Best of ASCO – Colorectal & Pancreatic Cancers Best of ASCO Colorectal & Pancreatic Cancers Ali Shamseddine, MD Professor of Medicine Head of Hematology/Oncology.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab (bev) vs FOLFIRI plus bev
Advertisements

1 N9841: A Randomized Phase III Equivalence Trial of Irinotecan (CPT-11) versus FOLFOX4 in Patients with Advanced Colorectal Carcinoma Previously Treated.
Have the OPTIMOX-2, CAIRO-3, COIN, DREAM and other recent trials settled the question of maintenance versus observation in advanced CRC? Yes Deborah Schrag,
ECCO ESMO 2011 GI Cancer Updates “ VELOUR” Study Author: J Tabernero et al Reviewed by: Dr. Scott Berry Date posted: October.
NSABP PROTOCOL C-10: RESULTS A Phase II Trial of 5-Fluorouracil, Leucovorin and Oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6) Plus Bevacizumab for Patients with Unresectable.
Pilot Experience with Adjuvant FOLFIRI +/- Cetuximab in Patients with Resected Stage III Colon Cancer – NCCTG Intergroup N0147 J. Huang*, D. J. Sargent*,
KRAS Status in Response to Cetuximab
Does the New EPOC trial eliminate Anti-EGFR antibodies as part of pre-op therapy for curable liver-only mCRC? YES! Cathy Eng, M.D., F.A.C.P. Associate.
BOPA 2009 Clinical Update: Colorectal Cancer Dr Nick Maisey.
Clinical Review of Current Treatment Strategies for Colorectal Cancer
Individualizing Therapy for Gastrointestinal Malignancies 2010 Update
Fabio Puglisi Dipartimento di Oncologia Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Udine Antiangiogenic Treatment Mediterranean School of Oncology.
AVADO PFS Analysis (ITT Population) All P values vs. placebo Adapted from Miles et al. ASCO 2008, abstract LBA 1011.
Avastin ® : setting the standard in treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) Fairooz Kabbinavar David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA Los Angeles,
Vascular issues associated with bevacizumab Stuart M. Lichtman, MD, FACP 65+ Clinical Geriatric Program Associate Attending Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer.
Phase III study of first-line XELOX plus bevacizumab (BEV) for 6 cycles followed by XELOX plus BEV or single agent (s/a) BEV as maintenance therapy in.
Clinicaloptions.com/oncology Expert Insight Into the First-line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer N016966: Efficacy Results  PFS significantly.
Van Cutsem E et al. ASCO 2009; Abstract LBA4509. (Oral Presentation)
Phase III studies of Xeloda® in colorectal cancer (CRC)
Oxaliplatin/5FU/LV in adjuvant colon cancer: Updated efficacy results of the MOSAIC trial, including survival, with a median follow-up.
Phase II Presurgical Feasibility Study of Bevacizumab in Untreated Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Jonasch E et al. Journal of Clinical Oncology.
Pancreatic Cancer Ali Shamseddine MD Proessor of Medicine AUBMC
Adjuvant Therapy of Colon Cancer 2005 Daniel G. Haller, M.D. Abramson Cancer Center at the University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia PA.
Is surgical resection of an asymptomatic primary colorectal tumor beneficial for patients with incurable Stage IV disease? A Phase II Trial of 5-Fluorouracil,
Capecitabine versus Bolus 5-FU/Leucovorin as Adjuvant Therapy for Colon Cancer: X-ACT Trial Results James Cassidy, MD Colorectal Cancer Update Think Tank.
1 A Randomized, Multi-Center Phase III Trial of Irinotecan in Combination with Three Different Methods of Administration of Fluoropyrimidine with Celecoxib.
Results of Docetaxel Plus Oxaliplatin (DOCOX) +/- Cetuximab in Patients with Metastatic Gastric and/or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma: Results.
Poster #382 XELOX-1/NO16966, a randomized phase III trial of first-line XELOX vs. FOLFOX-4 for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC): Updated.
Targeting VEGF for the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer Herbert Hurwitz Duke University Medical Center Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Adjuvant Matters Richard M Goldberg MD UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center Chapel Hill, NC.
*University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium
This house believes that FOLFIRINOX is the best treatment for patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma Pro Marc YCHOU Montpellier.
NSABP C08 adjuvant colon cancer Best of ASCO, Beirut, July 2009 Prof Eric Van Cutsem, MD, PhD Digestive Oncology Leuven, Belgium.
Response rate using conventional criteria is a poor surrogate for clinical benefit on progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in metastatic colorectal.
