NASA/Air Force Cost Model presented by Keith Smith Science Applications International Corporation 2002 SCEA National Conference June 11 -14.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
VirtualSim Inc. Real tools for virtual worlds Presentation.
Advertisements

1 System Engineers Toolbox 1 Compliance Automation, Inc. INCOSE: NM Enchantment Chapter By Cheryl Hill August 12, 2009.
Simulating Ground Support Capability for NASAs Reusable Launch Vehicle Program Kathryn E. Caggiano Peter L. Jackson John A. Muckstadt Cornell University.
Design of Experiments Lecture I
The System and Software Development Process Instructor: Dr. Hany H. Ammar Dept. of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering, WVU.
Virtual University - Human Computer Interaction 1 © Imran Hussain | UMT Imran Hussain University of Management and Technology (UMT) Lecture 16 HCI PROCESS.
Software Modeling SWE5441 Lecture 3 Eng. Mohammed Timraz
Architecture Team Industry Day Briefing 17 January, 2002.
Project Scope Management
May 17, Capabilities Description of a Rapid Prototyping Capability for Earth-Sun System Sciences RPC Project Team Mississippi State University.
List of investigators PPU’s for Next Generation EP Brian Gilchrist, UM Steve Battel, Battel Engineering (consultant) Alec Gallimore, UM Ken Arnett, UM-Space.
Copyright 2002 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chapter 4 Automated Tools for Systems Development 4.1 Modern Systems Analysis and Design Third Edition.
University of Southern California Enterprise Wide Information Systems Instructor: Richard W. Vawter.
Copyright 2002 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chapter 4 Automated Tools for Systems Development 4.1 Modern Systems Analysis and Design Third Edition Jeffrey A. Hoffer.
Propulsion Engineering Research Center NASA Technology Roadmap: Launch Propulsion Systems Robert J. Santoro The Propulsion Engineering Research Center.
LSU 10/09/2007System Design1 Project Management Unit #2.
Aerospace Engineering By Patrick Ferrell. Aerospace Engineering is the main branch of engineering concerned with the research, design, development, construction,
Page - 1 Rocketdyne Propulsion & Power Role of EASY5 in Integrated Product Development Frank Gombos Boeing Canoga Park, CA.
Engineering Systems of.
The program work breakdown structure (WBS) establishes the essential
6 Systems Analysis and Design in a Changing World, Fourth Edition.
Chapter 6: The Traditional Approach to Requirements
1 NASA OSMA SAS02 Software Reliability Modeling: Traditional and Non-Parametric Dolores R. Wallace Victor Laing SRS Information Services Software Assurance.
The Pursuit for Efficient S/C Design The Stanford Small Sat Challenge: –Learn system engineering processes –Design, build, test, and fly a CubeSat project.
Noah Garcia-Galan *Some information in this presentation comes from outside sources.
© VESP International Pty Limited To Contents Slide CLICK to advance slides/ bullet points within slides Integrated Master Planner An Overview.
FP OntoGrid: Paving the way for Knowledgeable Grid Services and Systems WP8: Use case 1: Quality Analysis for Satellite Missions.
-Nikhil Bhatia 28 th October What is RUP? Central Elements of RUP Project Lifecycle Phases Six Engineering Disciplines Three Supporting Disciplines.
Space Engineering 2 © Dr. X Wu, 2012
N A S A G O D D A R D S P A C E F L I G H T C E N T E R I n t e g r a t e d D e s i g n C a p a b i l i t y / I n s t r u m e n t D e s i g n L a b o r.
© 2012 PRICE Systems, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Optimize tomorrow today. ® Understanding and Measuring the Impact of Design and Systems Engineering Decisions.
Rational Unified Process Fundamentals Module 4: Disciplines II.
Requirements and Operations Team Industry Day Briefing 17 January, 2002.
.1 RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CENTER SYSTEM AND INFORMATION SCIENCES JHU/MIT Proprietary Titan MESSENGER Autonomy Experiment.
