Key Aspects of IP License Agreements Donald M. Cameron The purpose of this document is to provide information as to developments in the law. It does not.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
G. Conti – Politecnico di Milano 2006 © 1/13 CRUI – WIPO 28 marzo 2006 Technology Transfer Office Setting up a license agreement: An Italian University.
Advertisements

Collaborative Intellectual Property
The Federal Technology Transfer Process: Licenses and Cooperative Research and Development Agreements ADVANCED LICENSING INSTITUTE AT.
Negotiating Technology License Agreements Tamara Nanayakkara.
Intellectual Property and the Ownership of Research 6 June 2007 Professor Fiona Macmillan.
“I Get by with a Little Help from My Friends” Legal Issues Related to Corporate Collaboration, Alliances, Sponsorships, Joint Ventures, and Licensing Mark.
Key Aspects of IP License Agreements Donald M. Cameron Revised by Noel Courage for UofT Law 32H1S – March 13, 2012.
© 2012 Cooley LLP, Five Palo Alto Square, 3000 El Camino Real, Palo Alto, CA The content of this packet is an introduction to Cooley LLP’s capabilities.
LICENSING “One Way of Putting Your I.P. to Work for Your Organization” Inventing and Patenting Seminar May 16, 2001.
. Software Licenses T HE T EXAS A&M U NIVERSITY S YSTEM Nicholas E. Chremos, TAMUS Office of General Counsel November 8, 2012 O FFICE OF T ECHNOLOGY C.
Business of IP Conference Series/Tech Council of Maryland: Technology Licensing Fundamentals Presented by Stephen Candelmo Arent Fox LLP Washington, DC.
Air Force Materiel Command I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Developing, Fielding, and Sustaining America’s Aerospace Force INTELLECTUAL.
Computer Engineering 294 IP R.Smith 5/ Intellectual Property What is it? Why is it important? – What is it designed to do? What are its basic forms?
Successful Technology Licensing Chapter III: Key Terms Cluster 3: Forms of Payment and other Financial Terms Arnaud Michel Gide Loyrette Nouel, Paris (Bogota,
CS 501: Software Engineering Fall 2000 Lecture 7 Management II Business and Legal Aspects of Software Engineering.
Chapter 5 Intellectual Property & Internet Law
{ Legal Basics for Business Danielle A. Higgins, Esq. Day Ketterer, Ltd.
IP=Increased Profits How to Make Your IP Work For You Rachel Lerner COSE Fall 2006.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LICENSING Advantages to Transferring Intellectual Property Rights Abroad Avoid Costs of Exporting Goods Avoid Problems with Host.
By, Henry “Hank” Abromson, Esq.. Introduction  Henry “Hank” Abromson  Attorney with Miles & Stockbridge P.C. (Frederick)  Intellectual Property, Corporate,
A business law firm serving entrepreneurs, emerging growth companies and investors Licensing and Corporate Partnering An Overview of Licensing Agreements.
Commercialization of Intellectual Property by Bob Reader Vice President, Licensing National Institute for Strategic Technology Acquisition and Commercialization.
Intro to Intellectual Property 05/13/2015. Exponential Inventor Intro to Intellectual Property 05/13/2015 Why is IP Important? Everyone makes a big deal.
Constructing the “Price” of the Technology in IP Licensing Negotiations Sub Regional Training Program on IP Valuation Maribor November 5 to 7, 2012.
I DENTIFYING AND P ROTECTING I NTELLECTUAL P ROPERTY Tyson Benson
WIPO NATIONAL WORKSHOP ON NEGOTIATING TECHNOLOGY LICENSING AGREEMENTS organized by The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) in cooperation with.
Middleware Promises Warranties that Don’t Indemnities that Won’t Stephen Rubin, Esquire
Overview OTL Mission Inventor Responsibility Stanford Royalty Sharing Disclosure Form Patent View Inventor Agreements Patent.
Intellectual Property 101 For Entrepreneurs HMC Entrepreneurial Conference Claremont, California March 6, 2004 Stephen H. LaCount.
SUCCESSFUL TECHNOLOGY LICENSING (STL) Key Terms of a Licensing Agreement Cluster I an II : Subject Matter and Scope ________________ INAPI – WIPO Santiago.
