Reframe the problem or the solution

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Behavioral Side of Pricing MKT 750 Dr. West. Agenda Issues associated with product pricing Defining terms Capturing value Behavioral pricing Discuss.
Advertisements

Hawawini & VialletChapter 7© 2007 Thomson South-Western Chapter 7 ALTERNATIVES TO THE NET PRESENT VALUE RULE.
1 Intuitive Irrationality: Reasons for Unreason. 2 Epistemology Branch of philosophy focused on how people acquire knowledge about the world Descriptive.
Construal MAR 3503 March 1, False consensus effect Ross, Greene, & House, 1977 Rater’s own choice Estimated percent of others who would:
Rationality Alan Kaylor Cline Department of Computer Sciences The University of Texas at Austin Based upon classic decision puzzlers collected by Gretchen.
1 MKT201 – Buyer Behavior Chapter 9&11 Supplementary Examples.
Chapter 1 Thinking Like an Economist
Does Prospect Theory Hold in Intertemporal Choice? The interaction of time and risk in preferences for gains and losses David J. Hardisty & Jeff Pfeffer.
Network Security An Economics Perspective IS250 Spring 2010 John Chuang.
CHAPTER 14 Utility Axioms Paradoxes & Implications.
Prospect Theory, Framing and Behavioral Traps Yuval Shahar M.D., Ph.D. Judgment and Decision Making in Information Systems.
Decision making and economics. Economic theories Economic theories provide normative standards Expected value Expected utility Specialized branches like.
Judgment and Decision Making How Rational Are We?.
Saving For the Future.  Why should we save? To provide for future needs. Both expected and unexpected. What might happen if you do not set something.
Uncertainty and Consumer Behavior
Or Why We’re Not Really As Rational As We’d Like to Believe.
Decision Framing and Cognitive Inertia.
Decision-making II choosing between gambles neural basis of decision-making.
Lecture 4 PPE 110. In most situations when people make choices, the outcomes are random. For example, if you buy a stock, it may go up or down. If you.
© 2007 Arizona State University The Value of a College Education Why Finish Your Degree? Arthur Blakemore, Ph.D. Chair, Department of.
Do we always make the best possible decisions?
Behavioral Finance Rationality and Psychology February 26, 2008 Behavioral Finance “Rationality and Psychology” – Part IV – The Equity Premium Puzzle and.
Decision-making I choosing between gambles neural basis of decision-making.
© 2007 Arizona State University The Economic Value of a College Degree $1 Million … And More Arizona State University Last updated
 Introduction (Scary details)  Part I: Introduction to Stock Market Challenge (Brett) 4:30 to 5:15  Part II: What is Financial Literacy (Bill) 5:15.
Choice. There’s never just one reinforcer Hmm…what to do?
© Thomson/South-WesternSlideCHAPTER 241 BUDGETING, SAVING, AND INVESTING MONEY 24.1Budgeting Money 24.2Saving Money 24.3Investing Money Chapter 24.
Investing Bonds and Stocks. Setting Investment Goals  Investing presents opportunities for people and businesses to increase their income.  Investing.
BizWiz Lesson 2. Investing  Why do people choose to invest rather than keeping their money in a piggy bank?  How can you make your money work for you?
Standard 4.0 Investigate opportunities available for saving and investing. 4.3Evaluate methods of investing. a. Stocks and Bonds Our Goals Learn The Rules.
Review of Related Literature Different decision-making: – Budget decisions of managers – Irrationality of continuing the risk of losing a prospect – Decision-making.
New Focus: Transformative Consumer Research MAR 3503 April 12, 2012.
Building: Knowledge, Security, Confidence Pay Yourself First FDIC Money Smart for Young Adults.
Decision making Making decisions Optimal decisions Violations of rationality.
