A. Grothey 1, J.M. Lafky 1, B.W. Morlan 1, P.J. Stella 2, S.R. Dakhil 3, G.G. Gross 4, W.S. Loui 5, B.M. Bot 1, S.R. Alberts 1, J.T. Reynolds 6 1 Mayo.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab (bev) vs FOLFIRI plus bev
Advertisements

Moskowitz CH et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 290.
Phase I Trial Of FOLFIRI In Combination With Sorafenib And Bevacizumab In Patients With Advanced Gastrointestinal Malignancies Background: Background:
A Meta Analysis of Risk of Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC) Treated with Anti Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF)
Phase III Study Comparing Gemcitabine plus Cetuximab versus Gemcitabine in Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Southwest.
Phase III study of first-line XELOX plus bevacizumab (BEV) for 6 cycles followed by XELOX plus BEV or single agent (s/a) BEV as maintenance therapy in.
Efficacy and Safety of Single Agent Sunitinib in Treating Advanced Hepatocelluar Carcinoma Patients After Sorafenib Failure: A Prospective, Open-Label,
ASCO 2009 Safety and Efficacy of AMG 655 Plus Modified FOLFOX6 (mFOLFOX6) and Bevacizumab (B) for the First-line Treatment of Patients (Pts) With Metastatic.
Cabozantinib (XL184) in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC): Results from a Phase II Randomized Discontinuation Trial Hussain M et.
A Phase II Trial of Perifosine in Patients with Chemo-Insensitive Sarcomas Study Update – November 2008 Dejka Araujo, MD MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston,
1 A Randomized, Multi-Center Phase III Trial of Irinotecan in Combination with Three Different Methods of Administration of Fluoropyrimidine with Celecoxib.
A Phase 2 Study of Elotuzumab in Combination with Lenalidomide and Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Updated.
Results of Docetaxel Plus Oxaliplatin (DOCOX) +/- Cetuximab in Patients with Metastatic Gastric and/or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma: Results.
Results of the X-PECT Study: A phase III randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study of perifosine plus capecitabine (P-CAP) vs. placebo plus capecitabine.
Phase III Trial of Pazopanib in Locally Advanced and/or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Sternberg CN et al. ASCO 2009; Abstract (Oral Presentation)
1Bachelot T et al. Proc SABCS 2010;Abstract S1-6.
Phase III trial of chemotherapy with or without irinotecan in the front-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer in elderly patients. FFCD
S. K. Anderson 1, J. M. Lafky 1, X. W. Carrero 1, T. K. Kimlinger 1, T. M. Halling 1, S. Kumar 1, P. J. Flynn 2, H. M. Gross 3, K. A. Jaeckle 4, J. C.
Ibrutinib, Single Agent or in Combination with Dexamethasone, in Patients with Relapsed or Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (MM): Preliminary Phase.
Bevacizumab continuation versus no continuation after first-line chemo-bevacizumab therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized.
MABEL – a large multinational study of cetuximab plus irinotecan in metastatic colorectal cancer progressing on irinotecan H Wilke, R Glynne-Jones, J Thaler,
Lenalidomide Is Safe and Active in Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia (WM) 1 Updated Results from a Multicenter, Open-Label, Dose-Escalation Phase 1b/2 Study.
Final Efficacy Results from OAM4558g, a Randomized Phase II Study Evaluating MetMAb or Placebo in Combination with Erlotinib in Advanced NSCLC Spigel DR.
AVADO TRIAL David Miles Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Middlesex, United Kingdom A randomized, double-blind study of bevacizumab in combination with docetaxel.
ECCO ESMO 2011 GI Cancer Updates TAS102 and BSC vs. Placebo and BSC Reviewer: Dr. Scott Berry Date posted: October 2011.
The Combination of Bevacizumab (Bev) with capecitabine/irinotecan (CapIri/Bev) or capecitabine/oxaliplatin (CapOx/Bev) is highly active in advanced colorectal.
Cortés J et al. ASCO 2009; Abstract (Poster Discussion)
Activation of insulin like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF-1R) signaling pathway is implicated in proliferation, survival, and angiogenesis in pancreatic.
