Doc.: IEEE 802.11-13/0800r3 SubmissionHemanth Sampath, QualcommSlide 1 HEW Study Group Documentation Date: 2013-07-15 Authors: July 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1100r0 September 2013 Osama Aboul-Magd (Huawei Technologies)Slide 1 HEW SG Progress Review Date: Authors:
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /1176r0 Submission Sep 2013 Reza Hedayat (Cisco Systems) Slide 1 Some Simulation Scenarios for HEW NameAffiliationPhone Reza HedayatCisco.
Doc.: IEEE hew Submission Sep 2013 Slide 1 PAR and 5C: Comments and some draft text based on n Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1225r1 Considerations on CCA for OBSS Opearation in ax Date: Slide 1Huawei Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0543r0 Submission May 2015 TG ax Scenarios Proposed additions for frequency re-use Date: Authors: Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide.
Doc.: IEEE /568r0 Submission Frequency Selective Scheduling (FSS) for TGax OFDMA May 2015 Slide 1 Date: Authors: Kome Oteri (InterDigital)
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/1162r1 September 2014 Eric Wong et al (Apple)Slide 1 Energy Efficiency Evaluation Methodology Follow Up Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0861r0 SubmissionSayantan Choudhury Impact of CCA adaptation on spatial reuse in dense residential scenario Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0053r0 Submission Jan Zhang Jiayin (Huawei Technologies)Slide 1 Further Considerations on Calibration of System Level Simulation.
Doc.: IEEE /0107 Jan 2014 SubmissionYonggang Fang et. al. (ZTE) HEW Evaluation Metrics Date: Slide 1 Authors: NameAffiliationAddress .
Doc.: IEEE /1126r0 Submission September 2012 Krishna Sayana, SamsungSlide 1 Wi-Fi for Hotspot Deployments and Cellular Offload Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0323r0 SubmissionRon Porat, BroadcomSlide 1 Views on ah Use Cases Date: Authors: March 2011.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/0070r0 Jan 2014 Josiam et.al., SamsungSlide 1 Joint MAC/PHY Evaluation Methodology Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0789r0 July 2015 Allan Jones, ActivisionSlide 1 Proposed changes to Evaluation Methodologies Date: ?? Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/0026r1 January 2014 Yong Liu, et al.Slide 1 Thoughts on HEW PAR Date: Authors:
Doc. No. IEEE hew-r1 Submission July 2013 Klaus Doppler, NokiaSlide 1 Evaluation Criteria and Simulation Scenarios Date: July 16, 2013 Authors:
September 2013 doc.: IEEE 11-13/1105r0 Submission Meng Yang (CATR) Discussion on Access Mechanism for HEW Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /1153r0 Submission September 2013 Laurent Cariou (Orange)Slide 1 Simulation scenario proposal Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0486r1 Submission May 2013 Ron Porat, Broadcom HEW- Metrics, Targets, Simulation Scenarios Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /1081r0 SubmissionSayantan Choudhury HEW Simulation Methodology Date: Sep 16, 2013 Authors: Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /0065r0 Submission January 2014 William Carney, SONYSlide 1 Comments on Draft HEW PAR Date: Authors:
Doc.: ax Submission July 2014 Slide 1 Proposed Calibration For MAC simulator Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0757r0 Submission July 2013 Ron Porat, Broadcom Evaluation Methodology and Simulation Scenarios Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Sep 2013 Jinsoo Choi, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 Discussion on HEW Functional Requirements Date: Authors:
