Our PatientsOur PeopleOur BusinessOur Community © 2008 Endo Pharmaceuticals. All Rights Reserved. Biosimilars 2009 Update Pending Legislation Review Pam.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Presented by Richard J. Berman, Partner Arent Fox LLP Washington, DC
Advertisements

AXINN, VELTROP & HARKRIDER LLP © 2007 | AXINN, VELTROP & HARKRIDER LLP Click To Modify Title Name Goes Here FDA Hearings on the BPCI Act.
Patent-Extender Drugs: Loop-holes in the Law Sandy H. Yoo 4/14/06.
Pharma Workshop IV Patent Linkage in the USA Lawrence T. Welch Eli Lilly and Company.
The Gaming of Pharmaceutical Patents Brief Overview.
An Introduction to the Hatch-Waxman Act and ANDA Litigation
FDA Counsel.com 1 ANDAs, OTCs, Orphans and Cosmetics -- Key Issues Wednesday, August 18, 2004 SDRAN RAC STUDY COURSE Michael A. Swit, Esq. FDACounsel.com.
What You Need to Know About Biosimilars: Products, Recent Deals, IP Issues and Licensing August 2, 2012 Madison C. Jellins 1.
The Hatch-Waxman Act and How it Works: Balancing Incentives to Innovate with the Need for Affordable Drugs Minnesota Intellectual Property Association.
BIOSIMILARS IN THE UNITED STATES – UPDATE ON FDA IMPLEMENTATION AND OTHER CURRENT ISSUES James C. Shehan Hyman, Phelps & McNamara, P.C. 700 Thirteenth.
Proposed FOB Legislation Patent Provisions AIPLA Mid-Winter Conference Biotechnology Committee Donald R. Ware, Foley Hoag LLP January 24, 2008.
Going Beyond the Current Regulatory and Incentives Frameworks A new proposal to foster greater orphan drug development 1.
UNITED SPINAL ASSOCIATION AUGUST, 2014 Biologics & Biosimilars: An Overview 1.
Biosimilars in the Pharmaceutical Industry: U.S. Update Darryl Webster Wyeth January 2008 AIPLA IP Practice in Japan Committee.
New York Washington Seattle Brian J. Malkin, Partner Brian J. Malkin, Partner Frommer Lawrence.
Physician Perspectives on Subsequent Entry Biologics (SEBs) Michael S. Reilly, Esq. Executive Director, Alliance for Safe Biologic Medicines March 31,
©2009 Law Offices of Albert Wai-Kit Chan, PLLC
What is a Generic Medication?. The World Health Organization Definition of a Generic Medication A generic drug is a pharmaceutical product, usually intended.
1. Within a few years, more than half of newly approved medicines will be biopharmaceuticals. To ensure safety and efficacy, the FDA created a daunting.
A New Pathway for Follow-on Biologics Presented by: Steve Nash May 7, 2010.
Regulation of Generic Drugs Office of Generic Drugs Craig Kiester Regulatory Support Branch.
© 2009 Pharmaceutical Law Group PC Market Exclusivity Paradigm Gregory J. Glover, MD, JD Pharmaceutical Law Group
1 FDA Thailand By HIV Module/Marketing Group Mr. Manaswee Arayasiri.
1 Patent Term Extension under 35 U.S.C. § 156 Mary C. Till Legal Advisor Office of Patent Legal Administration.
The Life Sciences Lawyer’s Guide to PTA and PTE
Assessing Global Standards for Biologic Medicines Richard Dolinar, MD Endocrinologist Chairman of the Alliance for Safe Biologic Medicines Presented at.
BEIJING BRUSSELS CHICAGO DALLAS FRANKFURT GENEVA HONG KONG LONDON LOS ANGELES NEW YORK PALO ALTO SAN FRANCISCO SHANGHAI SINGAPORE SYDNEY TOKYO WASHINGTON,
Generic Substitution Principles in Practice Copyright © – Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy (AMCP)Slide 1.
Stages of drug development
Recent False Claims Developments Robert J. Sherry K&L Gates May 2009.
Subsequent Entry Biologics (SEBs) – Canada Presentation to AIPLA Biotechnology Committee January 25, 2012 Daphne C. Lainson
Nonclinical Studies Subcommittee Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Science CMC Issues for Screening INDs Eric B. Sheinin, Ph.D. Acting Deputy Director.
Data protection and extension of patent rights TRIPS requirements & TRIPS-plus provisions Carlos Correa.
Clinical Trial Review and Approval: New Regulations and their implications Siddika Mithani, Ph.D Clinical Trials & Special Access Programme Therapeutic.
Anthony C. Tridico, Ph.D. AIPLA BIOTECHNOLOGY COMMITTEE Pinning Down a Moving Target: Patenting Biotech in Uncertain Times.
