Node Information Queries July 2002 Yokohama IETF Bob Hinden / Nokia.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TCP/IP Protocol Suite 1 Chapter 27 Upon completion you will be able to: Next Generation: IPv6 and ICMPv6 Understand the shortcomings of IPv4 Know the IPv6.
Advertisements

Transitioning to IPv6 April 15,2005 Presented By: Richard Moore PBS Enterprise Technology.
Auto Configuration and Mobility Options in IPv6 By: Hitu Malhotra and Sue Scheckermann.
1 IPv6. 2 Problem: 32-bit address space will be completely allocated by Solution: Design a new IP with a larger address space, called the IP version.
1 Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) What the caterpillar calls the end of the world, nature calls a butterfly. - Anonymous.
IP Version 6 (IPv6) Dr. Adil Yousif. Why IPv6?  Deficiency of IPv4  Address space exhaustion  New types of service  Integration  Multicast  Quality.
1 Improved DNS Server Selection for Multi-Homed Nodes draft-savolainen-mif-dns-server-selection-04 Teemu Savolainen (Nokia) Jun-ya Kato (NTT) MIF WG meeting.
Slide #1IETF 77 – Roll WG – March 2010 ROLL RPL IETF 77 status draft-ietf-roll-rpl Tim Winter Pascal Thubert Design Team.
IAB/IESG Recommendations on IPv6 Address Allocation Bob Hinden at RIPE Sept Brian Carpenter at ARIN Oct Alain Durand at APNIC Oct
1 DNSOPS / Vienna IETF / July 2003 / Bob Hinden IPv6 DNS Discovery, and why it is important Bob Hinden.
IAB/IESG Recommendations on IPv6 Address Allocation Bob Hinden at RIPE Sept Brian Carpenter at ARIN Oct Alain Durand at APNIC Oct
DHCP: Dual-Stack Issues draft-ietf-dhc-dual-stack-01 Tim Chown dhc WG, IETF 60, San Diego, August 2, 2004.
Brett Neely IP Next Generation. To boldly go where no network has gone before...
IPv6 WORKING GROUP (IPNGWG) March 2001 Minneapolis IETF Bob Hinden / Nokia Steve Deering / Cisco Systems Co-Chairs.
IPv6 Document Status and Action Plan Margaret Wasserman IETF56 San Francisco March 2003.
Physical & Logical Address COMP 315. MAC Address A media access control address (MAC address) is a unique identifier assigned to network interfaces for.
3GPP-IPv6 Design Team Status August 2001 London IETF Bob Hinden / Nokia.
Local IPv6 Networking March 2000 Adelaide IETF Bob Hinden / Nokia.
July 16, Diameter EAP Application (draft-ietf-aaa-eap-02.txt) on behalf of...
IPv6 WORKING GROUP December 2001 Salt Lake City IETF Bob Hinden / Nokia Steve Deering / Cisco Systems Co-Chairs.
SHIM6 Protocol Drafts Overview Geoff Huston, Marcelo Bagnulo, Erik Nordmark.
IPv6 WORKING GROUP July 2002 Yokohama IETF Bob Hinden / Nokia Steve Deering / Cisco Systems Margaret Wasserman / Wind River Co-Chairs.
ICMP
IPv6 WORKING GROUP March 2002 Minneapolis IETF Bob Hinden / Nokia Steve Deering / Cisco Systems Co-Chairs.
OPSREA Open Meeting Area Directors: Dan Romascanu and Ron Bonica Monday, July 26, 2010 Afternoon Session 2, 15:20– 17:20, Brussels Room Discussion list.
IETF 81: V6OPS Working Group – Proxy Mobile IPv6 – Address Reservations 1 Reserved IPv6 Interface Identifier for Proxy Mobile IPv6 Sri Gundavelli (Cisco)
Chapter 20 Network Layer: Internet Protocol
Transient BCE for Proxy Mobile IPv6 draft-ietf-mipshop-transient-bce-pmipv6-00.txt Oliver Marco
IPv6 Working Group IETF58 Minneapolis November 2003 Bob Hinden & Brian Haberman Chairs.
IPv6 Site-Local Discussion Bob Hinden & Margaret Wasserman IETF 56 San Francisco March 2003.
IPv6 WORKING GROUP (IPv6 a.k.a. IPNGWG) August 2001 London IETF Bob Hinden / Nokia Steve Deering / Cisco Systems Co-Chairs.
OSPF WG – IETF 67 OSPF WG Document Status or “You can bring a Horse to Water …” Rohit Dube/Consultant Acee Lindem/Cisco Systems.
1 Requirements for Internet Routers (Gateways) and Hosts Relates to Lab 3. (Supplement) Covers the compliance requirements of Internet routers and hosts.
ICMPv6 Error Message Types Informational Message Types.
Dissuasion, Working Group Scope and Deliverables Lou Berger Pat Thaler
IPv6 WORKING GROUP (IPNGWG) December 2000 San Diego IETF Bob Hinden / Nokia Steve Deering / Cisco Systems Co-Chairs.
Dnssd requirements draft-ietf-dnssd-requirements-03 Kerry Lynn Stuart Cheshire Marc Blanchet Daniel Migault IETF 90, Toronto, 24 July
GEONET Brainstorming Document. Content Purpose of the document Brainstorming process / plan Proposed charter Assumptions Use cases Problem description.
1 ipv6-node-02.PPT/ 18 November 2002 / John Loughney IETF 55 IPv6 Working Group IPv6 Node Requirements draft-ietf-ipv6-node-requirements-02.txt John Loughney.
Routing Information Protocol
July 2007 CAPWAP Protocol Specification Editors' Report July 2007
NEMO Basic Support update IETF 61. Status IANA assignments done Very close to AUTH48 call Some issues raised recently We need to figure out if we want.
Autoconf WG 66 th IETF, Montreal. Agenda and Status (1/2) Agenda Bashing min WG & Doc Status
ISIS IETF 68 Chris Hopps, David Ward. Note Well Any submission to the IETF intended by the Contributor for publication as all or part of an IETF Internet-Draft.
CHAPTER 6: STATIC ROUTING Static Routing 2 nd semester
GEONET Brainstorming Document. Content Purpose of the document Brainstorming process / plan Proposed charter Assumptions Use cases Problem description.
1 cellhost-ipv6-52.ppt/ December 13, 2001 / John A. Loughney Minimum IPv6 Functionality for a Cellular Host John Loughney, Pertti Suomela, Juha Wiljakka,
1 Notes on 8BITMIME pre- evalution by IESG IETF 76 – Hiroshima November, 2009 Alexey Melnikov
1 IETF-70 draft-akhter-bmwg-mpls-meth MPLS Benchmarking Methodology draft-akhter-bmwg-mpls-meth-03 IETF 70 Aamer Akhter / Rajiv Asati /
1/7 zerouter BoF Problem Statement 19 th Nov th IETF - Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Multiple Interfaces (MIF) WG documents status MIF WG IETF 80, Prague Problem statement and current practices documents.
IPv6 Transition/Co-existence Security Considerations draft-ietf-v6ops-security-overview-04.txt Elwyn Davies Suresh Krishnan Pekka Savola IETF-66, Montreal,
David B. Johnson Rice University Department of Computer Science DSR Draft Status Monarch Project 57th IETF.
IPv6 Working Group IETF55 Atlanta November URL for Thermometer
1 Link Scoped IPv6 Multicast Addresses Jung-Soo Park, Myung-Ki Shin ETRI 54th IETF – Yokohama, Japan draft-ietf-ipv6-link-scoped-mcast-01.txt.
Lecture 13 IP V4 & IP V6. Figure Protocols at network layer.
Design Guidelines for IPv6 Networks draft-matthews-v6ops-design-guidelines Philip Matthews Alcatel-Lucent.
6 October 20031IPv6-WG - 9th Global Grid Forum, Chicago Guidelines for IP version independence in GGF specs T.Chown, J.Bound, S.Jiang Piers O’Hanlon.
Draft-ietf-ccamp-lmp-02.txt Link Management Protocol (LMP) LMP draft updates…  draft-ietf-ccamp-lmp-07.txt  draft-ietf-ccamp-lmp-wdm-01.txt  draft-ietf-ccamp-lmp-test-sonet-sdh-00.txt.
ITU Liaison on T-MPLS Stewart Bryant
IPng WORKING GROUP November 1999 Washington DC IETF Bob Hinden / Nokia Steve Deering / Cisco Systems Co-Chairs.
IPv6 Node Information Queries Update Bob Hinden Vienna IETF.
NEMO Basic Support Protocol IETF 60, San Diego
IETF57 Vienna July 2003 Bob Hinden & Margaret Wasserman Chairs
Address Resolution Protocol
IPv4 Support for Proxy Mobile IPv6 Ryuji Wakikawa & Sri Gundavelli
Internet Protocol, Version 6 (IPv6)
PW Control Word Stitching
IETF Montreal BFD YANG Data Model
IPv6 Current version of the Internet Protocol is Version 4 (v4)
Presentation transcript:

