Summative Jeopardy Summing Up Summative Decision- Making.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Advertisements

The SCPS Professional Growth System
Educational Specialists Performance Evaluation System
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System. Future-Ready Students For the 21st Century The guiding mission of the North Carolina State Board of Education.
PORTFOLIO.
Gwinnett Teacher Effectiveness System Training
Virginia Teacher Performance Evaluation System 0 August 2012.
Preparing for Learning Objectives Review the TAPS component of the Cobb Keys for Teacher Effectiveness Explore the Teacher Performance Standards.
APS Teacher Evaluation Module 9 Part B: Summative Ratings.
Understanding the EPC Rating rubrics
August 2014 The Oregon Matrix Model was submitted to USED on May 1, 2014 and is pending approval* as of 8/8/14 *Please note content may change Oregon’s.
Professional Development and Appraisal System
Virginia Teacher Performance Evaluation System
New Teacher Performance Evaluation Program
Stronge Leader Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
OverviewOverview Virginia Principal Performance Evaluation System February 2013.
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Differentiated Supervision
The New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation System Natick Public Schools.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY13-14 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Interim Evaluation Documents evidence of meeting standards
TEACHER KEYS EFFECTIVENESS SYSTEM (TKES). WHY TKES? HOUSE BILL 244 Passed during 2013 legislative session Mandates use of single, state-wide evaluation.
Today’s website:
Prince William County Schools Professional Performance Process
Teacher and Leader Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
Document Review STANDARDEVIDENCE Standard 1 - Professional KnowledgeDocumentation and Observation Standard 2 - Instructional PlanningDocumentation and.
Brooke Bennett. *National Educational Technology Standards and Performance Indicators for Teachers* 1. Facilitate & inspire student learning and creativity.
SENIOR SEMINAR IN PHYSICAL EDUCATION What am I responsible for?
Teacher Keys Effectiveness System Forsyth County Schools Orientation May 2013 L.. Allison.
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
Requirements are now 20 hours per year. July 1 – June 30 1.School calendar changes 2.Out of district opportunities 3.Online opportunities - Safe Schools.
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
Professional Performance Process Presented at March 2012 Articulation Meetings.
Student Achievement Teacher and Leader Effectiveness Principal Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Overview.
Type Date Here Type Presenter Name/Contact Here Making Evaluation Work at Your School Leadership Institute 2012.
Kathy Mears National Catholic Educational Association Teacher Performance Development Process.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 9: Annual Evaluation Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
DVC Essay #2. The Essay  Read the following six California Standards for Teachers.  Discuss each standard and the elements that follow them  Choose.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Update 11/29/12.
Making Plans for the Future April 29, 2013 Brenda M. Tanner, Ed.D.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
Primary Purposes of the Evaluation System
Student Achievement Teacher and Leader Effectiveness Stronge and Associates Educational Consulting, LLC  Uniform evaluation system for teachers, educational.
Guidelines for Uniform Performance Standards and Evaluation Criteria for Teachers Virginia Department of Education Approved April 2011.
Summary of the International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE) and NCATE's Educational Computing and Technology facilitation Standards for K-12.
Assessment Design. Four Professional Learning Modules 1.Unpacking the AC achievement standards 2.Validity and reliability of assessments 3. Confirming.
Guidelines for Uniform Performance Standards and Evaluation Criteria for Teachers Virginia Department of Education Approved April 2011.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 6: Informal Observations Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
Candidate Assessment of Performance CAP The Evidence Binder.
COMPONENT THREE MONITORING LEARNING PROGRESS WHAT IS THE SCHOOL’S ASSESSMENT PLAN? HOW IS THE ASSESSMENT DATA ANALYZED AND KNOWN? HOW DID THE RESULTS IMPACT.
Candidate Assessment of Performance CAP The Evidence Binder.
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
Principal Evaluation Code of Virginia states that: Principal evaluations be consistent with the 7 Standards set forth by the state.
SENIOR SEMINAR IN PHYSICAL EDUCATION What am I responsible for?
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
Standard One: Engaging & Supporting All Students in Learning
Richmond Public Schools Overview for teachers and administrators
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria
Personal Growth and Professional Development
Uniform Performance Standards for Educators Reflective Practice and…The Butterfly Effect LEVEL II Transitions
TKES and SLO assessments
Insert your name and a picture. Change the Design Template.
ADEPT Performance Standards
Professional Portfolio
Teacher Practice Instruments
CLASS KeysTM Module 6: Informal Observations Spring 2010
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13
Presentation transcript:

Summative Jeopardy Summing Up Summative Decision- Making

Summative Categories Just the Facts Ma’am If You Knew Standards Like I Know Standards How do I Rate? Summative Trivia (True or False) What’s it Worth to Ya?

To be completed before the last week of school. Summative Evaluation

It is recommended that this standard account for 40% of a teacher’s summative evaluation. Student academic progress

The total number of performance standards rated in summative assessment. 7

Daily Doubl e

The summative evaluation represents where the _______________ exists, based on various data sources. Preponderance of evidence

This is a behavioral summary scale that describes acceptable performance levels for each of the seven teacher performance standards. Performance Rubric

The teacher receives one point for this rating. Unacceptable

The teacher receives 3 points for this rating. Proficient

The teacher receives 2 points for this rating. Developing/Needs Improvement

The teacher receives 4 points for this rating. Exemplary

How many points are needed for an overall summative rating of Exemplary? 34

The teacher demonstrates an understanding of the curriculum, subject content, and the developmental needs of students by providing relevant learning experiences. Professional Knowledge

The teacher uses resources, routines, and procedures to provide a respectful, positive, safe, student- centered environment that is conducive to learning. Learning Environment

The teacher effectively engages students in learning by using a variety of instructional strategies in order to meet individual learning needs. Instructional Delivery

The teacher maintains a commitment to professional ethics, communicates effectively, and takes responsibility for and participates in professional growth that results in enhanced student learning. Professionalism

The teacher plans using the Virginia Standards of Learning, the school’s curriculum, effective strategies, resources, and data to meet the needs of all students. Instructional Planning

This is where most teachers will fall on the performance rating scale. Proficient

This person has the ultimate responsibility for ensuring that the teacher evaluation system is executed faithfully and effectively in the school. Site Administrator

Teachers who earn the _____________ rating must meet the requirements of the proficient level and go beyond it. Exemplary

A teacher who receives this rating consistently meets the job requirements, has a positive impact on learners, and is willing to learn and apply new skills. Proficient

Ratings are NOT made at the performance indicator level, they are made at the _____________. Performance standard level

In the teacher performance evaluation system, there are five levels of ratings. True or False? False ‒ four rating levels

Evaluators have until March 1, 2012 to complete the second observation of probationary teachers. True or False? False ‒ end of second quarter

The results of the summative evaluation are discussed with the teacher at a formative evaluation conference. True or False? False ‒ summative evaluation conference

The evaluator should determine where the “preference of evidence” exists in making judgments for summative assessment on each of the seven teacher performance standards. True or False? False ‒ preponderance

The overall summative score would be 36 for a teacher who received exemplary on standards 1-6 and proficient on standard 7 True or False? True ‒ (6 x 4 pts) + (4 x 3 pts) = 36 pts