Preliminary Results from a Phase II study of FOLFIRI and Bevacizumab as First Line Treatment for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (Abstract #3579) S. Kopetz,
. Background Paclitaxel and Irinotecan in Platinum Refractory or Resistant Small Cell Lung Cancer: a Galician Lung Cancer.
Results of a Randomized Phase 2 Study of PD , a Cyclin ‐ Dependent Kinase (CDK) 4/6 Inhibitor, in Combination with Letrozole vs Letrozole Alone.
Audeh MW et al. ASCO 2009; Abstract (Clinical Science Symposium)
Phase II trial of irinotecan/docetaxel for advanced pancreatic cancer with randomization between irinotecan/docetaxel and irinotecan/docetaxel plus C225,
Phase II trial of chemotherapy with high-dose FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab in the front-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)
Phase I evaluation of sorafenib & bevacizumab as first-line therapy in hepatocellular cancer (HCC) Joleen M. Hubbard 1, Steven R. Alberts 1, William S.
Raafat R. Abdel-Malek, MD, FRCR Ass. Prof Clinical Oncology Cairo University, Egypt Efficacy & Toxicity of Sunitinib in mRCC patients in Egypt.
Phase II trial of irinotecan/docetaxel for advanced pancreatic cancer with randomization between irinotecan/docetaxel and irinotecan/docetaxel plus C225,
A Phase 1 Study of the Selective Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase-Delta (PI3Kδ) Inhibitor, Idelalisib (GS- 1101) in Combination with Rituximab and/or Bendamustine.
A Phase 2 Study with a Daily Regimen of the Oral mTOR Inhibitor RAD001 (Everolimus) in Patients with Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Cancer Amato RJ et.
Figure 1. Hazard ratios for progression-free survival analyzed with fixed effect model. Table 1: Relevant trials Table 2. Methodological quality Conclusions.
Phase II Study of Sunitinib Administered in a Continuous Once-Daily Dosing Regimen in Patients With Cytokine-Refractory Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Cabozantinib (XL184) in metastatic castration- resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC): Results from a phase II randomized discontinuation.
P.A. Tang 1, S. J. Cohen 1, G. Bjarnason 1, C. Kollmannsberger 1, K. Virik 1, M. J. MacKenzie 1, J. Brown 1, L. Wang 1, A. Chen 2, M. J. Moore 1 1 Princess.
A Multi-Center Phase I/II Trial of Carfilzomib and Pomalidomide with Dexamethasone (Car-Pom-d) in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Shah.
A Phase II Study of Sorafenib Combining with Docetaxel and Cisplatin in the Treatment of Metastatic or Advanced Unresectable Gastric and Gastroesophageal.
Patterns of Care in Medical Oncology Treatment of Metastatic Colon Cancer.
1 A Randomized, Multi-Center Phase III Trial of Irinotecan in Combination with Three Different Methods of Administration of Fluoropyrimidine with Celecoxib.
Responses to Subsequent Anti-HER2 Therapy After Treatment with Trastuzumab-DM1 in Women with HER2- Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer 1 A Phase Ib/II Trial.
Phase I/II study of oral fluoropyrimidine S-1 plus oral Leucovorin as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer T. Yoshino 1, W. Koizumi 2,
North Central Cancer Treatment Group Randomized Phase II Trial of Panitumumab, Erlotinib, and Gemcitabine (PGE) versus Erlotinib-Gemcitabine (GE) in Patients.
A Phase I Study of MEK162 and FOLFOX in chemotherapy-resistant metastatic colorectal cancer May Cho, Dean Lim, Timothy Synold, Paul Frankel, Lucille Leong,
Results of a Phase 2, Multicenter, Single-Arm Study of Eribulin Mesylate as First-Line Therapy for Locally Recurrent or Metastatic HER2-Negative Breast.
Clinical outcomes and prognostic factors of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with sorafenib as first-line therapy : A Korean multicenter.
