4 male, 4 female LCLs HumanChimpanzeeRhesus Macaque Expression: RNAseq Active Gene Marks: Pol II (ChIPseq) H3K4me3 (ChIPseq) Repressed Region Mark: H3K27me3.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Original Figures for "Molecular Classification of Cancer: Class Discovery and Class Prediction by Gene Expression Monitoring"
Advertisements

Comparative Genomics II: Functional comparisons Caterino and Hayes, 2007.
Supplementary Material Epigenetic histone modifications of human transposable elements: genome defense versus exaptation Ahsan Huda, Leonardo Mariño-Ramírez.
Model Selection in Machine Learning + Predicting Gene Expression from ChIP-Seq signals
TGCAAACTCAAACTCTTTTGTTGTTCTTACTGTATCATTGCCCAGAATAT TCTGCCTGTCTTTAGAGGCTAATACATTGATTAGTGAATTCCAATGGGCA GAATCGTGATGCATTAAAGAGATGCTAATATTTTCACTGCTCCTCAATTT.
Differential Principal Component Analysis (dPCA) for ChIP-seq
Compound cis-regulatory elements with both boundary and enhancer functions in the human genome Daudi Jjingo 1, Jianrong Wang 1, Andrew B. Conley 1, Victoria.
Biol 456/656 Molecular Epigenetics Lecture #5 Wed. Sept 2, 2015.
Supplemental Figure 1. False trans association due to probe cross-hybridization and genetic polymorphism at single base extension site. (A) The Infinium.
Genomics 2015/16 Silvia del Burgo. + Same genome for all cells that arise from single fertilized egg, Identity?  Epigenomic signatures + Epigenomics:
Date of download: 6/21/2016 Copyright © 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: Epigenetic Signatures of Autism: Trimethylated H3K4.
The Chromatin State The scientific quest to decipher the histone code Lior Zimmerman.
Functional Elements in the Human Genome
Figure 1. Annotation and characterization of genomic target of p63 in mouse keratinocytes (MK) based on ChIP-Seq. (A) Scatterplot representing high degree.
Pol II Docking and Pausing at Growth and Stress Genes in C. elegans
Differential Expression of Circular RNAs in Glioblastoma Multiforme and Its Correlation with Prognosis  Junle Zhu, Jingliang Ye, Lei Zhang, Lili Xia,
Volume 13, Issue 7, Pages (November 2015)
Genetic-Variation-Driven Gene-Expression Changes Highlight Genes with Important Functions for Kidney Disease  Yi-An Ko, Huiguang Yi, Chengxiang Qiu, Shizheng.
1. Interpreting rich epigenomic datasets
Correlated occupancies across FACT-bound regions.
High-Resolution Profiling of Histone Methylations in the Human Genome
Volume 91, Issue 6, Pages (September 2016)
by Holger Weishaupt, Mikael Sigvardsson, and Joanne L. Attema
Figure 4. (A) Scatterplot of RPC4 T statistic (between TP0 and TP36) for the indicated groups of isolated tRNA genes (RPC4 peak only, n = 35; RPC4 + H3K4me3.
Volume 44, Issue 3, Pages (November 2011)
HS induces sustained H3K4me3 and H3K4me2 methylation at HSP22
SAGA Is a General Cofactor for RNA Polymerase II Transcription
Lucas J.T. Kaaij, Robin H. van der Weide, René F. Ketting, Elzo de Wit 
Volume 45, Issue 6, Pages (December 2016)
Volume 63, Issue 2, Pages (July 2016)
Shinsuke Ohba, Xinjun He, Hironori Hojo, Andrew P. McMahon 
Volume 28, Issue 2, Pages (August 2015)
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages (December 2015)
Nuclear Fractionation Reveals Thousands of Chromatin-Tethered Noncoding RNAs Adjacent to Active Genes  Michael S. Werner, Alexander J. Ruthenburg  Cell.
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages (February 2015)
Volume 33, Issue 4, Pages (February 2009)
Human-Specific Transcriptional Networks in the Brain
Nuclear Fractionation Reveals Thousands of Chromatin-Tethered Noncoding RNAs Adjacent to Active Genes  Michael S. Werner, Alexander J. Ruthenburg  Cell.
Volume 10, Issue 8, Pages (March 2015)
High-Resolution Profiling of Histone Methylations in the Human Genome
Glimpses of the Epigenetic Landscape
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages 9-22 (January 2013)
Figure 2. Ectopic expression of PLZF modulates H3K27ac at enhancer regions in myeloid cells. (A) Box plots showing ... Figure 2. Ectopic expression of.
Supplementary Figure S1: Purity for naïve and memory subsets
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 67, Issue 6, Pages e6 (September 2017)
B. Ajekigbe, K. Cheung, Y. Xu, A. J. Skelton, A. Panagiotopoulos, J
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (April 2015)
Epstein-Barr Virus Oncoprotein Super-enhancers Control B Cell Growth
Volume 44, Issue 3, Pages (November 2011)
Human Promoters Are Intrinsically Directional
Pol II Docking and Pausing at Growth and Stress Genes in C. elegans
Evolution of Alu Elements toward Enhancers
Volume 132, Issue 2, Pages (January 2008)
Volume 10, Issue 10, Pages (October 2017)
Dynamic Regulation of Nucleosome Positioning in the Human Genome
Volume 30, Issue 6, Pages (June 2009)
Volume 66, Issue 4, Pages e4 (May 2017)
Volume 60, Issue 3, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 57, Issue 4, Pages (February 2015)
Volume 16, Issue 11, Pages (September 2016)
Gene Density, Transcription, and Insulators Contribute to the Partition of the Drosophila Genome into Physical Domains  Chunhui Hou, Li Li, Zhaohui S.
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages (August 2010)
Volume 1, Issue 3, Pages (September 2007)
Volume 10, Issue 7, Pages (February 2015)
Volume 24, Issue 8, Pages e7 (August 2018)
Fig. 4 Differential histone modifications at promoters in various brain cell populations. Differential histone modifications at promoters in various brain.
Chromatin state mapping pinpoints PAX3–FOXO1 (P3F) in active enhancers
HOXA9 and STAT5 co-occupy similar genomic regions and increase JAK/STAT signaling. HOXA9 and STAT5 co-occupy similar genomic regions and increase JAK/STAT.
Mutant TERT promoter displays active histone marks and distinct long-range interactions: A, cell lines that were used in the study with their origin and.
Presentation transcript:

