Readiness Review for Jlab Experiment E04 - 007 Hall A and BigBite Collaboration experiment Approved Jan 2004 for 16 days Precision Measurement of the Electroproduction.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Helium Bag Readiness. Scattering chamber Clamshell flange (not here yet) Coffee can collimator Polyurethane Balloon (sides only) 10 m Mylar Balloon.
Advertisements

Measuring the Neutron and 3 He Spin Structure at Low Q 2 Vincent Sulkosky College of William and Mary, Williamsburg VA Experimental Overview The.
Measuring the Neutron and 3 He Spin Structure at Low Q 2 Vincent Sulkosky for the JLab Hall A Collaboration College of William and Mary, Williamsburg VA.
Ioana Niculescu James Madison University August 15, 2013.
Run Plan Document E04-007: Threshold Pion Production.
1 Pion beam tracker for HADES Jerzy Pietraszko CBM Collaboration Meeting, March 9-13, 2009, GSI, Darmstadt.
SBS Hadron and Electron Calorimeters Mark Jones. SBS Hadron and Electron Calorimeters Mark Jones Overview of GEn, GMn setup Overview of GEp setup The.
SBS Hadron and Electron Calorimeters Mark Jones 1 TexPoint fonts used in EMF. Read the TexPoint manual before you delete this box.: AAA A.
Richard Lindgren - UVa Cole Smith - UVa Khem Chirapatimol - Chiang Mai University E04- Status Report Precision Measurements of π 0 Electroproduction near.
E : HRS Cross Section Analyses Vincent Sulkosky Massachusetts Institute of Technology GMp Collaboration Meeting September 24 th, 2012.
Measurement of the  n(p)  K +   (p) at Jefferson Lab Sergio Anefalos Pereira Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati.
Hall D Photon Beam Simulation and Rates Part 1: photon beam line Part 2: tagger Richard Jones, University of Connecticut Hall D Beam Line and Tagger Review.
Upcoming Review of the Hall D Photon Beam and Tagger Richard Jones, University of Connecticut, for the GlueX collaboration GlueX Collaboration Meeting.
Study of two pion channel from photoproduction on the deuteron Lewis Graham Proposal Phys 745 Class May 6, 2009.
Update on the Gas Ring Imaging Cherenkov (GRINCH) Detector for A 1 n using BigBite Todd Averett Department of Physics The College of William and Mary Williamsburg,
Bogdan Wojtsekhowski, Jefferson Lab Experimental search for A’ for APEX collaboration 1.
E : (GMp) Precision Measurement of the Proton Elastic Cross Section at High Q 2 Vincent Sulkosky Massachusetts Institute of Technology for the.
Proton polarization measurements in π° photo-production --On behalf of the Jefferson Lab Hall C GEp-III and GEp-2γ collaboration Wei Luo Lanzhou University.
APS Meeting April 5-8, 2003 at Philadelphia Chunhui Luo 1 Chunhui Luo Inclusive J/ψ Production at DØ.
PAIR SPECTROMETER DEVELOPMENT IN HALL D PAWEL AMBROZEWICZ NC A&T OUTLINE : PS Goals PS Goals PrimEx Experience PrimEx Experience Design Details Design.
The Design of Barrel Electromagnetic Calorimeter (BEMC) October Lu Jun-guang.
T.C. Jude D.I. Glazier, D.P. Watts The University of Edinburgh Strangeness Photoproduction At Threshold Energies.
SHMS Optics and Background Studies Tanja Horn Hall C Summer Meeting 5 August 2008.
High Precision Measurement of the Proton Charge Radius A. Gasparian NC A&T State University, Greensboro, NC Outline  Previous experiments and proton size.
S PIN A SYMMETRIES ON THE N UCLEON E XPERIMENT ( E07-003) Anusha Liyanage Experiment Nuclear Physics Group Meeting Hampton University May 11, 2009.
Short Range Correlation in 4 He E07 – 006 Update report presented to the Hall A User group meeting the Hall A User group meeting Igor Korover Tel Aviv.
HAPPEX-III, PVDIS, PREx targets D.S. Armstrong April 17 ‘09 1)Cryotargets – what we requested: new 25 cm racetrack cells – status 2) Solid Targets for.
Jin Huang M.I.T. Hall A Analysis Workshop Dec 14, JLab.
Vincent Sulkosky Massachusetts Institute of Technology Spokespeople: J.-P. Chen, A. Deur, F. Garibaldi Hall A Collaboration Meeting December 10 th, 2012.
Rosen07 Two-Photon Exchange Status Update James Johnson Northwestern University & Argonne National Lab For the Rosen07 Collaboration.
NanoPHYS’12 – December 17-19, 2012 K. Nakano, S. Miyasaka, K. Nagai and S. Obata (Department of Physics, Tokyo Institute of Technology) Drift Chambers.
Exclusive π 0 electroproduction in the resonance region. Nikolay Markov, Maurizio Ungaro, Kyungseon Joo University of Connecticut Hadron spectroscopy meeting.
