Surrey Mini-School Lecture 2 R. F. Casten. Outline Introduction, survey of data – what nuclei do Independent particle model and residual interactions.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A brief introduction D S Judson. Kinetic Energy Interactions between of nucleons i th and j th nucleons The wavefunction of a nucleus composed of A nucleons.
Advertisements

Some Aspects of Nuclear Structure Paddy Regan Department of Physics University of Surrey Guildford, UK IASEN School 1 Dec 2013 iThemba.
Some (more) Nuclear Structure
Collective properties of even- even nuclei Vibrators and rotors With three Appendices.
Shell Model and Collective Models in Nuclei Experimental and theoretical perspectives R. F. Casten WNSL, Yale Univ. RIKEN, January, 2010.
Isomer Spectroscopy in Near-Spherical Nuclei Lecture at the ‘School cum Workshop on Yrast and Near-Yrast Spectroscopy’ IIT Roorkee, October 2009 Paddy.
The Collective Model and the Fermi Gas Model
Single Particle and Collective Modes in Nuclei R. F. Casten WNSL, Yale June, 2009 Wright Nuclear Structure Laboratory Surrey Mini-School Lecture Series.
Single Particle and Collective Modes in Nuclei Lecture Series R. F. Casten WNSL, Yale Sept., 2008.
The Shell Model of the Nucleus 4. Applications – nuclear spin [Sec. 6.1 and 6.3 Dunlap]
II. Spontaneous symmetry breaking. II.1 Weinberg’s chair Hamiltonian rotational invariant Why do we see the chair shape? States of different IM are so.
Review Short range force, Pauli Principle  Shell structure, magic numbers, concept of valence nucleons Residual interactions  favoring of 0 + coupling:
The Collective Model Aard Keimpema.
(taken from H-J. Wolesheima,
Shell Model and Collective Models in Nuclei Experimental and theoretical perspectives R. F. Casten WNSL, Yale Univ. RIKEN, January, 2010.
Lectures on Nuclear Structure – What nuclei do and why: An empirical overview from a simple perspective CERN, July 2013 Richard F. Casten Yale University.
The proton-neutron interaction and the emergence of collectivity in atomic nuclei R. F. Casten Yale University BNL Colloquium, April 15, 2014 The field.
Multipole Decomposition of Residual Interactions We have seen that the relative energies of 2-particle systems affected by a residual interaction depend.
Shell Model with residual interactions – mostly 2-particle systems Simple forces, simple physical interpretation.
P461 - Nuclei II1 Nuclear Shell Model Potential between nucleons can be studied by studying bound states (pn, ppn, pnn, ppnn) or by scattering cross sections:
The Quantum Mechanical Picture of the Atom
Microwave Spectroscopy II
How nuclei behave: a simple perspective based on symmetry and geometry (with a discussion of the microscopic drivers of structural evolution) R. F. Casten.
The IBA The Interacting Boson Approximation Model Preliminary review of collective behavior in nuclei Collective models, and why the IBA Basic ideas about.
IBA Lecture part 2. Most general IBA Hamiltonian in terms with up to four boson operators (given N) IBA Hamiltonian Mixes d and s components of the wave.
The Shell Model of the Nucleus 5. Nuclear moments
Nuclei with more than one valence nucleon Multi-particle systems.
Atomic Orbitals, Electron Configurations, and Atomic Spectra
Seniority A really cool and amazing thing that is far more powerful than the casual way it is often invoked. It is the foundation, for example, for: Enormous.
5. Exotic modes of nuclear rotation Tilted Axis Cranking -TAC.
FermiGasy. W. Udo Schröder, 2005 Angular Momentum Coupling 2 Addition of Angular Momenta    
4. The rotating mean field. The mean field concept A nucleon moves in the mean field generated by all nucleons. The mean field is a functional of the.
Themes and challenges of Modern Science Complexity out of simplicity -- Microscopic How the world, with all its apparent complexity and diversity can be.
