Www.pjm.com PJM © 2006 The Institute for Regulatory Policy Studies Illinois State University Conference May 12, 2006 Jeff Bladen PJM Interconnection.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
In the Post 06 Environment November 9, 2006 Jim Eber Demand Response.
Advertisements

PJM ©2008 Regional Round-up of Demand Response Developments Susan Covino PJM Interconnection A National Town Meeting on Demand Response Washington, DC.
Demand Response Commissioner Suedeen Kelly June 3, 2008.
Standard Market Design (SMD) in New England Federal Energy Regulation Commission Conference on Standard Market Design January 22, 2002 David LaPlante Vice.
Demand Response: The Challenges of Integration in a Total Resource Plan Demand Response: The Challenges of Integration in a Total Resource Plan Howard.
OCTOBER 8, 2014 Bob Laurita INTERNAL MARKET MONITORING New Import Capacity Resource FCM Market Power Mitigation Order to Show Cause Compliance Filing.
Gloria Godson VP, Federal Regulatory Policy Reliability Pricing Model Part 2.
1 July 15, 2007Alcoa Energy Regulatory Affairs NARUC / FERC Demand Response Collaborative Perspectives of a Large End Use Participant of NYISO Programs.
PJM©2014www.pjm.com Winter 2014 Overview & Recent and Upcoming Market Rule Changes Adam Keech Director, Market Operations.
Demand Response in New York State Northwest Power and Conservation Council DR workshop February 24, 2006.
Energy Storage Definitions/Definitions ETWG 18 Feb 2013.
Resource Adequacy in PJM
PJM© PJM as Part of the Eastern Interconnection KEY STATISTICS PJM member companies 750+ millions of people served 60 peak load in megawatts.
Susan Covino Senior Consultant, Emerging Markets March 31, 2015
Utility Regulation March 10, 2011 Raj Addepalli Deputy Director, Electric, Office of Electric,Gas and Water New York State Department of Public Service.
Market Overview in Electric Power Systems Market Structure and Operation Introduction Market Overview Market Overview in Electric Power Systems Mohammad.
COMPETITIVE ELECTRICITY MARKETS March 15, PA Customer Choice Legislation  Distribution service remains regulated by PAPUC.  Transmission service.
North American Electricity Markets APEX Paris, France October 15-16, 2007 Kenneth Laughlin, PJM.
ASSOCIATION OF ENERGY ENGINEERS – SW OHIO PJM AND OHIO REGULATORY CHANGES HOWARD PETRICOFF VORYS, SATER, SEYMOUR & PEASE LLP 1.
Demand Response in MISO Markets NASUCA Panel on DR November 12, 2012.
Gas & Power Coordination: Growing Pains in Time of Transition Mark Stultz, BP Natural Gas Supply Association OPSI Annual Meeting Chicago, Illinois October.
Reliability Pricing Model (RPM) Overview Andrew Ott PJM Senior Vice President, Markets.
PacifiCorp Participation in the California ISO. 2 Full participation provides significant benefits beyond those of the Energy Imbalance Market EIM BenefitsFull.
© 2013 McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC October 17, 2013 Robert A. Weishaar, Jr. ON SITE ENERGY – INTERPLAY WITH PJM DEMAND RESPONSE PROGRAMS Harrisburg, PA.
1 Non-Transmission Alternatives to Reduce Local Congestion Costs Bill Bojorquez June 3, 2004.
1 PRR 776 in the Context of the ERCOT Market Design Eric S. Schubert Regulatory Affairs Advisor BP Energy Company.
Welcome New York Independent System Operator. (Pre-NYISO) Regulated Market Physical contracts Regulated industry Cost Based System Two Party Deals Bundled.
Demand Response in Midwest ISO Markets February 17, 2008.
THE PJM INTERCONNECTION STATE OF THE MARKET REPORT 2001 Joseph E. Bowring Manager PJM Market Monitoring Unit Federal Energy Regulatory Commission June.
Reactive Power Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Open Meeting December 15, 2004.
1 Demand Response in Midwest ISO Markets 09 February 2007.
OSC Meeting April 27, Transmission Cost Allocation Overview.
Joe Polidoro, Sr. Engineer PJM Interconnection, LLC Grid of the Future: Integrating Load Response into the Markets.
1 Capacity Markets Investment in Generation Capacity Payments October 31, 2005 J. W. Charlton.
