PJM©2008 1 www.pjm.com Demand Response in PJM 2009 NASUCA Mid-Year Meeting June 30, 2009 Boston, MA Panel: Price Responsive Demand – A Long-Term Bargain.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
In the Post 06 Environment November 9, 2006 Jim Eber Demand Response.
Advertisements

PJM ©2008 Regional Round-up of Demand Response Developments Susan Covino PJM Interconnection A National Town Meeting on Demand Response Washington, DC.
Achieving Price-Responsive Demand in New England Henry Yoshimura Director, Demand Resource Strategy ISO New England National Town Meeting on Demand Response.
Demand Response in Connecticut Presented by: Bob Laurita ISO New England December 2, 2004.
1 July 15, 2007Alcoa Energy Regulatory Affairs NARUC / FERC Demand Response Collaborative Perspectives of a Large End Use Participant of NYISO Programs.
Demand Response in New York State Northwest Power and Conservation Council DR workshop February 24, 2006.
Resource Adequacy in PJM
NARUC-FERC Demand Response Collaborative Meeting NARUC Fall Meeting Anaheim, CA T. Graham Edwards President & CEO November 11, 2007.
MISO’s Midwest Market Initiative APEX Ron McNamara October 31, 2005.
Enhancing Interruptible Rates Through MISO Demand Response: WIEG Annual Meeting June 19, 2008 Presented by: Kavita Maini, Principal KM Energy Consulting,
Loads Acting as a Resource Relationships with QSEs and LSEs
Susan Covino Senior Consultant, Emerging Markets March 31, 2015
Solutions to California’s Energy Crisis: Real-Time Pricing by Frank Wolak Chairman, Market Surveillance Committee March 17, 2001.
Demand Response in MISO Markets NASUCA Panel on DR November 12, 2012.
Costs of Ancillary Services & Congestion Management Fedor Opadchiy Deputy Chairman of the Board.
© 2013 McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC October 17, 2013 Robert A. Weishaar, Jr. ON SITE ENERGY – INTERPLAY WITH PJM DEMAND RESPONSE PROGRAMS Harrisburg, PA.
Measurement, Verification, and Forecasting Protocols for Demand Response Resources: Chuck Goldman Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Demand Resources: Challenges and New Initiatives for ISO New England Henry Yoshimura, ISO New England NEW DEMAND RESPONSE PRODUCTS IN ELECTRICITY MARKETS.
EnergyConnect, Inc. is a wholly owned subsidiary of EnergyConnect is proud to be an ENERGY STAR PARTNER. George Barnes – Director Business Development.
An Overview of the Australian National Electricity Market Brian Spalding Chief Operating Officer.
PJM© PJM Confidential PJM Generation Interconnection Overview Virginia Offshore Wind Conference Virginia Beach June 22, 2011 Paul McGlynn General.
Welcome New York Independent System Operator. (Pre-NYISO) Regulated Market Physical contracts Regulated industry Cost Based System Two Party Deals Bundled.
1 Calculation of BGS-CIEP Hourly Energy Price Component Using PJM Hourly Data for the PSE&G Transmission Zone.
Demand Response in Midwest ISO Markets February 17, 2008.
Overview of the North American and Canadian Markets 2008 APEX Conference in Sydney, Australia October 13, 2008 Hung-po Chao Director, Market Strategy and.
THE PJM INTERCONNECTION STATE OF THE MARKET REPORT 2001 Joseph E. Bowring Manager PJM Market Monitoring Unit Federal Energy Regulatory Commission June.
Demand Response How to make money by not using electricity?
1 New England Demand Response Resources: Present Observations and Future Challenges Henry Yoshimura Demand Resources Department ISO New England, Inc. Holyoke,
FERC’s Role in Demand Response David Kathan ABA Teleconference December 14, 2005.
Stakeholder Meeting February 13, 2008 Interaction between Scarcity Pricing and Demand Response Dongqing Holly Liu, Ph.D. Senior Market and Product Economist.
1 Demand Response in Midwest ISO Markets 09 February 2007.
Joe Polidoro, Sr. Engineer PJM Interconnection, LLC Grid of the Future: Integrating Load Response into the Markets.
Demand Response Products. Discussion Points 1.Setting the scene….. 2.Virtual Power Station 3.Reserves deployment order 4.Demand Response Products.
