Progress and Plans for Solenoid-free Plasma Start-up and Ramp-up R. Raman D. Mueller, S.C. Jardin and the NSTX-U Research Team NSTX-U PAC-35 Meeting PPPL.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PPPL,NFRI Study of Error Field and 3D Plasma Response in KSTAR J.-K. Park 1, Y. M. Jeon 2, In collaboration with J. E. Menard 1, K. Kim 1, J. H. Kim 2,
Advertisements

Potential Upgrades to the NBI System for NSTX-Upgrade SPG, TS NSTX Supported by Culham Sci Ctr U St. Andrews York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U.
Study of tearing mode stability in the presence of external perturbed fields Experimental validation of MARS-K/Q and RDCON codes Z.R. Wang 1, J.-K. Park.
NSTX-U T&T TSG Contributions to FY15 JRT NSTX-U Supported by Culham Sci Ctr York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U Kyoto U Kyushu U Kyushu Tokai U.
Summary of Presentations on Plasma Start-up and Progress on Small ST devices from STW2011 R. Raman University of Washington, Seattle, WA The Joint Meeting.
Team Meeting April 25, 2014 NSTX-U Construction Progress NSTX-U Supported by Culham Sci Ctr York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U Kyoto U Kyushu U.
Development and characterization of intermediate- δ discharge with lithium coatings XP-919 Josh Kallman Final XP Review June 5, 2009 NSTX Supported by.
Operations Notes Updates Since Last Team Meeting Stefan Gerhardt NSTX Team Meeting B318 January 3 rd, 2013 NSTX-U Supported by Culham Sci Ctr York U Chubu.
Raman, APS051 Solenoid-free Plasma Start-up in NSTX using Transient CHI R. Raman 1, T.R. Jarboe 1, B.A. Nelson 1, M.G. Bell 2, D.Mueller 2, R. Maqueda.
Particle control task force early run discussion R. Maingi, J. Canik Particle Control Task Force Meeting PPPL LSB B318 January 20, 2015 NSTX-U Supported.
Coupling Solenoid-free Coaxial Helicity Injection Started Discharges to Induction in NSTX Office of Science R. Raman University of Washington For the NSTX.
NSTX-U Collaboration Status and Plans for: ORNL Boundary Physics and RF Research J.M. Canik, J.B.O. Caughman, J.-W. Ahn, S.J. Diem, T.K. Gray, D.L. Green,
Quality Assurance Readiness for Operations Review Judy Malsbury, Head of QA Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory NSTX Upgrade LSB B318 December 9-11, 2014.
Sustainment and Control Chapter Status Stefan Gerhardt 12/5/12 NSTX-U Supported by Culham Sci Ctr York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U Kyoto U Kyushu.
ISTP (and other…) Update Stefan Gerhardt NSTX-U Monday Physics Meeting Feb. 20, 2015 B318 NSTX-U Supported by Culham Sci Ctr York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima.
EP-TSG session Meeting agenda et al. M. Podestà NSTX-U Research Forum 2015 EP-TSG session PPPL, Room B252 02/24/2015 NSTX-U Supported by Culham Sci Ctr.
NSTX-U Collaboration Status and Plans for: Charged Fusion Product Diagnostic FIU Werner U. Boeglin Ramona Perez, Alexander Netepenko, FIU D.S. Darrow PPPL.
1 Update on Run Schedule R. Raman NSTX Team Meeting PPPL, Princeton, NJ, 08 February, 2006 Work supported by DOE contract numbers DE-FG02-99ER54519 AM08,
RF Operations: Commissioning the RF systems and antenna conditioning J. Hosea et al. NSTX-U Supported by Culham Sci Ctr York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima.
Supported by Office of Science Culham Sci Ctr U St. Andrews York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U Kyoto U Kyushu U Kyushu Tokai U NIFS Niigata U U.
NSTX Supported by Culham Sci Ctr U St. Andrews York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U Kyoto U Kyushu U Kyushu Tokai U NIFS Niigata U U Tokyo JAEA Hebrew.
Radiative divertor with impurity seeding in NSTX V. A. Soukhanovskii (LLNL) Acknowledgements: NSTX Team NSTX Results Review Princeton, NJ Wednesday, 1.
