Lesson 21 Prediction of Abnormal Pore Pressure

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Title Petrophysical Analysis of Fluid Substitution in Gas Bearing Reservoirs to Define Velocity Profiles – Application of Gassmann and Krief Models Digital.
Advertisements

Well Design - PE 413 Chapter 1: Formation Pressure
PETE 411 Well Drilling Lesson 17 Casing Design.
MANAGED PRESSURE DRILLING PRESENTATION ______________________________________________________________________ A Continuous Circulating Concentric Casing.
PETE 203 DRILLING ENGINEERING
Chapter 3 Casing design.
Petroleum Engineering 406
PETE 411 Drilling Engineering
Petroleum Engineering 406 Lesson 3 Well Control. Read Well Control Manual –Chapter 7-8 Homework 2 Due Jan. 30, 2001.
Terra Slicing Technology Overview.
Lesson 20 Abnormal Pressure
I.Pressure Concepts  Depth:  Measured Depth (MD).  True Vertical Depth (TVD).
DRILLING ENGINEERING Well Control.
DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi. DRILLING ENGINEERING Vahid Salimi.
Tim Armitage.  Shale Gas Reservoir's  The problems with Shale Reservoirs  What is needed to Create a usable model  Possible solutions to Porosity.
Lesson 14 Jet Bit Nozzle Size Selection
Well Control Gas Solubility.
Lecture items Neutron log * Definition. * Types
Petroleum Engineering 406
PETE 411 Well Drilling Lesson 5 Hole Problems.
Lesson 22 Prediction of Fracture Gradients
ATMATM PETE 406 UBD ATMATM ATMATMATMATM PETE Underbalanced Drilling, UBD Lesson 9 Benefits of Underbalanced Drilling UDM - Chapter 3.
PETE 203 DRILLING ENGINEERING
Petroleum Engineering 406
Petroleum Engineering 411 Well Drilling
Integrated Drilling and Logging Program Approach in HPHT Environment: Successful Drilling of Deepwater Oberan Field, Nigeria, ENI Deepest Well in Deep.
Probability Distributions Continuous Random Variables.
PETE 411 Well Drilling Lesson 23 Gas Cut Mud.
Lesson 4 Drilling Cost & Drilling Rate
Lesson 10 Drilling Hydraulics (cont’d)
Confidential to SMD JIP
Lesson 25 Well Control, cont’d
Outline Pore Pressure and Fracture Gradient Drilling Fluid Casing Design Cement Design Drilling Bit Economic Analysis.
8. Permeability (Das, chapter 7)
PETE 411 Well Drilling Lesson 9 Drilling Hydraulics - Hydrostatics.
Dual Gradient Drilling Basic Technology Confidential to DGD JIP
Lesson 12 Laminar Flow - Slot Flow
WELL PROBLEMS.
Lesson 18 Casing Design Example
25-26 August 1999Well Control Conference of the Americas Greater Kick Tolerance and Fewer Casing Strings Make Dual Gradient Drilling a Winner Schubert,
Session 5: CASING DRILLING®
Petroleum Engineering 406
Well Design PE 413.
1 Petroleum Engineering 406 Lesson 13 Shallow Water Flows.
SPE DISTINGUISHED LECTURER SERIES is funded principally through a grant of the SPE FOUNDATION The Society gratefully acknowledges those companies that.
Lesson 26 * Well Control * * Variable Geometry *
Petroleum Engineering 406 Lesson 4 Well Control. Read Well Control Manual –Chapter 9 Homework 2 Due Feb. 3, 1999.
Casing Design.
TAMU-Petroleum Engineering
ATMATM PETE 689 UBD ATMATM ATMATMATMATM Lesson 9 Gasified Liquid Hydraulics Read: UDM Chapter 2.7 pages
Improved Near Wall Treatment for CI Engine CFD Simulations Mika Nuutinen Helsinki University of Technology, Internal Combustion Engine Technology.
POROSITY DETERMINATION
Uncertainty in AVO: How can we measure it? Dan Hampson, Brian Russell
Background 1. Energy conservation equation If there is no friction.
6. Gas Kick Behavior Confidential to DGD JIP Slide 1 of 48 by Hans C. Juvkam-Wold Lesson 6 Gas Kick Behavior Dual Gradient Drilling Basic Technology.
Petroleum Engineering 411 Well Drilling
Bacha Khan University Charsadda
Wellbore Stability in Olmos Formation
An Automated Approach to Wellbore Stability Analysis Petroleum Engineering Senior Design II GROUP L: QUENTYN GUGLIELMO HUGH HANNUM CARSON POLLAT BRONSON.
Mud weight High enough to prevent influx from reservoir fluids High enough to ensure wellbore stability Too high mud weight can cause fracturing of the.
Logo here… PORE PRESSURE PREDICTION OF SOME SELECTED WELLS; INSIGHT FROM THE SOUTHERN PLETMOS BASIN, OFFSHORE SOUTH AFRICA. Oluwatoyin Ayodele, Mimonitu.
Well Design - PE 413 Chapter 1: Fracture Pressure
Oil-Field Hydraulics Chapter 7 Kick Fundamentals
Chapter 2: Casing Design Casing Selection
Chapter V Primary Cementing.
Oil-Field Hydraulics Chapter 8 Shut-in Procedures
Casing Design Workshop
Formation Fracture Pressure
Casing Point Selection
Casing Design Workshop
Presentation transcript:

Lesson 21 Prediction of Abnormal Pore Pressure PETE 411 Well Drilling Lesson 21 Prediction of Abnormal Pore Pressure

Prediction of Abnormal Pore Pressure Resistivity of Shale Temperature in the Return Mud Drilling Rate Increase dc - Exponent Sonic Travel Time Conductivity of Shale

HW #11 Slip Velocity Due 10-28-02 Read: Applied Drilling Engineering, Ch. 6 HW #11 Slip Velocity Due 10-28-02

Shale Resistivity vs. Depth 1. Establish trend line in normally pressured shale 2. Look for deviations from this trend line (semi-log)

EXAMPLE Shale Resistivity vs. Depth 1. Establish normal trend line 2. Look for deviations (semi-log)

to quantify pore pressure 9 ppg (normal) (lb/gal equivalent) 16 14 12 10 Shale Resistivity vs. Depth 1. Establish normal trend line 2. Look for deviations 3. Use OVERLAY to quantify pore pressure (use with caution) 9 ppg (normal)

Depth, ft Shale Density , g/cc

Depth, ft Mud Temperature in flowline, deg F

Example 8.2 X Why?

Example 8.8 X Thermal conductivity, heat capacity, pore pressure...

Drilling Rate, ft/min PHYD - PPORE , psi

Effect of Differential Pressure DP = (P2 - P1)1,000 Effect of Differential Pressure

Typical Drilling Rate Profiles - Shale The drilling rate in a normally pressured, solid shale section will generally generate a very steady and smooth drilling rate curve. The penetration rate will be steady and not erratic (normally pressured, clean shale).

Typical Drilling Rate Profiles - Sand The drilling rate in a sand will probably generate an erratic drilling rate curve. Sands in the Gulf Coast area are generally very unconsolidated. This may cause sloughing, accompanied by erratic torque, and temporarily, erratic drilling rates.

Typical Drilling Rate Profiles - Shaley Sands This is generally the most troublesome type drilling rate curve to interpret. Many times this curve will look similar to a solid shale curve that is moving into a transition zone. Shaley Sands Note: This is a prime example why you should not base your decision on only one drilling parameter, even though the drilling rate parameter is one of the better parameters.

Typical Drilling Rate Profiles Transition Zone Shale If you are drilling close to balanced, there will probably be a very smooth, (gradual) increase in the drilling rate. This is due to the difference between the hydrostatic head and the pore pressure becoming smaller.

Typical Drilling Rate Profiles As the pressure becomes very small, the gas in the pores has a tendency to expand which causes the shale particles to pop from the wall. This is called sloughing shale. The transition zone generally has a higher porosity, making drilling rates higher. In a clean shale the ROP will increase in a smooth manner. Transition Zone Shale

Typical Drilling Rate Profiles Note: If you are drilling overbalanced in a transition it will be very difficult to pick up the transition zone initially. This will allow you to move well into the transition zone before detecting the problem.

Typical Drilling Rate Profiles This could cause you to move into a permeable zone which would probably result in a kick. The conditions you create with overbalanced hydrostatic head will so disguise the pending danger that you may not notice the small effect of the drilling rate curve change. This will allow you to move well into that transition zone without realizing it.