BigBite Spectrometer Equipment by Douglas W. Higinbotham.
Preparation for E Pi0 Collaboration Meeting Tuesday Feb R.Lindgren.
HAPPEX-III and PVDIS targets D.S. Armstrong July 22 ‘08 1)Pointing angle measurements – water cell target some old-style nuclear physics… 2) Cryotargets.
E : (GMp) Precision Measurement of the Proton Elastic Cross Section at High Q 2 Vincent Sulkosky Massachusetts Institute of Technology for the.
Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering on the neutron Malek MAZOUZ LPSC Grenoble EINN 2005September 23 rd 2005.
Update on the Hall C Monte Carlo simulation for 12 GeV Mark Jones.
Experimental Nuclear Physics Some Recent Activities 1.Development of a detector for low-energy neutrons a. Hardware -- A Novel Design Idea b. Measure the.
Vina Punjabi Norfolk State University Hall A Collaboration Meeting June 10-11, 2010 GEp-V Experiment to Measure G Ep /G Mp.
Lecture 9: Inelastic Scattering and Excited States 2/10/2003 Inelastic scattering refers to the process in which energy is transferred to the target,
Proton Charge Form Factor Measurement E. Cisbani INFN Rome – Sanità Group and Italian National Institute of Health 113/Oct/2011E. Cisbani / Proton FF.
MOLLER Collaboration Meeting May 2014 Hall A Update Thia Keppel 1.
Calorimetry for Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering in Hall A Alexandre Camsonne Hall A Jefferson Laboratory Workshop on General Purpose High Resolution.
E Precision Measurement of the Neutron Magnetic Form Factor up to Q 2 =13.5 (GeV/c) 2 by the Ratio Method B. Quinn, J. Annand, R. Gilman, B. Wojtsekhowski.
A. Zelenski a, G. Atoian a *, A. Bogdanov b, D.Raparia a, M.Runtso b, D. Steski a, V. Zajic a a Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY, 11973, USA b.
GEp-III in Hall C Andrew Puckett, MIT On behalf of the Jefferson Lab Hall C GEp-III Collaboration April 15, 2008.
FSC Status and Plans Pavel Semenov IHEP, Protvino on behalf of the IHEP PANDA group PANDA Russia workshop, ITEP 27 April 2010.
Magnetized hadronic calorimeter and muon veto for the K +   +  experiment L. DiLella, May 25, 2004 Purpose:  Provide pion – muon separation (muon veto)
The Q Weak Experiment Event tracking, luminosity monitors, and backgrounds John Leacock Virginia Tech on behalf of the Q Weak collaboration Hall C Users.
00 Cooler CSB Direct or Extra Photons in d+d  0 Andrew Bacher for the CSB Cooler Collaboration ECT Trento, June 2005.
E97-110: Small Angle GDH Experimental Status Report E97-110: Small Angle GDH Experimental Status Report Vincent Sulkosky Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
J-PARC でのハイパー核ガンマ線分光実験用 散乱粒子磁気スペクトロメータ検出器の準備 状況 東北大理, 岐阜大教 A, KEK B 白鳥昂太郎, 田村裕和, 鵜養美冬 A, 石元茂 B, 大谷友和, 小池武志, 佐藤美沙子, 千賀信幸, 細見健二, 馬越, 三輪浩司, 山本剛史, 他 Hyperball-J.
SANE Collaboration ( E07-003) Anusha Liyanage Hampton University January 12, 2010 Measurement Of the Proton Form Factor Ratio at High Q 2 by Using The.
Hall C - 12 GeV pCDR Max. Central Momentum 11 GeV/c 9 GeV/c Min. Scattering Angle 5.5 deg 10 deg Momentum Resolution.15% -.2% Solid Angle 2.1 msr 4.4 msr.
E97-110: Small Angle GDH Experimental Status Report E97-110: Small Angle GDH Experimental Status Report Vincent Sulkosky Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Spectrometer optics studies and target development for the 208Pb(e,e’p) experiment in Hall A at Jefferson Lab, GUIDO M. URCIUOLI, INFN, Roma, Italy, JUAN.
P.F.Ermolov SVD-2 status and experimental program VHMP 16 April 2005 SVD-2 status and experimental program 1.SVD history 2.SVD-2 setup 3.Experiment characteristics.
Comparison of GENIE with Garino Data Xin Qian BNL In collaboration with Steve Dytman 1.
Comparison of GENIE with Garino Data Xin Qian BNL In collaboration with Steve Dytman 1.
Feasibility studies for DVCS and first results on exclusive  at COMPASS DVCS studies Physics impact Experimental issues Recoil detector prototype Exclusive.
Hall A Update Thia Keppel User Group Board of Directors January 2015.
Understanding the 3 He Nuclei: Asymmetry Measurements in Quasi- Elastic Ge Jin University of Virginia For the E Collaboration.
E STATUS REPORT Khem Chirapatpimol University of Virginia
Precision Measurement of the Electroproduction of p0 Near Threshold:
M. Jones B. Wojtsekhowski
A Precision Measurement of GEp/GMp with BLAST
Special Considerations for SIDIS
Hall “12 GeV” May 27, 2003 NAPP 2003: J.J. LeRose.
What is the CNI experiment
Presentation transcript:

Readiness Review for Jlab Experiment E Hall A and BigBite Collaboration experiment Approved Jan 2004 for 16 days Precision Measurement of the Electroproduction of  0 Near Threshold: A Test of Chiral QCD Dynamics Co-spokespersons J. Annand, D. Higinbotham, R. Lindgren, V. Nelyubin, and B. Norum, Physics Goal: Extract high precision data in a fine grid of Q 2 and W from Q 2 = in steps of 0.01 (GeV/c) 2 and from  W = MeV above threshold in steps of MeV. Complete kinematic coverage from MeV above threshold for proton momentum > 220 MeV/c

Outline Overview Beam Energy and Current Beam Monitoring Targets Electron Arm Spectrometer Proton Arm BigBite Mechanical Hardware Additions Calibrations Run Plan/Commissioning Production Running Milestones People Power Safety

W (MeV) Above Threshold Q2 (GeV/c)(Deg.) p  Vertical +/- 18 deg Horizontal +/_ 5 deg 25 cm 80 cm 117 BigBite Solid Angle ~100msr Proton Cone

Layout of Experiment in Hall A Detect electron in HRS and recoil proton in BigBite. LH2 Target 20 cm Liquid Hydrogen( LH2)  m 6061 Al Luminosity 1-2 x Hz/cm 2 HRS Electron BigBite Beam Dump HRS Luminosity Monitor MWDC(12 Planes) p  E-E Trigger Scintillator Arrays Energy 1.2 GeV Current 1- 2  A e

Beam Conditions Beam Energy GeV –No higher than 1.2 GeV –Need the best energy resolution as possible < 2 x –Energy lock on –ep/arc energy measurement and elastic scattering Beam Current –Production running  a –Rastered beam 2 mm x 4mm Polarization as high as possible Beam Monitoring –BCMs, BPMs, Silver calorimeter, Moller Polarimeter Pulsed beam - Investigate using to calibrate acceptance of BigBite in single arm mode. (Radiation tail method looks sufficient)

Targets Cryo-targets liquid hydrogen –Two different length targets will help disentangle systematic errors. – A 20 cm long, 2 cm wide/hign 200 um thick window thick aluminum cell exist. Production data will be taken on the 20 cm cell. Investigating shielding BB from windows of cell at one kinematics.. Compare to data with software cuts on z position. –A 4 cm pan cake cell with thin Be window will be used for same kinematics above. Small target. Smaller acceptance corrections. Take data on empty cell for background. Can not correct in software. Compare with data above for same kinematics. Multi-foil C12 target, C, Ta,BeO –Solid Target for elastic energy and z position measurements. Targets

Electron Arm Spectrometer Range of electron angles for production running and acceptance calibration –Angular range 12.5 to 80 degrees –Momentum range [GeV/c] 0.3 to 1.2 GeV/c –VDC1 Yes –VDC2 Yes –S1 Yes –S2 Yes Only need to cover about 20 MeV in focal Plane. Excellent intrinsic resolution in W and and Q 2 Rates are high due to radiation tail in the region of pion threshold. Need to turn off high voltages for PMTs outside this range of W Air coupling. Contributes to somewhat degraded energy resolution in W. –Still sufficient to accomplish Physics goal Investigating using smaller and thinner window 10 by 6 cm window for HRS with snout.

