™ Nutrient Management Planning ¨ Will these be mandated in your state?  An emerging national issue is how to account for agricultural non-point source.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Nutrient Management: Planning and Trends
Advertisements

Using RMMS to Track the Implementation of Watershed-based Plans
Manure Management Planner Brad Joern and Phil Hess Agronomy Dept., Purdue University West Lafayette, IN Version 0.12.
Soil Erosion Estimation TSM 352 Land and Water Management Systems.
Phosphorus and Potassium CNMP Core Curriculum Section 5 – Nutrient Management.
Phosphorus Index for Oregon and Washington Steve Campbell USDA - Natural Resources Conservation Service Portland, Oregon Dan Sullivan Oregon State University.
Phosphorus Indices: an Understanding of Upper Mississippi Strategies John A. Lory, Ph.D. Division of Plant Sciences University of Missouri.
©2003 Institute of Water Research, all rights reserved Water Quality Modeling for Ecological Services under Cropping and Grazing Systems Da Ouyang Jon.
2013 KY NRCS (590) Nutrient Management Standard Highlights: NRCS 590 is now only required for producers applying to receive NRCS financial or technical.
Baraboo River Watershed RCPP
Developing a GIS-Based Soil Erosion Potential Model for the Jemez Watershed – Using the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) Josh Page CE 547 –
Developing Modeling Tools in Support of Nutrient Reduction Policies Randy Mentz Adam Freihoefer, Trip Hook, & Theresa Nelson Water Quality Modeling Technical.
Nutrient Management Natural Resources Conservation Service.
Defining Land Management in the Wisconsin River Basin Defining Land Management in the Wisconsin River Basin Adam Freihoefer Wisconsin Department of Natural.
Minnesota Watershed Nitrogen Reduction Planning Tool William Lazarus Department of Applied Economics University of Minnesota David Mulla Department of.
1 Technical Service Provider Training National Association of Independent Crop Consultants January 20-23, 2010 Wyndham Orlando Resort 8001 International.
Bringing Marginal Land Into Production Don Day Extension Associate - Energy.
Conservation Effects Assessment Project (CEAP) Measuring the Environmental Benefits of Conservation Managing the Agricultural Landscape for Environmental.
Product Information, Benefits, Safeguards and Farmland Application Procedures.
Iowa P-Index Relationship to Feedlots Steve Brinkman CCA Nutrient Management Specialist USDA / NRCS
LTHIA – Upgrades and Training Bernard A. Engel Tong Zhai Larry Theller Agricultural and Biological Department Purdue University In conjunction.
1 Storm Water Management: Using GIS to Direct Non-Point Source Pollution Mitigation Efforts in the Eagleville Brook Watershed Jason Parent
Web-Based GIS for Hydrological Impact Analysis Bernie Engel, Professor and Head Larry Theller, GIS Specialist Agricultural and Biological Engineering Purdue.
Getting More NM Planning WI Dept. of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection Selling Nutrient Management Getting Conservation Compliance Reporting
Nutrient Management Planning Alan Sutton Department of Animal Sciences.
Using the Missouri P index John A. Lory, Ph.D. Division of Plant Sciences Commercial Agriculture Program University of Missouri.
Rick Koelsch University of Nebraska – Lincoln Bob Broz University of Missouri - Columbia.
Soil Erosion Assessment using GIS and RUSLE model
Soil Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) Model Input
Nonpoint Source Pollution Reductions – Estimating a Tradable Commodity Allen R. Dedrick Associate Deputy Administrator Natural Resources & Sustainable.
Agricultural Nonpoint Source Pollution and Water Quality as a function of Land Management Practices on Four Kansas Farms William W. Spotts Dr. Donald Huggins.
Soil Erosion: Causes, Control & Estimation AGME Fundamentals of Agricultural Systems Technology Photos courtesy of NRCS of USDA.
Lake Springfield Watershed Nutrient Management Project February 11, 2015.
Planning Process for CNMPs Vicki S. Anderson Resource Conservationist Natural Resources Conservation Service.