Mental Accounting. Mental accounting Utility theory is a common currency theory All options are evaluated with respect to utility But all gains and losses.
Thinking and Decision Making
Pay Yourself First.
Decision Making choice… maximizing utility framing effects
Framing Effects From Chapter 34 ‘Frame and Reality’ of Thinking Fast and Slow, by D. Kahneman.
Find your role and sit at the indicated seat. Do not open the bag at your seat until you are told to do so.
Chapter 1 Personal Financial Planning: An Introduction McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2007 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Investing Basics Investment and Finance 12 Ms. Stewart getsmarteraboutmoney.ca.
Source: The Marketing White Book , Businessworld Financial Insecurity In India February 19, 2009.
Prospect Theory. 23A i 23B, reference point 23A) Your country is plagued with an outbreak of an exotic Asian disease, which may kill 600 people. You.
The Role of Savings Benefits of Savings Chapter 12.
Decision making behavior Why do people make the choices they do? Reason-based choice Regret theory Effort-accuracy Choice and judgment heuristics.
Financial Literacy: Knowing What You Need To Know To Achieve Your Financial Goals.
RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS Special Lectures University of Kuwait Richard Wilson Mallinckrodt Professor of Physics Harvard University January 13th, 14th and.
RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS Special Lectures University of Kuwait Richard Wilson Mallinckrodt Professor of Physics Harvard University January 13th, 14th and.
Financial Management Back to Table of Contents. Financial Management 2 Chapter 21 Financial Management Analyzing Your Finances Managing Your Finances.
Decision Making choice… maximizing utility framing effects.
CREDIT AND BUDGETS. MONEY Each person makes unique decisions about money Most people have a mixture of different attitudes, values and beliefs about money.
Psychology 485 March 23,  Intro & Definitions Why learn about probabilities and risk?  What is learned? Expected Utility Prospect Theory Scalar.
Chapter Seventeen Uncertainty. © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved Topics  Degree of Risk.  Decision Making Under Uncertainty.
Introduction to Prospect Theory Psychology 466: Judgment & Decision Making Instructor: John Miyamoto 11/17/2015: Lecture 08-2 Note: This Powerpoint presentation.
Survey Research And a few words about elite interviewing.
Allais Paradox, Ellsberg Paradox, and the Common Consequence Principle Then: Introduction to Prospect Theory Psychology 466: Judgment & Decision Making.
The Nonrational Escalation of Commitment The Nonrational Escalation of Commitment Presented by: Hamid Shekari Omid Keivanloo.
8.E.1.3 Explain how quality of life is impacted by personal financial choices (e.g. credit, savings, investing, borrowing and giving). The student will.
1 BAMS 517 – 2011 Decision Analysis -IV Utility Failures and Prospect Theory Martin L. Puterman UBC Sauder School of Business Winter Term
마스터 제목 스타일 편집 마스터 텍스트 스타일을 편집합니다 둘째 수준 셋째 수준 넷째 수준 다섯째 수준 The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice - Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman.
QUESTION to answer You are worried about a possible disease form central or SE ASIA affecting 600 people Decide between to government programs.
Chapter 32 Saving and Investing Introduction to Business Spring 2005.
Behavioral Finance Biases Feb 23 Behavioral Finance Economics 437.
Psychology and Personal Finance
Effects of Foreign Language on Decision Making
DIS 280 Social Science Research Methodology: Problem Framing
Choices, Values and Frames
Behavioral Finance Economics 437.
Prospect Theory.
Presentation transcript:

Reframe the problem or the solution November 15, 2010

Overview What is framing? What can it do to help guide good choices? What are some useful examples, and can we build on them?

Use reframing to make things stick

What is reframing? It’s presenting the same option in different formats This can change people’s opinions, choices, and preferences Both formats are accurate, and convey the same information The meaning of that information is what differs REFRAMING: “Our new fan uses 50% less energy than our old fan!” versus “Our old fan uses twice as much energy as our new fan!” NOT REFRAMING: “Our new fan uses 50% less energy than our old fan!” versus “Our new fan uses twice as much energy as our old fan!”

Make a good thing better… Know your audience Know your numbers Know your reference point Know your strengths

Palestinian delegation Reactive devaluation Proposal offered by the Palestinians on 5/10/93 “How good is the proposal for Israel (1-7)?” minus “How good is the proposal for the Palestinians (1-7)? Participants Putative source Israeli delegation Palestinian delegation Israeli Jews -0.95 -2.45 Israeli Arabs 0.93 -0.01

Participants’ own affiliation Party over policy Participants evaluate a welfare reform bill Some participants were told that the bill was written by Republicans, others told it was written by Democrats Ps indicate (on a 1-7 scale) how much they are in favor of the bill Bill was written by Participants’ own affiliation Liberal Conservative Democrats 5.46 2.69 Republicans 3.15 5.49 Cohen, 2003

Make a good thing better… Know your audience Know your numbers Know your reference point Know your strengths

The cost of safety School buses used to occasionally catch on fire Safety features could have been added to newly built buses that would help prevent this from happening These features would cost about $1000 per bus

The cost of safety Some people were not in favor of adding these features Their math: 30,000 new buses per year X $1000 = an extra $30 million a year school districts would have to spend Only about 30 schoolchildren died this way per year, so each saved life cost $1 million

The cost of safety Fans of not burning children alive had different math Buses usually last 10 years, so the cost per year per bus is only $100 The cost per school day per bus is 56¢ The cost per pupil per day is less than half of 1¢

Reframing

A treat It’s hot, and you’re at the beach. You want a refreshment. How much would you pay for this Häagen Dazs ice cream?

Make a good thing better… Know your audience Know your numbers Know your reference point Know your strengths

Framing effects Imagine that the country is preparing for the outbreak of an unusual disease, which is expected to kill 600 people. Two programs have been proposed. If program A is adopted, 200 people will be saved If program B is adopted, there is a 1/3 chance that 600 people will be saved, and a 2/3 chance that no one will be saved Imagine that the country… If program C is adopted, 400 people will die If program D is adopted, there is a 1/3 chance that nobody will die, and a 2/3 chance that 600 will die Tversky & Kahneman, 1981

Prospect theory

Prospect theory People are risk averse when choosing among gains, and risk seeking when choosing among losses Compare: Winning $740 versus taking a 75% chance to win $1000 Losing $750 versus taking a 75% chance to lose $1000 Loss aversion: losses loom larger than gains Consider a gamble where you have a 50% chance of winning $1000 and a 50% chance of losing $1000

Construal even happens in Japan! Some investment advice

Construal and saving Northwestern Mutual survey of 2,741 household decision makers (all bachelor’s degree or higher) earning at least $75,000. Survey conducted September 2003, with sample balanced and weighted according to U.S. Census averages. Could you comfortably save 20% of your household’s annual income at this point in your life? YES = 51% Could you comfortably live on 80% of your household’s annual income at this point in your life? YES = 77%

Mental accounting Imagine that you have decided to see a play and paid the admission price of $20 per ticket. As you enter the theater, you discover that you have lost the ticket. The seat was not marked and the ticket cannot be recovered. Would you pay $20 for another ticket? 46% say yes Tversky & Kahneman, 1984

Mental accounting Imagine that you have decided to see a play where admission is $20 per ticket. As you enter the theater, you discover that you have lost a $20 bill Would you still pay $20 for a ticket to the play? 88% say yes Tversky & Kahneman, 1984

Mental accounting Why are people generally willing to buy a ticket after having lost $20, but not willing to buy another ticket after having lost their previous ($20) ticket? It matters what “mental account” you file the loss under: If you lose the ticket and buy another, you have just increased the price of the play to $40 But if you lose $20 and then buy a ticket, the price of the play is still only $20

Make a good thing better… Know your audience Know your numbers Know your reference point Know your strengths

Framing effects Pro-life versus pro-choice Liberal versus progressive Terrorists versus freedom fighters Cash discounts versus credit card surcharges

Make a good thing better… Know your audience Know your numbers Know your reference point Know your strengths Know your limits

Summary If all else fails, redescribe your issue: Emphasize (or deemphasize) the source Do the math Give a good starting place Emphasize your best features