1 Ramp-to-Ramp Toll Modeling Presented By Presented By Jim Fennessy Fennessy Associates Michael W Doherty URS Corporation For Model Task Force Meeting.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Speed-Flow & Flow-Delay Models Marwan AL-Azzawi Project Goals To develop mathematical functions to improve traffic assignment To simulate the effects.
Advertisements

SE Florida FSUTMS Users Group Meeting FDOT Systems Planning Office
Feedback Loops Guy Rousseau Atlanta Regional Commission.
Expanding the Potential of Tolling: A 21 st Century Look AASHTO November 18, Brian Peters Florida DOT, Assistant Secretary of Finance and Administration.
Incorporating Travel Time Reliability Data in Travel Path Estimation Sam Granato, Ohio DOT Rakesh Sharma, Belomar Regional Council.
April 10, 2007 Travel Forecasting Methodology for I-95 HOT Lanes in Virginia 13th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference Reno, Nevada.
Corridor planning: a quick response strategy. Background NCHRP Quick Response Urban Travel Estimation Techniques (1978) Objective: provide tools.
A Toll Choice Probability Model Application to Examine Travel Demand at Express and Electronic Toll Lanes in Maryland.
Analyzing the Effects of Tolls and Operating Costs on Statewide Travel Patterns Vishal Gossain Thomas A. Williams Joseph P. Savage Jr. Christopher E. Mwalwanda.
GEOG 111 & 211A Transportation Planning Traffic Assignment.
Session 11: Model Calibration, Validation, and Reasonableness Checks
Sequential Demand Forecasting Models CTC-340. Travel Behavior 1. Decision to travel for a given purpose –People don’t travel without reason 2. The choice.
Evaluation Tools to Support ITS Planning Process FDOT Research #BD presented to Model Advancement Committee presented by Mohammed Hadi, Ph.D., PE.
Agenda Overview Why TransCAD Challenges/tips Initiatives Applications.
Presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Transportation leadership you can trust. Improving the Treatment of Priced Roadways in Mode Choice.
TRIP ASSIGNMENT.
Amar Sarvepalli. 500 projects in 6-8 weeks Need VMT, VHT and More.
Estimating Risks Associated with Travel Demand Forecasts 14 th TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference May 2013 Thomas Adler, RSG Michael Doherty,
An Experimental Procedure for Mid Block-Based Traffic Assignment on Sub-area with Detailed Road Network Tao Ye M.A.Sc Candidate University of Toronto MCRI.
An Empirical Comparison of Microscopic and Mesoscopic Traffic Simulation Paradigms Ramachandran Balakrishna Daniel Morgan Qi Yang Caliper Corporation 14.
Source: NHI course on Travel Demand Forecasting (152054A) Session 10 Traffic (Trip) Assignment Trip Generation Trip Distribution Transit Estimation & Mode.
ITS Sketch Planning Tool Webinar 2:00 – 4:00 PM January 8, 2009.
Enhancing TDF Model Results Using Intersection Control Specific Delays and Turning Movement Level Matrix Estimation for a Downtown Circulation Study Presented.
Methodology for the Use of Regional Planning Models to Assess Impact of Various Congestion Pricing Strategies Sub-network Extraction A sub-network focusing.
Integration of Transportation System Analyses in Cube Wade L. White, AICP Citilabs Inc.
Comparing a Household Activity-Based Model with a Person Activity-Based Model 14th TRB Conference on Transportation Planning Applications May 5-9, 2013,
NTERFACING THE MORPC REGIONAL MODEL WITH DYNAMIC TRAFFIC SIMULATION INTERFACING THE MORPC REGIONAL MODEL WITH DYNAMIC TRAFFIC SIMULATION David Roden (AECOM)
Bangkok September, Economic Integration 2 Bangkok September, 2012.
Transportation Planning, Transportation Demand Analysis Land Use-Transportation Interaction Transportation Planning Framework Transportation Demand Analysis.
A Road Pricing Feasibility Screening Tool May 19, 2015 Thomas Adler, RSG Nikhil Sikka, RSG Vince Bernardin, RSG Sarah Sun, FHWA.
Enhanced 511: Beyond the Basics Jerry Woods Florida DOT – District 5 iFlorida - Automated Message Generation Based on Travel Times.
Client Name Here - In Title Master Slide Data Requirements to Support Road Pricing Analyses Johanna Zmud, Ph.D. NuStats Partners, LP Expert Forum on Road.
Current State of FSUTMS Practice Presented to Model Task Force November 9, 2009 Terry Corkery FDOT Systems Planning Office.
February 8, 2008 SERPM65 vs. SERPM6-Corradino 1 SERPM-6.5 & SERPM-6: Differences & Future Directions Southeast Florida FSUTMS Users Group Meeting Ft. Lauderdale,
