5 April 2005JAS Consultative Meeting, Dar es Salaam1 Joint Assistance Strategy Presentation by Peniel M. Lyimo, Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Finance,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 John Rwangombwa Permanent Secretary and Secretary to Treasury Ministry of Finance and Economic Planning Republic of Rwanda 1 Challenges and opportunities.
Advertisements

Mutual Accountability and Aid Transparency - Rwanda – IATI Partner Country Meeting, 4th July 2011 Paris, France Ronald NKUSI Director, External Finance.
KENYA HEALTH SECTOR PARTNERSHIP Third IHP+ Country Health Sector Teams Meeting Brussels, December 2010.
CIDAs Aid Effectiveness Agenda October Canadian aid program CIDA is the lead agency for development assistance The International Assistance Envelope.
ENHANCING AID EFFECTIVENESS
Linkages Between NPoA and MTEF
Development Cooperation Framework DPG Main, 4 th March
Commonwealth Local Government Forum Freeport, Bahamas, May 13, 2009 Tim Kehoe Local Government and Aid Effectiveness.
1 General Budget Support DPG Induction 2009 August 25, 2009 – Dar es Salaam Poverty Reduction Budget Support Group Organization and Work Programme Presentation.
Aid Transparency and Fiscal Transparency - Rwanda Experience - Marie-Ange INGABIRE External Finance Unit Ministry of Finance and Economic Planning IATI.
1 General Budget Support Presentation by the Ministry of Finance.
Common recommendations and next steps for improving local delivery of climate finance Bangkok, October 31, 2012.
Presentation on Managing for Development Results in Zambia By A. Musunga Director M&E MOFNP - Zambia.
The Uganda Country Evaluation of the Implementation of the Paris Declaration, Phase 1 ( ) Paper presented At the Paris Declaration Evaluation Reference.
AN INTRODUCTION Country Systems. Outline 1. What are Country Systems? 2. What does it mean to use country systems? 3. Why does the ‘use of country systems’
SECTOR POLICY SUPPORT PROGRAMMES A new methodology for delivery of EC development assistance. 1.
Global Partnership Monitoring Framework Key findings Asia-Pacific Regional Workshop Seoul, March 2014.
1 Development Partners Group (DPG) DP Induction Seminar August
From Effective Aid to Effective Institutions Synthesis of Joint International Evaluations Julia Betts and Helen Wedgwood Paris 5 th October 2011.
1 Donor coordination and effectiveness of aid to agriculture Effectiveness in Aid to Agriculture Czech action to strengthen food security Glopolis / FoRS.
Gender and Development Effectiveness. Entry points for Tanzania? DPG Main, 8 May 2012 Anna Collins-Falk, Representative, UN Women on behalf of DPG Gender.
Development Cooperation and Partnerships Strategy ( ) October 2014 KIM Lumang Bopata Policy Department.
13 January 2011 Country Launch – 2011 Survey on Monitoring the Paris Declaration Role of Donors.
Denmark-Tanzania Country Policy Country Policy to be implemented through Country Programme ($400m) Overall objective remains fighting.
Capacity Development: In Context of Aid Coordination, Harmonization and Alignment Agenda Yuko Suzuki UNDP Tanzania November 2005.
1 Presentation by the Ministry of Finance and Economic Affairs Dar es Salaam, Tanzania TANZANIA AID COORDINATION.
Train4dev Training for Development September-December 2006SWAP Joint Learning Event1 Supporting Sector Programmes Senior Level Session Transport Sector.
SECTOR POLICY SUPPORT PROGRAMMES A new methodology for delivery of EC development assistance. 1.
Aid for Development Effectiveness -Managing for Development Results- Terence D. Jones UNDP Third International Roundtable Managing for Development Results.
February 21, JAS Consultation between the Government of Tanzania and Development Partners February 21, 2006 Courtyard Hotel, Dar es Salaam.
25th August, 2009Dialogue Structure and Division of Labour1 DPG Induction Seminar, 25 August 2008 Presentation by the MOFEA Dar -Es Salaam, Tanzania.
PACIFIC AID EFFECTIVENESS PRINCIPLES. Purpose of Presentation Provide an overview of Pacific Principles on Aid Effectiveness Provide an overview of Pacific.
