1 Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Department Of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility CWL SURA.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 NNSAs ICF Strategy Presented to Fusion Power Associates 34th Annual Meeting and Symposium Washington, DC December 11, 2013 Kirk Levedahl NNSA NATIONAL.
Advertisements

EAC HIGHER EDUCATION POLICY
Briefing to the Commission to Review the Effectiveness of the National Energy Laboratories (CRENEL) Joseph McBrearty, Deputy Director for Field Operations.
Office of Nuclear Energy 1May 20, 2013 Property Management Workshop Office of Nuclear Energy Program Perspective Delivering Nuclear Solutions for America's.
1 Performance Assessment An NSF Perspective MJ Suiter Budget, Finance and Awards NSF.
SPAWAR CTO: Meeting the Transition Challenge Dr. Roger Boss – for Rob Wolborsky CTO and 7.0 S&T National Lead 17 Nov 2010 Distribution A: Approved for.
U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Advanced Scientific Computing Research Program NERSC Users Group Meeting Department of Energy Update June 12,
Department of Energy Office of Science Yet Another Report from DOE Office of High Energy Physics Presented to SLUO September 10, 2006 Dr. Robin.
September 2005 Director of Education, Training and Research Partnerships Idaho National Laboratory and University Academic Centers of Excellence Andrew.
Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Science Dr. Raymond L. Orbach Under Secretary for Science U.S. Department.
Innovation, Colleges and Applied Research ACCC College and Institute Applied Research Symposium (February 12-13, 2004)
Thomas Hacker Barb Fossum Matthew Lawrence Open Science Grid May 19, 2011.
“Advancing Knowledge. Improving Life.” Strategic Planning Workshop Dean Stanley Lemeshow Strategic Planning Process Dean Stanley Lemeshow October 2007.
Challenges Faced in Developing Audit Plans and Programs 21 st March, 2013.
National Institute of Standards and Technology U.S. Department of Commerce TheTechnology Innovation Program (TIP) Standard Presentation of TIP Marc G.
Output from this Series of Workshops: A science vision for the RHIC future 1.Provide a science case for the future RHIC program that makes clear its importance.
Jefferson Lab Status Hall A collaboration Dec. 16, 2013 R. D. McKeown Deputy Director For Science.
GlueX Collaboration Meeting February 2011 Jefferson Lab Our 30’th Collaboration Meeting.
1 Robert S. Webb and Roger S. Pulwarty NOAA Climate Service.
THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK Information Technology Strategy & 5 Year Plan.
HEPAP and P5 Report DIET Federation Roundtable JSPS, Washington, DC; April 29, 2015 Andrew J. Lankford HEPAP Chair University of California, Irvine.
Colorado Springs Utilities Environmental Services Functional Assessment Presentation for the American Public Power Association’s 2001 Engineering & Operations.
Jefferson Lab Strategic Planning Divisional Town Meeting Mission Statement of your Division – What is or should be the mission statement of your division?
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Secretary of Technology Page 1 Jefferson Lab Overview Deb Magaldi Public Affairs
SURA Jefferson Laboratory Committee report J. L. Matthews, Chair Massachusetts Institute of Technology November 5, 2004.
Nuclear Science User Facilities (NSUF) DOE Headquarters Perspective Michael Worley Director, Office of Innovative Nuclear Research Office of Nuclear Energy.
Center for Renewable Energy Research and Environmental Stewardship CRERES November 6, 2009.
A National Coalition for Manufacturing Innovation Mission Statement and Strategic Plan Generated at Initial Planning Meeting June 2005.
National Science Foundation 1 Evaluating the EHR Portfolio Judith A. Ramaley Assistant Director Education and Human Resources.
Developing people, growing organisations 1 Delivering change through effective governance Care & Repair Cymru Stephanie Bamford Thursday 20 September 2012.
U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Advanced Scientific Computing Research Program NERSC Users Group Meeting Department of Energy Update September.
Southeastern Universities Research Association Jerry Draayer, SURA President Board of Trustees Meeting November 4 & 5, 2004 University of Arkansas, Fayetteville.
John Womersley John Womersley Director, Science Programmes Science and Technology Facilities Council Technology Gateway Centres.
The Evaluation of Publicly Funded Research Berlin, 26/27 September 2005 Evaluation for a changing research base Paul Hubbard Head of Research Policy, HEFCE,
Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy RHIC Users Meeting BNL; June 8, 2006 Gulshan Rai RHIC/AGS Users Meeting Gulshan Rai Program Manager for Heavy.
DOE Annual Review of SLAC HEP Research Program June 14-16, 2005 SLAC Charge to Committee Issues Procedures.
BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Peter Bond Deputy Director for Science and Technology October 29, 2005 New Frontiers at RHIC Workshop.
J EFFERSON L AB – A N I NTRODUCTION Hugh Montgomery; May 14, 2012.
U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science High Energy Physics Advisory Panel Meeting FY 2009 Budget Request.
NSAC Report Donald Geesaman Argonne National Laboratory Chair, US Department of Energy/National Science Foundation Nuclear Science Advisory Committee NuPECC.
Contractor Assurance System Peer Review April Page 1 NSTAR 2011 May 16, 2011 Jefferson Lab Hugh Montgomery.
SURA IT Committee & Regional CASA Meeting “SURAgrid Partnership” Sheraton Four Points 1201 K Street, NW Washington, DC March 7, 2006 Jerry P. Draayer SURA.
Materials Innovation Platforms (MIP): A New NSF Mid-scale Instrumentation and User Program to Accelerate The Discovery of New Materials MRSEC Director’s.
12 Gev Science Review:Overview Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Department of Energy Swapan.
10/25/2007GlueX Collaboration Meeting1 October 25-27, 2007 Jefferson Lab This is approximately our 20’th such meeting.
Presentation to Membership. A Recap of Our Process February 2009: Decision to renew strategic plan March 2009: Engagement of Berlin, Eaton.
Workshop on Women in Science and Engineering Latifa Elouadrhiri Jefferson Lab November 16, 2009.
Applied Sciences Perspective Lawrence Friedl, Program Director NASA Earth Science Applied Sciences Program LANCE User Working Group Meeting  September.
U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Science Dr. Raymond L. Orbach Director, Office of Science April 29, 2004 PRESENTATION FOR THE BIOLOGICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL.
The 12 GeV Physics Program at Jefferson Lab R. D. McKeown Jefferson Lab College of William and Mary PTSP 2013 – Charlottesville, VA September 9, 2013.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES NSLS-II Beamline Development John Hill NSLS-II Experimental Facilities Division Director PAC Meeting November 20, 2007.
Department of Energy Office of Science  FY 2007 Request for Office of Science is 14% above FY 2006 Appropriation  FY 2007 Request for HEP is 8% above.
Jefferson Lab’s Enabling Technologies: A Call for Strategic Planning W. OREN JLAB Engineering Division 9 February 2012.
Office of Science Office of Science Advisory Committee Chairs Perspectives on the Department of Energy Office of Science - Issues and Opportunities in.
1 National Centers for Environmental Prediction Status of UCAR Review Recommendations Executive Summary September 15, 2010 Louis Uccellini Director “Where.
Leadership Guide for Strategic Information Management Leadership Guide for Strategic Information Management for State DOTs NCHRP Project Information.
Nigel Lockyer Fermilab Operations Review 16 th -18 th May 2016 Fermilab in the Context of the DOE Mission.
CPM 2012, Fermilab D. MacFarlane & N. Holtkamp The Snowmass process and SLAC plans for HEP.
U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Science Presentation to the Basic Energy Sciences Advisory Committee (BESAC) Dr. Raymond L. Orbach, Director November.
GlueX Collaboration Meeting
Jefferson Lab Overview
Electron Ion Collider New aspects of EIC experiment instrumentation and computing, as well as their possible impact on and context in society (B) COMPUTING.
IT Governance at the SCO
Strategic Planning Committee 2017 Year End Update
Introduction to Jefferson Lab
Scientific Computing Strategy
SOLID Collaboration Meeting
Feedback from the Temple Town Meeting MEIC Accelerator R&D Meeting
Socio-Economic Impact of ESS
Presentation transcript:

1 Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Department Of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility CWL SURA BdTrusteesNov02:mbs Jefferson Lab SURA BOARD OF TRUSTEES November 5, 2002 Director ’ s Report Christoph Leemann

2 Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Department Of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility CWL SURA BdTrusteesNov02:mbs Scientific Pre-Eminence -Consolidate and enhance highest quality scientific program in hadronic physics in context of customer and stakeholder requirements Benchmark stewardship -Efficient use of resources to maximize science output and value for national investment -On cost, on schedule completion of SNS, 10 kW FEL meeting or exceeding specification -Continued excellent ISM, ISSM performance Position lab for vibrant future -12 GeV and beyond -FEL program (recognized and funded) -Create technological innovation based on unique core capabilities Employer of choice for the best and the brightest JLab Leadership Goals

3 Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Department Of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility CWL SURA BdTrusteesNov02:mbs Path Forward to Realize Goals Assessment: facing challenges and opportunities from a position of strength A compelling vision shared and supported by customers and stakeholders Strategies to “close the gap”

4 Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Department Of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility CWL SURA BdTrusteesNov02:mbs A Position of Strength: JLab Performance FY ‘02 completed to highest customer expectations: highest rating “outstanding” SURA Institutional Management Review: -Strategic planning, managerial effectiveness, and corporate culture “outstanding” -Smooth leadership transition and effective steps to make a good organization better Physics: -Beautiful, highest quality, and relevant -Unique facility, strong theory and computer simulation -Highly productive: publications and Ph.D.’s SNS exceeding specs against tight schedule FEL from add-on to inclusion in Navy budget Managed to obtain funding for CEBAF Center addition (59,000 ft 2 )