Space Systems Engineering Database (SSED) Seminar on Aerospace Mishaps and Lessons Learned 2004 MAPLD Conference 8 September 2004 Jon Binkley (310) 336.
The System and Software Development Process Instructor: Dr. Hany H. Ammar Dept. of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering, WVU.
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing UCSD: Engineering Core 2 Portal and Grid Infrastructure.
Simulation Based Operational Analysis of Future Space Transportation Systems Alex J. Ruiz-Torres Information and Decision Sciences, COBA, UTEP Edgar Zapata.
N A S A G O D D A R D S P A C E F L I G H T C E N T E R I n t e g r a t e d D e s i g n C a p a b i l i t y / I n s t r u m e n t S y n t h e s i s & A.
J. Scott Hawker p. 1Some material © Rational Corp. Rational Unified Process Overview See and use the RUP Browser on lab machines.
March 2004 At A Glance autoProducts is an automated flight dynamics product generation system. It provides a mission flight operations team with the capability.
Chapter 6 CASE Tools Software Engineering Chapter 6-- CASE TOOLS
Constellation Space Transportation Planning Office July 30, 2009.
CASE (Computer-Aided Software Engineering) Tools Software that is used to support software process activities. Provides software process support by:- –
Copyright 2002 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chapter 4 Automated Tools for Systems Development 4.1 Modern Systems Analysis and Design.
Chapter 4 Automated Tools for Systems Development Modern Systems Analysis and Design Third Edition 4.1.
Time Phasing Development and Production Chapter 16.
Approved For Public Release © The Aerospace Corporation 2009 June 17, 2009 Initial Summary of Human Rated Delta IV Heavy Study Briefing to the Review of.
6 Systems Analysis and Design in a Changing World, Fourth Edition.
March 2004 At A Glance ITPS is a flexible and complete trending and plotting solution which provides user access to an entire mission full-resolution spacecraft.
March 2004 At A Glance Advanced Mission Design (AMD) researches and develops innovative trajectories and the mathematical methods used for optimal designs.
T EST T OOLS U NIT VI This unit contains the overview of the test tools. Also prerequisites for applying these tools, tools selection and implementation.
March 2004 At A Glance The AutoFDS provides a web- based interface to acquire, generate, and distribute products, using the GMSEC Reference Architecture.
SwCDR (Peer) Review 1 UCB MAVEN Particles and Fields Flight Software Critical Design Review Peter R. Harvey.
Introduction to Avionics Mac Mollison. What I Want to Talk About l What do we mean by “avionics”? l What is the focus of this course?
Micro Arcsecond X-ray Imaging Mission Pathfinder (MAXIM-PF) Mechanical George Roach Dave Peters 17 May 2002 “Technological progress is like an axe in the.
EDGE™ Preliminary Project Plan P09102 – METEOR Stage Separation System JJ Guerrette (ME)
Know how NASA plans and implements space missions Comprehend the essential components of a space mission Comprehend the selection and training of astronauts.
NASA Model-Based Systems Engineering Pathfinder 2016 Summary and Path Forward Karen J. Weiland, Ph.D. Jon Holladay, NASA Systems Engineering Technical.
Modern Systems Analysis and Design Third Edition
Iterative, Concurrent Design of Advanced Space Transportation Systems
Modern Systems Analysis and Design Third Edition
Microsoft dynamics ax production online training
NASA Hypersonic Research
Modern Systems Analysis and Design Third Edition
Modern Systems Analysis and Design Third Edition
Knowing When to Stop: An Examination of Methods to Minimize the False Negative Risk of Automated Abort Triggers RAM XI Training Summit October 2018 Patrick.
Mark Suder
Modern Systems Analysis and Design Third Edition
Presentation transcript:

NASA/Air Force Cost Model presented by Keith Smith Science Applications International Corporation 2002 SCEA National Conference June

Contents u Introduction u Model Evolution u Redesign Overview u NAFCOM Features u NAFCOM Demonstration

The NASA/Air Force Cost Model (NAFCOM) is a parametric estimating tool for space hardware. It is based on historical NASA and Air Force space projects and is primarily used in the very early phases of a development project. NAFCOM can be used at the subsystem or component levels. NAFCOM Description

NAFCOM Database u NAFCOM is based on spacecraft data from the Resource Data Storage and Retrieval Database (REDSTAR) u REDSTAR is NASA’s major repository of cost, technical, and programmatic information including over 25,000 documents –540 companies, government agencies, universities, and aerospace societies represented –Total program to subcomponent cost data –Information on spacecraft bus, attached payloads, engines, launch vehicles, upper stages, scientific instruments, aircraft, DoD, cost models and cost estimating, schedules, ground and launch operations, mission operations, Lessons Learned u The database currently includes 122 missions including: –76 unmanned earth orbiting, 24 unmanned planetary, 11 launch vehicles, 8 manned, 3 engines

NAFCOM Evolution u Since 1990, eight versions of NAFCOM have been developed by SAIC with increasing levels of capability.

Why Redesign NAFCOM? u Limitations with existing framework –The amount of time it takes to create a NAFCOM estimate v Every estimate must be built from scratch – analogous searches, WBS development, technical inputs on many screens, etc. v Requires significant training and thorough understanding of mechanics of using the model and of the content and nature of the database –Limited interface in a Collaborative Engineering Environment –Speed to delivery of new versions v Addition of new modules is difficult and requires more programming due to evolved code over the past ten years

Scope of Redesign u A new, simplified user interface has been designed using a template-based methodology. u The template-based estimating methodology allows users to quickly create a complete estimate. u Common spacecraft and launch vehicle configurations have been identified and used to develop baseline WBSs. u These WBSs serve as the templates for the development of an estimate within NAFCOM. u A graphical wizard guides the user by posing questions that drill down to the most appropriate estimating template.

Wizard u A SINGLE screen dynamically changes based on Mission and Vehicle Type providing the capability to estimate hundreds of possible vehicle configurations u Vehicle Types –Single-stage to Orbit –Two-stage to Orbit –Two-stage Bimese –Three-stage to Orbit –Four-stage to Orbit –Shuttle-derived

New Interface u Toolbar provides easy access u WBS is generated based on wizard but allows addition of lower level elements u Data and reports on screen change based on WBS element selected u Various on-screen reports are provided u Major cost drivers allow quick changes to template defaults on simple screens u Funding profiles can be selected at the subsystem level u Status bar provides dynamic view of cost estimate

NAFCOM Features u Subsystem-level Complexity Generators u Process-based Schedule Estimating u Time Phasing of Cost u Cost Trades u Enhanced Engine Estimating u Integration into CEC u Quick estimate startup with use of template wizard u Expert knowledge of database embedded in template selection process

NAFCOM Features u Subsystem Level Complexity Generators –Innovative application of multiple cost drivers v The equations follow the form: Cost = C * Weight ^ W * Inheritance ^ X * Technology ^ Y * Management ^ Z –Data driven, statistically based –Documents estimating assumptions –Minimizes the use of subjective inputs –Repeatable and verifiable –Nine new complexity generators have been developed including SRM, propulsion (less engines), OMS, TVC, recovery, landing, thermal control, crew accommodations, and ECLS.

NAFCOM Features u Process-based Schedule Estimating –SAIC identified the processes for currently defined common subsystems and system integration elements and tied these processes to schedule estimating algorithms –The methodology considers cost and technical parameters in the calculation of the schedule baselines –Three levels of schedules are generated: v System level by Stage v Stage level by Subsystem v Subsystem level by Process

NAFCOM Features u Time Phasing of Cost –Developed using schedules generated in process-based module –Cost is spread at the subsystem level –DDT&E and flight unit cost are shown separately –User may select either fiscal or calendar years –Beta distributions can be changed for DDT&E and flight unit

NAFCOM Features u Cost Trades –Allows the user to perform “what if” scenarios based on global changes to technical factors: v Weight v Manufacturing management v Engineering management v New design v System Test Hardware –One, all, or a combination of the factors can be increased or decreased by a percentage to determine the effect these changes have on total cost

NAFCOM Features u Enhanced Engine Estimating –Fully integrated versions of a liquid rocket engine model and a combined cycle propulsion model –Algorithms from the U.S. Air Force jet engine cost model

NAFCOM Features u Integration into collaborative environments –NAFCOM estimates are saved as Excel spreadsheets allowing easy manipulation of inputs external to the application

NAFCOM Demonstration