Node Information Queries July 2002 Yokohama IETF Bob Hinden / Nokia

Node Information Queries IP Version 6 Working Group (IPv6)Yokohama IETF 2 CHANGES IN NEW DRAFT (-09) Added Applicability Statement IPv6 Node Information Queries include the capability to provide forward and reverse name lookups independent of the DNS by sending packets directly to IPv6 nodes or groups of nodes. The applicability of these mechanics is currently limited to diagnostic and debugging tools. These mechanisms can be used to learn the addresses and names for nodes on the other end of a point-to-point link or nodes on a shared-medium link such as an Ethernet. This is very useful when debugging problems or when bringing up IPv6 service where there isn't global routing or DNS name services available. IPv6's large auto-configured addresses make debugging network problems and bringing up IPv6 service difficult without these mechanisms. An example of a IPv6 debugging tool using IPv6 Node Information Queries is the ping6 program in the KAME, USAGI, and other IPv6 implementations [KAME]. The mechanisms defined in this document may have wider applicability in the future (for example, name lookups in zero configuration networks, global reverse name lookups, etc.), but any use beyond debugging and diagnostic tools is left for further study and is beyond the scope of this document.

Node Information Queries IP Version 6 Working Group (IPv6)Yokohama IETF 3 IESG COMMENTS (1) Technical Comments –Text in draft inconsistent with Applicability Statement Several reference to use for DNS forward/reverse lookups –Missing guidance on using mechanisms for temporary addresses Need to update security considerations –Protocol has many options for extensions and is resulting complex IANA considerations allow anyone to get an code point for an extention.

Node Information Queries IP Version 6 Working Group (IPv6)Yokohama IETF 4 IESG COMMENTS (2) Meta Comments (e.g., use beyond Applicability text) –Potential problem of mixing or contaminating DNS Raises complex security and trust issues –Expressed concern people expressed on Ipng list that some feeling that using the ICMP mechanism as a replacement for DNS operations is a desirable approach –Document needs to be updated to clarify that results from ICMP lookups are never mixed with DNS lookups –Not consistent with use of reverse lookups as access control method

Node Information Queries IP Version 6 Working Group (IPv6)Yokohama IETF 5 NEXT STEPS Continue work on Draft? Update Draft –Address technical comments –Augment Applicability statement for meta comments