Agricultural Best Management Practices For Protecting Water Quality Recommended by Georgia Soil and Water Conservation Commission and approved by the EPD.
Nutrient Management Planning Canada-Manitoba Farm Stewardship Program Steve Sager, P.Ag. Soil Resource Specialist Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada-PFRA.
GIS Tools for Watershed Delineation Public Policy Perspectives Teaching Public Policy in the Earth Sciences April 21, 2006 Gary Coutu Department of Geography.
Introduction Soil erosion research is a capital-intensive and time-consuming activity. However, the advent of computer technology leads to a new approach.
Predicting Sediment and Phosphorus Delivery with a Geographic Information System and a Computer Model M.S. Richardson and A. Roa-Espinosa; Dane County.
Land Treatment and the Conservation Planning Process CNMP Core Curriculum Section 3 — Land Treatment Practices.
2 -1 Lesson 2 Whole Farm Nutrient Planning By Rick Koelsch, University of Nebraska.
Watershed Management Assessment Through Modeling: SALT and CEAP Dr. Claire Baffaut Water Quality Short Course Boone County Extension Office April 12, 2007.
Clayton County Watershed Projects Update Turkey River Watershed Alliance January 31, 2013.
Components of a Nutrient Management Plan Scott Sturgul Nutrient & Pest Management Program Soil & Water Management Farm & Industry Short Course Feb. 16,
Field Specific Decisions: N vs P CNMP Core Curriculum Section 5 – Nutrient Management.
Estimating Soil Erosion From Water Using RUSLE By: Andrea King USDA-Natural Resource Conservation Service.
Using Manure as Fertilizer Saves $ On this 120 acre farm with 40 cows the manure is worth $5000 It is fertilizer already on the farm, as is the nitrogen.
LTHIA and Online Watershed Delineation - Tale of a DEM consumer Larry Theller,Bernie Engel, and Tong Zhai Purdue University Agricultural and Biological.
Building an OpenNSPECT Database for Your Watershed Shan Burkhalter and Dave Eslinger National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Office for.
The Effect of Compost Application and Plowing on Phosphorus Runoff Charles S. Wortmann Department of Agronomy and Horticulture Nutrient Management for.
Nutrient Issues Review of Nutrient Management Issues Addressed by EPA NODA for Proposed CAFO Regulations.
Components of a Nutrient Management Plan The How, Where, When, and Why.
David Rounce. Outline Why Erosion Potential RUSLE Model Process of Project Relevance.
Nutrient Management Summary CNMP Core Curriculum Section 5 – Nutrient Management.
Assessing Fire Damage and Erosion Potential in Forestland Affected by the Cerro Grande Wildfire of 2000 Rachel Anne Rebecca November 21, 2000.
Nutrients and the Next Generation of Conservation Presented by: Tom Porta, P.E. Deputy Administrator Nevada Division of Environmental Protection President,
P Index Fundamentals of Nutrient Management Training Course December 15, 2005 Isaac Wolford, West Virginia NRCS State Agronomist.
NRCS Conservation Planning Slide 1 Astor BoozerWayne Honeycutt Regional ConservationistDeputy Chief for Science & Technology USDA NRCSUSDA-NRCSWashington,
Nutrient Management Planning for CAFO & AFO Fundamentals Nutrient Management Training Dec. 16 &17, 2009 Tom Basden WVU Extension Service.
SOIL EROSION ASSESSMENT Measurement of Water Erosion Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE) - predict annual soil loss by water – Wischmeier and Mannering,
Integrated Nutrient Management (Nutrient Management Plan ) A Series of Lecture By Mr. Allah Dad Khan.
Using RMMS to Track the Implementation of Watershed-based Plans
Using RMMS to Track & Report BMP Implementation
NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT POLICY NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE
Winter application worksheet
Soil Loss Estimation. USLE – Universal Soil Loss Equation SLEMSA – Soil Loss Estimation Model for Southern Africa.
Protecting our Watershed
Components of a Nutrient Management Plan
Nutrient Management Planning
Presentation transcript:

™ Nutrient Management Planning ¨ Will these be mandated in your state?  An emerging national issue is how to account for agricultural non-point source pollution.  If your state has passed legislation concerning Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) you should plan for NMP mandates?

™ Clear Understanding? ¨ According to the EPA’s State Source Water Assessment and Protection Program Final Guidance (U.S. EPA’s SSWAPP Final Guidance, August 1997, page A-25) a susceptibility analysis should be conducted with, “clear understanding where the significant potential sources of contamination are located.”

™ Application of CNMPs ¨ Such plans, if applied on a wide- scale basis, would account for agricultural non-point source pollution, however few agencies have the ability to access this large-scale data. ¨ GIS would be a good candidate to accomplish this task.

™ General NRCS Requirements ¨ Aerial photos (base map). ¨ Soil Maps, Soil Test Results. ¨ Planned Crop Sequence. ¨ Manure Sample Analysis. ¨ Realistic Yield Goals. ¨ Recommended nutrient rates and timing. ¨ Location of sensitive areas. ¨ Complete nutrient budget for N,P,K. ¨ Phosphorus Index Rating.

™ Save the farm!

™ Same Road 4 years later.

™ CNMPs are more than pollution tracking. ¨ Resource management. –Prevent runoff, soil loss. –Land Stewardship (Clean water) –Sustainable Production ¨ Efficiency –Reduce Input Cost. –Improves Management Structure. –Facilitates Better Planning. What are the benefits of a CMNP?

™ What are the problems with such a plan. ¨ No structure currently exists to manage site-specific data on a large scale. ¨ Cost of implementation. ¨ More Programs! ¨ Restrictions on farming practices.

™ Can the EPA and USDA fulfill their commitment? ¨ The Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) for streams and lakes are set by the state and cannot be exceeded. ¨ Such an analysis does not adequately account for agriculture’s contribution to waterway pollution. ¨ Currently the mechanism for locating non-point source pollution is a watershed scale analysis.

™ Site-Specific Data. ¨ It is imperative that site-specific data be promoted as the needed data for these plans. ¨ Averages of such data by county, will not adequately represent a field and may result in misapplication of both organic and inorganic fertilizers. ¨ Though some extrapolation of data is warranted, there are some attributes such as yield and nutrient levels that are unique to a field.

™ Following is just one element that may improve the resolution of CNMPs. ¨ Site-specific field erosion.  Currently it is acceptable to calculate field erosion using the slope values from SSURGO data.  There is the possibility for large errors when using this data.

™ Soil Loss ¨ Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) –30 meter resolution Digital Elevation Model data will be used to establish slope steepness for each field. Acquisition: Online download from USGS data warehouse.Acquisition: Online download from USGS data warehouse. –R – Rainfall Erosion Index. NRCS averages for the area.NRCS averages for the area. –K – SSURGO Data (Soil Types) Acquisition: From NASIS Soil Data Viewer (NASIS). Acquisition: From NASIS Soil Data Viewer (NASIS). –C and P (Site specific data ) Cover Management Factors.Cover Management Factors. Support Practice Factors.Support Practice Factors. Slope length.Slope length. Terracing and /or contouring.Terracing and /or contouring.

™ Study SITE ¨ Approximately 5 miles north of Enid, Oklahoma. ¨ Well drained silt loam. ¨ Irrigated corn, soybean rotation. ¨ Conventional tillage.

™ Slope Steepness ¨ It is important to note that both methods are an improvement over SSURGO data. ¨ This research found no significant difference between the average slope calculated using a inclinometer and the average slope generated using 30 by 30 meter DEM data.

™ Slope Surface (DEM)  Though, only a small area of this field contains 4–5 % slopes. SSURGO data attributes this entire field with a 1– 3% percent slope.  Surface values were verified using a inclinometer.

™ Slope Lengths Must be Site-Specific! ¨ There are many papers suggesting that slope length can be obtained from DEMs. ¨ This research found that though DEMs accurately depict average slope, this is not the case with slope length.

™ Highly Erodible Land (HEL)

™ Spreadable acres ¨ Considering P2O5 levels and HEL there are only spreadable acres. ¨ Currently these restrictions only apply to manure.

™ Erosion is only one element of a CNMP. ¨ Feel free to ask question concerning any aspect of CNMP’s.

™ R&D Cooperation ¨ Manure Management Planner ¨ Developed by Brad Joern and Phil Hess of Purdue University. ¨ Outstanding tool for barn management. ¨ John Lory of the University of Missouri- Columbia is developing a MMP ArcView extension.

™ Manure Manager

™ National Soil Information System (NASIS)