Electron Rate In HRS

Proton Arm BigBite Replace Havar with 200  m aluminum (Old slide)

BigBite in- plane range

Proton Arm BigBite The low energy recoil protons will be detected in two of the MWDC chambers commissioned in the GEN Experiment. The Middle chamber will be upgraded at UVa.Three more planes will be added to bring it up to six planes. Mitra will discuss this. The MWDC are followed by two planes of 24 scintillators each. A 3 mm thick  E plane and a 30 mm thick E plane. These were designed and tested by Glasgow and commissioned in the SRC experiment. They will be used for particle ID for protons and time of flight will be used to measure momentum of low momentum protons. Better than wire chambers at low p. The trigger for E will be a coincidence between the E plane and the HRS-L. The hadron package electronics, BigBite trigger for E04-007, readout, and milestones will be discussed by B. Moffit, Plan to use VME. Have Fast bus for back-up. Modifications to BigBite frame are being made to accommodate two wire chambers followed by  E-E scintillator planes. Need to minimize straggling of low energy protons. Transport protons using helium a few mm above atmospheric pressure. Cheaper and more convenient than vacuum. Come back to this later.

Scintillator Rates scaled from measured rates in SRC Experiment. Shows why we plan to use the E plane in the trigger and not the  E. We may miss some low energy protons. Needs to be investigated. 3 mm  E Plane 30 mm E Plane

Machining of scattering chamber clamshell flange-right (CS-R) with windows for BigBite and HRS-R(Monitor). Machining of scattering chamber clamshell flange- left (CS-L)for HRS-L with windows for production data ( Deg.) and elastic calibration data ( Deg) “Coffee can” collimator, vacuum window, and flanges Construction of polyurethane “helium containment” balloons for BigBite and coupling to scattering chamber and wire chambers support stand. Helium gas handling system, pressure monitor, venting to outside Hall A. New Mechanical Hardware Additions

Scattering chamber Clamshell flange (not here yet) “Coffee can” collimator 0.005” Polyurethane Balloon (sides only) 10  m Mylar Balloon Front wire chamber Upgraded Rear wire chamber  E Plane E Plane 20 H targetElectron Beam 10  m mylar foil

Coffee Can Collimator

Clamshell and Coffee Can Collimator Side View Clamshell and Coffee Can Collimator Top view

Transport of low energy protons ( MeV/c) from target through BigBite to MWDC Transport protons using helium a few mm above atmospheric pressure. Almost as good as using vacuum. More convenient and cheaper. Use company that makes polyurethane helium filled balloons of all shapes and sizes. Polyurethane skin “ thick. Will lose helium slowly over a few days. Test leakage rate. Flexible enough to have limited angular movement of BigBite. Show sample material. Stretched over circular snout fixed to scattering chamber and hot glued Stretched over rectangular angle aluminum attached to wire chamber frame and hot glued Investigate stability of system and radiation damage of polyurethane and glue.

Shape of Polyurethane Helium Filled Balloon cm 44.0 cm 33.1 cm 38.7 cm Bottom view 2 Deg 5 cm 25.2 cm 18 Deg Side view cm 33.8 cm cm 82.3 cm 5 cm Stretch over aluminum support frame and hot glue poly and terminate with 10  m mylar Stretch over “coffee can” collimator and hot glue

Test on Balloons Need to always keep inflated above atmospheric pressure Monitor during the experiment. This is crucial. Mechanical stability of of joints and seams and leak rates On the polyurethane balloons and mylar balloons Conduct radiation damage test on both types. –Effects on hot glue joints –Effects on seams –Effects on polyurethane

GEANT Results Beam Energy GeV Transport Medium HRS Target Cell Window Vacuum Window  Miss. Mass) MeV  W) MeV  c. m. ) Deg.  Deg.  Q   (GeV/c) He bag Air Coupled 190  m Al 170  m Al Ave 26 Ave1.7x He bag Vacuum coupled 190  m Al 170  m Al Same as above Same as above 1.5 x He bag Air Coupled 25  m Havar 25  m Havar ave 19.4 ave 1.2 x He bag Vacuum Coupled 25  m Havar 25  m Havar x Vacuum Chamber Vacuum coupled 25  m Havar 150  m Kapton x10 -3  W = MeV Q 2 = to (GeV/c) 2  p   z  cm B=7 kG at 1.2 GeV