Prototype Multi-Energy Soft X-ray Diagnostic for EAST Kevin Tritz Johns Hopkins University NSTX-U Monday Physics Meeting PPPL, Princeton, NJ June 25 th,
Direct measurement of plasma response using Nyquist Contour Z.R. Wang 1, J.-K. Park 1, M. J. Lanctot 2, J. E. Menard 1,Y.Q. Liu 3, R. Nazikian 1 1 Princeton.
NSTX-U Program Update J. Menard NSTX-U Team Meeting B318 May 7, 2013 NSTX-U Supported by Culham Sci Ctr York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U Kyoto.
NSTX-U Supported by Culham Sci Ctr York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U Kyoto U Kyushu U Kyushu Tokai U NIFS Niigata U U Tokyo JAEA Inst for Nucl.
ASC SPG NSTX-U Supported by Culham Sci Ctr York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U Kyoto U Kyushu U Kyushu Tokai U NIFS Niigata U U Tokyo JAEA Inst.
NSTX-U 5 Year Plan for Plasma Start-up and Current Ramp-up R. Raman D. Mueller, S.C. Jardin for the NSTX Research Team NSTX-U PAC-33 Meeting PPPL – B318.
Absorber arc mitigation during CHI on NSTX D. Mueller, M.G. Bell, A.L. Roquemore, R. Raman, B.A. Nelson, T.R. Jarboe and the NSTX Research Team DPP09 Meeting.
ASC Five Year Plan Chapter Status Stefan Gerhardt NSTX-U Supported by Culham Sci Ctr York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U Kyoto U Kyushu U Kyushu.
Summary of the SFPS XPs R. Raman, D. Mueller University of Washington Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory and the NSTX Research Team FY09 NSTX Results.
Wave Heating and Current Drive TSG: XMP for Recomissioning the HHFW System R.J. Perkins, J. C. Hosea Theory & Modeling: N. Bertelli NSTX-U Supported by.
XP817: Transient CHI – Solenoid free Plasma Startup and Coupling to Induction Office of Science R. Raman, B.A. Nelson, D. Mueller, T.R. Jarboe, M.G. Bell.
1 R Raman, B.A. Nelson, D. Mueller 1, T.R. Jarboe, M.G. Bell 1, J. Menard 1, R. Maqueda 2 et al. University of Washington, Seattle 1 Princeton Plasma Physics.
NSTX-U Construction Erik Perry Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory NSTX Upgrade Readiness to Operate Review LSB B318 December 9-11, 2014 NSTX-U Supported.
1 Roger Raman for the NSTX Research Team University of Washington, Seattle NSTX Run Usage 27 February – 5 May, 2006 NSTX Mid-Run Assessment PPPL, Princeton,
M&P TSG Prioritization for FY2015 and campaign startup M.A. Jaworski, C.H. Skinner, R. Kaita NSTX-U Science and Topical Science Group organizational meeting.
Progress and Plans for Non-inductive Ramp-up/Sustainment Modeling Francesca Poli for the NSTX-U team NSTX-U PAC-35 Meeting PPPL – B318 June 11-13, 2013.
NSTX-U Collaboration Status and Plans for: X Science LLC Ricky Maqueda NSTX-U Collaborator Research Plan Meetings PPPL – LSB B318 April / May 2014 NSTX-U.
Safety Jerry Levine Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory NSTX Upgrade Project Office of Science Review LSB B318 May 2 - 3, 2012 NSTX-U Supported by Culham.
Macroscopic Stability TSG Pre-forum Meeting #1 J.W. Berkery Department of Applied Physics, Columbia University, New York, NY NSTX-U Supported by Culham.
EP-TSG: draft plans for commissioning & first research phases of NSTX-U operation M. Podestà, D. Liu, N. Gorelenkov, N. Crocker for the NSTX-U EP-TSG Pre-Forum.
Development and characterization of intermediate- δ discharge with lithium coatings XP-919 Josh Kallman XP Review - ASC Feb 2, 2009 NSTX Supported by College.
NSTX-U Collaboration Plans for UCLA PI: Neal A. Crocker Co-PI: Prof. Troy Carter Grad. Student (planned 2 nd year onward) PPPL Research Contacts and Collaborators:
Solenoid Free Plasma Startup Progress and Plans R. Raman, D. Mueller S.C. Jardin (Theory) for the NSTX Research Team NSTX PAC-29 PPPL B318 January 26-28,
1 Plasma Start-up In NSTX Using Transient CHI R. Raman, T.R. Jarboe 1, D. Mueller 2, B.A. Nelson 1, M.G. Bell 2, M. Ono 2, T. Bigelow 3, R. Kaita 2, B.