Determination of Abnormal Pore Pressure Using the dc - exponent From Ben Eaton:

Where

Example Calculate the pore pressure at depth X using the data in this graph. Assume: West Texas location with normal overburden of 1.0 psi/ft. X = 12,000 ft. X 1.2 1.5 dc

Example From Ben Eaton:

Example

E.S. Pennebaker Used seismic field data for the detection of abnormal pressures. Under normally pressured conditions the sonic velocity increases with depth. (i.e. Travel time decreases with depth) (why?)

E.S. Pennebaker Any departure from this trend is an indication of possible abnormal pressures. Pennebaker used overlays to estimate abnormal pore pressures from the difference between normal and actual travel times.

Depth, ft Interval Travel Time, msec per ft

Ben Eaton Example: Assume: S/D = 1.0 psi/ft also found a way to determine pore pressure from interval travel times. Example: In a Gulf Coast well, the speed of sound is 10,000 ft/sec at a depth of 13,500 ft. The normal speed of sound at this depth, based on extrapolated trends, would be 12,000 ft/sec. What is the pore pressure at this depth? Assume: S/D = 1.0 psi/ft

Ben Eaton From Ben Eaton, ( Dt a 1/v )

From Ben Eaton Note: Exponent is 3.0 this time, NOT 1.2! r = (0.6904 / 0.052) = 13.28 lb/gal p = 0.6904 * 13,500 = 9,320 psig

Equations for Pore Pressure Determination

Pore Pressure Determination

EXAMPLE 3 - An Application... Mud Weight = 10 lb/gal. (0.52 psi/ft) Surface csg. Set at 2,500 ft. Fracture gradient below surf. Csg = 0.73 psi/ft Drilling at 10,000 ft in pressure transition zone * Mud weight may be less than pore pressure! DETERMINE Maximum safe underbalance between mud weight and pore pressure if well kicks from formation at 10,000 ft.

Depth, ft Pressure, psi 2,500 Casing Seat FractureGradient 0.73 – 0.52 = 0.21 (psi/ft) 2,500 Casing Seat FractureGradient = 0.73 psi/ft Depth, ft Mud Wt. Grad = 0.52 psi/ft 10,000 5,200 Pressure, psi

Example 3 - Solution The danger here is fracturing the formation near the casing seat at 2,500 ft. The fracture gradient at this depth is 0.73 psi/ft, and the mud weight gradient is 0.52 psi/ft. So, the additional permissible pressure gradient is 0.73 – 0.52 = 0.21 psi/ft, at the casing seat. This corresponds to an additional pressure of DP = 0.21 psi/ft * 2,500 ft = 525 psi

Example 3 – Solution – cont’d This additional pressure, at 10,000 ft, is also 525 psi, and would amount to an additional pressure gradient of: 525 psi / 10,000 ft = 0.0525 psi/ft This represents an equivalent mud weight of 0.0525 / 0.052 = 1.01 lb/gal This is the kick tolerance for a small kick!

Problem #3 - Alternate Solution When a well kicks, the well is shut in and the wellbore pressure increases until the new BHP equals the new formation pressure. At that point influx of formation fluids into the wellbore ceases. Since the mud gradient in the wellbore has not changed, the pressure increases uniformly everywhere.

Depth, ft Wellbore Pressure, psi Casing Seat at 2,500 ft 525 Casing Seat at 2,500 ft Depth, ft After Kick and Stabilization Before Kick Kick at 10,000 ft DP 525 Wellbore Pressure, psi

At 2,500 ft Initial mud pressure = 0. 52 psi/ft At 2,500 ft Initial mud pressure = 0.52 psi/ft * 2,500 ft = 1,300 psi Fracture pressure = 0.73 psi/ft * 2,500 ft = 1,825 psi Maximum allowable increase in pressure = 525 psi At 10,000 ft Maximum allowable increase in pressure = 525 psi (since the pressure increases uniformly everywhere). This corresponds to an increase in mud weight of 525 / (0.052 * 10,000) = 1.01 lb/gal = maximum increase in EMW = kick tolarance for a small kick size.

Depth, ft Wellbore Pressure, psi 1,825 psi Casing Seat at 2,500 ft Kick at 10,000 ft DP Wellbore Pressure, psi

Depth, ft Wellbore Pressure, psi After Large Kick and Stabilization Casing Seat at 2,500 ft After Small Kick and Stabilization Depth, ft Before Kick Kick at 10,000 ft DP Wellbore Pressure, psi