Enhancing Aid Effectiveness-Joint Assistance Strategy DPG Orientation Seminar 12 September 2006.
1 Harmonisation and Alignment: Challenges for US and European donors Alex Wilks, European Network on Debt and Development GMF, 18 th December
JAST IMPLEMENTATION Ministry of Finance Dar es Salaam Annual National Policy Dialogue 2011, January 26 th -27 th,2012.
Regional Policy EU Cohesion Policy 2014 – 2020 Proposals from the European Commission.
Session Overview Introduction course structure Introduction participants Declarations and guidelines on (support to) DLG Decentralisation and aid effectivenss.
AID EFFECTIVENESS A GLANCE FROM GLOBAL TO COUNTRY LEVELS Cao Manh Cuong Foreign Economic Relations Dept. Ministry of Planning and Investment.
International Development on Aid Effectiveness Presenter Said Muhammed Jama Aid Coordination Expert Ministry of National Planning and Development.
Development Partners Group Coordination mechanism for harmonization and alignment 1.
1 Joint Donor Staff Training Activity Tanzania, June 2002 Partnership for Poverty Reduction Module 4 - Links between PRSP, Sector Programmes and.
AID COOPERATION FRAMEWORK IN TANZANIA Presentation by Ministry of Finance DPG INDUCTION 21ST OCTOBER 2013.
DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION FRAMEWORK Presentation by Ministry of Finance 10 December 2013.
A short introduction to the Strengthened Approach to supporting PFM reforms.
Embracing the Paris Principles and AAA to Curb Corruption and Enhance Development Performance Mitchell O’Brien Governance Specialist Team Lead – Parliament.
Vito Cistulli - FAO -1 Damascus, 2 July 2008 FAO Assistance to Member Countries and the Changing Aid Environment.
A Water Sector Partnership Some thoughts on a sector approach and sector dialogue Pippa Bird (DFID) Presentation to the DPG Water Retreat – 8 th September.
THE MKUKUTA AND MDGs, IMPLEMENTATION FRAMEWORK AND MONITORING. A Paper presented at the Development Partners Seminar held in Dar es Salaam on 25 th October,
Launch of the 2008 Survey on Monitoring the Paris Declaration. Christian SHINGIRO External Finance Unit.
Joint Assistance Strategy for Tanzania (JAST) Poverty Policy Week Creative and Hard Work, the Key to Fighting Poverty Presentation by the Ministry of Finance.
BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA Ministry of Finance and Treasury Donor Coordination Forum Meeting The Report on progress on Adherence to the Principles of the Paris.
ADE’s 25 th anniversary Economic Governance: Key to Development ? Introduction Bruxelles – Bibliothèque Solvay – 5 October 2015.
PRS – Budget linkages in Tanzania Making Budget Reform Matter for Poverty Reduction 27 April 2006 Allister Moon.
MOH 2 February Identify needs Prioritize needs Finalize list of endorsed needs Submit needs to MOPAD Consult with donor Negotiation (intra- and.
CABRI response to Accra Action Agenda
Implementing the Internationally Agreed Development Goals:
Towards Aid Effectiveness The Role of the Donor Community
Africa Region Accra High Level Forum Preparatory Consultation Workshop Summary of Group 3 Discussions on Harmonisation and Alignment April,
ECOSOC Operational Segment Implementing the internationally agreed development goals, including those contained in the Millennium declaration: national.
PROCUREMENT FIDUCIARY ARRANGEMENTS IN SECTOR-WIDE APPROACHES (SWAps)
Options for Sector Wide Approaches (SWAps)
Paris Declaration Survey Results 2008
NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION FRAMEWORK
SWAPs: Based on Lessons Mainly from Morocco and Zambia
The SWA Collaborative Behaviors
Joint session with IHP+ introduction
KEEPING A DEVELOPMENT FOCUS: THE CHALLENGES IN ENSURING POLICY COHERENCE FOR DEVELOPMENT: A UGANDA’S PERSPECTIVE Presented by: Pius Bigirimana, Permanent.
Aid for Development Effectiveness -Managing for Development Results-
Financial Management Harmonization and Alignment: It’s All About Results ''Financial management in the health sector is a sacred responsibility because.
(Further) Improving Development Cooperation
Presentation transcript:

5 April 2005JAS Consultative Meeting, Dar es Salaam1 Joint Assistance Strategy Presentation by Peniel M. Lyimo, Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Tanzania

5 April 2005JAS Consultative Meeting, Dar es Salaam2 Presentation outline 1. Introduction - why do we need JAS? 2. Objectives of JAS 3. Government commitment to development and poverty reduction 4. Basic Principles of JAS – Division of labour – Funding instruments and arrangements – Dialogue structure – Risk mitigation – Monitoring and evaluation of JAS 5. Conclusion

5 April 2005JAS Consultative Meeting, Dar es Salaam3 1. Introduction – why do we need JAS?  The Government of Tanzania (GOT) and her Development Partners have made considerable progress in building effective partnerships on the basis of country ownership, harmonisation and alignment under the TAS  But transaction costs in delivering and managing development assistance remain high and progress needs to be extended to all levels of Government and Development Partners – Separate/individual Development Partner country strategies – Multiplicity of approaches in aid delivery  GOT wishes to consolidate existing efforts in ownership, harmonisation and alignment and move the development partnership to a higher level under a single framework for development cooperation – a Joint Assistance Strategy  JAS initiative is part and parcel of reforms commenced in the early 1990s

5 April 2005JAS Consultative Meeting, Dar es Salaam4 2. Objectives of JAS  JAS aims to contribute to achieving Tanzania’s development and poverty reduction goals articulated in the National Strategy for Growth and Reduction of Poverty (NSGRP) and the Zanzibar Poverty Reduction Plan (ZPRP) through the production of external financing plan  It aims to strengthen national ownership and Government leadership of the development process and improve aid effectiveness through harmonisation of Government and Development Partner processes, alignment of Development Partner support to Government priorities, systems and processes, and managing for results  It aims to facilitate mutual accountability  It intends to adopt a unified country strategy

5 April 2005JAS Consultative Meeting, Dar es Salaam5 3. Government commitment to development and poverty reduction National development and poverty reduction goals  GOT is committed to achieving national development and poverty reduction goals laid out in the National Vision 2025, the Zanzibar Vision 2020, the National Poverty Eradication Strategy (NPES), the NSGRP and ZPRP  Under JAS, Development Partners will support national poverty reduction and development strategies, national and sector policies and reform programmes

5 April 2005JAS Consultative Meeting, Dar es Salaam6 3. Government commitment to development and poverty reduction (cont.) Harmonisation of Government strategies and processes  GOT will harmonize NSGRP and ZPRP and align all sector strategies and policies and local government activities with these two strategies  GOT will ensure strategic resource allocation to the implementation of NSGRP/ZPRP and strengthen the annual PER/MTEF process  GOT will harmonize all processes at national, sector and local government level around NSGRP/ZPRP and national budget

5 April 2005JAS Consultative Meeting, Dar es Salaam7 3. Government commitment to development and poverty reduction (cont.) Capacity building  GOT is committed to strengthening human and institutional capacity at all levels of Government and across non-state actors  Two key areas of focus are public financial management and public service delivery  Development Partners will support GOT capacity building efforts in ongoing public sector reform programmes, e.g. PFMRP, PSRP, LGRP, LSRP  Technical assistance will be used for capacity building rather than project/programme execution. It will be demand driven, untied from the source of finance and procured openly by the Government