HELIOS: Household Employment and Land Impact Outcomes Simulator FLORIDA STATEWIDE IMPLEMENTATION Development & Application Stephen Lawe RSG Michael Doherty.
Using GIS Networks to Represent Model Networks May 19, 2009 Hoyt Davis & Chunyu Lu Gannett Fleming, Inc.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to TRB 11 th Conference on Transportation Planning Applications presented by Dan Goldfarb, P.E. Cambridge.
13 Step Approach to Network Design Steps A Systems Approach 8Conduct a feasibility Study 8Prepare a plan 8Understand the current system 8Design.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Safety Data Analysis Tools Workshop presented by Krista Jeannotte Cambridge Systematics, Inc. March.
Dynamic Tolling Assignment Model for Managed Lanes presented to Advanced Traffic Assignment Sub-Committee presented by Jim Hicks, Parsons Brinckerhoff.
SHRP2 C10A Final Conclusions & Insights TRB Planning Applications Conference May 5, 2013 Columbus, OH Stephen Lawe, Joe Castiglione & John Gliebe Resource.
Application of an Activity-based Model for a Toll Road Study in Chicago Matt Stratton Parsons Brinckerhoff May 19, 2015.
1 Fine Tuning Mathematical Models for Toll Applications Dr. A. Mekky, P.Eng., A. Tai, M. Khan Ministry of Transportation, Ontario, Canada.
TRANSIMS Version 5 Network Files January 20, 2011 David Roden – AECOM.
an Iowa State University center SIMPCO Traffic Modeling Workshop Presented by: Iowa Department of Transportation and Center for Transportation Research.
A Dynamic Traffic Simulation Model on Planning Networks Qi Yang Caliper Corporation TRB Planning Application Conference Houston, May 20, 2009.
1 FSUTMS-Voyager: Transit Standards within Evolving FSUTMS Summary Presentation Florida Model Task Force Tampa, Florida December 13 th, slides.
Comparative Analysis of Traffic and Revenue Risks Associated with Priced Facilities 14 th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference.
Presented to MTF Transit Committee presented by David Schmitt, AICP November 20, 2008 FSUTMS Transit Model Application.
Modeling Various Tolling Schemes Using Emme: Seattle Experience Andrew Natzel, Parsons Brinckerhoff Bhanu Yerra, Parsons Brinckerhoff Craig Helmann, Puget.
FSUTMS Model Status and Standardization Florida Model Task Force Meeting Tampa, FL December 13, 2006 Developments and Future Directions.
Jack is currently performing travel demand model forecasting for Florida’s Turnpike. Specifically he works on toll road project forecasting to produce.
Estimating Volumes for I-95 HOT Lanes in Virginia Prepared for: 2009 Planning Applications Conference Houston, TX May 18, 2009 Prepared by: Kenneth D.
Interstate 95 Managed Lanes PD&E Study (95 Express) Project Development and Environment Study SE FSUTMS Users Group The Corradino Group November 2, 2007.
Incorporating Time of Day Modeling into FSUTMS – Phase II Time of Day (Peak Spreading) Model Presentation to FDOT SPO 23 March 2011 Heinrich McBean.
1 Assessing Travel Demand for Exclusive Truck Facilities Matthew Roorda, University of Toronto Michael Hain, University of Toronto Glareh Amirjamshidi,
The Current State-of-the-Practice in Modeling Road Pricing Bruce D. Spear Federal Highway Administration.
Generated Trips and their Implications for Transport Modelling using EMME/2 Marwan AL-Azzawi Senior Transport Planner PDC Consultants, UK Also at Napier.
1 Forecasting Traffic for a Start-Up Toll Road 12 th TRB National Transportation Planning Application Conference May 18, 2009 David Schellinger, P.E. Vice.
1 Toll Modeling Analysis for the SR 520 Bridge Replacement and HOV Project 19 th Annual International EMME/2 Users’ Conference October 19-21, 2005 Presented.
TRAFFIC STUDY AND FORECASTING SHRI DEVI POLYTECHINIC
Macro / Meso / Micro Framework on I-395 HOT Lane Conversion
Network Attributes Calculator
APPLICATIONS OF STATEWIDE TRAVEL FORECASTING MODEL
Jim Henricksen, MnDOT Steve Ruegg, WSP
Modelling Sustainable Urban Transport
Multi-modal Bi-criterion Highway Assignment for Toll Roads Jian Zhang Andres Rabinowicz Jonathan Brandon Caliper Corporation /9/2018.
Problem 5: Network Simulation
Advanced Toll Modeling
  Advanced Tools to Assess Managed Toll Lane Operations Model Task Force Toll Subcommittee Meeting September 16, 2010.
Presentation transcript:

1 Ramp-to-Ramp Toll Modeling Presented By Presented By Jim Fennessy Fennessy Associates Michael W Doherty URS Corporation For Model Task Force Meeting Orlando, Florida November 29, 2007