NSTX-U Collaboration Status and Plans for: Local Helicity Injection - U. Wisconsin R.J. Fonck,B. T. Lewicki, A. J. Redd University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Wave Heating and Current Drive TSG: XMP/XPs for the 2015 NSXT-U Campaign RF-TSG R.J. Perkins, J. C. Hosea Theory & Modeling: N. Bertelli Univ. Rep: P.
1 Plasma Start-up In NSTX Using Transient CHI R. Raman, T.R. Jarboe 1, D. Mueller 2, B.A. Nelson 1, M.G. Bell 2, M. Ono 2, T. Bigelow 3, R. Kaita 2, B.
Effect of 3-D fields on edge power/particle fluxes between and during ELMs (XP1026) A. Loarte, J-W. Ahn, J. M. Canik, R. Maingi, and J.-K. Park and the.
NSTX-Upgrade Magnetics And Related Diagnostics SPG NSTX Supported by Culham Sci Ctr U St. Andrews York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U Kyoto U Kyushu.
First results of fast IR camera diagnostic J-W. Ahn and R. Maingi ORNL NSTX Monday Physics Meeting LSB-318, PPPL June 22, 2009 NSTX Supported by College.
Supported by Office of Science NSTX S.M. Kaye, PPPL ITPA PPPL 5-7 Oct Confinement and Transport in NSTX: Lithiumized vs non-Lithiumized Plasmas Culham.
NSTX-U Disruption PAM Working Group – Controlled Shutdown XP Discussion S. A. Sabbagh and R. Raman Department of Applied Physics, Columbia University,
Planning for Toroidal Lithium Divertor Target for NSTX and Supporting Experiments on CDX-U/LTX R. Kaita Boundary Physics Science Focus Group Meeting July.
Upgrades to PCS Hardware (Incomplete) KE, DAG, SPG, EK, DM, PS NSTX Supported by Culham Sci Ctr U St. Andrews York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo.
Solenoid-free Plasma Start-up in NSTX using Transient CHI Office of Science 22 nd IAEA Fusion Energy Conference October 13-18, 2008, Geneva College W&M.
Preliminary Results from XP1020 RFA Measurements J.W. Berkery Department of Applied Physics, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA NSTX Monday Physics.
Raman, Dec051 Solenoid-free Plasma Start-up in NSTX using Transient CHI R. Raman 1, T.R. Jarboe 1, B.A. Nelson 1, M.G. Bell 2, D.Mueller 2, R. Maqueda.
NSTX NSTX Team Meeting –Masa Ono August 15, 2014 NSTX-U Team Meeting August 15, 2014 Culham Sci Ctr U St. Andrews York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo.
Advanced Scenario Development on NSTX D. A. Gates, PPPL For the NSTX Research Team 50th APS-DPP meeting Dallas, TX November 17, 2008 College W&M Colorado.
NSTX-U Collaboration Status and Plans for: M.I.T. Plasma Science and Fusion Center Abhay K. Ram, Paul Bonoli, and John Wright NSTX-U Collaborator Research.
1 Roger Raman for the NSTX Research Team University of Washington, Seattle Update on the NSTX Run Plan PPPL, Princeton, NJ, 15 May, 2006 Supported by Office.
Monitoring impact of the LLD Adam McLean, ORNL T. Gray, R. Maingi Lithium, TSG group preliminary research forum PPPL, B252 Nov. 23, 2009 NSTX Supported.
NSTX-U Research Highlights and Plans Jonathan Menard, PPPL For the NSTX Research Team IAEA FEC Meeting October 2012 NSTX-U Supported by Culham Sci Ctr.
Comments on HC Measurements for NSTX- Upgrade SPG CS Upgrade Meeting 11/2/11 NSTX Supported by Culham Sci Ctr U St. Andrews York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima.
J-W. Ahn 1 K.F. Gan 2, F. Scotti 3, R. Maingi 1, J.M. Canik 1, T.K. Gray 1, J.D. Lore 1, A.G. McLean 4, A.L. Roquemore 3, V.A. Soukhanovskii 4 and the.
Neutron diagnostic calibration transfer XMP D. Darrow and the NSTX Research Team XMP & XP review meeting Control Room Annex June 11, 2015 NSTX-U Supported.
Profiles Variations in NSTX-U and their Potential Impact on Equilibrium and Stability Magnetoboss 12/6/2013 NSTX-U Supported by Culham Sci Ctr York U Chubu.
Demonstration of Coupling CHI Started Discharges to Induction in NSTX R. Raman 1, B.A. Nelson 1, T.R. Jarboe 1, D. Mueller 2, M.G. Bell 2, J. Menard 2,
Presentation transcript:

Progress and Plans for Solenoid-free Plasma Start-up and Ramp-up R. Raman D. Mueller, S.C. Jardin and the NSTX-U Research Team NSTX-U PAC-35 Meeting PPPL – B318 June 11-13, 2014 NSTX-U Supported by Culham Sci Ctr York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U Kyoto U Kyushu U Kyushu Tokai U NIFS Niigata U U Tokyo JAEA Inst for Nucl Res, Kiev Ioffe Inst TRINITI Chonbuk Natl U NFRI KAIST POSTECH Seoul Natl U ASIPP CIEMAT FOM Inst DIFFER ENEA, Frascati CEA, Cadarache IPP, Jülich IPP, Garching ASCR, Czech Rep Coll of Wm & Mary Columbia U CompX General Atomics FIU INL Johns Hopkins U LANL LLNL Lodestar MIT Lehigh U Nova Photonics Old Dominion ORNL PPPL Princeton U Purdue U SNL Think Tank, Inc. UC Davis UC Irvine UCLA UCSD U Colorado U Illinois U Maryland U Rochester U Tennessee U Tulsa U Washington U Wisconsin X Science LLC

NSTX-U PAC-35 – Progress and Plans for Plasma Start-up & Ramp-up NSTX-U 2 Outline Introduction Progress in the last year – in preparation for upcoming run –NIMROD & TSC Simulations –Progress with CHI on QUEST Solenoid-free Start-up & Ramp-up (SFSU) research goals and plans for FY15 & 16 Key results expected by the end of the FY16 run –Impact on further NSTX-U operation and future devices

NSTX-U PAC-35 – Progress and Plans for Plasma Start-up & Ramp-up NSTX-U 3 Goal: Develop and understand non-inductive start-up/ramp-up to project to ST-FNSF operation with small or no solenoid Aligned with FES program vision for FNSF requirements –Enabling access to low aspect ratio for nuclear applications –Simplify the tokamak concept to reduce cost High level NSTX-U goals: –Demonstrate and understand solenoid-free current start-up –Ramp-up the solenoid-less seed current non-inductively using RF and NBI Solenoid-free Start-up & Ramp-up 5YR objectives: –FY15-16: Establish high current CHI target that is suitable for non-inductive current ramp-up –FY15-16: Test Ramp-up of a kA inductively generated plasma using RF and NBI –FY17-18: Integrate non-inductive start-up to ramp-up. Test Ramp-up of ECH- heated CHI generated plasma with RF and NBI

NSTX-U PAC-35 – Progress and Plans for Plasma Start-up & Ramp-up NSTX-U 4 CHI is planned to be used as initial current seed for subsequent non-inductive current ramp-up in NSTX-U NSTX-U Start-up and Ramp-up strategy CHI in NSTX/NSTX-U Off-axis non-inductive current drive to be studied on DIII-D as part of DIII-D 2014 National Campaign (Mueller, Menard, Holcomb, et al.,)

NSTX-U PAC-35 – Progress and Plans for Plasma Start-up & Ramp-up NSTX-U 5 CHI start-up to ~0.4MA is projected for NSTX-U, and projects to ~20% start-up current in next-step STs Injector flux in NSTX-U is ~ 2.5 times higher than in NSTX  supports increased CHI current ParametersNSTXNSTX-UST-FNSF Major radius [m] Minor radius [m] B T [T] Toroidal flux [Wb] Sustained I p [MA]1210 Injector flux (Wb) Projected Start-up I p (MA) New Tools for CHI –> 2.5 x Injector Flux (proportional to I p ) –TF = 1 T (increases current multiplication) –ECH (increases T e ) –> 2kV CHI voltage (increases flux injection) –Full Li coverage (reduces low-Z imp.) –Metal divertor, Cryo pump (increases T e )