The FTC, Pharmaceuticals, Antitrust & IP: A Grab Bag October 23, 2008 This presentation was prepared from public sources. The views expressed herein do.
Follow-on or Biosimilar Biologic s Points to Consider Paul Kim Foley Hoag LLP Massachusetts Biotechnology Council Thursday, May 28, 2009 © 2008 Foley Hoag.
Follow-On Biologics: The New Regulatory Frontier [?] Michael S. Labson August 23, 2007.
FDA’s Biosimilars Guidance -- Legal and Regulatory Considerations James S. Cohen, Esq. McDermott Will & Emery DIA Webinar April 10, 2012.
Biosimilars in Canada and Europe AIPLA Biotechnology Committee Webinar Noel Courage September 25, 2012.
© 2008 Dechert LLP Pharma v. Pharma or Pharma & Pharma: The Legal Interface Between the Makers of Original and Copied Versions of Medicines AIPLA Antitrust,
The New Drug Development Process (www. fda. gov/cder/handbook/develop
The FDA: Basic Facts It takes 12 to 15 years to develop a single drug Only 1 in 10,000 potential medications makes it completely through the process Only.
‘Linkage’ & other TRIPS+ provisions: a public health perspective Karin Timmermans World Health Organization Seminar “Data exclusivity and patent Bangkok.
Our PatientsOur PeopleOur BusinessOur Community © 2008 Endo Pharmaceuticals. All Rights Reserved. Strategies to Maximize Patent Term Balancing Scope and.
Biotechnology Chemical Pharmaceutical Customer Partnership
Copyright © 2010 by K&L Gates LLP. All rights reserved. The Biosimilars Act—A Basic Introduction Michael H. Hinckle K&L Gates Research Triangle Park, NC.
WHO Workshop on Assessment of Bioequivalence Data Addis Ababa, 31. August – 3. September 2010 Selection of comparators Compiled by Jan Welink WHO Workshop.
Can the Specialty Beast Be Tamed? Steven B. Miller, MD Express Scripts.
General Regulatory Issues in the Development of Drugs Intended for Treatment of Chronic Illness Sharon Hertz, M.D. Medical Officer Division of Anesthetic,
“Journey of a Drug” From Test Tube TO Prescribing Physician.
October 28, F OOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION AMENDMENTS ACT OF 2007 (FDAAA) and Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies (REMS) Presented to the Ninth.
Copyright 2010, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP Healthcare Reform--New Path for Biosimilars Kathleen M. Sanzo, Esq. Washington, DC May.
 An Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) contains data which when submitted to FDA's CDER, Office of Generic Drugs, provides for the review and ultimate.
Office of the Vice President & General Counsel 300 North Ingalls Building, Suite 3B04 (734) Right to Try: Evolution of State and National Policy.
Regulation of Generic Animal Drugs in the United States
Final Canadian Guidelines for “Biosimilars” Subsequent Entry Biologics (SEBs) DIA RA SIAC RD/RI Working Groups 11-May-2010 Stephen Sherman.
Recent FTC Pharmaceutical Cases: Background and Examples Sue H. Kim This presentation was prepared from public sources. The views expressed herein do not.
Emerging Health Care Issues: The U.S. FTC Report on Follow-on Biologic Drug Competition Sue H. Kim Foreign Attorney Yoon & Yang LLC.
PTAB Litigation 2016 Part 11 – Bio/Pharma Issues 1.
James G. Sheehan Associate United States Attorney 615 Chestnut Street, Suite 1250 Philadelphia, PA Phone: (215)
iHEA 9th World Congress Sydney, July 8, 2013
The Life Sciences Lawyer’s Guide to PTA and PTE
Free Trade and Intellectual Property Rights: Implications for the Canadian Pharmaceutical Environment Joel Lexchin MD School of Health Policy & Management.
Premarket Notification 510(k) process
US Prescribers and Biosimilars Naming
Hatch-Waxman Overview
Subsequent Entry Biologics: IP Issues
Biotechnology Chemical Pharmaceutical Customer Partnership
Pharma Workshop IV Patent Linkage in the USA
Presentation transcript:

Our PatientsOur PeopleOur BusinessOur Community © 2008 Endo Pharmaceuticals. All Rights Reserved. Biosimilars 2009 Update Pending Legislation Review Pam Politis AIPLA Spring Meeting 2009 May 14, 2009