PJM©2009www.pjm.com Implications of Electric Transportation for the National Grid Ken Huber PJM Interconnection February 19, 2010.
The Secrets to Successful AMI Deployment – The Ontario Experience Paul Murphy, President & CEO Independent Electricity System Operator February 19, 2007.
1 Welcome to Load Participation Orientation Elev MenWomen Phones Info Presentation and other Load Participation information will be posted at:
PJM©2013www.pjm.com Deployment of smart-grid technologies – Technology and market challenges Stu Bresler VP, Market Operations PJM Interconnection University.
NYISO Demand Side Programs and Issues
Ontario Electricity Supply Forum PEO Mississauga Chapter - September 6, 2007 Rhonda Wright-Hilbig, P.Eng Market Analysis - IESO.
“Demand Response: Completing the Link Between Wholesale and Retail Pricing” Paul Crumrine Director, Regulatory Strategies & Services Institute for Regulatory.
Demand Response Workshop September 15, Definitions are important Demand response –“Changes in electricity usage by end-use customers from their.
PJM©2013www.pjm.com Economic DR participation in energy market ERCOT April 14, 2014 Pete Langbein.
PJM©2012www.pjm.com PJM’s Experience with Capacity Markets Terry Boston President & CEO PJM Interconnection Power Across Texas September 21, 2012.
Demand Side Products in PJM Joseph BowringCornell University January 17, 2011.
California’s Proposed DR Cost-Effectiveness Framework January 30, 2008.
Demand Response: Next Steps OPSI Annual Meeting October 1, 2012 Howard J. Haas.
©2005 PJM 1 STATE OF THE MARKET REPORT 2004 Joseph E. Bowring Market Monitor FERC Briefing April 13, 2005.
Demand Response in Energy and Capacity Markets David Kathan FERC IRPS Conference May 12, 2006.
Chicago Advanced Energy Demand Response & CSP Evolution Kellen Bollettino Comverge Inc. 10/23/14.
PJM © 2006 The Institute for Regulatory Policy Studies Illinois State University Conference May 12, 2006 Jeff Bladen PJM Interconnection.
Demand Response: What It Is and Why It’s Important 2007 APPA National Conference San Antonio, Texas June 26, :00 a.m. to Noon Glenn M. Wilson Director.
©2005 PJM 1 APEx The Mature PJM Market Kenneth W. Laughlin PJM October 31, 2005 Orlando, FL.
PJM©2008 Potential Effects of Proposed Climate Change Policies on PJM’s Energy Market Paul M. Sotkiewicz, Ph.D. Senior Economist PJM Interconnection Organization.
Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) A Success Story… In Progress Ingmar Sterzing United States Association of Energy Economics (USAEE) Pittsburgh.
Emergency Demand Response Concept Overview and Examples Presented to: ERCOT December 3, 2004 Presented by: Neenan Associates.
Demand Response
Business Case NPRR 351 Floyd Trefny Amtec Consulting Brenda Crockett Champion Energy Services.
Programs/Products that ERCOT Does Not Presently Offer ERCOT Demand Side Working Group New DR Product Options Subgroup Jay Zarnikau Frontier Associates.
Demand Response, Planning, and Regional Markets NASUCA Conference June 30, 2009 Joe Rosenthal, CT OCC.
PJM©2014www.pjm.com State of Demand Response Stu Bresler Vice President- Market Operations PJM Interconnection 10 th OPSI Annual Meeting October 13, 2014.
©2003 PJM 1 Presentation to: Maryland Public Service Commission May 16, 2003.
BGE Smart Grid Initiative Stakeholder Meeting September 17, 2009 Wayne Harbaugh, Vice President, Pricing and Regulatory Services.
The Midwest ISO – Platform to Meet Tomorrow’s Challenges Wisconsin Industrial Energy Group August 7, 2008.
Overview of the NYISO Demand Response Programs
Asia-Pacific Energy Regulatory Forum
Calculation of BGS-CIEP Hourly Energy Price Component Using PJM Hourly Data for the PSE&G Transmission Zone.
The Future of Demand Response in New England
Calculation of BGS-CIEP Hourly Energy Price Component Using PJM Hourly Data for the PSE&G Transmission Zone.
Wholesale Electricity Costs
Calculation of BGS-CIEP Hourly Energy Price Component Using PJM Hourly Data for the PSE&G Transmission Zone.
Presentation transcript:

PJM© Demand Response in PJM 2009 NASUCA Mid-Year Meeting June 30, 2009 Boston, MA Panel: Price Responsive Demand – A Long-Term Bargain for Consumers? Paul M. Sotkiewicz, Ph.D. Senior Economist, Markets PJM Interconnection, LLC

PJM© PJM Market Participants in Demand Response Electric Distribution Company (EDC): PJM Member that owns, or leases, electric distribution facilities that are used to provide electric distribution service to electric load within the PJM Control Areas. Who Can be a CSP?: Any LSE Any EDC Any third party (PJM member) specializing in Demand Response Curtailment Service Provider (CSP): PJM Members that will act on behalf of end-use customers who wish to participate in PJM Load Response opportunities. Load Serving Entity (LSE): PJM Member, including Load aggregator or power marketer, serving end-users within the PJM Control Area, to sell electric energy to end-users with the PJM Control Areas. End Use Customer: Cannot directly participate Unless it is a PJM Member (e.g. as an LSE or CSP)

PJM© What is Demand Response? From an operational perspective: It is the ability of consumers to change consumption in response to energy market prices. It is the ability of consumers to reduce consumption in response to a notice from a system operator to meet system needs such as a contingency or emergency situation to maintain reliability.

PJM© What is Demand Response? From a customer perspective: It is the ability of consumers to control energy expenditures through reductions in, or changing patterns of, consumption. –Reduction of consumption during high price events and possibly shifting that consumption to lower priced periods –Committing to reductions in usage during peak periods and/or “emergency of contingency events” for reliability needs

PJM© What is Demand Response? From a load serving entity (LSE) or electricity distribution company (EDC) perspective: It is the ability of consumers to help the LSE/EDC to avoid high cost purchases/production or avoid new capacity purchases/builds –May help reduce overall costs for remaining LSE/EDC customers

PJM© Energy Market Capacity MarketAncillary Services Economic Load Response Program (ELRP) Reductions are voluntary Reductions measured against a consumption baseline (CBL) Emergency only…little used Emergency – Capacity Only Emergency – Full (also gets an energy payment when responding at PJM’s direction) DR (3 year ahead commitment) ILR (3 month ahead commitment…phased out for delivery year) Mandatory reduction when PJM request Emergency Load Management resources during a peak event Testing now required Synchronous Reserves Regulation DA Scheduling Reserves Load bids into these markets and responds to an event exactly like a generator Mandatory response to a Synchronous Reserve event if cleared in the Synchronous Reserve market Demand Response Opportunities in PJM

PJM© Responding to Wholesale Prices in the Energy Market Retail Rate An End-Use-Customer reduce consumption when wholesale prices are high