Lecture 20: More on the deuteron 18/11/ Analysis so far: (N.B., see Krane, Chapter 4) Quantum numbers: (J , T) = (1 +, 0) favor a 3 S 1 configuration.
Collective Model. Nuclei Z N Character j Q obs. Q sp. Qobs/Qsp 17 O 8 9 doubly magic+1n 5/ K doubly magic -1p 3/
Shape phase transition in neutron-rich even-even light nuclei with Z=20-28 H.B.Bai X.W.Li H.F.Dong W.C.Cao Department of Physics, Chifeng University, Chifeng.
Experimental evidence for closed nuclear shells Neutron Proton Deviations from Bethe-Weizsäcker mass formula: mass number A B/A (MeV per nucleon)
The Algebraic Approach 1.Introduction 2.The building blocks 3.Dynamical symmetries 4.Single nucleon description 5.Critical point symmetries 6.Symmetry.
1 Proton-neutron pairing by G-matrix in the deformed BCS Soongsil University, Korea Eun Ja Ha Myung-Ki Cheoun.
Nuclear Models Nuclear force is not yet fully understood.
Interpreting and predicting structure Useful interpretative models; p-n interaction Second Lecture.
How do nuclei rotate? 1. The molecular picture.
Quantum-Mechanical View of Atoms
The Shell Model of the Nucleus 1. Evidences [Sec. 5.1 and 5.2 Dunlap]
Shell Model with residual interactions – mostly 2-particle systems Start with 2-particle system, that is a nucleus „doubly magic + 2“ Consider two identical.
Lecture 23: Applications of the Shell Model 27/11/ Generic pattern of single particle states solved in a Woods-Saxon (rounded square well)
Shell Model with residual interactions – mostly 2-particle systems Simple forces, simple physical interpretation Lecture 2.
Quantum Phase Transitions (QPT) in Finite Nuclei R. F. Casten June 21, 2010, CERN/ISOLDE.
Quantum Two 1. 2 Angular Momentum and Rotations 3.
Nuclear and Radiation Physics, BAU, 1 st Semester, (Saed Dababneh). 1 Shell model Notes: 1. The shell model is most useful when applied to closed-shell.
Shell structure: ~ 1 MeV Quantum phase transitions: ~ 100s keV Collective effects: ~ 100s keV Interaction filters: ~ keV Binding energies, Separation.
July 29-30, 2010, Dresden 1 Forbidden Beta Transitions in Neutrinoless Double Beta Decay Kazuo Muto Department of Physics, Tokyo Institute of Technology.
Some (more) High(ish)-Spin Nuclear Structure Paddy Regan Department of Physics Univesity of Surrey Guildford, UK Lecture 2 Low-energy.
The Semi-empirical Mass Formula
Quantum phase transitions and structural evolution in nuclei.
Quantum Phase Transitions in Nuclei
Quantum Phase Transition from Spherical to γ-unstable for Bose-Fermi System Mahmut Böyükata Kırıkkale University Turkey collabration with Padova–Sevilla.
Monday, Oct. 2, 2006PHYS 3446, Fall 2006 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 3446 – Lecture #8 Monday, Oct. 2, 2006 Dr. Jae Yu 1.Nuclear Models Shell Model Collective Model.
Pairing Evidence for pairing, what is pairing, why pairing exists, consequences of pairing – pairing gap, quasi-particles, etc. For now, until we see what.
Rotational energy term in the empirical formula for the yrast energies in even-even nuclei Eunja Ha and S. W. Hong Department of Physics, Sungkyunkwan.
Determining Reduced Transition Probabilities for 152 ≤ A ≤ 248 Nuclei using Interacting Boson Approximation (IBA-1) Model By Dr. Sardool Singh Ghumman.
Seniority A really cool and amazing thing
Surrey Mini-School Lecture 2 R. F. Casten
Identical Particles We would like to move from the quantum theory of hydrogen to that for the rest of the periodic table One electron atom to multielectron.
Nuclear Chemistry CHEM 396 Chapter 4, Part B Dr. Ahmad Hamaed
Lecture 5-6 xxxxxxx.
PHL424: Shell model with residual interaction
Nuclear Physics, JU, Second Semester,
Multipole Decomposition of Residual Interactions
How do nuclei rotate? 1. The molecular picture.
Presentation transcript:

Surrey Mini-School Lecture 2 R. F. Casten

Outline Introduction, survey of data – what nuclei do Independent particle model and residual interactions – Particles in orbits in the nucleus – Residual interactions: results and simple physical interpretation – Multipole decomposition – Seniority – the best thing since buffalo mozzarella Collective models -- Geometrical – Vibrational models – Deformed rotors – Axially asymmetric rotors – Quantum phase transitions Linking the microscopic and macroscopic – p-n interactions The Interacting Boson Approximation (IBA) model

Independent Particle Model – Uh –oh !!! Trouble shows up

Mottelson (Nobel Prize for the Unified Model, 1975) – ANL, Sept Shell gaps, magic numbers, and shell structure are not merely details but are fundamental to our understanding of one of the most basic features of nuclei – independent particle motion. If we don’t understand the basic quantum levels of nucleons in the nucleus, we don’t understand nuclei. Moreover, perhaps counter-intuitively, the emergence of nuclear collectivity itself depends on independent particle motion (and the Pauli Principle). Shell Structure

Independent Particle Model Some great successes (for nuclei that are “doubly magic plus 1”). Clearly inapplicable for nuclei with more than one particle outside a doubly magic “core”. In fact, in such nuclei, it is not even defined. Thus, as is, it is applicable to only a couple % of nuclei. Residual interactions and angular momentum coupling to the rescue.

Shell Model with residual interactions – mostly 2-particle systems Simple forces, simple physical interpretation

Residual Interactions Need to consider a more complete Hamiltonian: H = H 0 + H residual H residual reflects interactions not in the single particle potential. NOT a minor perturbation. In fact, these residual interactions determine almost everything we know about most nuclei. Start with 2- particle system, that is, a nucleus “doubly magic + 2”. H residual is H 12 (r 12 ) Consider two identical valence nucleons with j 1 and j 2. Two questions: What total angular momenta j 1 + j 2 = J can be formed? What are the energies of states with these J values?

Coupling of two angular momenta j 1 + j 2 All values from: j 1 – j 2 to j 1 + j 2 (j 1 = j 2 ) Example: j 1 = 3, j 2 = 5: J = 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 BUT: For j 1 = j 2 : J = 0, 2, 4, 6, … ( 2j – 1) (Why these?) /

How can we know which total J values are obtained for the coupling of two identical nucleons in the same orbit with total angular momentum j? Several methods: easiest is the “m-scheme”.

Can we obtain such simple results by considering residual interactions?

Separate radial and angular coordinates

Extending the IPM with residual interactions Consider now an extension of, say, the Ca nuclei to 43 Ca, with three particles in a j= 7/2 orbit outside a closed shell? How do the three particle angular momenta, j, couple to give final total J values? If we use the m-scheme for three particles in a 7/2 orbit the allowed J values are 15/2, 11/2, 9/2, 7/2, 5/2, 3/2. For the case of J = 7/2, two of the particles must have their angular momenta coupled to J = 0, giving a total J = 7/2 for all three particles. For the J = 15/2, 11/2, 9/2, 5/2, and 3/2, there are no pairs of particles coupled to J = 0. Since a J = 0 pair is the lowest configuration for two particles in the same orbit, that case, namely total J = 7/2, must lie lowest !!

Treat as 20 protons and 20 neutrons forming a doubly magic core with angular momentum J = 0. The lowest energy for the 3-particle configuration is therefore J = 7/2. Note that the key to this is the results we have discussed for the 2-particle system !! 43 Ca

How can we understand the energy patterns that we have seen for two – particle spectra with residual interactions? Easy – involves a very beautiful application of the Pauli Principle.

x

This is the most important slide: understand this and all the key ideas about residual interactions will be clear !!!!!

R 4/2 < 2.0

Backups

Residual interactions –Pairing – coupling of two identical nucleons to angular momentum zero. No preferred direction in space, therefore drives nucleus towards spherical shapes –p-n interactions – generate configuration mixing, unequal magnetic state occupations, therefore drive towards collective structures and deformation –Monopole component of p-n interactions generates changes in single particle energies and shell structure Shell model too crude. Need to add in extra interactions among valence nucleons outside closed shells. These dominate the evolution of Structure

So, we will have a Hamiltonian H = H 0 + H resid. where H 0 is that of the Ind. Part. Model We need to figure out what H resid. does.

Think of the three particles as How do the 2 behave? We have now seen that they prefer to form a J = 0 state.