Randomized Phase III Trial Comparing FOLFIRINOX (F: 5FU/Leucovorin [LV], Irinotecan [I], and Oxaliplatin [O]) versus Gemcitabine (G) as First-Line Treatment.
T Andre, E Quinaux, C Louvet, E Gamelin, O Bouche, E Achille, P Piedbois, N Tubiana-Mathieu, M Buyse and A de Gramont. Updated results at 6 year of the.
Gemcitabine + Cisplatin +/- Bevacizumab as 1st-line Treatment of Advanced NSCLC: AVAiL Study Manegold PASCO 25:#7514, 2007/Ann.
Mace L. Rothenberg, M.D. Professor of Medicine Ingram Professor of Cancer Research Biomarkers in Colorectal Cancer Management: KRAS Mutations and EGFR.
0 Adjuvant FOLFIRI +/- Cetuximab in Patients with Resected Stage III Colon Cancer NCCTG Intergroup Phase III Trial N0147 Jocelin Huang, Daniel J Sargent,
KRAS status and efficacy in the first- line treatment of patients with mCRC treated with FOLFOX with or without cetuximab: The OPUS experience Carsten.
AVADO TRIAL David Miles Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Middlesex, United Kingdom A randomized, double-blind study of bevacizumab in combination with docetaxel.
Cmab might have therapeutic benefit in Japanese patients with KRAS p.G13D mutant colorectal cancer. Limitations of this study are its retrospective design.
Preliminary Results from a Phase II study of FOLFIRI and Bevacizumab as First Line Treatment for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (Abstract #3579) S. Kopetz,
Cetuximab plus FOLFIRI in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: the influence of KRAS and BRAF biomarkers on outcome: updated data from the CRYSTAL.
Monoclonal Antibodies EGFR Inhibitors for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Where are we and What’s next Discussion of Abstracts Jeffrey Meyerhardt,
Kang Y et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract LBA4007.
NSABP Overall Survival and Updated Disease-Free Survival Results of the NSABP C-08 Trial Assessing Bevacizumab in Stage II & III Colon Cancer CJ Allegra,
Riccardo Giampieri Scuola di Specializzazione Oncologia Università Politecnica delle Marche Ancona How to manage patients with mutated KRAS tumors.
1 CONFIDENTIAL – DO NOT DISTRIBUTE ARIES mCRC: Effectiveness and Safety of 1st- and 2nd-line Bevacizumab Treatment in Elderly Patients Mark Kozloff, MD.
Figure 1. Hazard ratios for progression-free survival analyzed with fixed effect model. Table 1: Relevant trials Table 2. Methodological quality Conclusions.
Adjuvant Therapy of Colon Cancer: Where are we now ? Leonard Saltz, MD Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York, NY.
Impact of Bevacizumab (Bev) on Efficacy of Second-Line Chemotherapy (CT) for Triple- Negative Breast Cancer: Analysis of RIBBON-2 Brufsky A et al. Proc.
A Discussion on Biologic Agents in Gastric Cancer Treatment Yoon-Koo Kang, MD Professor of Medicine Asan Medical Center University of Ulsan College of.
Patterns of Care in Medical Oncology Treatment of Metastatic Colon Cancer.
1 A Randomized, Multi-Center Phase III Trial of Irinotecan in Combination with Three Different Methods of Administration of Fluoropyrimidine with Celecoxib.
Phase III Study of First-Line XELOX Plus Bevacizumab (BEV) for 6 Cycles Followed by XELOX Plus BEV or Single Agent (s/a) BEV as Maintenance Therapy in.
Discussant: M Ducreux, MD, PhD Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif France TH-302 plus Gemcitabine vs. Gemcitabine in Patients with Untreated Advanced Pancreatic.
BRAF mutant mCRC patients – What would you recommend? FOLFIRINOX/Bev
Jordan Berlin Co-Director, GI Oncology Program
First efficacy and safety results from XELOX-1/NO16966, a randomised 2x2 factorial phase III trial of XELOX vs FOLFOX4 + bevacizumab or placebo in first-line.
LV5FU2-cisplatin followed by gemcitabine or the reverse sequence in metastatic pancreatic cancer: Preliminary results of a randomized phase III trial (FFCD.
Cetuximab with chemotherapy as 1st-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of the CRYSTAL and OPUS studies according to KRAS.
KRAS status and efficacy in the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with FOLFIRI with or without cetuximab: The.
1 Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
1University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium;
Ali Shamseddine,MD,FRCP
1Cancer Research UK, Glasgow, United Kingdom
Phase III study of irinotecan/5FU/LV (FOLFIRI) or oxaliplatin/5FU/LV (FOLFOX) +/- cetuximab for patients with untreated metastatic adenocarcinoma of the.
and the NSABP Investigators
1Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
Presentation transcript:

Best of ASCO – Colorectal & Pancreatic Cancers Best of ASCO Colorectal & Pancreatic Cancers Ali Shamseddine, MD Professor of Medicine Head of Hematology/Oncology Division American University of Beirut Medical Center

Best of ASCO – Colorectal & Pancreatic Cancers Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Colorectal Cancer

Best of ASCO – Colorectal & Pancreatic Cancers

Survival Results of NSABP C-07 FULV 5-FU 500 m 2 IV bolus weekly x 6 + LV 500 mg/m 2 IV weekly x 6 of each 8-week cycle x 3 (n = 1209) FLOX FULV + Oxaliplatin 85 mg/m 2 IV on Weeks 1, 3, and 5 of each 8-week cycle x 3 (n = 1200) Patients with stage II or III carcinoma of the colon stratified by number of positive lymph nodes (N = 2409) Wolmark N, et al. ASCO Abstract LBA4005.  Primary endpoint: DFS

Best of ASCO – Colorectal & Pancreatic Cancers C-07: Disease-Free Survival 3-Year DFS5-Year DFS FLOX (n = 1200) 76.1%69.4% P =.002 HR: 0.81 (95% CI: ) FULV (n = 1209) 71.5%64.2% ∆ 4.6%5.2% Wolmark N, et al. ASCO Abstract LBA4005.

Best of ASCO – Colorectal & Pancreatic Cancers C-07: Overall Survival Deaths, n3-Year OS5-Year OS FLOX (n = 1200) %77.7% P =.06 HR: 0.85 (95% CI: ) FULV (n = 1209) %73.5% ∆ 422.0%4.2% Wolmark N, et al. ASCO Abstract LBA4005.

Best of ASCO – Colorectal & Pancreatic Cancers Initial Safety Report of NSABP C-08 Arm A mFOLFOX6 every 2 wks x 12 doses (n = 1356) Arm B: mFOLFOX6 + Bevacizumab 5 mg/kg every 2 wks x 26 doses (n = 1354) Patients with stage II or III colon adenocarcinoma with ECOG performance score of 0/11 (N = 2710)  Patients were stratified by the number of positive lymph nodes and were randomized between Days 29 and 50 postoperatively  mFOLFOX6 regimen: leucovorin 400 mg/m 2 IV, 5-FU 400 mg/m 2 IV, 5-FU 2400 mg/m 2 over 46 hrs; oxaliplatin 85 mg/m 2 IV  Primary endpoint: DFS Allegra CJ, et al. ASCO Abstract 4006.

Best of ASCO – Colorectal & Pancreatic Cancers C-08: Grade 3/4 Toxicities Significantly Increased With Bevacizumab Adverse EventmFOLFOX, %mFOLFOX + Bevacizumab,% P Value Hypertension *<.0001 Any pain <.0001 Proteinuria0.82.7<.0001 Wound complications † <.0001 Allegra CJ, et al. ASCO Abstract *5 patients had grade 4 hypertension. † All grade 3.  Median time on study: 22.4 months  No significant increases in GI perforation, hemorrhage, arterial, or venous thrombotic events, or deaths have been observed with the addition of bevacizumab

Best of ASCO – Colorectal & Pancreatic Cancers Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Best of ASCO – Colorectal & Pancreatic Cancers CONcePT Trial Design Grothey A, et al. ASCO Abstract *Treat to failure. † 8 cycles with oxaliplatin, 8 cycles without oxaliplatin, 8 cycles with oxaliplatin. Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (N = 140) Continuous Oxaliplatin* mFOLFOX7 + Bevacizumab + Placebo (n = 34) Continuous Oxaliplatin* mFOLFOX7 + Bevacizumab + Ca 2+ /Mg 2+ (n = 35) Intermittent Oxaliplatin † mFOLFOX7 + Bevacizumab + Placebo (n = 36) Intermittent Oxaliplatin † mFOLFOX7 + Bevacizumab + Ca 2+ /Mg 2+ (n = 35)

Best of ASCO – Colorectal & Pancreatic Cancers CONcePT: Treat-to-Failure  Treat-to-failure –Continuous oxaliplatin (CO): 4.2 months (95% CI: ) –Intermittent oxaliplatin (IO): 5.6 months (95% CI: )  Unstratified (IO relative to CO): P =.002*  Stratified by CaMg (IO relative to CO): P =.003* Grothey A, et al. ASCO Abstract *Log-rank test.

