UV Aerosol Product Status and Outlook Omar Torres and Changwoo Ahn OMI Science Team Meeting Outline -Status -Product Assessment OMI-MODIS Comparison OMI-Aeronet.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Satellite Observations of Enhanced Pre- Monsoon Aerosol Loading and Tropospheric Warming over the Gangetic-Himalayan Region Ritesh Gautam 1, N. Christina.
Advertisements

Validation of MODIS based GOES-R ABI AOD retrievals using Ground based LIDAR Data R. Bradley Pierce Ed Eloranta, Dave Turner, Shobha Kondragunta, Pubu.
GEOS-5 Simulations of Aerosol Index and Aerosol Absorption Optical Depth with Comparison to OMI retrievals. V. Buchard, A. da Silva, P. Colarco, R. Spurr.
Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009 Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009.
Measurement of the Aerosol Optical Depth in Moscow city, Russia during the wildfire in summer 2010 DAMBAR AIR.
Satellite Imagery ARSET Applied Remote SEnsing Training A project of NASA Applied Sciences Introduction to Remote Sensing and Air Quality Applications.
Direct Radiative Effect of aerosols over clouds and clear skies determined using CALIPSO and the A-Train Robert Wood with Duli Chand, Tad Anderson, Bob.
Direct aerosol radiative forcing based on combined A-Train observations – challenges in deriving all-sky estimates Jens Redemann, Y. Shinozuka, M.Kacenelenbogen,
Aircraft spiral on July 20, 2011 at 14 UTC Validation of GOES-R ABI Surface PM2.5 Concentrations using AIRNOW and Aircraft Data Shobha Kondragunta (NOAA),
Aerosol Optical Properties in Southeast Asia From AERONET Observations T.F. Eck 1, B.N. Holben 1, J. Boonjawat 2, A. Snidvongs 2, H.V. Le 3, J.S. Schafer.
A Progress Report on Combining MODIS and CALIPSO Aerosol Data for Direct Radiative Effect Studies Jens Redemann, Qin Zhang, Philip Russell, John Livingston,
Trace gas and AOD retrievals from a newly deployed hyper-spectral airborne sun/sky photometer (4STAR) M. Segal-Rosenheimer, C.J. Flynn, J. Redemann, B.
Aerosol Optical Depths from Airborne Sunphotometry in INTEX-B/MILAGRO as a Validation Tool for the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) on Aura J. Livingston.
OMI Aerosol Products: A tutorial ARSET Applied Remote SEnsing Training A project of NASA Applied Sciences.
The combined use of MODIS, CALIPSO and OMI level 2 aerosol products for calculating direct aerosol radiative effects Jens Redemann, M. Vaughan, Y. Shinozuka,
Operational assimilation of dust optical depth Bruce Ingleby, Yaswant Pradhan and Malcolm Brooks © Crown copyright 08/2013 Met Office and the Met Office.
A four year record of Aerosol Absorption measurements from OMI near UV observations Omar Torres Department of Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences Hampton.
The first decade OMI Near UV aerosol observations: An A-train algorithm Assessment of AOD and SSA The long-term OMAERUV record Omar Torres, Changwoo Ahn,
About the status and outlook for OMI Surface UV product OMI Science Team Meeting Helsinki, June 24-27, 2008 Antti Arola.
Aerosol Optical Depth during the Northern CA Fires of 2008 In situ aerosol light scattering and absorption measurements in Reno Nevada, 2008, indicated.
T2 T1 (biomass burning aerosol) (dust) Findings (1) OMI and AATS AOD retrievals have been analyzed for four spatially and temporally near-coincident events.