2 Follow-on Biologics Bills in the House of Representatives 2009 H.R Waxman Bill Promoting Innovation and Access to Life-Saving Medicine Act Introduced March 11, 2009 Amendment to Public Health Services Act 42 U.S.C. § 262 Supported by GPhA, AARP, Labor Unions, Managed Care Groups H.R Eshoo Bill Pathway for Biosimilars Act Introduced March 17, 2009 Amendment to Public Health Services Act 42 U.S.C. § 262 Supported by PhRMA, BIO

3 Follow-on Biologics Bills-Similarities Permit follow-on applicant to reference Approved Product Data Two Possible Designations with Approval: Biosimilar and Interchangeable Application Data –Biosimilar Analytical Studies-chemical, physical, biological Animal studies Necessary clinical studies to demonstrate safety, purity, and potency* *Eshoo Bill requires trials for the purpose of assessing immunogenicity.

4 Follow-on Biologics Bills-Similarities H.R Waxman Bill Biosimilar: “no clinically meaningful differences between the biological product and the reference product would be expected in terms of the safety, purity, and potency if treatment were to be initiated with the biological product instead of the reference product.” H.R Eshoo Bill Biosimilar: “highly similar” to reference product. DEFINITION OF BIOSIMILAR

5 Follow-on Biologics Bills-INTERCHANGEABLE H.R Waxman Bill Interchangeable Biological Product: –Biosimilar to reference product; –Can safely “switch” patients H.R Eshoo Bill Interchangeable Biological Product: –Biosimilar to reference product and all other interchangeable products; –All approved uses of the reference product; –Can safely “switch” patients –Final guidance on interchangeability of the product class.

6 Follow-on Biologics Bills-Market Exclusivity 5 years –extendable by 6 months 3 years for Similar Substance Exclusivity Adjustment –6 month extension limited for products with annual gross U.S. sales of over $1 billion. 12 years –Extendable by 2 years if extension is requested during first 8 years after approval At least 4 years DATA exclusivity –FDA must have initiated guidance proceedings H.R Waxman BillH.R Eshoo Bill FDA WILL NOT APPROVE FOB APPLICATION

7 Reference Product Holder Burden to Disclose Notice is Discretionary! FOB Applicant asks for Patent information from RP sponsor –RP Sponsor MUST identify all “related patents” –Must update for 2 years Anytime after FOB application is filed, FOB may send notice.* Disclosure Burden on FOB Applicant FOB sends application to RP sponsor w/in 30 days RP sponsor sends list of patents (60 days) FOB certifies (30 days) 3 rd Party Patents Too!!! Follow-on Biologics Bills-Patent Notices H.R Waxman BillH.R Eshoo Bill NO ORANGE BOOK!

8 Within 45 days of receiving notice, RP Holder may file suit –Only for patents in notice, i.e. those patents the FOB applicant selected. If no suit on notice patents FOB applicant may bring DJ action If no suit in 45 day period, any later suit limited to reasonable royalities. Not Listed = No Suit! Trial court decision of infringement prevents FDA approval until patent expires. No possibility of “at risk” launch for RP who wins trial court decision. FOB cannot bring DJ action until 3 years prior to market exclusivity expiration. Third Parties Too! Follow-on Biologics Bills-Patent Suits H.R Waxman BillH.R Eshoo Bill NO 30 MONTH STAY!

9 FOB can pick one indication for approval –Reduces clinical trial burden without market consequence. Guidance Document to be issued, but not required for approval. Biosimilar has same official name as reference product NO Auth. Biosimilars during exclusivity period. Biosimilarity and Interchangeability must be demonstrated for every use in the reference product label. Guidance Documents Required for Each Product Class!! Every biological product has unique official name. Follow-on Biologics Bills- DIFFERENCES H.R Waxman BillH.R Eshoo Bill BIAS IN THE DETAILS!

10 Canada-Subsequent Entry Biologics Detailed Guidance Issued March 27,2009 –Detailed expectations for data comparisons between SEB and reference product. –Importance of manufacturing and Quality data stressed Allows for “Biosimilar” designation, not interchangeable. –SEB must create independent label, setting forth data supporting similarity to reference product. –No claims for bioequivalence or therapeutic equivalence may be made In the label. Provides 6 years data exclusivity Patent Notice and litigation provisions identical to generic drug pathway (same as Hatch-Waxman) First SEB (Omnitrope™) approved April 22, 2009