Best of ASCO – Colorectal & Pancreatic Cancers CONcePT: Progression-Free Survival  Treat-to-failure –Continuous oxaliplatin (CO): 7.3 months (95% CI: 6.9-NE) –Intermittent oxaliplatin (IO): 12.0 months (95% CI: 8.2-NE)  Unstratified (IO relative to CO): P =.044*  Stratified by CaMg (IO relative to CO): P =.030* Grothey A, et al. ASCO Abstract *Log-rank test.

Best of ASCO – Colorectal & Pancreatic Cancers Clinical practice*: Hepatic metastasectomy in patients with liver disease only Cassidy, et al. ASCO 2008 (poster) *BEAT: largest prospective trial with a predefined analysis for resectability (non-randomised study) n=107n=71n= n= n= n= Patients (%) Hepatic metastasectomy with no residual disease (R0) Hepatic metastasectomy Avastin + CTx All (n=704) Avastin + CTx Including oxaliplatin (n=349) Avastin + CTx Including irinotecan (n=230)

Best of ASCO – Colorectal & Pancreatic Cancers Clinical practice*: Significant improvement in 2-year OS for patients who underwent hepatic metastasectomy with R0 resection *BEAT (non-randomised study) OS = overall survival Cassidy, et al. ASCO 2008 (poster) OS estimate Months Hepatic metastasectomy and R0 resection (n=114) Hepatic metastasectomy total (n=145) No hepatic metastasectomy (n=1,791) p< % 89% 86%

Best of ASCO – Colorectal & Pancreatic Cancers FDG-PET Improves Selection of Patients With CRC Liver Metastases Wiering B, et al. ASCO Abstract CT imaging only (n = 75) CT imaging + FDG-PET (n = 75) Patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases selected for surgical treatment by imaging with CT scan (N = 150) Laparotomy Excluded by PET Findings at laparotomy and F/U Findings at laparotomy and F/U  Patients were followed for at least 3 yrs for OS and DFS –No standard chemotherapy was given postoperatively

Best of ASCO – Colorectal & Pancreatic Cancers  Primary endpoint: futile laparotomies, defined as a laparotomy that –Did not result in complete tumor treatment –Revealed benign disease –Did not result in DFS longer than 6 months  Secondary endpoint: OS and DFS FDG-PET Improves Selection of Patients With CRC Liver Metastases Wiering B, et al. ASCO Abstract 4004.

Best of ASCO – Colorectal & Pancreatic Cancers  Number of futile laparotomies was reduced from 45% to 28%  Addition of FDG-PET to the workup for surgical resection of colorectal liver metastases prevents unnecessary surgery in 1 out of 6 patients  No significant differences in OS or DFS were noted in the first 3 yrs of follow-up FDG-PET in CRC Liver Metastases: Conclusions Wiering B, et al. ASCO Abstract 4004.

Best of ASCO – Colorectal & Pancreatic Cancers KRAS Status and Efficacy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Best of ASCO – Colorectal & Pancreatic Cancers KRAS Status and Efficacy of First-Line FOLFOX ± Cetuximab: OPUS  Genomic DNA was isolated from archived tumor material  KRAS mutation status of codons 12/13 was determined using a sensitive, quantitative PCR-based assay  Population with tissue available for KRAS analysis (n = 233) was representative of overall ITT population (n = 337) in terms of demographics and efficacy parameters  KRAS mutations detected in 42% (99/233) of evaluable samples Bokemeyer C, et al. ASCO Abstract 4000.

Best of ASCO – Colorectal & Pancreatic Cancers OPUS: Results KRAS Status Median PFS Cetuximab + FOLFOX, Mos Median PFS FOLFOX, mos HR (P Value) Overall RR Cetuximab + FOLFOX, % Overall RR FOLFOX, % P Value WT7.7 (n = 61)7.2 (n = 73)0.57 (.02) Mutation5.5 (n = 52)8.6 (n = 47)1.83 (.02) PFS and Response Rates by KRAS Mutation Status  The benefit from addition of cetuximab to standard treatment is higher for the population with WT KRAS  No benefit could be shown of adding cetuximab to FOLFOX for patients with KRAS mutations Bokemeyer C, et al. ASCO Abstract 4000.