2011 Industry Sponsored Research Workshop INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY Michael Jaremchuk Associate Director CVIP Phone: FAX:
Introduction to IP Ellen Monson Director Intellectual Property Office University of Cincinnati.
1 Knowledge | Innovation | Technology Overview of Risk Management in University Technology Transfer David N. Allen, Ph.D. Associate Vice President for.
Technology-Business-Legal Some Critical Intersections Getting Started Legally IP Protection Licensing Mark J. Sever, Jr., Esquire Deborah A. Hays, Esquire.
Intellectual Property Intellectual Property. Intellectual Property Intellectual effort, not by physical labor Intangible property Lawsuits involve infringement.
Best Practices in Licensing Diane M. Reed Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear Rouz Tabaddor Vice President, Chief IP Counsel Corelogic Information Solutions,
Strategic Alliances How to Structure, Negotiate, and Implement Successful Alliances February 11, 2003 Debra J. Dorfman Copyright © 2003 by Hale and Dorr.
Zheng Liu January 18, 2015 Intellectual Property Law For Startups.
Custom Software Development Intellectual Property and Other Key Issues © 2006 Jeffrey W. Nelson and Iowa Department of Justice (Attach G)
Copyright 2008 The Prinz Law Office.1 Getting Started with Drafting a License Agreement: A Brief Guide to the Elements and Key Considerations By Kristie.
“Win-Win” LicensingAgreement: Negotiating and Drafting Strategies “Win-Win” Licensing Agreement: Negotiating and Drafting Strategies August 12 – 14, 2008.
© 2007 West Legal Studies in Business, A Division of Thomson Learning Chapter 5 Intellectual Property.
How Commercial Firms Protect Intellectual Property In Transactions Daniel J. Mazella Celera Genomics Group, An Applera Corporation Business.
Commercializing Scientific Research and development Legislation, Contracts, Royalty rates Anne K. S. Jensen Senior Examiner, M. Sc. EE Danish Patent and.
Getting to “Yes” in University IP Licensing: Mock Negotiation Workshop October 25, 2012 Presented by Jim Singer Brienne Terril.
Mark Collins © 2015 Mark Collins.  Original, invented, creative, unique  Patents ◦ Protected through registration  Copyright ◦ Protected through litigation.
Intellectual Property Basics: What Rules Apply to Faculty, Staff, and Student Work Product? Dave Broome Vice Chancellor and General Counsel October 15,
Intellectual Property Legal Implications. What is Intellectual Property? The product of creativity and intellectual endeavour Intellectual Property Rights.
UNECE April 2009 Commercialization of IPR A Business Perspective Jason Bucha, Compliance Counsel April 2, 2009.
Lecture 27 Intellectual Property. Intellectual Property simply defined is any form of knowledge or expression created with one's intellect. It includes.
Fundamentals of Intellectual Property
ip4inno Module 4C IP Licensing Name of SpeakerVenue & Date.
1 Successful Technology Licensing: A Practical Guide.
Patent Review Overview Summary of different types of Intellectual Property What is a patent? Why would you want one? What are the requirements for patentability?
An introduction to Intellectual property protection TG © Copyright by Stevens Institute of Technology.
Типичные ошибки и проблемы при лицензирования и продаже российских патентов в США by Dmitri Dubograev © 2010.
Technology Transfer Office
Intellectual Property and the Ownership of Research
Customer Contracting/Licensing Obstacles & Pitfalls By: Mark E
Intro to Intellectual Property 3.0
Lecture 28 Intellectual Property(Cont’d)
Intellectual Property, Patents, Trademarks, Copyright, and Franchising
Customer Contracting/Licensing Obstacles & Pitfalls
IP and legal issues Super-project.eu.
IP and legal issues Super-project.eu.
Intellectual Property
Chapter 40 Franchises and Special Forms of Business
What are the types of intellectual property ?
Intellectual Property Considerations in Forming and Scaling a Business
Presentation transcript:

Key Aspects of IP License Agreements Donald M. Cameron The purpose of this document is to provide information as to developments in the law. It does not contain a full analysis of the law nor does it constitute an opinion of Ogilvy Renault or any member of the Firm on the points of law discussed. © D. Cameron, R. Borenstein 2003 The Canadian Institute – Key Business Agreements Toronto, Ontario

2 Agenda  IP Rights 5 Minutes  Skeleton of a License Agreement 5 Minutes  License Grant & Consideration 15 Minutes  Licensor & Licensee Obligations 10 Minutes  Common Clauses 5 Minutes  Questions 5 Minutes

3 What is Intellectual Property?  It’s not the right to do something  It’s the right to exclude others  Legal monopoly  Limited in time  Limited in territory  “License to litigate”

4 The Legal Cubby-holes PatentsFunction, materials Trade-marksNames, logos CopyrightForm of expression Trade Secrets/ Confidential Information Secrecy of info.

5 Patents  “Applied science”  Machines  Processes  Compositions of matter  Drugs  Certain software processes (limited)

6 Patents Prerequisites:  New  Useful  Inventive (non-obvious)

7 Patents New (Novelty):  Never been done, used, written about before  Made available to the public Useful (Utility):  It works  It achieves the promise

8 Patents Inventive (non-obvious):  Any idiot would not have thought of it  A person of ordinary skill in the area  With no inventive abilities  Would have been led to the solution  Directly and without difficulty

9 Trade-marks  Names  Logos  Product packaging  Shape of product  Earned by use  Registration gives Canadian rights

10 Trade-marks  Key: distinctiveness  Must link products or services to a unique source

11 Copyright  Protects “works”  books  movies  music  artwork  computer programs  Protects “expression”, not ideas  Arises automatically, but can be registered

12 Trade Secrets  Recipes  Formulae  Customer lists  “Know-how”  Non-patentable inventions

13 The Legal Cubby-holes Patents Trade-marks Copyright Industrial Designs Trade Secrets

14 Overview of Basic Licensing  Permission to do what you would not otherwise have the right to do

15 Skeleton of a License Agreement  The Big Question: WHO GETS WHAT?

16 Skeleton of a License Agreement  Three building blocks License Skeleton  Who: The Parties  Gets: The Grant  What: The Definitions Licensor Licensee Definitions The Grant

17 IP License Agreement - WHO  Who has the right to grant the license?  Ownership of the intellectual property?  Licensed to sublicense the intellectual property?  Do I have a warranty that says so?

18 IP License Agreement - WHO  Who is the Licensee?  The company? >> 1 machine, 1 location >> site license >> corporate wide  Subsidiaries and affiliates?

19 IP License Agreements - WHAT  WHAT DOES THE LICENSEE GET?  What IP rights are being granted?  copyright, trade secrets, patents, know-how  if trade secrets, include confidentiality provisions

20 IP License Agreements - WHAT  WHAT DOES THE LICENSOR GET?  $$$$  License fees  Royalties  Cross-licenses

21 License Grant The Legal Cubby-holeWhat it Protects  PatentsFunction or Composition  TrademarksBrand Names and Logos  CopyrightThe Form of Information  Trade Secrets / The Secrecy of an idea Confidential Info

22 License Grant  Licensor hereby grants to Licensee  a nontransferable, nonexclusive right and license to use  the Licensed Patents  In the Territory, solely for the purpose of manufacturing and selling the Licensed Products License Skeleton Licensor Licensee Definitions The Grant

23 License Grant  What is the Licensee allowed to do?  Patents: make, use, sell  Trade-marks: use  Copyright: copy, publish, translate, perform, modify, create derivative works  Trade Secrets: use

24 License Grant  What is the Licensee allowed to do?  Exclusive: only the Licensee  Sole: only the Licensee and the Licensor  Non-exclusive: multiple Licensees

25 License Grant  What is the Licensee allowed to do?  Territory: “use the Licensed Trade-marks to promote, sell and distribute products in Canada and the United States  Field: use the Licensed Patents to develop a therapeutic product to treat diabetes  Sublicense: modify the source code of the Licensed Software to create the Integrated Software and sublicense the object code of the Integrated Software to end-users

26 License Grant  What is the Licensee not allowed to do?  non-competition  no reverse engineering  no misuse of confidential information  sublicense  use outside scope of grant Simon Says!