CCO Independent Conference Coverage* of the 2016 ASCO Annual Meeting, June 3-7, 2016 Phase II MONARCH 1: CDK4/6 Inhibitor Abemaciclib in HR+/HER2- MBC.
CCO Independent Conference Coverage
KEYNOTE-028: Pembrolizumab in PD-L1+, ER+/HER2- Breast Cancer
Alessandra Gennari, MD PhD
Pazopanib: the role in the treatment of mRCC
Gajria D et al. Proc SABCS 2010;Abstract P
Nivolumab in Patients (Pts) with Relapsed or Refractory Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma (R/R cHL): Clinical Outcomes from Extended Follow-up of a Phase 1 Study.
University of Southern California, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center
Intervista a Lucio Crinò
Regorafenib TAS-102 or TAS-102 Regorafenib
Barrios C et al. SABCS 2009;Abstract 46.
Baselga J et al. SABCS 2009;Abstract 45.
Nab-paclitaxel in Ovarian Cancer
Martin M et al. Proc SABCS 2012;Abstract S1-7.
Phase 2, Randomized, Open-label Study of Cetuximab and Bevacizumab Alone or in Combination with Fixed-dose Rate (FDR) Gemcitabine as First-line Therapy.
R Hermann6, P Sportelli7, L Gardner7 and J Bendell8
Presentation transcript:

A. Grothey 1, J.M. Lafky 1, B.W. Morlan 1, P.J. Stella 2, S.R. Dakhil 3, G.G. Gross 4, W.S. Loui 5, B.M. Bot 1, S.R. Alberts 1, J.T. Reynolds 6 1 Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; 2 St Joseph Mercy Health System, Ann Arbor, MI; 3 Wichita Community Clinical Oncology Program, Wichita, KS; 4 MeritCare Health System, Fargo, ND; 5 Cancer Research Center of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI; 6 Medcenter One Health System, Bismarck, ND Abstract (updated) Background : BEV, a monoclonal antibody against VEGF ligand, is a standard component of medical therapy of mCRC. Activation of alternative angiogenesis pathways have been implicated in resistance to BEV. Sorafenib is a multi-kinase inhibitor that targets all VEGF receptors, PDGFR, and RAF, an enzyme downstream of KRAS. This study examines the therapeutic effects of combined vertical blockade of VEGF signaling (i.e., ligand and receptors) in patients (pts) with prior progressive disease (PD) on BEV-containing medical therapy in mCRC. Methods : MCRC pts with documented PD on standard therapy including BEV, fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and anti- EGFR antibody for pts with wild-type KRAS (or ineligibility for these agents) received sorafenib (200 mg orally BID, days 1-5 and 8 12) and BEV (5 mg/kg IV) every 2 weeks. Primary endpoint is proportion of pts progression-free (PF) and still on study at 3 months. Results : Eighty-three pts were rapidly enrolled between June and Oct. 2009; 3 were later deemed ineligible and 1 canceled participation. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.1 months and median overall survival (OS) was 6.7 months for all pts. 2 pts had a partial response. Toxicity data are available from all 79 pts with 66% of these pts experiencing at least one grade 3 or 4 adverse event (AE) at least possibly related to treatment (rel). Most frequent grade 3/4 AEs rel were: fatigue (25%), hypertension (18%), skin reaction (9%), elevated lipase (8%), abdominal pain (8%), and diarrhea (8%). Of the 68 pts who have discontinued therapy, 26% went off due to non-disease related issues (AEs, pt refusal, MD decision). Conclusions : The combination of BEV and sorafenib as salvage therapy in heavily pretreated mCRC pts is tolerable and manageable with promising initial evidence of activity. Background Anti-VEGF directed therapy in combination with conventional chemotherapy has shown proof-of-efficacy in advanced CRC in the first and second-line setting. Mechanisms of resistance to anti-VEGF therapy can include the upregulation of