Q 2 =0.10 (GeV/c) 2 Distler PRL 80, 2294 (1998) LEC’s a 3 = and a 4 = Q 2 =0.05 (GeV/c) 2 Merkel et al. PRL 88, 1230 (2002) ChPT Bernard, et al. NP A607, 379(1996) MAID Large deviations between ChPT and data Need data in a finer grid in Q 2 Electro-  0 production on the proton  tot  b 

Calibrations/Commissioning Beam Current integration - Silver Calorimeter BigBite angle and acceptance in-plane –Elastic scattering from hydrogen and radiative tail –Coincidence between electron in HRS-L and recoil p in BigBite –Cut on W= MeV P = MeV/c, HRS-L degrees. Vertex reconstruction accuracy - multi foil C target –BigBite at 48 Deg Beam energy calibration- – Elastic scattering from Ta, C, H Efficiency of detection system – Measure elastic cross section H HRS-L at 45 Deg, BigBite at 48 Deg Luminosity monitor HRS-R

Run Plan Production running BigBite Calibration Measurements HRS-L at Deg BigBite at 42 Deg –Production Running HRS-L at 12.5 Deg., BigBite at 42 Deg –Production Running HRS-L at 14.7 Deg., BigBite at 42 Deg –Production Running HRS-L at 16.6 Deg., BigBite at 42 Deg BigBite Calibration Measurements HRS-L at Deg., BigBite at 48 Deg –Production Running HRS-L at 12.5 Deg., BigBite at 48 Deg –Production Running HRS-L at 14.7 Deg., BigBite at 48 Deg –Production Running HRS-L at 16.6 Deg., BigBite at 48 Deg BigBite Calibration Measurements HRS-L at Deg., BigBite at 54 Deg –Production Running HRS-L at 12.5 Deg., BigBite at 54 Deg –Production Running HRS-L at 14.7 Deg., BigBite at 54 Deg –Production Running HRS-L at 16.6 Deg., BigBite at 54 Deg HRS-R fixed at 90 Degrees

Milestones March –Design/Draft windows in Clamshell Flanges (2) –Design/Draft Coffee Can Collimator –Design/Draft shape of polyurethane helium containment balloon –Design ways of coupling balloon to chamber –Order sample polyurethane balloon material April –Design Helium gas handling system for balloon –Design 4 cm pancake cell - D. Meekins. –Order prototype polyurethane balloon( ” thick) and prototype 10  m mylar pillow shape balloon. Order two extra balloons for protecting PMTs from helium leaks –Finalize mechanical hardware design (Lindgren) and have CAD drawings made for integration into the system(Jlab). –Middle Wire chamber shipped to UVa for upgrade to 6 wire planes May –Test prototype balloons for helium leak rate and radiation damage

Milestones June –Upgraded wire chamber shipped to JLab for testing July –Install upgraded wire chamber into frame. –Start and complete machining clamshell flanges, collimator, and window components August –Assemble flanges, collimator, window, gas handling system, and balloon for further testing. September –Check out all new hardware, electronics, and hadron package. Make sure it all works. (Need milestones for hadron package) November - December –Review, Check out Run Plan, Check BigBite scintillators and wire planes with Cosmic rays, check discriminator levels and high voltages. Check out trigger electronics with cosmic rays. Jan 2008 –Install pi0 experiment - one month Feb 2008 –Run pi0 (32 days)

People Power Overview and Run PlanR. Lindgren, B.E. Norum (UVa) GEANT Calculations V. Nelyubin (UVa) Target Design and ConstructionD. Meekins (JLab) Design of new Clamshell, Coffee Can Collimator, Helium Bag systemR. Lindgren (UVa) CAD DrawingsJLab Middle Wire-Chamber UpgradeM. Shabestrai (UVa Grad. Student) N. Liyanaga (UVa) Hadron Package for BigBiteX. Zhan (MIT) Grad. Student Hadron Electronics for BigBiteB. Moffit (MIT) Research Associate ShiftsThe BigBite Family

Safety Documentation This research will be conducted in a manner that ensures that environmental, health, and safety (EH&S) and radiation safety (ALARA) concerns receive the highest consideration yet maintain the programmatic goals of the laboratory in producing the highest quality results efficiently. –Conduct of Operations (COO) –Experiment Safety Assessment Document (ESAD) – Radiation Safety Assessment Document.