can be measured based on resolutionSLA performance

First Call Resolution – Information sharing One measure of how efficient we are in dealing with customer issues/requests Definition: Tickets by initial tier of escalation (typically Service Desk) Some work underway by EHS and ANFEHS 5

Moving forward on Change Management ITSEC Change Management roadmap Significant MilestonesEHSEEAITDLWDEOEEPSANFOSCHEDMassDOT Participation in Mo. Change mtg Executive Support Change Mgr. Designated ? Change Calendar CAB Established Change policy & process published Ticketing system- manual or systemic in place Initial Metrics established Metrics published Post-implementation reviews established 6 * * Really contingent on upgrading to V12 of EHS’s UniCenter platform ** CAB is informal at this point; held at Senior staff on weekly basis; trying to adhere to 1 week advance notice *** OSC Published Policy is Being revised; Rationale ‘s TeamConcept is the ticketing system; will be establishing a CAB ** ***

EEA FSC reflecting related ITD activity 7

8 KPI review: Change Activity

Next Commonwealth wide Change calendar discussion: Feb 2 nd meeting- 1 st part of ITSEC 9

APPENDIX 10

IM backlogs 11 back

IM: First pass resolution 12 back

Incident SLA Performance based upon Resolution date (i.e. not upon ticket closure date) 13 Back

URGENCY/ IMPACT High A service outage with broad impact to the Commonwealth, across one or more services that are not functioning, or whole sites or agencies are impacted, or an agency specific critical severity (outage) has occurred causing complete service outage (as opposed to for example, a performance degradation). (see attached Critical Applic. List). May effect public safety, transportation, health, financial servicing, or ability to deliver other public services. Medium There is impact to a portion of an agency or office, with one or more services to the Commonwealth, either not functioning or seriously degraded so the effect is that the agency’s mission is impacted. Also may apply if one or more very high profile parties are impacted (I.e. Secretary or direct report). Low Impact is to an individual or a small workgroup or the service impacted is not of a mission critical nature. High Immediate action is required to restore service (s) or prevent failure of a service. No work around exists. FastLane user accounts inaccessible; Unable to Log into Citrix; Network to Lowell office out. ESE Mail (Exchange) down effecting all 550 Secondary Ed. end users -Complete loss of mission critical EHS application (ex. Beacon 3, Meditech, Family- net) Critical gateway loss (AD, VG, Mass.Gov) Complete Massmail outage at an EHS site -Complete loss of Commonwealth mission critical service (HRCMS, MMARS, etc.) DEP network down effecting 400 users; e- Permitting system down; EEA’s network down causing ELA (Environment Law Enforcement) outage and public safety impact LWD network ISP circuit failure all services impacted Registrar’s PC down; AutoCAD Licensing server down, Oracle Fin. Down ELAR -Educator Licensing applic. down preventing all admins & teachers from obtaining licensing records & certifications -Severe degradation of service from critical gateway (AD, VG, Mass.Gov) Complete loss of MassMail at an EHS agency EEA’s Waste site Cleanup data unavailable to Lic. Site professionals due to server outage Bad network switch - Springfield LWD call center down ANF: Governors Network down or Agency critical applic. out/degraded MassDot Employee’s hard drive down Medium A service outage occurred & there is a work around but service degraded or work around not sufficiently timely, too costly or too much effort. Or service has not failed but potentially may do so. Critical voice service components are not functional (ex. Voice Mail) MassMail service for the Commonwealth is degrading ANF: node down effecting some users Nutrition Applic. Performance is degraded – health educators have difficulty obtaining necessary info. IVR redundancy failover required causing degradation for Lawrence Call Center Single EEA user BB out ANF: EE keyboard broken Low A service outage has occurred and a work around exists and/or the remediation and/or needed procurement is in process. EEA’s HelpDesk HelpStar application unavailable but workaround via phones avail for short-term ANF: Phone system outage but redundant node processing calls EE PC down- temp. replacement not true image ANF: switch port out but other is avail. Local MASS.DOT printer outage – EE ability to do primary job no impacted ESE Corrupted outlook file on siwillngle user –w/a is: use OWA Printing for a group of users at An EHS site down, but alternative printing in the site available. Commonwealth Incident Prioritization: ITSEC member examples P1 P2 P3 P2 P3P4P4/P5 P4 14

15 Finalized SLOs for Incident Management Note: Catastrophic and Critical (P1’s and P2’s) are on a 24x7 coverage; High and Medium (P3’s & P4’s) are on Business day Calendar

16 Change Type and key Change Management business rules Change TypeAssessmen t required CAB approval required Emergency CAB approval required Only Change Manager approval required Change Manager or Duty Manager (if off hours); LOB Owner and Product Owner (always) and (where appropriate) Customer agency IT executive approval required NormalYes No No (this requirement may possibly come at a later point of maturity in several months) StandardNo EmergencyNo YesNoYes ITD Change types (following ITIL definitions)

Establish SE Culture Offer of Enterprise Service Delivery tool Commonwealth Policies, Processes and Metrics for Incident Management Develop Commonwealth SLOs and SLO Reporting Commonwealth Policies, Processes & Metrics for Change Management Common H/W & S/W Asset Mgt tool Institute single Commonwealth Virtual Operations Culture 17 FY 11 Q2-Q4 We Are Here Model fully implemented w/ Response time KPIs and IM categories FY 12 FY 13 ITSEC established Internal ITD Pilot- Monthly LOB/SLO Rpting Single Metrics reporting Framework established ITSEC Wiki presence ITD COMiT implemented 1 st Sec. Adoption COMiT 2 nd Sec. Adoption COMiT Follow-on COMiT Adoptions or integrations Incident Priorities Defined & ISB approved Begin reporting Incident Metrics ITD LOB/SLO reporting to Customers ITD IT Services customer metrics Change Types & Stnd Windows Defined & ISB approved Monthly CW wide Change Calendar ITD weekly CM Calendar published All ITD h/w s/w in Enterprise toolCommonwealth h/w s/w in Enterprise tool Operational Framework Defined and agreed Monitoring tools rationalized/integrated in support of end to end SE model Education & Marketing plan ITSEC Road show ITSEC Day & Symposium Commonwealth-wide Reporting of Incident SLO metrics Service Excellence Program - 3 year Road Map Begin publishing Change metrics