2 Ramp-to-Ramp Toll Modeling v Jim Fennessy: – History and Development v Michael W Doherty: – Application at Florida’s Turnpike

3 Development History of Ramp-to-Ramp Toll Modeling v CTOLL v UTPS -- UROAD v Toll Facilities Model v Other Miscellaneous Toll Modeling Development Toll Modeling Development v Ramp-to-Ramp Toll Modeling

4 CTOLL v Conversion of cost to time based upon average income in study area v Equilibrium highway load parameter: ranges from 0.02 (income = $100k) to 0.10 (income = $20k)

5 CTOLL CTOLL = ( 1248 * IVTT) / ( EIP * INCOME) TIMEC TIMEC 1248 – factor to convert income in dollars/year to cents/minute (assumes 2080 work hours/year) (assumes 2080 work hours/year) IVTT – Coefficient for In-Vehicle Travel Time (i.e. : Florida – 0.02) EIP – Expendable Income Percentage (Range : 10 – 35 %) INCOME – Average regional household income TIMEC – Coefficient of Time, Statistical Estimation of Mode & Route Choice based on Survey Data Collected Route Choice based on Survey Data Collected (i.e. : Orlando – , Tampa , Jacksonville – ) (i.e. : Orlando – , Tampa , Jacksonville – ) Example CTOLL – Jacksonville Region =0.0736, Clay Co =0.0798, St Johns Co = St Johns Co =0.0511

6 UTPS -- UROAD v Up to 20 toll categories v Coded in the TRANPLAN cost field v TOLLS – toll in dollars for each category (converted to time via CTOLL) v SERVT – service time in minutes v Toll links should be coded with zero distance on links to turn off capacity restraint calculation

7 UTPS – UROAD Link Representation A B C D B-C Toll Link

8 Toll Facilities Model v Current FSUTMS Toll Model v TOLDATA file – CTOLL (overrides any parameter) – A-NODE and B-NODE – Toll in dollars – Service time in minutes : seconds – Toll facility identification – Number of lanes – Toll type ramp (no accel/decel) or barrier

9 TOLL FACILITIES MODEL Link Representation D A-B Decel Link B-C Toll Link C-D Accel Link B C A

10 Miscellaneous Toll Modeling Developments v Open Road Tolling (TOLDATA file additional fields) v Discrete Tolls – Toll based upon the number of toll facilities crossed v Toll Avoidance Areas – Help identify use of facility without a paying toll u Is the area an error in coding? u Is the area a close up issue with the tolling scheme?

11 Ramp-to-Ramp Toll Modeling v Latest Toll Collection Methods – Ramp-to-Ramp (Card System) – Barrier – Electronic Tolling (SunPass) – Discount Pricing (Discrete Tolling) – Open Road Tolling – Variable Pricing (X-Lanes) v Flexible for all cases v Software Modifications

12 Ramp-to-Ramp Toll Modeling G A BCEF PDRSQ Software Problem: Toll Pathing :A B C D + 50 D E F G + 75 A B C E F G + 125

13 Ramp-to-Ramp Toll Modeling v Network Restructure v Pseudo Links – Turn Prohibitors / Penalties – Selected Links v Pseudo to Real Links v Assignment by Iteration v Output File – Real Links Software Solutions:

14 Ramp-to-Ramp Toll Modeling Toll Matrices for Veterans Expressway

15 Ramp-to-Ramp Toll Modeling Toll Matrices converted into a comma delimited format for input to TRANPLAN

16 Ramp-to-Ramp Toll Modeling Software Output : – Ramp-to-Ramp Detail Report u Volumes u Estimated Revenue u Ramp ID’s – Company Summary – DBF Output for Other Software Interface

17 Ramp-to-Ramp Toll Modeling Ramp-to-Ramp Detail Report

18 Ramp-to-Ramp Toll Modeling Company Summary Report

19 Florida Turnpike Application v Issues with : – Supporting Survey data for Toll Roads – CTOLL – Overstating short trips on Toll Roads – Sensitivity to Speeds and Capacities

20 Florida Turnpike Application CTOLL = ( 1248 * IVTT) / ( EIP * INCOME) TIMEC TIMEC CTOLL = Cost Time in Mode & Route Choice Time in Mode & Route Choice Surveys have shown that the CTOLL varies by Trip Length by Trip Purpose by Income

21 Florida Turnpike Application CTOLL = (1/VOT) * 0.6

22 Florida Turnpike Application Investment Grade Model Toll Mode Choice Assignment Zone to Zone Variations Ramp to Ramp Pathing Toll versus Free Trips Costs by Mode by Payment Method Variable Volume/Delay Curves Use of Posted Speeds Assignment of Toll & Free Trips Costs by Mode by Payment Method

23 Ramp-to-Ramp Toll Modeling Presented By Presented By Jim Fennessy Fennessy Associates Michael W Doherty URS Corporation For Model Task Force Meeting Orlando, Florida November 29, 2007