Robert LaPlante NOAA/NWS Cleveland, OH David Schwab Jia Wang NOAA/GLERL Ann Arbor, MI 15 March 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 13 – Weather Analysis and Forecasting
Advertisements

Ensembling Mesoscale Model Data National Weather Service, Cleveland, OH Christopher Mello.
Jess Charba Fred Samplatsky Phil Shafer Meteorological Development Laboratory National Weather Service, NOAA Updated September 06, 2013 LAMP Convection.
1.Real-time rainfall observations: Addition of USGS and NC State Climate Office precipitation stations so EMs can get real- time observations of how much.
Upcoming Changes in Winter Weather Operations at the Weather Prediction Center (WPC) Great Lakes Operational Meteorological Workshop Dan Petersen, Wallace.
David Prado Oct Antarctic Sea Ice: John N. Rayner and David A. Howarth 1979.
Robert LaPlante Christopher Mello NOAA/NWS Cleveland, OH Gregory Lang Jia Wang NOAA/GLERL Ann Arbor, MI 9 April 2013.
Operational Great Lakes Ice Charts and On-line Climatology 18 th Annual Canada/US Great Lakes Operational Meteorology Workshop Toronto Ontario Marie-France.
The Inland Extent of Lake Effect Snow (LES) Bands Joseph P. Villani NOAA/NWS Albany, NY Michael L. Jurewicz, Sr. NOAA/NWS Binghamton, NY Jason Krekeler.
Forecasting the Inland Extent of Lake-Effect Snow (LES) Bands: Application and Verification for Winter Joseph P. Villani NOAA/NWS Albany, NY.
Recent performance statistics for AMPS real-time forecasts Kevin W. Manning – National Center for Atmospheric Research NCAR Earth System Laboratory Mesoscale.
MOS Developed by and Run at the NWS Meteorological Development Lab (MDL) Full range of products available at:
FORECASTING EASTERN US WINTER STORMS Are We Getting Better and Why? Jeff S. Waldstreicher NOAA/NWS Eastern Region Scientific Services Division – Bohemia,
MOS Performance MOS significantly improves on the skill of model output. National Weather Service verification statistics have shown a narrowing gap between.
How might climate change affect heavy lake-effect snowstorms Kenneth Kunkel, Nancy Westcott, and David Kristovich Illinois State Water Survey Champaign,
INTRODUCTION Weather and climate remain among the most important variables involved in crop production in the U.S. Great Lakes region states of Michigan,
Robert LaPlante NOAA/NWS Cleveland, OH David Schwab Jia Wang NOAA/GLERL Ann Arbor, MI 22 March 2011.
Chapter 13 – Weather Analysis and Forecasting. The National Weather Service The National Weather Service (NWS) is responsible for forecasts several times.
Ice Validation and Verification of the Global Ocean Forecast System 3.1 Ruth H. Preller 1, E. Joseph Metzger 1, Pamela G. Posey 1, Alan J. Wallcraft 1,
Creation of Gridded MOS Land Water Mask Statistical Modeling Branch Meteorological Development Lab November 9, 2007.
Radar Animation 9:30 AM – 7:00 PM CST November 10, 2006 …Excerpt from Meteorological Overview of the November 10, 2006 Winter Storm… Illustrate value of.
Phillip Bothwell Senior Development Meteorologist-Storm Prediction Center 3 rd Annual GOES-R GLM Science Meeting Dec. 1, 2010 Applying the Perfect Prog.
Chuliang Xiao 1 and Brent Lofgren 2 1 CILER, University of Michigan 2 NOAA GLERL A Study of Great Lakes Effects on Synoptic Processes by Using WRF Comparison.
The Utilization of the Graphic Forecast Generator (GFE) to Locally Apply CPC’s Week Two Forecast.
Towards an object-oriented assessment of high resolution precipitation forecasts Janice L. Bytheway CIRA Council and Fellows Meeting May 6, 2015.
NOAA’s National Weather Service National Digital Forecast Database: Status Update LeRoy Spayd Chief, Meteorological Services Division Unidata Policy Committee.
MDSS Lab Prototype: Program Update and Highlights Bill Mahoney National Center For Atmospheric Research (NCAR) MDSS Stakeholder Meeting Boulder, CO 20.
Sea Ice Modelling and Data Assimilation at CIS Tom Carrieres.
VERIFICATION OF NDFD GRIDDED FORECASTS IN THE WESTERN UNITED STATES John Horel 1, David Myrick 1, Bradley Colman 2, Mark Jackson 3 1 NOAA Cooperative Institute.
By John Metz Warning Coordination Meteorologist WFO Corpus Christi.
Updated Ozone CART Analysis, AQAST Meeting St. Louis, MO June 3-4, 2015.
OUTLINE Current state of Ensemble MOS
An Experiment to Evaluate the Use of Quantitative Precipitation Forecasts from Numerical Guidance by Operational Forecasters Joshua M. Boustead and Daniel.
Synthesizing Weather Information for Wildland Fire Decision Making in the Great Lakes Region John Horel Judy Pechmann Chris Galli Xia Dong University of.