alternate angiogenesis pathways such as PDGFR and the overexpression of components of the VEGF pathway. A complete blockage of the VEGF signaling system by combining an anti-ligand (BEV) with a multi-targeted receptor kinase inhibitor (sorafenib) approach could result in synergistic inhibitory effects of tumor angiogenesis. Abstract ID: 3549 Dual VEGF inhibition with sorafenib and bevacizumab (BEV) as salvage therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Results of the phase II North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) study N054C Figure 2 Overall Survival Figure 1 Progression-free Survival Methods Main eligibility criteria: Pts with documented PD on all standard treatment options for mCRC including fluoropyrimidines, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, bevacizumab, and EGFR antibodies (if KRAS wild-type). PS 0,1; documented KRAS status; measurable disease. Treatment regimen: Sorafenib (200 mg orally BID, days 1-5 and 8-12) and BEV (5 mg/kg IV) every 2 weeks; Statistical design: Primary endpoint: PFS rate at 3 months. Secondary endpoints: response rate (RR), OS, safety, and feasibility. Results 83 mCRC patients were enrolled in 4.5 months; 79 evaluable (3 ineligibles, 1 canceled participation). Median age 62 years (range: 36-88). 77 of the 79 pts were evaluable for the 3 month PFS (primary endpoint). 33 pts (43%) were PF and still on study at 3 months post-baseline. Response (Fig 4): PR: 2 pts (at cycle 3 and 6, 1 KRAS mut/1 KRAS wt) SD: 48 pts ( mos) SD/PR: 50 pts (63%) Median PFS (Fig 1) all pts: 3.1 mos (95% CI: ), KRAS wt: 3.0 mos, KRAS mut: 3.8 mos Median OS (Fig 2) all pts: 6.7 mos, KRAS wt: 7.0 mos; KRAS mut: 5.8 mos. 52 (66%) pts experienced treatment-related grade 3+ AE; 8 (10%) pts grade 4 AE (Table 2). 491 treatment cycles administered. Median dose intensity: 100% for BEV and 95% for sorafenib (Fig 3). 29 pts (37%) delayed treatment at least once, 13 pts (16%) omitted BEV at least once, 26 pts (33%) omitted sorafenib at least once, and 48 pts (61%) reduced sorafenib at least once (Fig 3). Reasons for discontinuation of treatment: 50 pts (74%) with disease progression, 13 pts (19%) with AE, 4 pts (6%) refused further treatment, and 1 pt (1%) due to MD decision. 11 pts (14%) are still on study Table 2 Drug-related Grade 3/4 Adverse Events Reported in >1 Patient Conclusions Dual angiogenesis inhibition with sorafenib/bevacizumab is tolerable and manageable. Sorafenib/bevacizumab has documented activity in a salvage therapy setting in heavily pretreated patients with mCRC, independent of KRAS status. Further investigation of sorafenib/bevacizumab in earlier lines of therapy in combination with chemotherapy is warranted. Figure 4 Percent Reduction of Target Lesions (N=73) Notes: Any pt who went off treatment before any scans but progressed at any point during follow up or had PD without any scans during treatment were assigned 30% change (RECIST threshhold). Six patients went off treatment before having a scan and have not yet been reported as having PD. Figure 3 Average Dose Per Cycle Cycle Table 1 Patient Demographics Toxicity n (%) Grade 3Grade 4 Total Grade 3/4 Fatigue20 (25.3)0 Hypertension14 (17.7)0 Skin Reaction-Hand/Foot7 (8.9)0 Abdominal Pain5 (6.3)1 (1.3)6 (7.6) Diarrhea5 (6.3)1 (1.3)6 (7.6) Lipase5 (6.3)1 (1.3)6 (7.6) Nausea5 (6.3)0 Proteinuria5 (6.3)0 Anorexia4 (5.1)0 Back Pain4 (5.1)0 Bilirubin3 (3.8)1 (1.3)4 (5.1) Alkaline Phosphatase3 (3.8)0 Creatinine3 (3.8)0 Dehydration3 (3.8)0 Hyponatremia3 (3.8)0 Renal Failure3 (3.8)0 Amylase1 (1.3) 2 (2.5) Anemia1 (1.3) 2 (2.5) Hypokalemia2 (2.5)0 Hypophosphatemia2 (2.5)0 Figure 5 Common Phenomenon: Cavitation – Counted as SD