Jetstream 31 (J31) at Mid-Campaign in INTEX-B/MILAGRO: Science Goals, Payload, Example Results, Assessment Phil Russell, Jens Redemann, Brian Cairns, Charles.
GE0-CAPE Workshop University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill August 2008 Aerosols: What is measurable and by what remote sensing technique? Omar Torres.
Direct aerosol radiative forcing based on combined A-Train observations and comparisons to IPCC-2007 results Jens Redemann, Y. Shinozuka, M. Vaughan, P.
The Second TEMPO Science Team Meeting Physical Basis of the Near-UV Aerosol Algorithm Omar Torres NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Atmospheric Chemistry.
Characterization of Aerosols using Airborne Lidar, MODIS, and GOCART Data during the TRACE-P (2001) Mission Rich Ferrare 1, Ed Browell 1, Syed Ismail 1,
QA filtering of individual pixels to enable a more accurate validation of aerosol products Maksym Petrenko Presented at MODIS Collection 7 and beyond Retreat.
Satellite Imagery ARSET - AQ Applied Remote SEnsing Training – Air Quality A project of NASA Applied Sciences NASA ARSET- AQ – EPA Training September 29,
Livingston et al. EGU General Assembly April 2007 Comparison of airborne sunphotometer and satellite sensor retrievals of aerosol optical depth during.
Allen Chu & MODIS Aerosol Team MODIS Atmosphere Retreat Meeting St. Michaels, Maryland March 17, 2003 Evaluation of MODIS Aerosol Products in ACE-Asia.
Breakout Group on Aerosol Optical Properties & Radiative Effects of MILAGRO Science Meeting, Oct 2006, Boulder, CO Chair: Phil Russell Co-Chair:
Timothy Logan University of North Dakota Department of Atmospheric Science.
1 N. Christina Hsu, Deputy NPP Project Scientist Recent Update on MODIS C6 Deep Blue Aerosol Products and Beyond N. Christina Hsu, Corey Bettenhausen,
Synergy of MODIS Deep Blue and Operational Aerosol Products with MISR and SeaWiFS N. Christina Hsu and S.-C. Tsay, M. D. King, M.-J. Jeong NASA Goddard.
Airborne sunphotometer (AATS-14) measurements in ARCTAS - first insights into their combined use with satellite observations to study Arctic aerosol radiative.
Transpacific transport of anthropogenic aerosols: Integrating ground and satellite observations with models AAAR, Austin, Texas October 18, 2005 Colette.
Improving MISR-retrieved Aerosol Properties Using GOCART Simulations Yang Liu, PhD June 3, 2015 St. Louis, MO.
For INTEX-B/MILAGRO the J31 was equipped to measure solar energy and how that energy is affected by atmospheric constituents and Earth's surfaces. Because.
Page 1© Crown copyright 2006 Modelled & Observed Atmospheric Radiation Balance during the West African Dry Season. Sean Milton, Glenn Greed, Malcolm Brooks,
J31 Data Workshop 9-10Mar05 Validation of Satellite Aerosol Optical Depth by AATS-14 during ICARTT 2004 NASA Ames Airborne Sunphotometer Team Presented.
Jetstream 31 (J31) in INTEX-B/MILAGRO. Campaign Context: In March 2006, INTEX-B/MILAGRO studied pollution from Mexico City and regional biomass burning,
Direct aerosol radiative effects based on combined A-Train observations Jens Redemann, Y. Shinozuka, J. Livingston, M. Vaughan, P. Russell, M.Kacenelenbogen,
AEROCOM AODs are systematically smaller than MODIS, with slightly larger/smaller differences in winter/summer. Aerosol optical properties are difficult.
