© Crown copyright Met Office The EN4 dataset of quality controlled ocean temperature and salinity profiles and monthly objective analyses Simon Good.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tuning and Validation of Ocean Mixed Layer Models David Acreman.
Advertisements

Numerical Weather Prediction Process Prepared by C. Tubbs, P. Davies, Met Office UK Revised, delivered by P. Chen, WMO Secretariat SWFDP-Eastern Africa.
© Crown copyright Met Office Does the order of the horizontal and vertical transforms matter in the representation of an operational static covariance.
Experiments with Monthly Satellite Ocean Color Fields in a NCEP Operational Ocean Forecast System PI: Eric Bayler, NESDIS/STAR Co-I: David Behringer, NWS/NCEP/EMC/GCWMB.
Data assimilation for validation of climate modeling systems Pierre Gauthier Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences Université du Québec à Montréal.
Model calibration using. Pag. 5/3/20152 PEST program.
Effects of model error on ensemble forecast using the EnKF Hiroshi Koyama 1 and Masahiro Watanabe 2 1 : Center for Climate System Research, University.
Kick-Off Seadatanet – Heraklion – 7-11 June Atlantic and global products C. Coatanoan, F. Gaillard, E. Autret, T. Loubrieu.
Building Bluelink David Griffin, Peter Oke, Andreas Schiller et al. March 2007 CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research.
© Crown copyright Met Office The EN dataset Simon Good and Claire Bartholomew.
© Crown copyright Met Office Radiation developments Latest work on the radiation code in the Unified Model James Manners, Reading collaboration meeting.
Advanced data assimilation methods- EKF and EnKF Hong Li and Eugenia Kalnay University of Maryland July 2006.
© Crown copyright Met Office IQuOD Workshop 2, 5 th June 2014 Chris Atkinson, Simon Good and Nick Rayner Assigning Uncertainties to Individual Observations:
Quality Control Standards for SeaDataNet Review status at 1 st Annual Meeting (March 2007) Review developments over last year Current status Future work.
IQuOD An International Quality Control Effort Tim Boyer EDM workshop September 10, 2014.
Ensemble-variational sea ice data assimilation Anna Shlyaeva, Mark Buehner, Alain Caya, Data Assimilation and Satellite Meteorology Research Jean-Francois.
ASSIMILATION OF GOES-DERIVED CLOUD PRODUCTS IN MM5.
Ensemble Data Assimilation and Uncertainty Quantification Jeffrey Anderson, Alicia Karspeck, Tim Hoar, Nancy Collins, Kevin Raeder, Steve Yeager National.
Gridding Daily Climate Variables for use in ENSEMBLES Malcolm Haylock, Climatic Research Unit Nynke Hofstra, Mark New, Phil Jones.
Salinity from space Past, present and yet to come Chris Banks Christine Gommenginger Meric Srokosz Helen Snaith Chris Banks Christine Gommenginger.
Ocean Data Variational Assimilation with OPA: Ongoing developments with OPAVAR and implementation plan for NEMOVAR Sophie RICCI, Anthony Weaver, Nicolas.
Inter-comparison and Validation Task Team Breakout discussion.
Potential benefits from data assimilation of carbon observations for modellers and observers - prerequisites and current state J. Segschneider, Max-Planck-Institute.
© Crown copyright Met Office The EN QC system for temperature and salinity profiles Simon Good.
Dataset Development within the Surface Processes Group David I. Berry and Elizabeth C. Kent.
Reanalysis: When observations meet models
Page 1© Crown copyright HadISST2: progress and plans Nick Rayner, 14 th March 2007.
Soil moisture generation at ECMWF Gisela Seuffert and Pedro Viterbo European Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasts ELDAS Interim Data Co-ordination.
Using FLUXNET data to evaluate land surface models Ray Leuning and Gab Abramowitz 4 – 6 June 2008.
MODEL ERROR ESTIMATION EMPLOYING DATA ASSIMILATION METHODOLOGIES Dusanka Zupanski Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere Colorado State University.
The I nverse R egional O cean M odeling S ystem Development and Application to Variational Data Assimilation of Coastal Mesoscale Eddies. Di Lorenzo, E.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 In Situ SST for Satellite Cal/Val and Quality Control Alexander Ignatov.