27 License Grant Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler

28 License Grant “How many a dispute could have been deflated into a single paragraph if the disputants had dared to define their terms?” - Aristotle

29 Consideration  How much is the license worth? ¢¢¢  $$$ Non-Exclusive  Exclusive Small Territory  Large Territory Narrow Field  Broad Field “Use”  “Exploit” Technological  Technological Convenience Breakthrough

30 Consideration  License Fees (Fixed)  Initial or Upfront  Annual  Milestone

31 Consideration  Royalties (Fixed or Variable)  5$ per widget sold  5% of “Revenue” per widget sold  “Net Revenue”  “Sales Revenue”  “Profit”  “Allocated Price”

32 Consideration  Minimum Royalty Commitment  Tied to exclusivity  Quotas per Territory, Product line or Total  Maximum Royalties Payable  Cap on Amount (aggregate of royalty payments)  Cap on Time (duration of royalty payments)  “Stacks” (total percentage of 3d party royalties)  “Most Favoured Nation”  “Substantially Similar”

33 Consideration  Reports  May be tied to payment of royalties  Periodic reports (monthly, quarterly, annual)  Certified?  use outside scope of grant  Audits  Should be conducted regularly

34 Consideration  Other Consideration  Cross-license  Shares/ Stock/ Equity  Joint Venture arrangements

35 Obligations - Licensor  What does the Licensor have to do?  Deliver the Intellectual Property  Modify/Improve the Intellectual Property  Enforce the Intellectual Property  Defend against claims of Infringement

36 Obligations - Licensor  Deliver the Intellectual Property  Disclose Know-How  Train Licensee Personnel  Support and Maintenance  Disclose/Deliver Improvements and Modifications

37 Obligations - Licensor  Improvements – a development in the field of the licensed intellectual property that enhances one of the following:  Usability  Functionality  Efficiency  Performance

38 Obligations - Licensor  Improvements can be deemed included in license grant  No additional payment required  May extend life of payment terms  License may be offered a right of first refusal  Allows Licensor to negotiate additional $$$  Improvement may not be usable without base technology

39 Obligations - Licensor  Enforcement  Prosecute and maintain registrations  Take action against infringers  Keep other licensees “in line”  Defend against challenges to the validity of the intellectual property

40 Obligations - Licensor  Infringement Claims  IP litigation can be VERY scary, VERY expensive and VERY risky  Licensor may not want to bear the risk – will factor into overall value of license  Other options:  Replace  Modify  Settle or “Pay Tribute”

41 Obligations - Licensee  What does the Licensee have to do?  “Work” the Invention  Maintain Quality Standards  Disclose and Deliver Improvements  Indemnification/ Insurance  Safeguard Confidential Information, Non- Compete, Non-Solicit

42 Obligations - Licensee  “Working” the Invention  Tied to exclusivity  May incorporate “quotas”  Covenant to use “commercially reasonable” efforts to promote, distribute and sell products

43 Obligations - Licensee  Quality Standards  Critical in trade-mark licenses  Licensor entitled to inspect samples and audit  Good practice to provide Licensee with specifications for mark use (e.g. dimensions, colours) and legends

44 Obligations - Licensee  Improvements  These are “Licensee” improvements  Licensor may require disclosure, and a license back  Beware of “blocking” patents

45 Obligations - Licensee  Indemnification and Insurance  Flip side to infringement indemnity  Product liability concerns also VERY scary and VERY expensive  Indemnity limited by Licensee’s activities (i.e., is the Licensee manufacturing?)  In trade-mark licenses, product liability can be damaging to goodwill in owner’s mark

46 Common Clauses  Assignment  Term and Termination  Conflict Resolution

47 Common Clauses  Assignment  Usually require consent to assign or in the event of a change of control  May wish to withhold if assigned to a competitor  Guarantee from original licensee?

48 Common Clauses  Term  Term may be dependent on intellectual property rights

49 The Terms Patents17 or 20 years Trade-marks15 years (repeat) Copyrightauthor + 50 years Trade Secretsindefinitely

50 Common Clauses  Termination  No matter how friendly the parties are, conflicts may arise – employees depart, market conditions change, etc.  Better to plan ahead, while the parties are still on good terms

51 Common Clauses  Termination  By Licensor:  Failure of Licensee to pay royalties  Breach of Confidential Information  Failure to exploit  By Licensee  Invalidity of Patents  Infringement Claim

Key Aspects of IP License Agreements Donald M. Cameron The purpose of this document is to provide information as to developments in the law. It does not contain a full analysis of the law nor does it constitute an opinion of Ogilvy Renault or any member of the Firm on the points of law discussed. © D. Cameron, R. Borenstein 2003 The Canadian Institute – Key Business Agreements Toronto, Ontario