The climate and climate variability of the wind power resource in the Great Lakes region of the United States Sharon Zhong 1 *, Xiuping Li 1, Xindi Bian.
Validation of US Navy Polar Ice Prediction (PIPS) Model using Cryosat Data Kim Partington 1, Towanda Street 2, Mike Van Woert 2, Ruth Preller 3 and Pam.
Model Post Processing. Model Output Can Usually Be Improved with Post Processing Can remove systematic bias Can produce probabilistic information from.
Ice Cover in New York City Drinking Water Reservoirs: Modeling Simulations and Observations NIHAR R. SAMAL, Institute for Sustainable Cities, City University.
The Similar Soundings Technique For Incorporating Pattern Recognition Into The Forecast Process at WFO BGM Mike Evans Ron Murphy.
2006(-07)TAMDAR aircraft impact experiments for RUC humidity, temperature and wind forecasts Stan Benjamin, Bill Moninger, Tracy Lorraine Smith, Brian.
Application of Numerical Weather Prediction Prognoses to Operational Weather Forecasting in Hong Kong Pre-CAS Technical Conference on "Environmental Prediction.
Chap. 12 Lake-effect snow storms. Lake effect snow bands over the Great Lakes on 9 Jan 2011.
NWSRFS Snow Modeling Cold Regions Workshop November 2004 Andrea Holz NCRFC.
APPLICATION OF NUMERICAL MODELS IN THE FORECAST PROCESS - FROM NATIONAL CENTERS TO THE LOCAL WFO David W. Reynolds National Weather Service WFO San Francisco.
Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory Review – Ann Arbor, MI November 15-18, Click to edit Master text styles –Second level Third level.
NOAA/NWS Digital Services 1 National Weather Service Forecast Evolution and Delivery in a Digital Era Glenn Austin Office of Climate, Water, and Weather.
Linear Optimization as a Solution to Improve the Sky Cover Guess, Forecast Jordan Gerth Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies University.
National Weather Service Southern Region Forecast Office’s Operational Experiences Melinda Hinojosa National Weather Service Southern Region Headquarters.
Statistical Post Processing - Using Reforecast to Improve GEFS Forecast Yuejian Zhu Hong Guan and Bo Cui ECM/NCEP/NWS Dec. 3 rd 2013 Acknowledgements:
NOAA/NWS Digital Services 1 NWS Forecast Evolution and Delivery in a Digital Era Glenn Austin Office of Climate, Water, and Weather Services David Ruth.
Extreme Waves at the Great Lakes: Performance of NCEP’s Operational Wave Models Jose-Henrique Alves Research Scientist 1.
NDFDClimate: A Computer Application for the National Digital Forecast Database Christopher Mello WFO Cleveland.
NOAA’s National Weather Service Middle Atlantic River Forecast Center Weather Forecast Office State College Ted Rodgers Hydrometeorologist Cody Moser Hydrologist.
1 NWS Digital Services American Meteorological Society Annual Partners Meeting San Diego, CA January 13, 2005 LeRoy Spayd National Weather Service Office.
Forecasting smoke and dust using HYSPLIT. Experimental testing phase began March 28, 2006 Run daily at NCEP using the 6Z cycle to produce a 24- hr analysis.
SeaWiFS Highlights July 2002 SeaWiFS Celebrates 5th Anniversary with the Fourth Global Reprocessing The SeaWiFS Project has just completed the reprocessing.
National Weather Service Houston/Galveston Lance Wood Science and Operations Officer Assessing the Impact of MODIS SST Utilizing a local WRF.
Marine Modeling and Analysis Branch Ocean Waves.
Translating Advances in Numerical Weather Prediction into Official NWS Forecasts David P. Ruth Meteorological Development Laboratory Symposium on the 50.
1 NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION I GREAT LAKES ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LAB I ANN ARBOR MI HAB Particle Model Buoyancy += HAB Intensity.
Great Lakes Ice Database, 1973-present 1/15 Great Lakes Ice & Climate Research, Modeling, and Applications Jia Wang Integrated Physical & Ecological Modeling.
1 NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION I GREAT LAKES ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LAB I ANN ARBOR MI Meteotsunami Occurrences in the Great Lakes and.
NWS Forecast Office Assessment of GOES Sounder Atmospheric Instability
Storm Surge Forecasting Practices, Tools for Emergency Managers, A Probabilistic Storm Surge Model Based on Ensembles and Past Error Distributions.
FORECASTING EASTERN US WINTER STORMS Are We Getting Better and Why?
Communicating Uncertainty via Probabilistic Forecasts for the January 2016 Blizzard in Southern New England Frank M Nocera, Stephanie L. Dunten & Kevin.
Winter storm forecast at 1-12 h range
Aviation Forecast Guidance from the RUC
Post Processing.
Presentation transcript:

Robert LaPlante NOAA/NWS Cleveland, OH David Schwab Jia Wang NOAA/GLERL Ann Arbor, MI 15 March 2012

Outline Description of the expansion of the GLIM to all five Great Lakes for the ice season Comparison of the GLIM to the National Ice Center analysis for the ice season Future plans for the GLIM MODIS 4-9 March 2010

Description of the GLIM GLIM has been under development by GLERL since 2007 GLIM is a combination of the Princeton Ocean Model for hydrodynamics and the Combined Ice Ocean Model tailored for the Great Lakes GLIM which has two modules, runs twice a day for all five Great Lakes this year as part of the Great Lakes Coastal Forecast system (GLCFS) at NOAA/GLERL Hourly Nowcast runs - ingest surface meteorological and daily NIC ice concentration observations Forecast runs from 00 to 12o hours – driven by the NDFD The GLIM is run using the latest surface forecast meteorological grids from the NWS National Digital Forecast Database (NDFD) out to 5 days

GLIM resolution for the Great Lakes 10 km 2 km 5 km 2km ice season

Description of the GLIM GLIM Nowcasts of ice concentration are “nudged” towards the daily NIC ice concentration field and form the initial conditions for the forecast module Model output for the GLIM is posted to the web NWS CLE retrieves via ftp the GLIM for AWIPS and GFE

GLIM Nudge Procedure GLIM Nowcast nudging procedure was added in the ice season GLIM ice concentration are “nudged” or modified to be close to the daily National Ice Center ice concentration analysis

GLIM Ice Concentration is nudged toward the NIC ice concentration field which is updated daily GLIM NIC

GLERL GLIM included in the GLCFS Great Lakes Coastal Forecasting System Select “Ice”

Integration of the GLIM and NDFD results in the Forecast Generation of: Surface Water Temperature Ice Concentration Ice Thickness Ice Drift ice.php?lake=h&type=F&hr=01

Sources of Error in the GLIM Ice Concentration Forecast Error in the daily NIC ice concentration analysis NIC analysis data sources are lagged: ~00 and ~12 UTC RADARSAT passes & previous day ~18 UTC MODIS imagery and current day ~18 UTC MODIS imagery are combined and posted about 00 UTC the next day Variable observation times add uncertainty due to advective changes and growth and decay of ice cover Error in the NDFD parameters (wind, temperature, or dewpoint) over the entire Great Lakes Error within the GLIM: nudging procedure, vertical mixing, or wave mixing

Comparison of the GLIM to the NIC Analysis BOIVerify is a statistical analysis application that is run at many NWS offices to help verify locally produced gridded forecasts from the NDFD BOIVerify was modified at NWS CLE to ingest the GLERL GLIM forecasts of ice concentration and ice cover analysis from the National Ice Center (NIC) to help evaluate the GLIM GraADS software was also used to create difference fields between the NIC and GLERL GLIM

GLIM Performance This winter has been quite mild near the lakes with temperatures averaging in the warmest 10% of winters since records began Resultant Great Lakes ice cover has been minimal Maximum seasonal ice cover attained by lake (GLERL) Lake Ontario 3% Lake Superior 7% Lake Erie 16% Lake Michigan 17% Lake Huron 20%

GLIM Performance Lack of sustained cold prevented much ice growth this winter across the lakes and limited evaluation of GLIM ice forecasts Just a few, brief cold spells produced a slight increase in ice cover Examine Jan 12 for ice growth & thaw

NIC ice cover (%) 19 Jan 2012 GLIM ice cover (%) 72 hr valid 19 Jan 2012 GLIM –NIC (%) 19 Jan2012 Ice Cover/Concentration (%) Comparison GLIM was too slow in growing Ice along the Michigan shore and Too fast in eastern Georgian Bay Too little ice forecast Too much ice forecast %

NIC Ice Analysis 25 Jan 2012 (%) GLIM Ice Cover 120 hr fcst valid 25 Jan 2012 (%) GLIM - NIC (%) Ice FreeIce covered Too little ice forecast Too much ice forecast GLIM 120 hr fcst had too little Ice concentration in northern Georgian Bay, western Lake Erie, northern Lake MI, & sw Lake Superior

Too little ice forecast Too much ice forecast NIC Ice Analysis 25 Jan 2012 (%) GLIM Ice Cover 120 hr fcst valid 25 Jan 2012 (%) GLIM - NIC (%) Over Lake Huron the 120 hr GLIM forecast either grew too little Ice early in the forecast or melted it too Quickly near the end in most shallow areas Except Saginaw Bay

Summary of the GLERL GLIM ice season on Lake Erie Expansion of the GLIM to the Great Lakes was successfully implemented GLIM nowcasts for closely matched the NIC ice concentration analysis with daily nudging across all the lakes Since the NIC analysis is not a snap shot of the observed ice cover…some uncertainty is introduced into the GLIM Lack of sustained cold air this winter allowed only minimal ice growth that was confined to the shallow portions of the lakes Little ice formation allowed only a cursory examination of the GLIM on just a few forecasts Difficult to separate error in NIC analysis and NDFD with error in GLIM

Future Plans for the GLIM Assuming normal winter weather returns to the Great Lakes… a more thorough evaluation of the GLIM is planned for the ice season Forecasters need to be aware that the GLIM uses NDFD data over the entire lakes including the Canadian waters Additional NDFD fields may be used by the GLIM – snowfall and QPF to make the model more realistic Output from the GLIM may be added to the NDFD

Questions ?