4 male, 4 female LCLs HumanChimpanzeeRhesus Macaque Expression: RNAseq Active Gene Marks: Pol II (ChIPseq) H3K4me3 (ChIPseq) Repressed Region Mark: H3K27me3 (ChIPseq) Enhancer Marks: H3K4me1 (ChIPseq) H3K27ac (ChIPseq) 5 male, 3 female LCLs 6 male, 2 female LCLs 3 Species 8 Samples per species RNAseq+ 5 ChIPseq Figure S1. An illustration of the study design

Figure S2. Choices of cutoffs for classifying regions as enriched

H3K4me1H3K4me3 H3K27acH3K27me3 PolIIRNA Figure S3. Pairwise Spearman’s rank correlations between individuals from the three primates for four histone marks, Pol II and RNA H C R H C R H C R

Figure S4. Fold enrichment of the five marks in regions near TSSs in three primates ChimpanzeeHumanRhesus Macaque ChimpanzeeHuman Rhesus Macaque Fold Enrichment, TSS +/- 10 kb Fold Enrichment, TSS +/- 50 kb A B H3K27ac H3K27me3H3K4me1H3K4me3 Pol II

TSS +/- 2 kb ChimpanzeeHumanRhesus Macaque Figure S5. Pairwise Spearman’s rank correlations between marks in each of the three primates TSS +/- 10 kb TSS +/- 50 kb