Doc.:IEEE /0821r3 Submission July 2008 Minho Cheong, ETRISlide 1 Some Ambiguities about Throughput Conditions in PAR Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0542r0 SubmissionSimone Merlin, QualcommSlide 1 HEW Scenarios and Goals Date: Authors: May 2013.
Doc.: IEEE /1407r0 SubmissionSlide 1 Simulation Based Study of QoE Date: Authors: Chao-Chun Wang, MediaTek Nov NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/0866r0 July 2014 Johan Söder, Ericsson ABSlide 1 Traffic modeling and system capacity performance measure Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1401r0 Nov Josiam, Kuo, Taori et.al., SamsungSlide 1 System Level Assessments for Outdoor HEW Deployments Date: YYYY-MM-DD.
Discussion on ax functional requirements
Doc.: IEEE /0805-r1 SubmissionSlide 1 On Definition of Dense Networks and Performance Metric Date: Authors: Jianhan Liu, etc. Mediatek.
Doc.: IEEE /0386r0 SubmissionSlide 1 Discussions on MCS selection for SLS calibration Date: Authors: Tianyu Wu etc. MediaTek March.
Doc.: IEEE /1000r1 Submission Aug 2013 Simone Merlin (Qualcomm)Slide 1 Simulation Scenarios Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0805-r0 SubmissionSlide 1 On Definition of Dense Networks and Performance Metric Date: Authors: Jianhan Liu, etc. Mediatek.
Doc.: IEEE / Submission March 2013 Juho Pirskanen, Renesas Mobile CorporationSlide 1 Discussion On Basic Technical Aspects for HEW Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0341r2 Submission March 2011 MediaTek, Inc Slide 1 Usage Cases for ah Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1054 Sept 2013 SubmissionYonggang Fang, ZTETX HEW Evaluation Metrics Suggestions Date: Slide 1 Authors: NameAffiliationAddress .
Doc.: IEEE /1226r0 Submission Sep 2014 Slide 1 SLS Box 1&2 Calibration Results Date: Authors: Russell Huang (MediaTek)
Doc.: IEEE /0161r1 Submission doc.: IEEE /1032r0 Slide 1 Simulation Scenario for OBSS in Home Network Date: Authors: September.
Doc.: IEEE /1366r3 Submission November 2013 Laurent Cariou (Orange)Slide 1 Some propositions to progress towards the PAR definition Date: 2013-xx-11Authors:
Simulation Scenarios Date: Authors: Aug 2013 May 2013
Proposed basis for PAR discussion
Discussions on 11ac PHY Efficiency
Requirements Discussion
High-efficiency WLAN Straw poll
On High Efficiency WLAN (HEW) TG PAR Scope
Home Network Simulation Scenario with OBSS
Some propositions to progress towards the PAR definition
Below 6GHz 11vht PAR scope and purpose discussion
Discussions on 11ac PHY Efficiency
Some propositions to progress towards the PAR definition
High-efficiency WLAN Straw poll
802.11ax Timeline Scenarios Date: Authors: May 2014
HEW Study Group Documentation
High-efficiency WLAN Straw poll
High-efficiency WLAN Straw poll
MU-MIMO support for Heterogeneous Devices
High-efficiency WLAN Straw poll
Discussions on 11ac PHY Efficiency
Efficient Frequency Spectrum Utilization
Discussions on 11ac PHY Efficiency
Some propositions to progress towards the PAR definition
High-efficiency WLAN Straw poll
Distributed MU-MIMO and HARQ Support for EHT
Simulation Scenarios Date: Authors: Aug 2013 May 2013
TG ax Scenarios Proposed additions for frequency re-use
LC MAC submission – follow up
Consideration on System Level Simulation
Proposed basis for PAR discussion
LC MAC submission – follow up
Presentation transcript:

doc.: IEEE /0800r3 SubmissionHemanth Sampath, QualcommSlide 1 HEW Study Group Documentation Date: Authors: July 2013

doc.: IEEE /0800r3 Submission Abstract This presentation provides our view on the Study Group documentation that could help define PAR and enhance TG spec development. July 2013 Hemanth Sampath, QualcommSlide 2

doc.: IEEE /0800r3 Submission Background: 11ac PAR and Documentation 11ac PAR focused on optimizing link throughput in an isolated BSS. –PAR: “A maximum multi-station (STA) throughput (measured at the MAC data service access point), of at least 1 Gbps and a maximum single link throughput (measured at the MAC data service access point), of at least 500 Mbps.” Techniques & potential gains over 11n were understood even during SG phase. –MIMO, 80 MHz BW, MU-MIMO etc. –11ac 5C feasibility demonstration was relatively easy. The following documents were not needed until TG phase. –Channel model document. –Functional Requirements, Evaluation Methodology & Simulation Scenario document (FR-EM document). July 2013 Hemanth Sampath, QualcommSlide 3

doc.: IEEE /0800r3 Submission HEW PAR and Documentation HEW study group formed in March 2013 has a focus on improving efficiency & area throughputs in indoor and outdoor environments, dense networks, moderate to heavy user loaded APs, and presence of interfering sources. HEW SG is faced with a different set of challenges compared to VHT SG. –Don’t understand what metrics to use in PAR. –Don’t understand how to assess feasibility. –Don’t know how to quantify gains over 11ac. Hence, HEW SG may need some additional “guiding” documents to help form PAR metrics and feasibility [1] –These documents can be leveraged by TG, to create the appropriate TG documents, and help accelerate overall spec development process. July 2013 Hemanth Sampath, QualcommSlide 4

doc.: IEEE /0800r3 Submission Proposed Document Creation in SG Usage Model Document incorporating WFA feedback. –To have clear understanding of key categories and priorities for HEW. Channel Model document –Identify Indoor & outdoor channel models, derived from usage models Simulation Scenario document –Identify a minimum set of representative simulation scenarios (e.g.: residential, enterprise and/or outdoor metro), derived from usage models. –Include associated traffic models, metrics and reference channel models. Evaluation Methodology document –Identify performance comparison metrics to evaluate gains of proposals. –Include PHY and MAC modeling parameters, PHY abstraction & interference modeling. Note: Above SG Documents can be developed in parallel. July 2013 Hemanth Sampath, QualcommSlide 5

doc.: IEEE /0800r3 Submission Benefits of Early SG Documentation Help form PAR metrics and scope. Establishes well-defined scenarios and test methodology to evaluate potential gains and feasibility. –Needed anyway in TG to reproduce/verify results or show gains. –Avoids scenarios where proposals use “concocted simulations” to show gains. Accelerate TG process. –Why wait until TG launch to start developing these documents ? –Early documentation avoids lengthy “process” debates in TG phase. July 2013 Hemanth Sampath, QualcommSlide 6

doc.: IEEE /0800r3 Submission Strawpoll #1 Results Do you agree with the proposal to develop document(s) covering the following components ? –Channel model –Simulation scenario –Evaluation methodology These document(s) can be leveraged by TG, to create the appropriate TG documents. Yes - 95 No - 3 Abstain - 4 July 2013 Hemanth Sampath, QualcommSlide 7

doc.: IEEE /0800r3 Submission Follow-up to SP #1 General direction from SP#1 is that the group overwhelmingly supports documentation –Collate presentations into document, similar to Usage model document. Held offline discussions with parties who expressed interest in editing document(s). Converged to the following documentation and editors 1. Channel Model Document: Editor: Jianhan Liu (Mediatek) Co-editor : Wookbong Lee (LG) 2. Simulation Scenario and Evaluation Methodology Document: Editor: Robert Stacey (Intel) Co-editors: –Ron Porat (Broadcom) – Evaluation Methodology. –Simone Merlin (Qualcomm) – Simulation Scenarios. July 2013 Hemanth Sampath, QualcommSlide 8

doc.: IEEE /0800r3 Submission Strawpoll #2 Do you agree with the proposal to create the following documents ? 1. Channel Model Document: Editor: Jianhan Liu (Mediatek) Co-editor: Wookbong Lee (LG) 2. Simulation Scenario and Evaluation Methodology Document: Editor: Robert Stacey (Intel) Co-editors: –Ron Porat (Broadcom) – Evaluation Methodology. –Simone Merlin (Qualcomm) – Simulation Scenarios. Yes - No - Abstain - July 2013 Hemanth Sampath, QualcommSlide 9

doc.: IEEE /0800r3 Submission Reference [1] S. Merlin, G. Barriac. ‘HEW scenarios and goals’. Doc.: IEEE /0542r0. July 2013 Hemanth Sampath, QualcommSlide 10