NSTX-U PAC-35 – Progress and Plans for Plasma Start-up & Ramp-up NSTX-U 6 Pursuing direct simulation of experiment and basic physics understanding of CHI trends using NIMROD (3 Publications) E.B. Hooper et al., PoP (2013) Simulations by B. Hooper (LLNL) with support from C. Sovinec (U-Wisconsin) Helicity and plasma injection at the bottom slot into a low-density background generates flux bubble An X-point forms near the bottom of NSTX as the injection voltage drops  forming closed magnetic surfaces Recent Modeling – Plasma injection with Impurity radiation Impurity radiation –– required to match experimental temperatures  fast current decay after injection ends ––Rapid removal of impurities following injection improves target-plasma quality and duration. ––Note plasma heating in “No radiation” and “Reduced radiation” models

NSTX-U PAC-35 – Progress and Plans for Plasma Start-up & Ramp-up NSTX-U 7 NIMROD simulations suggest Transient CHI has resemblance to 2D Sweet Parker-type reconnection With reduction of injector voltage & current a toroidal E-field is generated in the injector region –E toroidal X B poloidal drift brings oppositely directed field lines closer and cause reconnection generating closed flux F. Ebrahimi, et al., PoP (2013) F. Ebrahimi, et al., PoP (2014) Elongated Sweet-Parker-type current sheet forms in injector region Higher-n modes/MHD not impacting 2D reconnection Direction of plasma flows In Injector Region only Current sheet

NSTX-U PAC-35 – Progress and Plans for Plasma Start-up & Ramp-up NSTX-U 8 TSC simulations being used to guide choice of NSTX-U coil currents for initial CHI operation Initial Transient CHI discharges will start with increasing levels of current in the PF1C injector coil CHI discharge will be grown into magnetic well that is suitable for the final equilibrium PF1CU (absorber coil) coil current will be pre- programmed to provide a buffer flux PF1AL and PF2L, PF3L coil currents may be adjusted in time, as needed, to reduce injector current requirements NSTX-U Vessel Geometry, 100 eV CHI generated toroidal current increases approximately linearly with injector flux as expected

NSTX-U PAC-35 – Progress and Plans for Plasma Start-up & Ramp-up NSTX-U 9 Helicity injected plasmas (CHI & Gun Start-up) can significantly benefit from ECH heating Increased T e predicted to significantly reduce current decay rate due to resistive dissipation –ECH heated plasma can be further heated with HHFW –Maximum HHFW power < 4MW, higher B T in NSTX-U would improve coupling –HHFW has demonstrated heating a 300 kA / 300 eV plasma to > 1 keV in 20ms TSC simulations

NSTX-U PAC-35 – Progress and Plans for Plasma Start-up & Ramp-up NSTX-U 10 Provides early test of ECH heating of CHI plasma for NSTX-U/FNSF CHI design completed (March 2014) –CHI installation later during 2014 Electrode mounted on top of divertor plate Electrode-based CHI may be applicable to FNSF US Contribution to project –Primary insulators –Capacitor bank power supplies –Gas injection systems New CHI Electrode Design to be Tested on QUEST (Collaboration with Japan)

NSTX-U PAC-35 – Progress and Plans for Plasma Start-up & Ramp-up NSTX-U 11 SFSU Research Plans for FY2015 Transient CHI Start-up –Using PF1C as the primary coil, establish current targets approaching 200kA and compare scaling with NSTX results –Study improvements to CHI plasma T e in discharges with higher poloidal flux with more complete Li coatings Assess inductive flux savings and compare to NSTX results Assess NBI coupling + current drive efficiency in kA flat-top current inductive plasmas (supports TRANSP validation activities – Poli)

NSTX-U PAC-35 – Progress and Plans for Plasma Start-up & Ramp-up NSTX-U 12 SFSU Research Plans for FY2016 Transient CHI Start-up –Study improvements to CHI plasma T e in discharges with higher poloidal flux with Li coating of the upper divertor –Develop targets approaching 400kA for FY17 and FY18 ramp-up experiments (will need ECH + higher CHI voltage during FY17) Generate discharges with partial solenoid pre-charge –Ramp-up CHI discharge while reducing solenoid current to zero Test NB coupling to CHI targets with small inductive drive –Understand importance of current profile on NB coupling Obtain full non-inductive current drive in flat-top phase with ohmic seeding, then clamp OH coil current to constant value progressively earlier in time (in support of TRANSP validation)

