MILGRAM’S EXPERIMENT A STUDY IN OBEDIENCE

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
“First They Came for the Jews” By Pastor Martin Niemöller
Advertisements

Milgram Experiment By Sean Shtofman.
Milgram, S. (1963). Behavioral study of Obedience.
Warm up! 1.Stand up 2.Shake the hand of the person next to you 3.Sit down 4.Clap your hands together five times 5.Moo like a cow.
Conformity How similar are we to sheep and lemmings?
Two Minutes Hate Discuss: What is Two Minutes Hate? What is the purpose? How does Winston feel about it? How do others seem to feel about it?
Why do we obey authority?
Obedience to Authority: An Experiment by Stanley Milgram
Stanley Milgram A lesson in obeying. How far do you think people will go in the name of obedience?
The Psychology of Evil How far will people go in the name of obedience?
AP Psychology.  What is obedience?  Who do we obey?  Why do we obey?  What would you do if a person of authority asked you do something illegal? 
Chapter 10 Social Psychology Title: Obey at Any Cost Author: S. Milgram (1963). Presented by Kelley Reinhardt May 5, 2004.
Social Psychology Lecture 14 Obedience and deindividuation Jane Clarbour Room: PS/B007 jc129.
Obedience to Authority. What Makes People Obey Authority? Why do you do what I tell you to do? Why do you do what I tell you to do? Who else do you obey?
Obedience to Authority: The Stanley Milgram Experiments Mr. Koch AP Psychology Forest Lake High School Obedience = changing behavior in response to a demand.
Understanding Ethics in Psychology
Obedience Why do we obey?. Why do we obey orders that we know are immoral or wrong? Germans who helped kill Jews in Europe. Serbs who killed Muslims in.
BEHAVIORAL STUDY OF OBEDIENCE
The Milgram Experiment. The Milgram Experiment was a series of social psychology experiments conducted in the early 1960s by Yale University psychologist.
Contributor© POSbase 2005 Obedience to Authority Obviously, Nazi criminals were not monsters, but normal citizens and caring fathers who were willing to.
The Milgram Obedience Experiment The Perils of Obedience "The social psychology of this century reveals a major lesson: often it is not so much the kind.
Stanley Milgram “The Obedience Experiment”. Milgram’s background Completed his undergraduate degree at Queens College in Political Science Went to Harvard.
Human Subjects’ Research. Learning Objectives Discuss key ethical concerns The role of the IRB Principles and origin of Belmont Report Principle of informed.
“Ordinary People” Doing Evil
Can people be forced to do something against their will? Have you ever? How?
PSYA2 – Social Influence
Meeus and Raaijmaker (1986). Background Meeus and Raaijmakers were critical of Milgram’s research. They thought parts of it were ambiguous – for example,
THE MILGRAM EXPERIMENT
Milgram’s Experiment. The Purpose of the Experiment Prompted by Milgram’s interest in Eichmann and the Nazi’s obedience to Hitler in the Holocaust. This.
Obedience to Authority “The Final Solution”. The Holocaust “The Nazi extermination of European Jews is the most extreme instance of abhorrent immoral.
AICE.Milgram.

Adolf Eichmann. What is this man famous for? What do you think we will be looking at this lesson?
3 The Influence of Other People on Attitudes and Behaviour GV917.
ADAPTED FROM SIMPLYPSYCHOLOGY The Milgram Experiment.
Obedience Obedience compliance of person is due to perceived authority of asker request is perceived as a command Milgram interested in unquestioning obedience.
Corruption and Obedience Marc Le Menestrel Associate Professor, UPF, Barcelona Visiting Professor of Ethics, INSEAD -
AS level Psychology The core studies The Social Approach.
Obedience.
Milgram, obedience & environmental determinism
Milgram (1963)’The behavioural study of obedience’
Conformity and Obedience to Authority
How Do Others Affect the Individual?
Conformity and Obedience to Authority. What is Conformity? Quick Write: What do you think of when you hear the word ‘conformity’? Why do people conform?
What is obedience? Lesson 2 – Social Learning Unit 2 – Understanding other people.
Groups & Obedience The Milgram Experiment
Milgram’s Experiment.
The Psychology of Evil How far will people go in the name of obedience?
Another inconvenient truth Are YOU capable of cold blooded murder?
FINALIZE MYTHBUSTING Score Worksheets. SECRETS OF THE PSYCHICS Correct Worksheets.
Milgram A behavioural study of obedience (1963). Obedience What do you think is meant by the term obedience? What do you think is meant by the term obedience?
MILGRAM’S EXPERIMENT A STUDY IN OBEDIENCE. What was the Experiment? The Milgram Experiment was a social psychology experiment conducted by Yale University.
Conformity. Results Even though the correct answer was always obvious, the average subject conformed to the group response on 32% of the trials and 74%
Social Psychology Miss Bird
MILGRAM’S EXPERIMENT A STUDY IN OBEDIENCE
Milgram Experiment.
“The Obedience Experiment”
Conformity and Obedience
Obedience Today.
The Milgram Experiment
How far will people go in the name of obedience?
Obedience to Authority: The Stanley Milgram Experiments
Milgram (1963)’The behavioural study of obedience’
Conformity and Obedience to Authority
How far will people go in the name of obedience?
The Milgram Experiment
Component 2: Psychological themes through core studies
The Milgram Experiment
Presentation transcript:

MILGRAM’S EXPERIMENT A STUDY IN OBEDIENCE AP PSYCHOLOGY Wadlington

What was the Experiment? The Milgram Experiment was a social psychology experiment conducted by Yale University psychologist Stanley Milgram. It measured the willingness of participants to obey an authority figure who instructed them to perform acts that possibly conflicted with their personal conscience. Stanley Milgram

Milgram’s Experiment The experiments began in July 1961, three months after the start of the trial of Nazi war criminal Adolf Eichmann. Milgram devised the experiments to answer the question: "Could it be that Eichmann and his million accomplices in the Holocaust were just following orders?”

Experiment Participants There were three roles in the experiment: Experimenter Teacher Learner In this experiment, both the experimenter and the learner were actors following a script. The only person really being experimented on was the “teacher.”

The Experimenter and Learner The role of the experimenter was played by a stern, impassive biology teacher dressed in a technician's coat, and the learner was played by an Irish- American accountant trained to act for the role.

The Setup The participant and the learner were told by the experimenter that they would be participating in an experiment helping his study of memory and learning in different situations. Two slips of paper were then presented to the participant and to the actor. The participant was led to believe that one of the slips said "learner" and the other said "teacher," and that he and the actor had been given the slips randomly. In reality, both said “teacher.”

Strapping Down the Learner The “teacher” then had to help strap the “learner” into a chair and attach electrical clamps to him. The “learner” was sure to mention the fact that he had a heart condition.

Separation The “teacher” and the experimenter then went to a connected, room. The "teacher" was given a 45-volt electric shock from the electro-shock generator as a sample of the shock that the "learner" would supposedly receive during the experiment.

The “Test” The "teacher" was then given a list of word pairs which he was to teach the learner. The teacher began by reading the list of word pairs to the learner. The teacher would then read the first word of each pair and read four possible answers. The learner would press a button to indicate his response. If the answer was incorrect, the teacher would administer a shock to the learner, with the voltage increasing for each wrong answer. If correct, the teacher would read the next word pair.

The Room Setup

Deception The subjects believed that for each wrong answer, the learner was receiving actual shocks. In reality, there were no shocks. After the confederate was separated from the subject, the confederate set up a tape recorder integrated with the electro-shock generator, which played pre-recorded sounds for each shock level.

Low Level Shock After a number of voltage level increases, the actor started to bang on the wall that separated him from the subject. After several times banging on the wall and complaining about his heart condition, all responses by the learner would cease.

Early Reactions At this point, many people indicated their desire to stop the experiment and check on the learner. Some test subjects paused at 135 volts and began to question the purpose of the experiment. Most continued after being assured that they would not be held responsible.

Small Prompts If at any time the subject indicated his desire to halt the experiment, he was given a succession of verbal prods by the experimenter, in this order: “Please continue” “The experiment requires that you continue” “It is absolutely essential that you continue” “You have no other choice, you must go on”

Putting a Stop to Things If the subject still wished to stop after all four successive verbal prods, the experiment was halted. Otherwise, it was halted after the subject had given the maximum 450-volt shock three times in succession.

Truly Shocking In Milgram's first set of experiments, 65 percent (26 of 40) of experiment participants administered the experiment's final 450-volt shock, though many were very uncomfortable doing so At some point, every participant paused and questioned the experiment. However, no participant completly refused to administer shocks before 300-volts.

Perception vs. Reality During a conference, before to reveal what the participants did, Milgram asked how they would have reacted in such a situation. Unanimously they replied that they would have stopped despite of the experimenter's orders at less than 300V. I observed a mature and initially poised businessman enter the laboratory smiling and confident. Within 20 minutes he was reduced to a twitching, stuttering wreck, who was rapidly approaching nervous collapse. He constantly pulled on his ear lobe and twisted his hands. At one point he pushed his fist into his forehead and muttered “Oh God, lets stop it.” And yet he continued to respond to every word of the experimenter, and obeyed to the end.”

Interpretations By modern standards, Milgram’s study was unethical. Nonetheless, it still remains a landmark experiment in psychology. From this experiment, Milgram developed two critical theories:

Theory of Conformism: A subject who has neither ability nor expertise to make decisions, especially in a crisis, will leave decision making to the group and its hierarchy. The group is the person's behavioral model. Agentic State Theory: The essence of obedience consists in the fact that a person comes to view himself as the instrument for carrying out another person's wishes, and he therefore no longer sees himself as responsible for his actions.