ENSEMBLES RT4/RT5 Joint Meeting Paris, February 2005 Overview of the WP5.3 Activities Partners: ECMWF, METO/HC, MeteoSchweiz, KNMI, IfM, CNRM, UREAD/CGAM,
Quality Control for the World Ocean Database GSOP Quality Control Workshop June 12, 2013.
2nd GODAE Observing System Evaluation Workshop - June Ocean state estimates from the observations Contributions and complementarities of Argo,
Monitoring Heat Transport Changes using Expendable Bathythermographs Molly Baringer and Silvia Garzoli NOAA, AOML What are time/space scales of climate.
© University of Reading 2008www.reading.ac.ukTTISS September 2009 Impact of targeted dropsondes on European forecasts Emma Irvine Sue Gray and John Methven.
CPC Unified Precipitation Project Pingping Xie, Wei Shi, Mingyue Chen and Sid Katz NOAA’s Climate Prediction Center
© Crown copyright Met Office An ocean database of surface / sub-surface temperature and salinity observations (D4.5) Chris Atkinson and Nick Rayner Prototype.
Multi-Variate Salinity Assimilation Pre- and Post-Argo Robin Wedd, Oscar Alves and Yonghong Yin Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research, Australian.
1. Analysis and Reanalysis Products Adrian M Tompkins, ICTP picture from Nasa.
Calibration & Sensitivity Analysis. Head measured in an observation well is known as a target. Baseflow measurements or other fluxes (e.g., ET) are also.
Ocean Syntheses David Behringer NOAA/NCEP NOAA Ocean Climate Observation 8th Annual PI Meeting June 25-27, 2012 Silver Spring, Maryland.
One-year re-forecast ensembles with CCSM3.0 using initial states for 1 January and 1 July in Model: CCSM3 is a coupled climate model with state-of-the-art.
CMEMS Mediterranean MFC. Update on specific development for CMEMS Med-MFC V2 Analysis and Forecast Product 1.Data Assimilation: Grid point EOFs ( * )
PreSAC Progress on NEMOVAR. Overview of NEMOVAR status First NEMOVAR experiments Use of NEMOVAR analyses to initialize ocean only forecasts Missing.
1 A multi-scale three-dimensional variational data assimilation scheme Zhijin Li,, Yi Chao (JPL) James C. McWilliams (UCLA), Kayo Ide (UMD) The 8th International.
1 Estimating Empirical Unit Hydrographs (and More) Using AB_OPT LMRFC Calibration Workshop March 10-13, 2009.
Observations and Ocean State Estimation: Impact, Sensitivity and Predictability Andy Moore University of California Santa Cruz Hernan Arango Rutgers University.
Ocean Data Assimilation for SI Prediction at NCEP David Behringer, NCEP/EMC Diane Stokes, NCEP/EMC Sudhir Nadiga, NCEP/EMC Wanqiu Wang, NCEP/EMC US GODAE.
© Crown copyright Met Office Ensemble of subsurface databases Simon Good, presented by Nick Rayner, ERA-CLIM workshop on observation errors, Vienna, April.
Predictability of Mesoscale Variability in the East Australia Current given Strong Constraint Data Assimilation Hernan G. Arango IMCS, Rutgers John L.
Accuracy, Reliability, and Validity of Freesurfer Measurements David H. Salat
Use of high resolution global SST data in operational analysis and assimilation systems at the UK Met Office. Matt Martin, John Stark,
Station lists and bias corrections Jemma Davie, Colin Parrett, Richard Renshaw, Peter Jermey © Crown Copyright 2012 Source: Met Office© Crown copyright.
RTOFS Monitoring and Evaluation Metrics Avichal Mehra MMAB/EMC/NCEP/NWS.
Assimilation of S(T) from ARGO Keith Haines, Arthur Vidard *, Xiaobing Zhou, Alberto Troccoli *, David Anderson * Environmental Systems Science Centre,
SeaDataNet Technical Task Group meeting JRA1 Standards Development Task 1.2 Common Data Management Protocol (for dissemination to all NODCs and JRA3) Data.
An T. Nguyen University of Texas, Austin
The impact of Argo data on ocean and climate forecasting
1. Analysis and Reanalysis Products
Predictability of orographic drag for realistic atmospheric profiles
Spatial Modes of Salinity and Temperature Comparison with PDO index
Argo Delayed-Mode Salinity Data
Aquarius SSS space/time biases with respect to Argo data
Y. Xue1, C. Wen1, X. Yang2 , D. Behringer1, A. Kumar1,
GODAE Quality Control Pilot Project
NOAA Objective Sea Surface Salinity Analysis P. Xie, Y. Xue, and A
Marina Tonani Manager Shelf Seas Forecasting
Presentation transcript:

© Crown copyright Met Office The EN4 dataset of quality controlled ocean temperature and salinity profiles and monthly objective analyses Simon Good

© Crown copyright Met Office What is the EN series of datasets? Climate datasets of ocean temperature and salinity profiles. Include: 1.The observed profiles with quality flags. 2.Monthly objective analyses formed from the data. Data are in NetCDF files. Freely available for scientific research and private study.

© Crown copyright Met Office Contents History of the dataset The EN4 dataset Objective analysis uncertainty estimates Ensemble of opportunity Conclusions

© Crown copyright Met Office History of the dataset

© Crown copyright Met Office How did they originate? The first version of the dataset was produced for the ENACT project (ENhanced ocean data Assimilation and Climate predicTion) for global ocean data assimilation. Data were collected from a number of sources. To get consistent quality control, all flags were discarded from the source. Then, all data were run through the Met Office quality control system. The system was shared with real time systems – necessary to have good automated checks.

© Crown copyright Met Office Updates to EN2 and EN3 A new version was produced for the ENSEMBLES project (EN2; Ingleby and Huddleston, 2007, Journal of Marine Systems, 65). Changes were updated data from sources; tweaks to quality control checks; updated background error covariances. EN3 (with various subversions) followed. Updated data again. Revised climatology. Tweaks to quality control checks again. Added some manual rejects.

© Crown copyright Met Office Update to EN4 Targeted development of a duplicate check and new quality control checks to solve specific issues with the dataset. Work done for the ERA-CLIM project (European Reanalysis of Global Climate Observations; Uncertainty estimates produced to accompany the objective analyses. Good et al. (2013), JGR-Oceans, 118.

© Crown copyright Met Office The EN4 dataset

© Crown copyright Met Office Input data Profiles obtained from WOD ASBO (Arctic Synoptic Basinwide Observations) Argo GTSPP Argo and GTSPP are used for monthly updates. Duplicate check applied to remove the multiple versions of profiles. Based on Gronell and Wijffels (2008), JAOT, 25.

© Crown copyright Met Office Number of profiles

© Crown copyright Met Office Thinning of levels CTD profile 50.9°W, 58.2°N July 1995 Original profile: 3596 levels EN3 version: 127 levels (~5m spacing near surface) EN4 version: 390 levels (~1m spacing near surface) Thinned profiles have (if available) EN3: 5m spacing near surface EN4: 1m spacing near surface

© Crown copyright Met Office Monthly processing cycle Quality control Analysis Persistence forecast Output as NetCDF file One month of observations processed per cycle Output as NetCDF file Available from Met Office website Observations

© Crown copyright Met Office Quality control tests Manual exclusions Track check Profile check (spikes etc.) Thinning (informational) Stability check Background checks Buddy check Multi level check Argo delayed mode flags Argo grey list Argo altimetry quality control External quality information Automatic quality checks Bathymetry check Measurement depths check Waterfall check Near surface and deep BTs Range check

© Crown copyright Met Office Background check Quality control examples Measurement depths check

© Crown copyright Met Office Quality control examples Track check Waterfall check Spike check

© Crown copyright Met Office Objective analysis system Uses a iterative scheme equivalent to optimal interpolation. But no need to subselect a limited number of observations close to a grid box. Monthly. Potential temperature and salinity. 1 degree grid, 42 levels in the vertical. Uses a persistence forecast as background. Relaxes to a climatology in the long term absence of observations.

© Crown copyright Met Office Example fields – March 2014 at 5 m

© Crown copyright Met Office Objective analysis uncertainty estimates

© Crown copyright Met Office Method The scheme used to produce the objective analyses makes it impossible to calculate uncertainty using the optimal interpolation equations. These are only valid if background error covariances are well known. Use an analysis quality method instead where observation values are set to 1 and background values to 0 (based on Donlon et al. 2012, Remote Sensing of Environment, 116). All other aspects of the analysis are the same except length scales are shortened. Result is linearly related to analysis error variance.

© Crown copyright Met Office Example of observation influence

© Crown copyright Met Office Example of observation influence Dots are the locations of observations

© Crown copyright Met Office Example of observation influence

© Crown copyright Met Office Example of observation influence

© Crown copyright Met Office Example of observation influence

© Crown copyright Met Office Linear relationship between ‘observation influence’ and analysis error variance Using simulated data points it is possible to show this relationship. Length scales have to be shortened by a factor 1.75 to get a linear relationship. Simulations Line fit

© Crown copyright Met Office Coefficients of the linear relationship For EN4 I developed an empirical scheme to do this. The observations are split into two groups and analyses made from each. The differences between analyses allow the uncertainty to be estimated. The method also allows some checks to be done: Intercept should match the background error variance – method can even be used to improve this Gradients should be negative – some issues with the EN4 analyses were identified

© Crown copyright Met Office Gradients of the linear relationship

© Crown copyright Met Office Example uncertainty estimates

© Crown copyright Met Office Ensembles of opportunity

© Crown copyright Met Office Uncertainty in construction of an ocean dataset There are a number of global ocean profile databases: WOD GTSPP CORA EN4 Etc. These are constructed differently, e.g. Different quality control. Different choices about which profiles to include. Bias adjustments. This tells us about the uncertainty in the data.

© Crown copyright Met Office Example From Lyman et al. (2010), Nature, 465.

© Crown copyright Met Office Conclusions

© Crown copyright Met Office Conclusions The EN series of datasets were originally started for global ocean data assimilation. This has been incrementally updated to the latest version EN4. It is available freely for scientific research and private study from The new version includes objective analysis uncertainty estimates produced using an ‘observation influence’ method.

© Crown copyright Met Office Questions and answers