Aerosol optical properties measured from aircraft, satellites and the ground during ARCTAS - their relationship to aerosol chemistry and smoke type Yohei.
Airborne Sunphotometry and Closure Studies during the SAFARI-2000 Dry Season Campaign B. Schmid BAER/NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, USA.
Airborne Sunphotometry and Closure Studies in the SAFARI-2000 Dry Season Campaign B. Schmid 1, P.B. Russell 2, P.Pilewskie 2, J. Redemann 1, P.V. Hobbs.
Phil Russell 1, John Livingston 2, Beat Schmid 3, Jens Redemann 4, Stephanie Ramirez 4, Qin Zhang 4 and many other contributors 10 Years of Studies Comparing.
New Aerosol Models for Ocean Color Retrievals Zia Ahmad NASA-Ocean Biology Processing Group (OBPG) MODIS Meeting May 18-20, 2011.
Page 1 © Crown copyright 2004 Aircraft observations of Biomass burning aerosol Ben Johnson, Simon Osborne & Jim Haywood AMMA SOP0 Meeting, Exeter, 15 th.
Preliminary Analysis of Relative MODIS Terra-Aqua Calibration Over Solar Village and Railroad Valley Sites Using ASRVN A. Lyapustin, Y. Wang, X. Xiong,
Pushing the limits of dark-target aerosol remote sensing from MODIS Robert C. Levy (SSAI and 613.2) Contributors: S. Mattoo (SSAI), L. Remer (NASA), R.
International Ocean Color Science Meeting, Darmstadt, Germany, May 6-8, 2013 III. MODIS-Aqua normalized water leaving radiance nLw III.1. R2010 vs. R2012.
Horizontal variability of aerosol optical properties observed during the ARCTAS airborne experiment Yohei Shinozuka 1*, Jens Redemann 1, Phil Russell 2,
Challenges in remote sensing of CCN concentration An assessment based on airborne observations of AOD, CCN, chemical composition, size distribution, light.
Characterization of the Station Fire, Los Angeles Aug. – Sept NASA Team MODIS Data products: Robert Levy Lorraine Remer N. Christina Hsu Charles.
Braak et al., OMI Science Team Meeting 6 June 2007 OMI Multiwavelength Aerosol Product Validation Status Remco Braak, Ben Veihelmann, Pepijn Veefkind.
J. Redemann 1, B. Schmid 1, J.A. Eilers 2, R. Kahn 3, R.C. Levy 4,5, P.B. Russell 2, J.M. Livingston 6, P.V. Hobbs 7, W.L. Smith Jr. 8, B.N. Holben 4 1.
1 Y. Kaufman, L. Remer, M. Chin, NASA; Didier Tanré, CNRS, Univ. of Lille Aerosol measurements & models MODIS & AERONET vs. GOCART.
Aerosol optical properties measured from aircraft, satellites and the ground during ARCTAS - their relationship to CCN, aerosol chemistry and smoke type.
Studying the radiative environment of individual biomass burning fire plumes using multi-platform observations: an example ARCTAS case study on June 30,
Jens Redemann 1, B. Schmid 1, J. M. Livingston 2, P. B. Russell 3, J. A. Eilers 3, P. V. Hobbs 4, R. Kahn 5, W. L. Smith Jr. 6, B. N. Holben 7, C.K. Rutledge.
Fourth TEMPO Science Team Meeting
Near UV aerosol products
An overview of J-31 measurements during the INTEX-B/MILAGRO campaign
Stelios Kazadzis A. Bais, A. Arola OMI science team meeting
Need for TEMPO-ABI Synergy
Using dynamic aerosol optical properties from a chemical transport model (CTM) to retrieve aerosol optical depths from MODIS reflectances over land Fall.
Mike Pavolonis (NOAA/NESDIS/STAR)
Carbonaceous aerosol absorption in Hadgem3
Assessment of Satellite Ocean Color Products of the Coast of Martha’s Vineyard using AERONET-Ocean Color Measurements Hui Feng1, Heidi Sosik2 , and Tim.
Presentation transcript:

UV Aerosol Product Status and Outlook Omar Torres and Changwoo Ahn OMI Science Team Meeting Outline -Status -Product Assessment OMI-MODIS Comparison OMI-Aeronet Comparison OMI-AATS Comparison -Summary and Conclusions Baltimore, June 6, 2007

Status Products: - Aerosol Extinction and Absorption Optical Depth 388 nm -Also reports values at 354 and 500 nm (converted) Validation Analysis -Comparisons to other satellite products (MODIS, MISR) (Ahn, et al, 2007) -Comparison to AERONET observations (Torres et al, 2007) -Comparison to Airborne observations (Livingston et al, 2007) Data availability -Publicly released (L2, L2G)

(A) Jan 2, 2007, biomass burning(B)May 14, 2006, Pollution Aerosols (C) March 10, 2006, Asian dust (D) August 15, 2006, Saharan dust OMI Aqua-MODIS comparison of retrieved AOD

Aeronet Sites used in the Analysis Site Location Aerosol type Alta_Floresta Agoufou Banizombou IER-Cinzana Ougadougou Mongu Forth Crete Blida Saada Dakar Kanpur Dhadnad Hamim Mukdahan XiangHe GSFC Halifax Bratts_Lake Bondville CARTEL Cove HJAndrews MD Science Center MVCO SERC Sioux_Falls UCSB Wallops 9S 56W 15N 1W 13N 2E 13N 5W 12N 1W 15S 23E 35N 25E 36N 2E 31N 8W 14N 16W 26N 80E 25N 56E 22N 54E 16N 104E 39N 116E 38N 76W 44N 63W 50N 104W 40N 88W 45N 71W 36N 75W 44N 122W 39N 76W 41N 70W 38N 76W 43N 96W 34N 119W 37N 75W smoke smoke, dust dust dust, smoke smoke dust, pollution dust dust,smoke dust,smoke,pollution dust smoke,pollution dust,smoke,pollut. weakly absorbing

13 sites 2 years (2005-6) 374 points OMI-UV Aeronet Comparison Weakly-absorbing aerosols 0.03~0.05 Bias Reasonable agreement for clear conditions Poor statistics!

OMI-Aeronet Comparison Desert Dust Aerosols 4 sites 2years points Good Statistics High Noise Level, Aerosol layer height? 0.3 bias

OMI-Aeronet Comparison Pollution Aerosols 2 sites 101 points Reasonable agreement Bias of ~0.2 at low AOD’s

AOD Comparisons, OMI - MODIS - AATS INTEX-B/MILAGRO, 2006 MODIS Aura/OMI overpass ~15 minutes after Aqua at 20:13 UT J31 low altitude transect J31 flight track color coded by altitude MODIS 10x10 km 2 OMI 13x24km 2 True Color Image (Aqua), 10 March, 19:55-20:00 UT (Phil Russell, NASA, AMES)

AOD Comparisons, OMI - MODIS - AATS INTEX-B/MILAGRO, 10 March 2006 J31 low altitude transect 19:40-20:01 UT OMI MW MODIS OMI UV J31 low altitude transect 19:40-20:01 UT OMI % cloud MODIS % cloud 2 2 Geo-collocation difference in OMI-UV and MW retrievals

10 March 2006 (over water) Case 1 OMI MW & UV AOD retrievals exceed MODIS and AATS values. (Prelim) Milagro Airborne AOD measurements vs OMI & MODIS OMI near-UV retrieval quality flags indicate poor retrievals and suggest possible cloud contamination; retrievals yield enhanced AODs

Photo from DC-8 over Mexico City, 19 Mar 2006 Courtesy of Cam McNaughton (Univ. of Hawaii)

MW UV T2 T1 J31 track OMI overpass: UT 19 March 2006 (over land) J31 ~ m above surface “Visibility poor; eyes burning in cockpit…” Larger OMI MW AOD retrievals over land likely due to incorrect surface albedo assumption. highest quality AATS AOD: high variability, flat depend. (Prelim) Phil Russell

Assessment of OMI-UV Absorption Retrievals during MILAGRO campaign OMI-UV Aerosol Absorption Optical Depth agrees well with AATS Inferred Absorption Optical Depth Spectral on March 19, 2006 (Phil Russell)

Comparison of OMI and AERONET Retrievals of Single Scattering Albedo Smoke and Pollution Aerosols RMS: 0.03 Dust Aerosols RMS: 0.02

OMI-Aeronet Comparison of Absorption Optical Depth Dust Aerosols RMS: 0.02

-Severe sub-pixel cloud contamination affects retrieval of extinction optical depth for weakly absorbing aerosols -Reasonable agreement for absorbing aerosols -In the presence dust-smoke mixtures, OMI AOD’s are over- estimated -In general a bias of about 0.2 ~0.3 is observed with respect to AERONET observations -Reasonable agreement in aerosol absorption parameters (AAOD and SSA) -Reprocessing of Collection 3 data will start in summer-07 -Preliminary analysis indicate that in Collection 3 data the AOD bias will decrease Summary and Conclusions