MER 2012: T1 – Achieving Enterprise Content and Records Management with SharePoint John Isaza, Esq., FAI Partner Legal Developments & Rules Affecting SharePoint.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Zubulake v. UBS Warburg LLC “Zubulake IV”
Advertisements

The Evolving Law of E-Discovery Joseph J. Ortego, Esq. Nixon Peabody LLP New York, NY Jericho, NY.
Successfully Navigating National and Global Discovery Disputes.
Saving Your Documents Can Save You Anne D. Harman, Esq. Bethany B. Swaton, Esq. Dinsmore & Shohl LLP 2100 Market Street, Wheeling (304)
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, 2004 District Justice Scheindlin Zubulake v. UBS Warburg LLC Zubulake V.
Considerations for Records and Information Management Programs in Light of the Pension Committee and Rimkus Consulting 2010 Decisions.
Litigation Holds: Don’t Live in Fear of Spoliation Jason CISO – University of Connecticut October 30, 2014 Information Security Office.
E-Discovery New Rules of Civil Procedure Presented by Lucy Isaki January 23, 2007.
INFORMATION WITHOUT BORDERS CONFERENCE February 7, 2013 e-DISCOVERY AND INFORMATION MANAGEMENT.
Ronald J. Shaffer, Esq. Beth L. Weisser, Esq. Lorraine K. Koc, Esq., Vice President and General Counsel, Deb Shops, Inc. © 2010 Fox Rothschild DELVACCA.
Cache La Poudre Feeds, LLC v. Land O’Lakes, Inc.  Motion Hearing before a Magistrate Judge in Federal Court  District of Colorado  Decided in 2007.
E - Discovery Federal Rules 2006 Alabama Rules February 2010 –Scope of duty to preserve electronic evidence during course of litigation –Sanctions for.
Establishing a Defensible and Efficient Legal Hold Policy September 2013 Connie Hall, J.D., Manager, New Product Development, Thomson Reuters.
E-Discovery in Government Investigations and Criminal Law JOLT Symposium February 22,
Ethical Issues in Data Security Breach Cases Presented by Robert J. Scott Scott & Scott, LLP
Ethical Issues in the Electronic Age Ethical Issues in the Electronic Age Frost Brown Todd LLC Seminar May 24, 2007 Frost Brown.
A PROACTIVE APPROACH TO E-DISCOVERY March 4, 2009 Presented to the Corporate Counsel Section of the Tarrant County Bar Association Carl C. Butzer Jackson.
1 A Practical Guide to eDiscovery in Litigation Presented by: Christopher N. Weiss Aric H. Jarrett Stoel Rives LLP Public Risk Management Association (PRIMA),
E-Discovery LIMITS ON E-DISCOVERY. No New Preservation Rule When does duty to preserve attach? Reasonably anticipated litigation. Audio sanctions.
W W W. D I N S L A W. C O M E-Discovery and Document Retention Patrick W. Michael, Esq. Dinsmore & Shohl LLP 101 South Fifth Street Louisville, KY
1 Best Practices in Legal Holds Effectively Managing the e-Discovery Process and Associated Costs.
Litigation Hold Overview Tom O’Connor Gulf Coast Legal Technology Center
Is Records Management Still Relevant? Sean Regan E-Discovery Product Marketing Manager Symantec Enterprise Vault.
E -nuff! : Practical Tips For Keeping s From Derailing Your Case Presented by Jerry L. Mitchell.
EDiscovery and Records Management. Records Management- Historical Perspective- Paper Historically- Paper was the “Corporate Memory” – a physical entity.
LBSC 708X The Record Nature of Electronic Records College of Information Studies.
1 Structuring your Information Management to Ensure Litigation Readiness Julian Ackert, Principal Washington DC John Forsyth, HBOS Edinburgh Andrew Haslam,
Developing a Records & Information Retention & Disposition Program:
1 E-Discovery Changes to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Concerning Discovery of Electronically Stored Information (ESI) Effective Date: 12/01/2006 October,
AIIM Presentation Selecting and Implementing A Records Management System June 5, 2008.