Figure S6. Mark enrichment levels are correlated with gene expression levels in chimpanzee R2R2 Scaled Enrichment Level Enrichment Level Low ExpressedMedium ExpressedHigh Expressed Distance to TSS (kb) Gene Expression Level TSS +/- 2kbTSS +/- 10kbTSS +/- 50kb marginal marginal + interactions H3K27ac H3K27me3H3K4me1H3K4me3 Pol II

Figure S7. Mark enrichment levels are correlated with gene expression levels in rhesus macaque R2R2 Scaled Enrichment Level Enrichment Level Low ExpressedMedium ExpressedHigh Expressed Distance to TSS (kb) Gene Expression Level TSS +/- 2kbTSS +/- 10kbTSS +/- 50kb marginal marginal + interactions H3K27ac H3K27me3H3K4me1H3K4me3 Pol II

ChimpanzeeHumanRhesus Macaque TSS +/- 10 kb TSS +/- 50 kb Scaled Enrichment Level Figure S8. Mark enrichment levels are plotted against gene expression levels for sliding windows of genes ordered by increasing expression levels in the three primates Gene Expression Level H3K27ac H3K27me3H3K4me1H3K4me3 Pol II

Predicted Gene Expression Level True Gene Expression Level Figure S9. Scatterplot of predicted gene expression levels against true gene expression levels for all analyzed genes in human H3K27ac H3K27me3H3K4me1H3K4me3 Pol II marginal

H3K4me1 H3K27ac Pol II H3K4me3 H3K27me3H C R Posterior Inclusion Probability Figure S10. Importance of the marginal and first-order interaction effects from the five marks for explaining gene expression levels in the three primates Marginal and Interaction Terms

FDR < 2.5% FDR < 7.5% FDR < 10% Figure S11. TSS regions associated with inter-species differences in enriched marks are enriched for differentially expressed (DE) genes H vs CH vs RC vs R Fold Enrichment of TSS Associated with Inter-Species Mark Differences in DE Genes H3K27ac H3K27me3H3K4me1H3K4me3 Pol II

Figure S12. An example of mark abundance and gene expression levels across three species EENSG , REX02 Human H3K27ac H3K27me3H3K4me1H3K4me3 Pol II RNAInput Rhesus Macaque Chimpanzee

Figure S13. Differences in mark enrichment level plotted against differences in gene expression level for sliding windows of genes ordered by increasing differences in expression level TSS +/- 50 kb Scaled Difference in Enrichment Level Difference in Gene Expression Level H vs R C vs R TSS +/- 10 kb H vs C Scaled Difference in Enrichment Level Difference in Gene Expression Level H3K27ac H3K27me3H3K4me1H3K4me3 Pol II

FDR < 10% FDR < 7.5% FDR < 2.5% Figure S14. R squared by mark enrichment level differences for all pairwise comparisons among the three primates marginal marginal + interactions R2R2 H vs C H vs R C vs R H3K27ac H3K27me3H3K4me1H3K4me3 Pol II

Figure S15. Scatterplot of predicted gene expression level differences plotted against true gene expression level differences for DE genes between human and chimpanzee Predicted Gene Expression Difference True Gene Expression Difference H3K27ac H3K27me3H3K4me1H3K4me3 Pol II marginal

Figure S16. Scatterplot of gene expression level differences plotted against sequence conservation and divergence for DE genes Difference in Gene Expression Level H vs RC vs RH vs C

Figure S17. R squared by four histone modifications and Pol II or by four histone modifications alone H vs CH vs RC vs R w/o Pol II FDR < 5% A C R 2 in Pol II w/ Pol II R 2 in RNA H vs CH vs RC vs R w/o Pol II w/ Pol II HCRHCR R 2 in Pol II R 2 in RNA B D marginal marginal + interactions H3K27ac H3K27me3H3K4me1H3K4me3