PJM©2009www.pjm.com Implications of Electric Transportation for the National Grid Ken Huber PJM Interconnection February 19, 2010.
PJM©2013www.pjm.com Deployment of smart-grid technologies – Technology and market challenges Stu Bresler VP, Market Operations PJM Interconnection University.
Demand Response: Keeping the Power Flowing in Southwest Connecticut Presented by: Henry Yoshimura Manager, Demand Response ISO New England September 30,
Bulk Power Transmission System
“Demand Response: Completing the Link Between Wholesale and Retail Pricing” Paul Crumrine Director, Regulatory Strategies & Services Institute for Regulatory.
Demand Response Workshop September 15, Definitions are important Demand response –“Changes in electricity usage by end-use customers from their.
1 Electricity System and Energy Market Basics David J. Lawrence Manager, Auxiliary Market Products Prepared for: RGGI I&L Workshop June 15, 2006.
PJM©2013www.pjm.com Economic DR participation in energy market ERCOT April 14, 2014 Pete Langbein.
Capacity mechanisms in Europe The fundamental issues behind the ongoing sector enquiry Session 2 - If a capacity mechanism, which design is most appropriate?
PJM©2012www.pjm.com PJM’s Experience with Capacity Markets Terry Boston President & CEO PJM Interconnection Power Across Texas September 21, 2012.
An update on the Market Development Program Phil Bishop New Zealand Electricity Commission Presentation to the EPOC Winter Workshop 3 September 2009.
1 Market Evolution Program Long-Term Resource Adequacy Regulatory Affairs Standing Committee Meeting May 14, 2003.
©2005 PJM 1 STATE OF THE MARKET REPORT 2004 Joseph E. Bowring Market Monitor FERC Briefing April 13, 2005.
Chicago Advanced Energy Demand Response & CSP Evolution Kellen Bollettino Comverge Inc. 10/23/14.
PJM© Demand Response in PJM 2009 NASUCA Mid-Year Meeting June 30, 2009 Boston, MA Panel: Price Responsive Demand – A Long-Term Bargain.
Demand Response: What It Is and Why It’s Important 2007 APPA National Conference San Antonio, Texas June 26, :00 a.m. to Noon Glenn M. Wilson Director.
©2005 PJM 1 APEx The Mature PJM Market Kenneth W. Laughlin PJM October 31, 2005 Orlando, FL.
IWWG Annual Conference Wind Management at MISO July 22, 2011.
PJM©2013www.pjm.com Demand Side Working Group Loads in SCED Angelo Marcino Real-Time Market Operations – PJM April 14, 2014.
NARUC/FERC COLLABORATIVE: DEMAND RESPONSE Paul Suskie, Chairman, Arkansas Public Service Commission July 15, 2007.
Emergency Demand Response Concept Overview and Examples Presented to: ERCOT December 3, 2004 Presented by: Neenan Associates.
Texas Nodal Team Cost Benefit Group Background to Standard Market Design in New England March 2, 2004 Michael Taniwha Manager, Market Administration ISO.
Conference on Standard Market Design Issues Alice Fernandez, FERC Staff January 22-23, 2002.
Programs/Products that ERCOT Does Not Presently Offer ERCOT Demand Side Working Group New DR Product Options Subgroup Jay Zarnikau Frontier Associates.
New Incentives for Pursuing Demand Response Scott Strauss and Sean Flynn Spiegel & McDiarmid APPA Legal Seminar San Francisco – November 2004.
Role Of ERC in the WESM To enforce the rules and regulations governing the operations of the WESM and monitors the activities of the Market Operator and.
PJM©2014www.pjm.com State of Demand Response Stu Bresler Vice President- Market Operations PJM Interconnection 10 th OPSI Annual Meeting October 13, 2014.
Demand Response 2010 and Beyond April 28, 2011 Pete Pengilly.
Wind Management at MISO
Overview of the NYISO Demand Response Programs
Asia-Pacific Energy Regulatory Forum
Calculation of BGS-CIEP Hourly Energy Price Component Using PJM Hourly Data for the PSE&G Transmission Zone.
The Future of Demand Response in New England
Calculation of BGS-CIEP Hourly Energy Price Component Using PJM Hourly Data for the PSE&G Transmission Zone.
Demand resource emergency energy measurement and verification
Calculation of BGS-CIEP Hourly Energy Price Component Using PJM Hourly Data for the PSE&G Transmission Zone.
Presentation transcript:

PJM © 2006 The Institute for Regulatory Policy Studies Illinois State University Conference May 12, 2006 Jeff Bladen PJM Interconnection

PJM © DR in the PJM marketplace Demand Response must be treated equally with generation both for short run dispatch (energy) and long run planning (capacity). PJM designed its markets to be agnostic. A MW gained is worth the same as a MW saved and resold. PJM has multiple options for DR participation, some active and others pending FERC final approval.

PJM © Comparison of Revenue Opportunities for Demand Response Current vs. Revised Revenue Opportunity PJM (today)PJM with new initiatives Real-Time/Spot Energy Sales Yes Day-Ahead Energy Sales Yes Forward Energy Sales NoYes; Proposed Forward Energy Reserve Market Forward Capacity Sales Limited by small volume and to current planning year Yes; RPM auction fixes problems Energy & Capacity payment for emergencies Not in all casesYes; Emergency program changes ensure payment Ancillary Services NoYes; Spin & Regulation

PJM © Comparison of Revenue Opportunities for Revised Demand Response vs. Generation Revenue Opportunity PJM with new initiatives Central Station Generation (PJM) Real-Time/Spot Energy Sales Yes Day-Ahead Energy Sales Yes Forward Energy Sales Yes; Proposed Forward Energy Reserve Market Yes, 50mw blocks at Hubs liquid up to 5 years Forward Capacity Sales Yes; Proposed RPM auction fixes problems Yes, Bi-lateral market liquid up to 3 years Energy & Capacity payment for emergencies Yes; Emergency program changes ensure payment Yes; always Ancillary Services Yes; Spin & RegulationYes; Spin, regulation, black start, etc…

PJM © PJM DSR Market Initiatives Emergency Enhancements (energy) – FERC approved in Feb, 2006, to be implemented on June 1. Ancillary Services – Now available as of May 1, Economic Load Response (energy) – Permanent status effective May 1, Reliability Pricing Model (capacity) – set for technical conference to work out implementation details for June 2007.

PJM © Economic Load Response Economic Load Response in the Energy Market: Permanent integration into the Energy Market (no longer a “Program”). Product rules largely unchanged from current. Treatment of incentive payments deferred until early Current sunset on 12/31/07. Pilot for non-interval metered customers enlarged and enhanced. Grants PJM flexibility to allow additional resources in.

PJM © Ancillary Services New chance for demand side resources to provide synchronized (formerly spinning) reserves and regulation: Same payments as generators when resource is made available. Demand resources initially limited to 25% of synchronized reserve requirement. Additional training requirements for Curtailment Service Providers (CSPs) Endorsed by overwhelming majority of members.

PJM © Emergency Enhancements Emergency Load Response enhanced: Preserves two options – energy only (voluntary) and energy and capacity (mandatory). Full Emergency Load Response made permanent. Expands aggregators of Full Emergency Load Response beyond LSEs to include CSPs. Aligns the deficiency charge more closely to the value of capacity as determined in PJM auctions. Allows demand resources to register simultaneously in Emergency and Economic Load Response. Links emergency payments to market prices with minimum dispatch price determined by resource not PJM.

PJM © DR Capacity Opportunities Part of an integrated Capacity Market Design (RPM) –Provides multi-tiered integrated Demand Response participation. Direct auction participation or self supply opt out. –Signals new resources to offer into Forward Auction –Integrates merchant transmission solutions to compete with generation and demand response –Provides stable capacity price signal to incent sustained investment where needed