DMKPred: Specificity and Cross-reactivity of Kinase Inhibitors

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Signal Transduction Mechanisms Underlying Underlying Growth Control and Oncogenesis Ronit Sagi-Eisenberg Dept. of Cell and Developmental Biology Sackler.
Advertisements

CELL COMMUNICATION. YOU MUST KNOW… THE 3 STAGES OF CELL COMMUNICATION: RECEPTION, TRANSDUCTION, AND RESPONSE HOW G-PROTEIN-COUPLED RECEPTORS RECEIVE CELL.
Topics Concept 8.5: Regulation of enzymes: What is an allosteric regulator? What are some examples? How do they benefit an organism Concept 12.1: What.
Chapter 11 Cell Communication. Question?  How do cells communicate?  By “ cellular ” phones.  But seriously, cells do need to communicate for many.
Simon Duri Xixi Hong Joseph Lustig Aleksandra Porebska.
Signaling and the Signal Transduction Cascade. Question?????? External Stimulus Inside cell Nucleus, Gene transcription Other cellular effects.
Applying pharmacophore-based approach to improving Taxol Started with a natural product that was highly active - can other molecules with the same mechanism.
PDGF β Receptor. Protein 1106 amino acid protein Weinberg Fig 5.10.
Molecular Medicine. Focus on Cancer Most chemotherapies were developed before the human genome was sequenced Many are alkylating agents that attach methyl.
Anticancer Therapy: Kinase Inhibitors Charles Harrell.
Using A Tyrosine-Kinase inhibitor to regulate JNK pathways and see its effect as a possible treatment for Parksinson’s Disease By: Sobi Abbasi.
Phylogeny in Drug Discovery?
Marty O’Neill II Carmen Banea
Malignant Melanoma and CDKN2A
Computational Analyses of Human Kinome against EGFR-TKIs using Homology Modeling and Molecular Docking Approaches Orathai Sawatdichaikul Institute of Food.
Rational Drug Design Soma Mandal, Mee'nal Moudgil, Sanat K. Mandal.
Advanced Cancer Topics Journal Review 4/16/2009 AD.
Reversible Phosphorylation of Proteins
Structural Bioinformatics R. Sowdhamini National Centre for Biological Sciences Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Bangalore, INDIA.
Sam Klingbeil, Nicole Reiff and James Wagner.  ERK2 is part of a signaling cascade that results in neuronal differentation, mitogenesis, oncogenic transformation.
Gene Transcription G0G0 G1G1 Priming S G2G2 M Cell Cell Cycle Growth Factors + Growth Factors & Cell Cycle Receptors.
RNA-binding Protein Insulin-like Growth Factor mRNA-binding Protein 3 (IMP-3) Promotes Cell Survival via Insulin-like Growth Factor II Signaling after.
From Signal Transduction to Targeted Therapy (Fall 2010) Pin Ling ( 凌 斌 ), Ph.D. Department of Microbiology & Immunology, NCKU ext 5632
Signal Response and Amplification
Here are some CML slides that may be helpful for your presentation.
Underlying Principles and Future Targets for Molecular Therapy of SCCHN Prof. Tim H. Brümmendorf Dept. of Hematology and Oncology University Hospital Eppendorf.
Computational biology of cancer cell pathways Modelling of cancer cell function and response to therapy.
BIOL 445 – CANCER BIOLOGY PRESENTATION
Open source software and web services for designing therapeutic molecules G. P. S. Raghava, Head Bioinformatics Centre, Institute of Microbial Technology,
Insights into normal cell biology Targets for diagnosis and follow-up
Interesting Developments. Historic trends in biotech fields.
Overview of Targeted Therapy Mechanisms November 11, 2011 Targeted Therapies and Biological Therapies SIG.
Biological Signal Detection for Protein Function Prediction Investigators: Yang Dai Prime Grant Support: NSF Problem Statement and Motivation Technical.
Genetics of Cancer Lecture 34.
Trends in Biotechnology Revision Questions. In 2005, ES-like cells were generated using four factors. The resulting cells were called iPS cells. What.
Benign Versus Malignant Tumors
Cell Communication Chapter Cell Communication: An Overview  Cells communicate with one another through Direct channels of communication Specific.
Gleevec vs. BMS Druker vs. Sawyers
Cell Communication Chapter 11.
Cell Signaling. Local Signaling Paracrine Paracrine Synaptic Synaptic.
You Must Know  3 stages of cell communication Reception, transduction, & response  How G-protein-coupled receptors receive cell signals & start transduction.
Integrin-EGFR Cross-Activation Elizabeth Brooks Department of Chemical Engineering University of Massachusetts, Amherst Peyton Lab Group Meeting December.
PHL 616 Drug Discovery & Development Fifth Lecture By Abdelkader Ashour, Ph.D. Phone:
Lung Cancer Tumour Markers
Cell Signaling Pathways – A Case Study Approach
Figure 1. Resistance mechanism against first generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI). (A) Mutations in the EGFR.
Cell Communication Chapter 11.
Targeting signal transduction
Controls the Cell Cycle
SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION Signal Transduction Pathway Protein Modification Phosphorylation Cascade Protein Kinases.
Innate immune-signaling cascades and evidence for upregulation in brain following AIE exposure. Innate immune-signaling cascades and evidence for upregulation.
Figure 1 Key time points in the discovery and development of imatinib for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) and gastrointestinal stromal.
Integrative approach for drug discovering
Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi: /nrclinonc
Figure 1 A schematic representation of the HER2 signalling pathway
Figure 2 Oestrogen receptor signalling pathways
Nat. Rev. Urol. doi: /nrurol
Figure 1 Therapeutic targeting of the B-cell receptor (BCR)
Figure 4 Angiogenic signalling network and inhibition by antiangiogenic drugs Figure 4 | Angiogenic signalling network and inhibition by antiangiogenic.
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Epidermal Growth Factor Signaling Pathways as Therapeutic Targets for Colorectal Cancer  Thomas Winder, Heinz–Josef.
Chapter 11 Cell Communication.
Treating myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury by targeting endothelial cell transcription  Edward M Boyle, MD, Timothy G Canty, MD, Elizabeth N Morgan,
Novel therapies for chronic myelogenous leukemia
Attacking Cancer at Its Root
A schematic representation of NOTCH signaling through DAB1–ABL–TRIO–RHO that stimulates colorectal cancer invasion and metastasis. A schematic representation.
The critical roles of miR-23a and miR-27a in colorectal cancer progression. miR-23a primarily increases cell motility through downregulation of its target.
Schematic representation of signaling pathways associated with cannabinoid receptor activation induced by its agonists. Schematic representation of signaling.
Overview of molecular JAK signaling.
Presentation transcript:

DMKPred: Specificity and Cross-reactivity of Kinase Inhibitors G P S Raghava, Head Bioinformatics Centre Email: raghava@imtech.res.in; Web: http://www.imtech.res.in/raghava/ Institute of Microbial Technology, Sector-39A, Chandigarh, India

What are protein kinases ? Critical components of cellular signal transduction cascades . They regulate cell division, differentiation, proliferation, movement & apoptosis by phosphorylating Ser, Thr and Tyr residues of specific substrates. Represent 1.7 % of all human genes .

Why kinases are so important? They are the key regulators of all aspects of neoplasia, including proliferation, invasion, angiogenesis and metastasis. A number of diseases, especially cancer involve unregulated kinase activity (overexpression / upregulation). This makes kinases as important targets for drug development. Kinase inhibitors are successfully used in cancer treatment.

Kinase inhibitors Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) drug molecule bind to the ATP binding site of bcr-abl tyrosine kinase.

Alignment of the ATP-binding site residues of kinase proteins

Selectivity and specificity of existing kinase inhibitors

Can we solve specificity problem of kinase inhibitors ? Most of the drug molecules binds with other protein kinases and cause cross-reactivity. It’s very difficult to design a specific kinase inhibitors against a protein kinase. If Kd of inhibitors with primary intended target is ≤ 10 fold then chances of cross-reactivity is low. Fabin et al., Nat. Biotechnol., 2005, 23, 229-236

Specificity and cross-reactivity of kinase inhibitors Molecules data: Data was taken from Nat. Biotechnol., 2005, 23, 229-236 (Fabin et al., 119 × 20 Kd data) Select those kinases for which  6 chemical molecules have significant binding Finally we select 29 protein kinases for this study

Structure Descriptors: Specificity and cross-reactivity of kinase inhibitors Structure Descriptors: We calculated 8 structure descriptors from Molinspiration (on line web server for descriptor calculation) We also calculated  600 structure descriptors using PreADMET (on line web server for molecular descriptor calculation) Remove insignificant descriptors and select 62 molecular descriptors for further study

Specificity and cross-reactivity of kinase inhibitors Calculate molecular descriptors of kinase inhibitors Remove similar and insignificant descriptors Calculate correlation between Kd and descriptors Select highly significant molecular descriptors Developed model for prediction