Best of ASCO – Colorectal & Pancreatic Cancers OPUS: PFS according to K-Ras status PFS – K-Ras mutantPFS – K-Ras wild-type Progression-free time (months) Kaplan-Meier estimate Cetuximab + FOLFOX FOLFOX Cetuximab + FOLFOX FOLFOX K-Ras mutant: HR=1.83; p= Cetuximab + FOLFOX: 5.5 months FOLFOX: 8.6 months Kaplan-Meier estimate Progression-free time (months) K-Ras wild-type: HR=0.57; p=0.016 Cetuximab + FOLFOX: 7.7 months FOLFOX: 7.2 months Bokemeyer, et al. ASCO 2008

Best of ASCO – Colorectal & Pancreatic Cancers KRAS and Efficacy of Irinotecan and Cetuximab in mCRC: EVEREST Patients with irinotecan- refractory metastatic cancer Cetuximab 400 mg/m 2 initial dose then 250 mg/m 2 /wk + Irinotecan 180 mg/m 2 Q2W Control Standard Cetuximab regimen (250 mg/m 2 /wk) (n = 23) Dose Escalation Cetuximab dose increases of 50 mg/m 2 Q2W up to maximum 500 mg/m 2 /wk (n = 31) Nonrandomized Standard Cetuximab regimen (250 mg/m 2 /wk) SCREENINGSCREENING Day 22 Randomized: skin toxicity grade 0/1 Not eligible for randomization: skin toxicity grade 2/3  All patients continued to receive irinotecan  Treatment until progression, unacceptable toxicity or withdrawal of consent  Skin and tumor biopsy at baseline, Week 3, and at maximum cetuximab dose in dose-escalation arm Tejpar S, et al. ASCO Abstract 4001.

Best of ASCO – Colorectal & Pancreatic Cancers EVEREST: PFS (ITT Population) Days PFS Estimate 800 P <.0001 KRAS mutant WT KRAS KRAS mutation present 83 days (95% CI: ) 173 days (95% CI: ) Tejpar S, et al. ASCO Abstract Reproduced with permission.

Best of ASCO – Colorectal & Pancreatic Cancers EVEREST: PFS by Treatment Group and KRAS Status Days KRAS mutant WT KRAS Control KRAS mutation present P =.014 KRAS mutant WT KRAS Dose Escalation KRAS mutation present KRAS mutant WT KRAS Nonrandomized KRAS mutation present P <.001P =.020 Tejpar S, et al. ASCO Abstract Reproduced with permission. PFS Estimate

Best of ASCO – Colorectal & Pancreatic Cancers Pancreatic Cancer

Best of ASCO – Colorectal & Pancreatic Cancers Treatment of Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Targeted Therapy beyond Erlotinib Treatment of Gemcitabine-Refractory Disease

Best of ASCO – Colorectal & Pancreatic Cancers

 Primary endpoint = overall survival  Stratified according to country, KPS (<80 vs ≥80), albumin level (<2.9g/dL vs ≥2.9g/dL) PD Previously untreated metastatic pancreatic cancer (n=600) Tarceva (100mg) + gemcitabine + Avastin (5mg/kg every 2 weeks) Tarceva (100mg) + gemcitabine + placebo KPS = Karnofsky performance status PD = progressive disease AVITA: study design

Best of ASCO – Colorectal & Pancreatic Cancers Overall survival probability Time (months) HR=0.89, p= (95% CI: 0.74–1.07) Gemcitabine + Tarceva + Avastin (n=221 with events) Gemcitabine + Tarceva (n=233 with events) Vervenne W, Van Cutsem E, et al. J Clin Oncol 2008;26(Suppl. 15 Pt I): 214s (Abs. 4507) AVITA: overall survival

Best of ASCO – Colorectal & Pancreatic Cancers PFS probability HR=0.73, p= (95% CI: 0.61–0.86) Vervenne W, Van Cutsem E, et al. J Clin Oncol 2008;26(Suppl. 15 Pt I): 214s (Abs. 4507) PFS = progression-free survival Gemcitabine + Tarceva + Avastin (n=257 with events) Gemcitabine + Tarceva (n=278 with events) Time (months) AVITA: PFS

Best of ASCO – Colorectal & Pancreatic Cancers