5 April 2005JAS Consultative Meeting, Dar es Salaam8 4. Basic Principles of JAS 4.1.Division of labour - Development Partners  Development Partners concentrate on only few sectors/thematic areas in line with NSGRP/ZPRP  A ‘lead partner’ leads and coordinates other ‘delegating partners’ activities in a sector/thematic area and sub-sector  The ‘lead partner’ represents ‘delegating partners’ in communication with Government  Development Partners outside a particular sector/thematic area can act as co-financers of activities in that sector/thematic area  Development Partners coordinate and harmonize their activities within and across sectors/thematic areas and align them to Government systems and processes

5 April 2005JAS Consultative Meeting, Dar es Salaam9 4. Basic Principles of JAS (cont.) 4.1.Division of Labour - Development Partners (cont.) Selection criteria and process  Development Partners’ areas of focus and roles as lead or delegating partners will be based on their comparative advantage in terms of established expertise in a particular sector/thematic area or sub-sector and not funding capacity  Other factors to determine areas of focus/Partner roles:  Development Partner agency capacity  Established relationships with Government and other Partners  Appropriate total number of Partners in a sector/thematic area depending on its size, nature and needs  Development Partners’ willingness to cooperate / recognize and trust the ‘lead partner’  Distribution of delegating and lead responsibilities among Development Partners

5 April 2005JAS Consultative Meeting, Dar es Salaam10 4. Basic Principles of JAS (cont.) 4.1.Division of labour - Development Partners Selection criteria and process (cont.)  Areas of focus and lead/delegating roles of Development Partners will be determined under GOT leadership in close consultation with Development Partners  Specific terms of reference including a code of conduct for lead and delegating partners will be agreed upon 4.2. Division of labour - Government  GOT will work towards more effective division of labour between central and line ministries and local government and will assign lead institutions in each sector/thematic area

5 April 2005JAS Consultative Meeting, Dar es Salaam11 4. Basic Principles of JAS (cont.) 4.3.Funding instruments and arrangements Aid modalities  GOT prefers General Budget Support (GBS) because of its benefits over other instruments in terms of  Promoting national ownership and leadership in budget management and resource allocation  Enhancing total budget/expenditure contestability  Shifting Government accountability from donors to citizens Chapter 7, Articles 135 and 136 of the Constitution of URT  Consolidated Fund  Appropriations from the CF by the Parliament  Enhancing transparency and accountability of public expenditures  Contributing to Development Partner harmonisation and alignment process  Focusing dialogue on strategic issues  Improving predictability of inflows  Strengthening the budget process

5 April 2005JAS Consultative Meeting, Dar es Salaam12 4. Basic Principles of JAS (cont.) 4.3.Funding instruments and arrangements (cont.)  GBS to attain 70% of development assistance in the medium-term (budget support including basket funds currently at 55%)  Common/Sector basket funds should be used as transition measure to GBS  Direct project aid High potential of using parallel systems Projects should adhere to the following principles:  Projects support national and sector priorities, strategies and programmes  Projects are integrated in sector and local government budget processes  Project documents explain why the project approach is necessary or appropriate  Projects operate within Government structures, systems, regulations and procedures  Focus on capital/physical infrastructure expenditures

5 April 2005JAS Consultative Meeting, Dar es Salaam13 4. Basic Principles of JAS (cont.) 4.3.Funding instruments and arrangements (cont.) Commitment and disbursement arrangements  All external resources will be integrated into the Government budget and Exchequer system  Development Partners will report to GOT the full amount of funds committed and disbursed to GOT and non state actors in a timely and reliable manner  Commitments will be made for a three year MTEF period through annual PER process and year to year variations will be minimized  Disbursements for all aid modalities will be in line with commitments, made through the Exchequer, and be frontloaded in the first half of the financial year