By Helen Streck President/CEO Kaizen InfoSource LLC Litigation Readiness: Information Manager’s Role.
Investigating & Preserving Evidence in Data Security Incidents Robert J. Scott Scott & Scott, LLP
Electronic Communications State Owned System Mandates Presented by: Eileen Goldgeier.
©2011 Office of Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley E-DISCOVERY Hélène Kazanjian Anne Sterman Trial Division.
The Sedona Principles 1-7
EDISCOVERY: ARE YOU PREPARED? Dennis P. Ogden Belin McCormick, P.C. 666 Walnut Street, Suite 2000 Des Moines, IA Telephone: (515) Facsimile:
Attorney-Client Privilege and Privacy Considerations Between US Corporations & Foreign Affiliates General Counsel Conference, Washington, D.C. October.
E-Discovery in Health Care Litigation By Tracy Vigness Kolb.
EDiscovery, Records Management and Records Retention.
2009 CHANGES IN CALIFORNIA DISCOVERY RULES The California Electronic Discovery Act Batya Swenson E-discovery Task Force
DOE V. NORWALK COMMUNITY COLLEGE, 248 F.R.D. 372 (D. CONN. 2007) Decided July 16, 2002.
Against: The Liberal Definition and use of Litigation Holds Team 9.
P RINCIPLES 1-7 FOR E LECTRONIC D OCUMENT P RODUCTION Maryanne Post.
The Challenge of Rule 26(f) Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer July 15, 2011.
Rambus v. Infineon Technologies AG 22 F.R.D. 280 (E.D. Va. 2004)
EDiscovery Preservation, Spoliation, Litigation Holds, Adverse Inferences. September 15, 2008.
RIM in the Age of E-Discovery RIM in the Age of E-Discovery FIRM Summer Program June 23, 2009 Christina Ayiotis, Esq., CRM Group Counsel– E-Discovery &
CORPORATE RECORDS RETENTION POLICY TRAINING By: Diana C. Toman, Corporate Counsel & Assistant Secretary.
537 F. Supp. 2d 14 (D.D.C. 2008). PARTIES Plaintiff: United States – Q-P-Q charges against USDOS employee Michael O’Keefe & VISA applicant STS Jewelers.
Information and Records Management INFM 718X/LBSC 708X Seminar on E-Discovery.
Defensible Records Retention and Preservation Linda Starek-McKinley Director, Records and Information Management Edward Jones
Digital Government Summit
© 2010 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
All Employee Basic Records Management Training. Training Overview 1.Training Objectives 2.Clark County RIM Program 3.Key Concepts 4.Employee Responsibilities.
Emerging Case Law and Recent eDiscovery Decisions.
Legal Holds Department of State Division of Records Management Kevin Callaghan, Director.
E-Discovery And why it matters to a SSA. What is E-Discovery? E-Discovery is the process during litigation of discovering information relevant to litigation.
Zubulake IV [Trigger Date]
The SharePoint Shepherd’s Course for End Users Based on the book by Robert L. Bogue Copyright 2011 AvailTek LLC All Rights Reserved.
U.S. District Court Southern District of New York 229 F.R.D. 422 (S.D.N.Y. 2004)
Record Retention to Manage Risk F. Jay Meyer Vice President & Senior Attorney TD Banknorth, N.A. Portland, Maine.
EDiscovery Also known as “ESI” Discovery of “Electronically Stored Information” Same discovery, new form of storage.
Title of Presentation Technology and the Attorney-Client Relationship: Risks and Opportunities Jay Glunt, Ogletree DeakinsJohn Unice, Covestro LLC Jennifer.
Key Social Media Considerations It is no longer a question of whether a social media policy is needed, it is more a matter of what that policy proscribes.
ENTICE Enterprise Needs for Tools and Infrastructure for Content Exploitation David Foster IT May 2010.
CITY OF PHOENIX RECORDS MANAGEMENT AND E-PRIVACY Margie Pleggenkuhle City Clerk Department March 18, 2004.
© Copyright DTI CONFIDENTIAL 1 Adam Bottner, Esq. Director of Business Development DTI April 15, 2016.
The Ethics of Technology
E-DISCOVERY The Sophomore Year May 20, 2010.
Presentation transcript:

MER 2012: T1 – Achieving Enterprise Content and Records Management with SharePoint John Isaza, Esq., FAI Partner Legal Developments & Rules Affecting SharePoint 2013 Usage 1

MER 2012: T1 – Achieving Enterprise Content and Records Management with SharePoint

Agenda Recent cases re: “trigger events” and “scope” for legal holds Legal analysis impacting SharePoint usage Recommendations 3

MER 2012: T1 – Achieving Enterprise Content and Records Management with SharePoint But First: Scope of Potential SharePoint Information to Manage Collaboration (team sites) Document versioning Lists and calendars Discussion boards and meeting workspaces Wikis and blogs Forms and surveys My Sites (social networking) Portals (web content management) Custom applications 4

MER 2012: T1 – Achieving Enterprise Content and Records Management with SharePoint And Sobering News Cyberattacks on Rise Against U.S. Corporations Cyberattacks on Rise Against U.S. Corporations – NYT May 14, 2013 A new wave of cyberattacks is striking American corporations, prompting warnings from federal officials, including a vague one issued last week by the Department of Homeland Security. This time, officials say, the attackers' aim is not espionage but sabotage, and the source seems to be somewhere in the Middle East.

MER 2012: T1 – Achieving Enterprise Content and Records Management with SharePoint Part I CASES RE: “TRIGGER EVENTS” & “SCOPE” FOR LEGAL HOLDS 6

MER 2012: T1 – Achieving Enterprise Content and Records Management with SharePoint Legal Holds Processes Pension Comm. of the Univ. of Montreal Pension Plan v. Banc of Am. Sec., LLC (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 15, 2010) 2010 WL “The failure to issue a written litigation hold constitutes gross negligence... ” “... the failure to collect records—either paper or electronic—from key players constitutes gross negligence or willfulness as does the destruction of or backup tapes after the duty to preserve has attached.” 7

MER 2012: T1 – Achieving Enterprise Content and Records Management with SharePoint Spoliation Sanctions without Bad Faith Sanctions for “careless” and “inexcusable” failure to issue a legal holds Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Ventura Corp., Civ. No (PG), 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS (D.P.R. Feb. 12, 2013) Sanction was exclusion of key testimony Evidence shredded at a warehouse and s and other files fell victim to a company-wide “software migration.” E.E.O.C. v. JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A., No. 2:09-cv (S.D. Ohio Feb. 28, 2013) Adverse inference instruction While scope of production was debated, 10 months of data destroyed per routine document deletion policies. 8

MER 2012: T1 – Achieving Enterprise Content and Records Management with SharePoint

Part II LEGAL ANALYSIS IMPACTING USE OF SHAREPOINT 10

MER 2012: T1 – Achieving Enterprise Content and Records Management with SharePoint Symantec Survey – 7/

MER 2012: T1 – Achieving Enterprise Content and Records Management with SharePoint eDiscovery and SharePoint Goals Anticipate risk Devise cost-efficient, defensible, automated methods for production of relevant ESI Balance with Federal requirements, as well as state discovery rules when applicable Consider implications of Social media impact Cloud storage

MER 2012: T1 – Achieving Enterprise Content and Records Management with SharePoint Collaboration Many users working on documents result in version control When legal hold “trigger” hits, all versions must be preserved “Scope” of legal holds includes anything that is relevant to the subject matter of the case Collaboration with counsel could result in waiver of attorney-client privilege 13

MER 2012: T1 – Achieving Enterprise Content and Records Management with SharePoint Collaboration (cont’d.) All are discoverable Some may contain “records” requiring robust RM Some may be non-record WIPs in LCM Wikis & Blogs Transactional in nature Who owns and controls data? Blog could be opened to outsiders Special hold challenges Discussion Boards Meeting Workspaces Forms Lists Surveys 14

MER 2012: T1 – Achieving Enterprise Content and Records Management with SharePoint My Sites (Social Networking) Records? Yes, some Discoverable? Of course! Who owns the data if outsiders post? Who controls the data? 15

MER 2012: T1 – Achieving Enterprise Content and Records Management with SharePoint Portals (Web Content Management) More “records” How do you declare, classify and capture? How do you protect privacy? Intranet and Internet functionality E.g., Hawaiian Airlines & Japan Airlines Site assets vs. Transactional logic Also discoverable All documents “irrespective of medium” per FRCP How do you implement legal holds? 16

MER 2012: T1 – Achieving Enterprise Content and Records Management with SharePoint Part III RECOMMENDATIONS 17

MER 2012: T1 – Achieving Enterprise Content and Records Management with SharePoint Recommendations Bottom line: Possession, custody and control First lines of defense Create and implement a records and information management (RIM) program Role of RRS Robust Legal Holds processes 18

MER 2012: T1 – Achieving Enterprise Content and Records Management with SharePoint

John J. Isaza, Esq., FAI Information Management Partner, Rimon, PC