5 Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Department Of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility CWL SURA BdTrusteesNov02:mbs A Position of Strength: JLab Performance (cont.) Unique community relations and outreach -Community relations best of all National labs (IM Review) -Education program has highest visibility in Office of Science Credible with scientific community: NSAC endorses need for more operating funds and 12 GeV upgrade Credible with DOE: -Operations review certifies JLab funding needs -Institutional Plan review and follow-on meetings with office of Science endorse vision Credible with legislators: FY ‘02 language, FY ‘03 bills and language

6 Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Department Of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility CWL SURA BdTrusteesNov02:mbs A Position of Strength in Perspective: Challenges 5 years of sub-inflation funding have created extreme pressures Core competencies are at risk: maintained through projects “for others” 12 GeV not yet secured

7 Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Department Of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility CWL SURA BdTrusteesNov02:mbs A Compelling Vision: Planning Process Planning involves stakeholders from all areas broadly and deeply Institutional Planning: -In-house working groups -Science Policy Advisory Group (Geesaman [chair], Appelquist, Austin, Close, Koonin, Sessler, Tigner, Vigdor) Nuclear Physics Research: -Program Advisory Committee; User’s Board of Directors 12 GeV Upgrade: -User workshops; NSAC/APS town meeting, Focused PAC sessions FEL: -FEL PAC; Industrial Advisory Board; Maritime Technical Advisory Board Plan vetted by DOE through JLab S&T Review, Annual Budget Review, and Institutional Plan process

8 Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Department Of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility CWL SURA BdTrusteesNov02:mbs Pursuing a Focused Vision Mission: Forefront Nuclear Physics Research Jefferson Lab was envisioned and built to perform physics experiments at the cutting edge of the field: elucidate the quark-gluon structure of hadrons through a three-pronged approach based on experiment, theory, and simulation Key experimental elements envisioned -A 6 GeV program through (and beyond) Construction of a 12 GeV Upgrade, the start of a program to understand quark confinement, study valence quark distributions and map GPDs beginning in Construction of a follow-on upgrade, ~ 25 GeV fixed target, and/or an electron ion collider for the third decade of the century to develop capabilities needed to complete our understanding of hadronic structure. This program will be supported by a growing theory effort and, in particular, the development of the computing capabilities required for lattice QCD A commensurate modest accelerator R&D program will lead to new performance levels for srf accelerating structures, enabling further advances in our nuclear physics research capabilities.

9 Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Department Of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility CWL SURA BdTrusteesNov02:mbs Envisioned Evolution of Jefferson Lab Nuclear Physics Program (draft)

10 Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Department Of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility CWL SURA BdTrusteesNov02:mbs Responding to National Needs with Unique Core Competencies Development and advancement of JLab core competencies benefit the Nuclear Physics mission and have resulted in capabilities useful to the larger national science enterprise. Jefferson Lab has responded to national needs in areas synergistic with our NP mission where we have unique capabilities. JLab will continue to apply its unique core competency in rf superconductivity as a partner in the construction of new facilities in the DOE Office of Science Lab system as requested (SNS, RIA, others) JLab will, working with the DOE and DOD, continue its synergistic development of breakthrough Free Electron Lasers as long as compatible with Tier III lab status (below 200 kW) -Complete the 10 kW IR and 1 kW UV for the DOD -Build a 100 kW FEL -Explore the industrial and scientific application of high power FELs JLab’s detector expertise is and will continue to be applied to a growing list of medical applications funded by DOE/OBER, NIH, and others.

11 Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Department Of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility CWL SURA BdTrusteesNov02:mbs Envisioned Evolution of Jefferson Lab Science and Technology Programs (draft)

12 Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Department Of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility CWL SURA BdTrusteesNov02:mbs Critical Success Factors Remain capable of attracting highest quality staff: funding limits motivating research opportunities Solve funding issues in context of increased science funding and get 12 GeV included in Office of Science overarching strategic plan Find path forward for accelerator R&D -Opportunity for breakthrough: accelerator R&D has gained high visibility in Office of Science Find path forward for FEL -Opportunity for breakthrough: at request of Office of Science, SURA and JLab will carry out a high-level FEL science review Finally: even the best organization can improve and learn to use resources ever more effectively

13 Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Department Of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility CWL SURA BdTrusteesNov02:mbs SURA*/Jefferson Lab Organization Newly formed standing committees to address: Science, Operations, Infrastructure

14 Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Department Of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility CWL SURA BdTrusteesNov02:mbs Key Features Summarized SPAG: Advise the Director on scientific direction Assistant Director: Added attention to stakeholders and lead for programs of continual improvement CIO: Centralize and make quickly accessible management information for planning, assessment and rapid response CFO: Centralize and fully integrate budget and financial systems and provide advice on resource allocation and redistribution across whole organization CTO: Consolidate tech transfer and related initiatives PMO: Centralize tools and procedures for project management

15 Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Department Of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility CWL SURA BdTrusteesNov02:mbs Conclusion All quantitative and qualitative data demonstrates that JLab is delivering on its mission as a well-managed, can-do organization. JLab management, with the help of internal and external sources has developed a compelling vision and has identified challenges and opportunities JLab management is committed to address these challenges aggressively