5 April 2005JAS Consultative Meeting, Dar es Salaam14 4. Basic Principles of JAS (cont.) 4.3.Funding instruments and arrangements (cont.) Procurement  GOT procurement systems will be strengthened with the support of Development Partners so as to attain international standards (BEST PRACTICES) and will be used for all aid modalities. Accounting and Auditing  Development Partners will use Government accounting and auditing procedures and systems and support GOT in strengthening them in order to attain international standards  GOT will provide reliable and timely accounting and auditing reports to Development Partners

5 April 2005JAS Consultative Meeting, Dar es Salaam15 4. Basic Principles of JAS (cont.) 4.4. Dialogue Structure  Dialogue is an important instrument to guide the JAS process and to achieve effective development co- operation in line with the principles of national ownership, alignment, harmonization, managing for results and mutual accountability.  Dialogue between GOT, Development Partners and domestic stakeholders will follow a range of ‘good practices’ including: dialogue under GOT leadership; inclusion of a wide range of domestic stakeholders; rationalized consultative processes; clear demarcation of different fora; predictable, open and frank dialogue based on better planning, organization and advance communication; information sharing etc.

5 April 2005JAS Consultative Meeting, Dar es Salaam16 4. Basic Principles of JAS (cont.) 4.5. Risk mitigation  Institutional and operational risk due to lack of GOT and Development Partner capacity of implementing JAS - mitigation through JAS awareness among GOT agencies, comprehensive capacity building and incentive changing initiatives, Development Partner change of practices and attitudes towards GOT and development cooperation, more decentralization/delegation to country offices/HOC, stronger role of non-state actors.  Volatility of Development Partner support due to GOT inability to meet funding requirements and Development Partner unwillingness or inability to provide funding as a result of domestic financial pressures or political events - mitigation by agreement between GOT and Development Partners on expected actions in such events

5 April 2005JAS Consultative Meeting, Dar es Salaam17 4. Basic Principles of JAS (cont.) 4.5. Risk mitigation (cont.)  Fiduciary risk arising from public expenditure not properly accounted for, not used for its intended purposes, and not representing value for money - mitigation by on-going efforts to strengthen financial management and accountability systems, on- going anti-corruption measures, M&E of PFM and accountability systems, policy dialogue, diagnostic reviews.  Assessments to date  ROSC – Fiscal Transparency (2002)  HIPC/PEM-AAP (2001, 2004)  PER external evaluation/PEFA (annual)  CFAA (2001)  CPAR (2002)  FRA for provision of GBS (2004)  GBS Evaluation (2004)  Revised PFMRP

5 April 2005JAS Consultative Meeting, Dar es Salaam18 4. Basic Principles of JAS (cont.) 4.6. Monitoring and Evaluation of JAS  Keeps track of GOT and Development Partner performance under the JAS  Reviews progress in implementing agreed JAS commitments and specifies actions for further improvement  Monitoring categories: ownership, alignment, harmonization, managing for results as guided by MKUKUTA, operational functioning of JAS and mutual accountability

5 April 2005JAS Consultative Meeting, Dar es Salaam19 4. Basic Principles of JAS (cont.) 4.6. Monitoring and Evaluation of JAS (cont.)  M&E by two groups: Government, Development Partners, non-state actors:  Annual M&E by using a JAS monitoring matrix with indicators drawing from those of the Paris Declaration and outputs from other review processes – output: JAS annual implementation report  Comprehensive mid-term and final review – output: mid-term and final review reports Independent Monitoring Group (IMG):  Mid-term and final assessment of JAS with a view to facilitating mutual accountability – output: IMG report

5 April 2005JAS Consultative Meeting, Dar es Salaam20 4. Basic Principles of JAS (cont.) 4.7. JAS Action Plan  JAS Action Plan will specify how to put JAS principles of division of labour, funding modalities, dialogue, etc. into practice in the short- to medium-term

5 April 2005JAS Consultative Meeting, Dar es Salaam21 5. Conclusion  The current proposal of JAS has been developed through consultations between GOT, Development Partners and non-state actors  We hope that all Development Partners support the Joint Assistance Strategy and look forward to continued fruitful consultations on further improving the presented proposal of the JAS