NSTX-U PAC-35 – Progress and Plans for Plasma Start-up & Ramp-up NSTX-U 13 SFSU expected results by end of FY2016 run Understand Transient CHI current generation potential in NSTX-U –T e dependence on injected poloidal flux –Effect of more complete Li coatings on radiation and achievable T e –CHI Voltage limits and requirements in preparation for FY17 and FY18 –Improved modeling with 3D NIMROD and 2D TSC of NSTX-U CHI discharges –Understand performance of CHI in new configuration on QUEST in support of ST-FNSF Understand coupling of NBI to low current inductively generated targets –In plasmas with varying parameters (T e and n e and profiles) –Determine NI current ramp-up rates that do not lead to MHD –Lowest plasma current below which NB CD & Bootstrap current overdrive is not possible (may not cover all possibilities due to Run Time limitations)

NSTX-U PAC-35 – Progress and Plans for Plasma Start-up & Ramp-up NSTX-U 14 Summary: FY15-16 Start-up & Ramp-up Research will Develop Capabilities for Eventual Full NI Ops. On NSTX-U Transient Coaxial Helicity Injection will develop capabilities for solenoid-free plasma start-up for the ST –Initial goal is to develop targets approaching 400kA targets in support of FY17-18 goals –Numerical simulations will/are supporting experiments –New CHI electrode design in support of ST-FNSF to be tested on QUEST –Localized Helicity Injection to be tested on NSTX-U, when technically ready (FY17 or later) NB Coupling in low current inductively generated discharges will be studied to apply this capability to CHI targets during FY17-18

NSTX-U PAC-35 – Progress and Plans for Plasma Start-up & Ramp-up NSTX-U 15 Back-up Slides

NSTX-U PAC-35 – Progress and Plans for Plasma Start-up & Ramp-up NSTX-U 16 CHI Research plans in preparation for NSTX-U operations in FY2015 Initial NSTX-U Hardware Configuration for Transient CHI Start-up identified –Developed initial start-up scenarios for NSTX-U for FY15 Expts. MOV rating will be increased from 1.65kV to 2kV –NSTX-U Engineering will implement this capability in the near future Starting work on energizing CHI cap bank for tests into dummy load –FY2015 and 2016 experiments will use existing capacitor bank

NSTX-U PAC-35 – Progress and Plans for Plasma Start-up & Ramp-up NSTX-U 17 Start-up and Ramp-up Research Involves Three Parallel Paths that Will be Linked as Technical Capabilities Permit (a) Generate and increase current produced by CHI –Heat with ECH (to eV) –Then heat with HHFW (to > 1keV) –Then ramp-up current using NBI and BS current overdrive (b) Current ramp-up of intermediate I p plasmas (Wave particle TSG) –Progressively increase initial current (from 0.3 to 0.5MA) and ramp-up using HHFW and BS current overdrive –Assist extension of NBI CD to lower I p (c) Current ramp-up at near full I p with NBI and bootstrap current overdrive –Progressively reduce initial current from 0.9 to 0.4MA and non-inductively ramp- up current to 1MA using NBI and BS current overdrive

NSTX-U PAC-35 – Progress and Plans for Plasma Start-up & Ramp-up NSTX-U 18 Bridge Electron Temperature Gap Between CHI Start-up and Current Ramp-up Requirements with ECH Heating 1MW ECH 1-2 MW HHFW T e = 1 keV 20ms 300eV G. Taylor, et al., Phys. Plasmas 19 (2012)

NSTX-U PAC-35 – Progress and Plans for Plasma Start-up & Ramp-up NSTX-U 19 NIMROD simulations show approximate consistency with scaling relations used for CHI design on NSTX and NSTX-U 1.CHI produced current increases with Injector Flux 2.Injector current increases with injector flux 3.Closed flux fraction increases with narrowness of flux foot print width 4.Closed flux fraction increase with faster reduction of injector current to zero 5.Lower limit on Te below which closed flux does not for - Closed flux fraction increases with Te F. Ebrahimi, et al., PoP (2014) NSTX vessel geometry