Specificity and cross-reactivity of kinase inhibitors Correlation between molecular descriptors and Kd Kinase1 Kd 1 Des1 Des2 ….. ……………………….. Des-m (Chemical1) . Des1 Des2 ….. ………………………… Des-m (Chemical2) . Des1 Des2 ….. ………………………… Des-m (Chemical.) Kd n Des1 Des2…… ………………………… Des-m (Chemical-n) Kinase2 Kd 1 Des1 Des2 ….. ……………………… Des-m (Chemical1) . Des1 Des2 ….. ………………………. Des-m (Chemical2) . Des1 Des2 ….. ……………………….. Des-m (Chemical.) Kd n Des1 Des2…… ………………………. Des-m (Chemical-n) Kinase-n Kd 1 Des1 Des2 ….. …………………….. Des-m (Chemical1) . Des1 Des2 ….. ……………………… Des-m (Chemical2) . Des1 Des2 ….. ……………………… Des-m (Chemical.) Kd n Des1 Des2…… ……………………… Des-m (Chemical-n) Select molecular descriptors with highest average correlation

General model for chemical kinase inhibitors Protein Top 5 Top 10 Top 15 Top 17 Molinspiration AAK1 0.514 NM 0.450 0.591 0.420 ABL1 0.449 0.714 0.430 0.697 0.472 ABL1E255K 0.530 0.480 0.435 0.475 0.585 ABL1H396P 0.851 0.623 0.473 0.633 ABL1M351T 0.440 0.698 0.561 0.675 0.474 ABL1Q252H 0.719 0.491 0.706 0.519 ABL1Y253F 0.409 0.731 0.486 0.716 0.444 ABL2 0.737 0.621 0.617 BIKE 0.253 0.381 0.669 0.511 CLK2 0.282 0.763 0.523 0.360 0.329 EGFR 0.287 0.279 0.476 0.226 0.277 EPHA5 0.428 0.445 0.349 0.464 EPHA6 0.212 0.441 0.372 0.233 0.379 EPHB1 0.462 0.195 0.578 0.394 0.577 GAK 0.197 0.341 0.028 0.455 0.382 JNK2 0.601 0.627 0.647 0.064 JNK3 0.120 0.368 0.467 0.327 KIT 0.908 0.518 0.366 0.332 LCK 0.653 0.771 0.727 0.047 MAP4K5 0.658 0.515 0.410 0.154 0.129 P38ALPHA 0.306 0.539 0.805 0.494 0.735 PDGFR 0.583 0.268 0.363 0.177 0.036 RIPK2 0.736 0.249 0.250 0.557 SLK 0.643 0.293 0.345 SRC 0.770 0.541 0.540 0.395 STK10 0.792 0.396 0.552 0.373 STK18 0.443 0.210 0.403 0.529 TNIK 0.563 0.274 0.235 0.202 VEGFR 0.266 0.172 0.314 0.328 Average 0.482 0.507 0.415

Kinase specific model for chemical kinase inhibitors Protein Top 5 +ve Top 5 –ve Top 10 +ve 10 mixed AAK1 0.55 0.80 NM 0.22 ABL1 0.52 0.38 0.16 ABL1E255K 0.32 ABL1H396P 0.51 0.24 0.33 ABL1M351T 0.72 0.56 0.66 0.48 ABL1Q252H 0.43 0.44 0.25 ABL1Y253F 0.21 0.07 0.03 ABL2 0.41 0.60 0.02 BIKE 0.96 0.76 CLK2 0.06 EGFR 0.81 0.29 0.91 EPHA5 0.95 EPHA6 0.79 0.68 EPHB1 0.89 GAK JNK2 0.14 0.37 0.18 JNK3 0.69 0.63 KIT 0.57 LCK 0.62 MAP4K5 0.61 0.31 P38ALPHA PDGFR RIPK2 0.65 SLK 0.59 0.30 SRC 0.34 0.17 STK10 0.01 STK18 0.19 TNIK 0.88 VEGFR Average 0.539 0.412 0.376 0.374

Web interface for DMKPred

Computational Resources for Drug Discovery Open Source Drug Discovery An Insilico Module of Open Source Drug Discovery

I’ll start with a brief overview of how we’ll be improving the prediction algorithm Adding tools, spiffing up tools, tools recognize more sites. Left vs. right 3 novel features tell you about in a moment Increasing # of sites Now for exciting part, our new features…

Meta-Server: Prediction of subcellular localization of proteins using various server

Thanku URLs: http://www.imtech.res.in/raghava/ & http://crdd.osdd.net/ & bic.uams.edu/