PJM© Revenue Opportunities in Economic Load Response 2007 Total revenue a 1 MW Demand Resource could have generated. Payment is LMP less the generation and transmission portion of the retail rate (no incentives included in 2007 figures). Strike price is the price at which reductions occur based on PJM load-weighted average LMP. Does not account for any increased consumption in off-peak periods at the retail price. Revenue Opportunities in 2007 Trigger or Strike Price LMP ($/MWh) Retail Rate ($/MWh) LMP≥75LMP≥100LMP≥ ,75764,09319, ,40744,44316, n/a24,79313,378

PJM© Revenue Opportunities in Economic Load Response 2008 Total revenue a 1 MW Demand Resource could have generated. Payment is LMP less the generation and transmission portion of the retail rate (no incentives included in 2007 figures). Strike price is the price at which reductions occur based on PJM load-weighted average LMP. Does not account for any increased consumption in off-peak periods at the retail rate. Revenue Opportunities in 2008 Trigger or Strike Price LMP ($/MWh) Retail Rate ($/MWh) LMP≥75LMP≥100LMP≥ ,412122,77048, ,16286,82039, n/a50,87030,357

PJM© Revenue Opportunities as Capacity Capacity Clearing Prices ($/MW-day) RTOEMAACSWMAAC 2007/ / / / / / Prices are those paid to DR committing 3 years forward.

PJM© Revenue Opportunities as Capacity Resulting Annual Revenue ($/MW-year) RTOEMAACSWMAAC 2007/200814,89272,15068, /200940,85154,31276, /201037,24569,83286, /201163, /201240, /20136,00851,00148,680 Revenues are for DR committed 3 years forward

PJM© Revenue Opportunities in Ancillary Services For a 1 MW resource clearing Synchronous Reserve in all hours –In 2007: RFC $192, Mid-Atlantic $63,522, Dominion $232 –In 2008: RFC $1,033, Mid-Atlantic $45,971, Dominion $0 For a 1 MW resources clearing in Regulation when the price (inclusive of opportunity cost) exceeds $100/MW –In 2007: $47,306 for 305 hours –In 2008: $85,477 for 503 hours –To date there has been no Demand Resource that has bid into Regulation For Day-ahead Scheduling Reserve (operating since June 1, 2008 through August 31, 2008) $1,236

PJM© Long-Term Vision for Demand Response “Price Responsive Demand (PRD)” is the long-term vision for demand response. What is PRD? –Deployment of advanced metering to end-use customers so they can see wholesale market prices in real-time; AND –End-use customers responding to wholesale market prices through the use of dynamic retail rates. PRD allows end-use customers to respond to wholesale prices in real-time. –Changing consumption patterns to reduce energy expenditures –By reducing during peak days can avoid costs of capacity

PJM© PJM Preparations for PRD PJM must enhance load forecast methods Day-ahead forecasts and real-time updates for the energy market. –Account for demand, by location, that will respond to prices to ensure resources are not over-committed Forecasting for capacity adequacy and transmission planning –Account for quantity and location of demand that will have responded to price and not be on the system during the forecast peak PJM to develop communication capabilities to provide price information to customers

PJM© PJM Working in Concert with States Provide assistance if requested to coordinate integration of dynamic retail rates PJM is willing and able to support various retail rate structures that fit each State’s needs Work with States to aid in understanding what information PJM can provide to facilitate PRD –Day-ahead and real-time LMP, for example Assist, to the extent possible, in analyzing potential impacts of PRD Shifts the locus of demand response to the retail level while accounting fully for it at the wholesale level

PJM© PRD vs. Current PJM Demand Response PRD – Long Term Vision –Benefits from responding to price embodied in dynamic retail rate linked to PJM prices. No measurement against a CBL or PJM settlement is necessary. –For capacity benefits, reduction in consumption at peak accounted for in reduced demand for capacity reflected in forecast. No need to offer reductions into capacity market. Current PJM DR –Benefits from reductions in response to price as measured against CBL are submitted for settlement at PJM. –For capacity benefits, offer reductions in a manner similar to a supply side resource into capacity market. Reductions not included in forecast demand for capacity.